Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:44:23.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

39 - Data Worlds: Patterns, Structures, Libraries

from Part VII - Scales, Polysystems, Canons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

Debjani Ganguly
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

The emergence of world literary studies and the digital turn in literary studies share a seminal text in Franco Moretti’s “Conjectures on World Literature.” Since that article was published in 2000, the ongoing digitization of cultural collections and emergence of new computational methods of analysis have only increased the excitement of some, and concern of others, that digital research will become a major, even a dominant, trajectory in world literary studies. But the associated claim – by critics and proponents alike – that digital approaches represent a paradigmatic shift ignores major continuities between digital research and the non-digital scholarship that preceded and continues alongside it, including in world literary studies. Much of the traction that Moretti’s “distant reading” has gained can be ascribed to commonalities in the conceptions of archives, and foregrounding of networks and patterns, in non-digital scholarship. And Moretti’s claim that “distant reading” dismantles traditional, specifically national and canonical, frameworks is not true of most digital literary projects, including the majority of Moretti’s own experiments. Such continuities, and the resulting disjunction between enactments of digital research and the global and democratic rhetoric in which new technologies are often couched, arise from the substantial ways in which pre-digital traditions, ideologies, and infrastructures shape digital resources and methods. Recognizing and interrogating this inheritance, an emerging group of digital projects advance key aims of world literary studies including situating literature “within a vast transnational library,” expanding “the canon of the literary properly to reflect global diversity,” and offering new conceptual frameworks that “adjust our reading of the novel to world scale” (Smith 92).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allington, Daniel, Brouillette, Sarah, and Golumbia, David. 2016. “Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities.” LA Review of Books, May 1. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/#!Google Scholar
Ballantyne, Tony. 2003. “Rereading the Archive and Opening up the Nation-State: Colonial Knowledge in South Asia (and Beyond).” In After the Imperial Turn: Thinking With and Through the Nation, ed. Burton, Antoinette. Durham University Press, 102–21.Google Scholar
Bammam, David, Underwood, Ted, and Smith, Noah A.. 2014. “A Bayesian Mixed Effects Model of Literary Character.” In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June 23–25, 2014). Association for Computational Linguistics, 370–79. http://acl2014.org/acl2014/P14-1/pdf/P14-1035.pdf.Google Scholar
Bergenmar, Jenny, and Leppanen, Katarina. 2017. “Gender and Vernaculars in Digital Humanities and World Literature.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, Vol. 25, No. 4: 232–46.Google Scholar
Bianco, Jamie “Skye.” 2015. “This Digital Humanities Which Is Not One.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Gold, Matthew K.. University of Minnesota Press, 98112. Minnesota Scholarship Online, doi: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0012.Google Scholar
Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. N.d. www.cervantesvirtual.com/.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. 2012. Reading by Numbers: Recalibrating the Literary Field. Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. 2017a. “The Equivalence of ‘Close’ and ‘Distant’ Reading; Or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 1: 77106. doi: 10.1215/00267929-3699787.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. 2017b. “Fictional Systems: Mass-Digitisation, Network Analysis, and Nineteenth-Century Australian Newspapers.” Victorian Periodicals Review, Vol. 50, No. 1: 100–38. doi: 10/1353/vpr.2017.0005.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine. 2018. A World of Fiction: Digital Collections and the Future of Literary History. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bode, Katherine, and Hetherington, Carol, eds. N.d. To Be Continued: The Australian Newspaper Fiction Database. http://cdhrdatasys.anu.edu.au/tobecontinued/.Google Scholar
Lab, Bodmer. N.d. A Digital World Literature. University of Genève and Martin Bodmer Foundatin. http://bodmerlab.unige.ch/en/.Google Scholar
British Library and findmypast. N.d. British Newspaper Archive. www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/Google Scholar
Brown, Susan, Clements, Patricia, and Grundy, Isobel, directors. N.d. The Orlando Project: Feminist Literary History and Digital Humanities. www.artsrn.ualberta.ca/orlando/.Google Scholar
Burrows, John F. 1987. Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels and an Experiment in Method. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cordell, Ryan. 2017. “‘Q i-tjb the Raven’: Taking Dirty OCR Seriously.” Book History, Vol. 20: 188225, doi: 10.1353/bh.2017.0006.Google Scholar
Cordell, Ryan, and Smith, David, eds. 2017. Viral Texts: Mapping Networks of Reprinting in 19th-Century Newspapers and Magazines, http://viraltexts.org/.Google Scholar
Crane, Gregory R., editor in chief. N.d. Perseus Digital Library. www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David. 2003. What Is World Literature? Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damrosch, David. 2004. “World Literature in a Postcanonical, Hypercanonical Age.” In Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, ed. Saussy., Haun Johns Hopkins University Press, 4353.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David. 2013. “World Literature in a Postliterary Age.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2: 151–70. doi: 10.1215/00267929-2072971.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. 2006. Through Other Continents: American Literature across Deep Time. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eaves, Morris, Essick, Robert, and Viscomi, Joseph, eds. 2020. William Blake Archive. www.blakearchive.org/.Google Scholar
