Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T01:07:07.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 399 - 446
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Harvard University Press. Chapter 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, H. (1965). Spinoza and the theory of the organism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renz, U. (2018). The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (2016). Objects, ideas, and ‘minds.’ In Wilson, , Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 126–40). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Beiser, F. C. (1987). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E., and Melamed, Y. (eds.). (2012). Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, J. (2011). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F. (1994). The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Alwill, trans. G. di Giovanni. McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. (2012). Last Works, trans. B. Rosenstock. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F., and Lærke, M. (2022). Spinoza’s reception. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 405–43). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nassar, D. (2012). Spinoza in Schelling’s early conception of intellectual intuition. In Förster, E. and Melamed, Y. (eds.). Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 136–55). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vallée, G. (1988). The Spinoza Conversations between Lessing and Jacobi: Text with Excerpts from the Ensuing Controversy, trans. Vallée, G., Lawson, J. B., and Chapple, C. G.. University Press of America.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M.. Zone.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1993). Spinoza’s argument for the identity theory. Philosophical Review, 102(2), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1974). Spinoza, vol. ii: L’Ame (Éthique, 2). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2019). Spinoza on intentionality, materialism, and mind-body relations. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19(43), 1–23.Google Scholar
Jaquet, C. (2018). Affects, Actions and Passions in Spinoza: The Unity of Body and Mind, trans. Reznichenko, T.. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013a). Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Thought: Parallelisms and the Multifaceted Structure of Ideas. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(3), 636–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013b). Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. C. (1999). Paradoxes of parallelism in Spinoza. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 37–54.Google Scholar
Winkler, S. (2018). Parallelism and the idea of God in Spinoza’s system. Idealistic Studies, 48(2), 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakira, E. (2014). Spinoza and the Case for Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Grey, J. (2014). Spinoza on composition, causation, and the mind’s eternity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(3), 446–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guigon, G. (2012). Spinoza on composition and priority. In Goff, P. (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (pp. 183–205). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mátyási, R. (2020). Spinoza on composition, monism, and beings of reason. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 2(1), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, A. (2017). The ‘physical’ interlude. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 102–20). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacksteder, W. (1977). Spinoza on part and whole: The worm’s eye view. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2020). The Metaphysics of the Material World: Suárez, Descartes, Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Domínguez, A. (1994). Presencia de Antonio Pérez in Spinoza. In Domínguez, A. (ed.), Spinoza y España (pp. 165–78). Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (2023). Spinoza, Life and Legacy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Carriero, J. (2018). The highest good and perfection in Spinoza. In Della Rocca, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 240–72). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2014). Being human and human perfection. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A. (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 124–42). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2014). Spinozistic constructivism. In Kisner, M. J. and Youpa, A., (eds.), Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory (pp. 57–84). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBuffe, M. (2010). From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford University Press. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
Newlands, S. (2018). Reconceiving Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2019). Spinoza’s values: Joy, desire, and good in the Ethics. In Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 174–97). Routledge.Google Scholar
Youpa, A. (2020). The Ethics of Joy: Spinoza on the Empowered Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barbone, S. (2002). What counts as an individual for Spinoza? In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J., Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 89–112). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1994). Spinoza’s theory of metaphysical individuation. In Barber, K. F. and Gracia, J. G. E. (eds.), Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes to Kant (pp. 73–101). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gilead, A. (1983). Spinoza’s principium individuationis and personal identity. International Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2005). Memory and personal identity in Spinoza. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 35, 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, S. (2020). Spinozistic selves. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 6)1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, D. (2021). Spinoza on diachronic identity. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 170–78). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2018). The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saw, R. L. (1972). Personal identity in Spinoza. In Kashap, P. S. (ed.), Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays (pp. 86–100). Hutchinson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Andrault, R. (2014). La vie selon la raison: Physiologie et métaphysique chez Spinoza et Leibniz. Honoré Champion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (1991). Physique et ontologie chez Spinoza: L’énigmatique réponse à Tschirnhaus. Cahiers Spinoza, 6, 83–109.Google Scholar
