Book contents
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Genealogies
- Part II Thinking the World
- Part III Transregional Worlding
- Part IV Cartographic Shifts
- Part V World Literature and Translation
- Part VI Poetics, Genre, Intermediality
- Part VII Scales, Polysystems, Canons
- Part VIII Modes of Reading and Circulation
- Part IX The Worldly and the Planetary
- Index
- References
Part II - Thinking the World
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Genealogies
- Part II Thinking the World
- Part III Transregional Worlding
- Part IV Cartographic Shifts
- Part V World Literature and Translation
- Part VI Poetics, Genre, Intermediality
- Part VII Scales, Polysystems, Canons
- Part VIII Modes of Reading and Circulation
- Part IX The Worldly and the Planetary
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of World Literature , pp. 199 - 278Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
References
Aristotle, . 1984. The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts and Ingram Bywater. Modern Library.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 2006. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd ed. Trans. George A. Kennedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, Zong-qi, ed. 2007. How to Read Chinese Poetry: A Guided Anthology. Bilingual, ed. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Ming Dong. 1997. “‘Fu-Bi-Xing’: A Metatheory of Poetry-Making.” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR), 19: 1–22.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David R. 2008. The Han Rhapsody: A Study of the Fu of Yang Hsiung. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1971. “Narrate or Describe? A Preliminary Discussion of Naturalism and Formalism.” In Writer & Critic and Other Essays, ed. and trans. Kahn, Arthur D.. Grosset & Dunlap, 110–48.Google Scholar
Metz, Christian. 1990. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Trans. Michael Taylor. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeffrey. 2000. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, Hellmut. 1967. “The Scholar’s Frustration: Notes on a Type of Fu.” In Chinese Thought and Institutions, ed. Fairbank, John King. University of Chicago Press, 310–19.Google Scholar
Yu, Pauline. 1987. The Reading of Imagery in the Chinese Poetic Tradition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
References
Beecroft, Alexander. 2008. “World Literature without a Hyphen: Towards a Typology of Literary Systems.” New Left Review, No. 54 (December): 87–100.Google Scholar
Beecroft, Alexander 2010. Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China: Patterns of Literary Circulation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecroft, Alexander 2015. An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day. Verso.Google Scholar
Beecroft, Alexander 2016. “Eurafrasiachronologies.” Journal of World Literature, Vol. 1, No. 1: 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecroft, Alexander 2018a. “Comparativisms.” In The Bloomsbury Handbook of Literary and Cultural Theory, ed. Dileo, Jeffrey. Bloomsbury, 216–29Google Scholar
Beecroft, Alexander 2018b. “Rises of the Novel, Ancient and Modern.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Novel, ed. Bulson, Eric. Cambridge University Press, 3–56.Google Scholar
Bris, Michel Le, and Rouaud, Jean. 2007. Pour Une Littérature-Monde. Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bush, Christopher. 2017. “Areas: Bigger than the Nation, Smaller than the World.” In Futures of Comparative Literature: ACLA State of the Discipline Report, ed. Heise, Ursula K.. Taylor & Francis, 171–74.Google Scholar
Chang, Kwang-Chih. 1999. “China on the Eve of the Historical Period.” In The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 B.C., ed. Loewe, Michael and Shaughnessy, Edward L., Cambridge University Press, 37–73.Google Scholar
Cohen, Margaret. 2002. The Sentimental Education of the Novel. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle, . 2002. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denecke, Wiebke. 2013. Classical World Literatures: Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Comparisons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ette, Ottmar. 2016. TransArea: A Literary History of Globalization. Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1998. The Clash of Civilizations and Remaking of World Order. Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
Lewis, Martin W., and Wigen, Kären E. 1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Victor B. 2009. Strange Parallels: Mainland Mirrors: Europe, Japan, China, South Asia, and the Islands. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Lars Boje, . 2018. “The Canons of Medieval Literature from the Middle Ages to the Twenty-First Century.” Analecta Romana Instituti Danici, 42: 47–63.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 1994. Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of An Epic Past. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. 1999. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Rev. ed. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ollett, Andrew. 2017. Language of the Snakes: Prakrit, Sanskrit, and the Language Order of Premodern India. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Olson, David M., Dinerstein, Eric, and Wikramanayake, Eric D., et al. 2001. “Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth.” BioScience, Vol. 51, No. 11 (November): 933–38.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 1996. “The Sanskrit Cosmopolis, 300–1300: Transculturation, Vernacularization, and the Question of Ideology.” In Ideology and Status of Sanskrit. Brill, 197–248.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2009. The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ricci, Ronit. 2011. Islam Translated: Literature, Conversion, and the Arabic Cosmopolis of South and Southeast Asia. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Prado, Ignacio M. 2018. Strategic Occidentalism: On Mexican Fiction, the Neoliberal Bookmarket, and the Question of World Literature. Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shunqing, Cao, and Wei, Guo. 2018. “From the Imperial Catalogue to Western Library Science.” Orbis Litterarum, Vol. 73, No. 4 (August 1): 328–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1935. “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms.” Ecology, Vol. 16, No. 3 (July 1): 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkowitz, Rebecca L. 2015. Born Translated: The Contemporary Novel in an Age of World Literature. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
