Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:33:09.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - East Asia as Comparative Paradigm

from Part III - Transregional Worlding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

Debjani Ganguly
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

With some fundamental changes taking place in the late twentieth and the early twenty-first century in an increasingly globalized world, especially the rapid growth of Asian economy and the rise of China, many of the old paradigms originated in the nineteenth century in social sciences and the humanities are losing their explanatory power and need to be modified and updated. Global history, for example, puts emphasis on the connectedness of the world from a broader perspective than the nineteenth-century norm of national histories, and world literature examines literary and cultural traditions far beyond the Eurocentric concentration and the Western canon. East Asia with its traditional Sinosphere and the Chinese scriptworld are getting more attention in recent scholarship as a regional cultural concept, which may offer some constructive ideas and insights into the multiplicity of cultural centers rather than the monolithic nucleus of a national model. This essay will discuss East Asia as a potential paradigm for the comparative study of literatures and cultures not just in East Asia, but for the idea of world literature as well.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casanova, Pascale. 2004. The World Republic of Letters. Trans. M. B. DeBevoise. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David, ed. 2014. World Literature in Theory. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David 2016. “Scriptworlds Lost and Found.” Journal of World Literature, Vol. 1, No. 2: 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denecke, Wiebke. 2014. Classical World Literatures: Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Comparisons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Etiemble, René. [1974] 2014 . “Should We Rethink the Notion of World Literature?” In World Literature in Theory, ed. Damrosch, David. Wiley Blackwell, 8598.Google Scholar
Fogel, Joshua A. 2009. Articulating the Sinosphere: Sino-Japanese Relations in Space and Time. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. [1827] 2014. “Conversations with Eckermann on Weltliteratur.” In World Literature in Theory, ed. Damrosch, David . Wiley Blackwell, 15-T21.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Watanabe. [ 1827] 2012. A History of Japanese Political Thought, 1600–1901. Trans. David Noble. International House of Japan.Google Scholar
Chun-chieh., Huang 2006. 黃俊傑. “論中國經典中‘中國’概念的涵義及其在近世日本與現代臺灣的轉化” [The Idea of “Zhongguo” and Its Transformation in Early Modern Japan and Contemporary Taiwan]. Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies臺灣東亞文明研究學刊, Vol. 3, No. 2: 91100.Google Scholar
Xun., Jiao 1987. 焦循. 孟子正義Mengzi zhengyi [The Correct Meaning of the Mencius]. Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Lee, Peter H., ed. 2003. History of Korean Literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taek, Lim Hyung. 2016. “From the Universal to the National: The Question of Language and Writing in Twentieth-Century Korea.” Journal of World Literature, Vol. 1, No. 2: 245–58.Google Scholar
Marra, Michael F, ed. 2002. Japanese Hermeneutics: Current Debates on Aesthetics and Interpretation. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Park, Sowon. 2016. “Introduction: Transnational Scriptworlds.” Journal of World Literature, Vol. 1, No. 2: 129–41.Google Scholar
Phan, John Duong. 2016. “The Twentieth-Century Secularization of the Sinograph in Vietnam, and its Demotion from the Cosmological to the Aesthetic.” Journal of World Literature, Vol. 1, No. 2: 275–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Mu. 1988. 錢穆. 中國文化史導論 Zhongguo wenhua shi daolun [Introduction to the History of Chinese Culture]. Sanlian.Google Scholar
Shirane, Haruo. 2002. “Constructing ‘Japanese Literature’: Global and Ethnic Nationalism.” In Japanese Hermeneutics: Current Debates on Aesthetics and Interpretation, ed. Marra, Michael F.. University of Hawai’i Press, 165–75.Google Scholar
Thornber, Karen Laura. 2009. Empire of Texts in Motion: Chinese, Korean, and Taiwanese Transculturations of Japanese Literature. Harvard University Asia Center,Google Scholar
Ying-shih., Yu 1993. 余英時. 文化評論與中國情懷 Wenhua pinglun yu Zhongguo qinghuai [Cultural Criticism and Chinese Sentiments]. Yunchen.Google Scholar
Longxi, Zhang. 2012. “Divine Authority, Reference Culture, and the Concept of Translation.” Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1: 123.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×