Parrochia, D. (1984–85). Physique pendulaire et modèles dans l’Éthique de Spinoza. Cahiers Spinoza, 5, 711–92.Google Scholar
Peterman, A. (2014). Spinoza on physical science. Philosophy Compass, 9(3), 214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. (2014). Descartes and the individuation of bodies. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 96(1), 38–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. (2019). Spinoza on Reason, Passions, and the Supreme Good. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Balibar, E. (1998). Spinoza and Politics, Trans. Snowden, P.. Verso.Google Scholar
Curley, E. (1996). Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 1st edn (pp. 315–42). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Den Uyl, D. J. (1983). Power, State and Freedom: An interpretation of Spinoza’s Political Philosophy. Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Field, S. L. (2020). Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on Power and Popular Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheron, A. (1969). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y., and Sharp, H. (eds.). (2018). Spinoza’s Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (2005). Notice sur la reception du Traité politique. In Spinoza, Oeuvres, vol. v: Traité Politique, ed. Ramond, C. (pp. 77–79). Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sharp, H. (2022). Spinoza on the fear of solitude. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 11, 137–52.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barbone, S. (1999). Power in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Bagley, P. J. (ed.), Piety, Peace, and the Freedom to Philosophize (pp. 91–110). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, S. L. (2020). Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on Power and Popular Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2011). Spinoza’s cosmological argument in the Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49(4), 439–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2004). Spinoza’s metaphysics of desire: The demonstration of IIIP6. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(1), 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, E. (2021). Power, freedom, and relational autonomy. In Armstrong, A. and Sangiacomo, A. (eds.), Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being With Others (pp. 149–63). Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Althusser, L. (1997). The only materialist tradition, Part I: Spinoza. In Montag, W. and Stolze, T. (eds.), The New Spinoza (pp. 3–20). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Del Lucchese, F. (2020). The mother of all prejudices: Teleology and normativity in Spinoza. Parrhesia, 32, 145–70.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (2002). The power of prejudice and the force of law: Spinoza’s critique of religion and its heirs. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(1), 51–70.Google Scholar
Klein, J. R. (2013). Philosophizing historically/historicizing philosophy: Some Spinozistic reflections. In Lærke, M., Smith, J. E. H., and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 134–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montag, W. (2020). Spinoza’s counter-aesthetics. Intellectual History Review, 30(3), 411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Alanen, L. (2012). Spinoza on passions and self-knowledge: The case of pride. In Pickavé, M. and Shapiro, L. (eds.), Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 234–50). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. (2012). Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2013). Secular Powers: Humility in Modern Political Thought. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyarslan, S. (2018). Spinoza’s critique of humility in the Ethics. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56(3), 342–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Della Rocca, M. (2015). Interpreting Spinoza: The real is the rational. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53, 525–35.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2015). Superheroes in the history of philosophy: Spinoza, super-rationalist. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53(3), 507–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1979). Spinoza’s ‘ontological’ argument. Philosophical Review, 88, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2014). Les études spinozistes aux États-Unis: Spinoza et le principe de raison suffisante (‘PSR’ en Anglais), représentations, concepts, idées. Archives de Philosophie, 77, 721–26.Google Scholar
Lin, M. (2018). The principle of sufficient reason in Spinoza. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 133–54). Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Lin, M. Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. Chapter 7.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1936). Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y., and Lin, M. Principle of sufficient reason. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/sufficient-reasonGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Jacobson, A. J. (2011). Prophecy without prophets: Spinoza and Maimonides on law and democracy of knowledge (pp. 135–60). In Vardoulakis, D. (ed.), Spinoza Now. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2020). Spinoza on superstition: Coming to terms with fear. In James, , Spinoza on Learning to Live Together. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. A. (1997). Why Spinoza chose the Hebrews: The exemplary function of prophecy in the Theological-Political Treatise. History of Political Thought, 18(1), 207–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • P
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • P
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • P
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×