West, Martin Litchfield, . 1997. The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Yoffee, Norman. 2005. Myths of the Archaic State: Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Ahmed, Siraj. 2013. “Notes from Babel: Towards a Colonial History of Comparative Literature,” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 39: 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
App, Urs. 2006. “Schopenhauer’s Initial Encounter with Indian Thought.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch, Vol. 87: 35–76.Google Scholar
App, Urs. 1998. “Schopenhauers Begegnung mit Buddhismus.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch, Vol. 79: 42–43.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: The Viking Press. .Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Baidik. 2016. “On Comparatism in the Colonial Archives, Methods, and the Project of Weltliteratur,” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 42: 677–711.Google Scholar
Beecroft, Alexander. 2015. An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day. Verso.Google Scholar
Brown, John. 1763. A Dissertation on the Rise, Union, and Power, the Progressions, Separations, and Corruptions of Poetry and Music. L. Davis and C. Reymers.Google Scholar
Casanova, Pascale. 2004. The World Republic of Letters. Trans. M. B. De Bevoise. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Bertram H. 1989. Thomas Percy: A Scholar-Critic in the Age of Johnson. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Debon, Günther. 1985. “Goethe erklärt in Heidelberg einen chinesischen Roman.” In Goethe und China – China und Goethe: Bericht des Heidelberger Symposions, ed. Debon, Günther and Hsia, Adrian. Peter Lang, 51–62.Google Scholar
Eckermann, Johann Peter. 1984. Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzeten Jahren seines Lebens. Beck.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2000. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. Trans. W. Glen-Doepel. Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1777. The Life of David Hume, Esq. Written by Himself. W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1987. “Of the Standard of Taste.” In Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Rev. ed. Liberty Classics, 226–49.Google Scholar
Hurd, Richard. 1751. “A Discourse concerning Poetical Imitation.” In Epistola ad Augustum. With an English Commentary and Notes. To which is Added a Discourse concerning Poetical Imitation. Thurbourn, 109–207.Google Scholar
Johnson, William M. 1972. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kafka, Franz. 1948. The Diaries 1910–1923. Ed. Brod, Max ; trans. Martin Greenberg and Hannah Arendt. Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Kafka, Franz. 1991. The Blue Octavo Notebooks. Trans. Ernst Kaiser and Eithne Wilkins. New York: Exact Change.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. The Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. 1982. “Ossian, Scott, and Nineteenth-Century Scottish Literary Nationalism.” Studies in Scottish Literature, Vol. 17: 39–54.Google Scholar
McLane, Maureen. 2001. “Ballads and Bards: British Romantic Orality.” Modern Philology, Vol. 98, No. 3: 423–43.Google Scholar
Parks, Tim. 2010. “The Dull New Global Novel.” The New York Review of Books, February 9. www.nybooks.com/daily/2010/02/09/the-dull-new-global-novel/.Google Scholar
Pittock, J. H. 1973. The Ascendency of Taste: The Achievement of Thomas and Joseph Warton. Routledge.Google Scholar
Puchner, Martin. 2014. “The Chinese Garden and World Literature.” Chinese Arts and Letters, Vol. 1, No. 1: 88–99Google Scholar
Purdy, Daniel. 2014. “Goethe, Rémusat and the Chinese novel: Translation and Circulation of World Literature.” In German Literature as World Literature, ed. Beebee, Thomas. Bloomsbury, 43–60.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2010. The World as Will and Representation. Trans. and ed. Norman, Judith, Welchman, Alistair, and Janaway, Christopher. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stach, Reiner. 2013. Kafka: The Years of Insight. Trans. Shelley Frisch. University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
Templeman, William Darby. 1953.“Warburton and Brown Continue the Battle over Ridicule.” Huntington Library Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1: 17–36.Google Scholar
Warburton, William. 1788. The Works of the Right Reverend William Warburton, Lord Bishop of Gloucester in Seven Volumes. London: A Caddell.Google Scholar
Warton, Thomas. 1762. Observations on the Fairy Queen of Spenser. 2nd ed. 2 vols. R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Williams, Kelsey Jackson. 2014. “Thomas Gray and the Goths: Philology, Poetry, and the Uses of the Norse Past in Eighteenth-Century England.” Review of English Studies, Vol. 65: 694–710.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. Routledge.Google Scholar
References
Apter, Emily. 2003. “Global Translatio: The ‘Invention’ of Comparative Literature, Istanbul, 1933.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Winter): 253–81.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. 1953. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Willard R. Trask. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich 1958. Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spätantike und im Mittelalter. Franke Verlag.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich 1993. Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Trans. Ralph Manheim. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brockmann, Stephen. 2015. “The Postwar Restoration in East and West.” New German Critique, Vol. 42, No. 3: 69–90.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, Willard. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1973. Essays on European Literature. Trans. Michael Kowal, . Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
D’haen, Theo, Domínguez, César, and Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl, eds. 2013. World Literature: A Reader. Routledge.Google Scholar
Etiemble, René. 1975. “Faut-il réviser la notion de Weltliteratur?” In Essais de littérature (vraiment) générale. 3rd ed. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Facundo, Espino, Román. 2016. “The German Who Happened to Be a Jew: Time, History, and Identity in Victor Klemperer’s Diary.” Oxford German Studies, Vol. 44, No. 4: 383–415.Google Scholar
Friederich, Werner P. 1960. “On the Integrity of Our Planning.” The Teaching of World Literature, edited by Block, Haskell M., The University of North Carolina Press, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2002. Vom Leben und Sterben der grossen Romanisten. Carl Hanser Verlag,Google Scholar
Klemperer, Victor. 1946. Kultur: Erwägungen nach dem Zusammenbruch des Nazismus. Neues LebenGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, Victor. 2010. Literatura universal y literatura europea. Trans. Jorge Seca, Acantilado.Google Scholar
Moulton, Richard G. 1911. World Literature and Its Place in General Culture. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richards, Jeffery. 1999. “National Identity and Recovering Memories in Contemporary Germany: The Reception of Victor Klemperer’s Diaries.” German Politics and Society, Vol. 17, No. 3: 121–41.Google Scholar
Seeba, Hinrich C. 2003. “Ernst Robert Curtius: Zur Kulturkritik eines Klassiker in der Wisschenschaftsgeschichte.” Monatshefte, Vol. 95, No. 4: 532–40.Google Scholar
Sepp, Arvi. 2010. “Humanität und Deutschtum. Die ikonische Bedeutung von Goethe, Schiller und Lessing als deutschjüdische Identifikationsfiguren in Victor Klemperers Tagebüchern 1933–1945.” Publications of the English Goethe Society, Vol. 79, No. 2: 113–28.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. 1948. Linguistics and Literary History: Essays in Stylistics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
References
Apter, Emily. 2013. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Writing Degree Zero. [1953] 1968. Trans. Annette Lavers and Colin Smith. Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Baidik. 2016. “On Comparatism in the Colony: Archives, Methods, and the Project of Weltliteratur.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 42, No. 3: 677–711.Google Scholar
Bose, Buddhadev, 1959. “Comparative Literature in India,” Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature, 8: 1–10.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Amit. 2008. Clearing a Space: Reflections on India, Literature and Culture. Black Kite.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Rosinka. 2012. “The Flute, Gerontion and Subalternist Misreadings of Tagore.” In Freedom and Beef Steaks: Colonial Calcutta Culture. Orient Blackswan, 175–201.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Rosinka. 2013. The Literary Thing: History, Poetry, and the Making of a Modern Cultural Sphere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Rosinka. 2016. “Rabindranath Translated to Tagore: Gitanjanli, 1913.” In A History of Indian Poetry in English, ed. Chaudhuri, Rosinka. Cambridge University Press, 130–47.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Supriya. 2016. “Singular Universals: Rabindranath Tagore on World Literature and Literature in the World.” In Tagore: The World as His Nest, ed. Subhoranjan Gupta, Das and Datta, Sangeeta. Jadavpur University Press, 82–83.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. 2016. What Is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David 2014a. “Introduction: World Literature in Theory and Practice.” In World Literature in Theory. Wiley Blackwell, 1–11.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David, and Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2011. “Comparative Literature/World Literature: A Discussion with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and David Damrosch.” Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 48, No. 2: 455–85.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. [1929] 1998. “Introduction to These Paintings.” In Selected Critical Writings. Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar
McDonald, Peter D. 2017. Artefacts of Writing: Ideas of the State and Communities of Letters from Matthew Arnold to Xu Bing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mufti, Aamir. 2016. Forget English! Orientalisms and World Literatures. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tagore, Debendranath. [1898] 1962. Ātmajibanī. Ed. Chakrabarty, Satischandra. Visva-Bharati,Google Scholar
Tagore, Rabindranath. [1907] 1961. “Viśvasāhitya.” In Rabindra Rachanabali, ed. Bhattacharya, C et al., Santiniketan: Visva-Bharati, 762–73.Google Scholar
Tagore, Rabindranath. 2014. Letters from a Young Poet. Trans. and intro. Rosinka Chaudhuri. Penguin Modern Classics.Google Scholar
Tiwari, Bhavya. 2012. “Rabindranath Tagore’s Comparative World Literature.” In The Routledge Companion to World Literature, ed. D’haen, Theo, Damrosch, David and Kadir, Djelal. Routledge, 342–46.Google Scholar