Erlin, Matt, and Tatlock, Lynne, eds. 2014. Distant Readings: Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century. NED – New ed. Boydell and Brewer. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt5vj848.Google Scholar
Europeana. N.d. Europeana Collections. .www.europeana.eu/.Google Scholar
Folsom, Ed., and Price, Kenneth M., eds. N.d.The Walt Whitman Archive. http://whitmanarchive.org/.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Paul. 2016. “An Archaeology of Victorian Newspapers.” Victorian Periodicals Review, Vol. 49, No. 4: 546–77, doi: 10.1353/vpr.2016.0039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jonathan, and Holbo, John, eds. 2011. Reading Graphs, Maps, Trees: Critical Responses to Franco Moretti. Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Roland. 2004. “Not Works But Networks: Colonial Worlds in Comparative Literature.” In Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, ed. Saussy, Haun. Johns Hopkins University Press, 212–23.Google Scholar
Google Books. Google Books. www.books.google.com/Google Scholar
HathiTrust. N.d. HathiTrust Digital Library. www.hathitrust.org/Google Scholar
He, Chengzhou. 2017. “World Literature as Event: Isben and Modern Chinese Fiction.” Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 54, No. 1: 141–60. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325.complitstudies.54.1.0141.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Brett, and Craig, Hugh, eds. 2014. Digital Shakespeares: Innovations, Interventions, Mediations. Special issue of The Shakespearean International Yearbook 14. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jeanneney, Jean-Noël. 2006. Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from Europe. University of Chicago Press. .Google Scholar
Jockers, Matthew L. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kim, David, Shepard, David, and Wan, Jun, with contributions by Leynov, David and Li, Elaine, and past contributions by Ardeni, Viola, Arevalo, Lourdes, de Carlo, Nickolas, Chykerda, C. Myles, Kurtz, Wendy, Williams, Amber, and Xie, Harry. N.d. WorldLiterature@UCLA: Translation Network Analysis in the Digital Humanities. University of California, Los Angeles, https://worldlit.cdh.ucla.edu/.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Adam. 2014. “Technology is Taking over English Departments: The False Promise of the Digital Humanities.” New Republic, May 3. https://newrepublic.com/article/117428/limits-digital-humanities-adam-kirsch.Google Scholar
Leffler, Yvonne, Arping, Åsa, Bergenmar, Jenny, Hermansson, Gunilla, and Johansson, Birgitta. N.d. Swedish Women Writers on Export in the 19th Century. https://swedishwomenwriters.wordpress.com/Google Scholar
Library of Congress. N.d. Chronicling America. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/.Google Scholar
Library of Congress. N.d. World Digital Library. www.loc.gov/wdl/.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. 2004. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. 2008. Local Transcendence: Essays on Postmodern Historicism and the Database. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. 2017a. “Assessing Data Workflows for Common Data ‘Moves’ Across Disciplines.” Alan Liu blog, May 6. doi: 10.21972/G21593.Google Scholar
Liu, Alan. 2017b. “Toward Critical Infrastructure Studies: Digital Humanities, New Media Studies, and the Culture of Infrastructure.” Alan Liu blog, Feb. 23, 2017, http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/toward-critical-infrastructure-studies-u-connecticut/.Google Scholar
Long, Hoyt, and So, Richard Jean. 2016. “Turbulent Flow: A Computational Model of World Literature.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3: 345–67. doi: 10.1215/00267929-3570656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Bonnie. 2014. “Archaeology of a Digitization.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65, No. 8: 1515–26. doi: 10.1002/asi.23061.Google Scholar
Marche, Stephen. 2012. “Literature is Not Data: Against Digital Humanities.” LA Review of Books, Oct. 28. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/literature-is-not-data-against-digital-humanities/#!Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome, ed. 2008. The Complete Writings and Pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti. www.rossettiarchive.org/about/index.html.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome, 2014. A New Republic of Letters: Memory and Scholarship in the Age of Digital Reproduction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Human Resource Development. N.d. Digital Library of India. https://ndl.iitkgp.ac.in/.Google Scholar
Montrose, Louis. 1992. “New Historicisms.” In Redrawing the Boundaries: The Transformation of English and American Literary Studies, ed. Greenblatt, Stephen and Gunn, Giles. Modern Language Association, 392417.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2000. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review, Vol. 1: 54–68. https://newleftreview.org/II/1/franco-moretti-conjectures-on-world-literature.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. Verso.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2017. “Patterns and Interpretation.” Stanford Literary Lab Pamphlet, Vol. 15 (Sept.). https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet15.pdf.Google Scholar
Morris, Leslie A., general ed. 2012. Emily Dickinson Archive. www.edickinson.org/team.Google Scholar
Mowat, Barbara, Werstine, Paul, Poston, Michael, and Niles, Rebecca, eds. N.d. Folger Shakespeare Library: Shakespeare’s Plays from Folger Digital Texts. Folger Shakespeare Library. www.folgerdigitaltexts.org.Google Scholar
National Library of Australia. N.d. Trove. https://trove.nla.gov.au/.Google Scholar
Oceanic Exchanges Project Team. 2017. Oceanic Exchanges: Tracing Global Information Networks in Historical Newspaper Repositories, 1840–1914. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WA94S.Google Scholar
Ortega, Élika. 2018. “Archives, Libraries, Collections, and Databases: A First Look at Digital Literary Studies in Mexico.” Hispanic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2: 229–47. Project MUSE, doi: 10.1353/hir.2018.0016.Google Scholar
Partzsch, Henrietta, Lappalainen, Päivi, PoniŽ, Katja Mihurko, Nedregotten Sørbø, Marie, and van Dijk, Suzan. N.d. Travelling Texts 1790–1914: The Transnational Reception of Women’s Writing at the Fringes of Europe, http://travellingtexts.huygens.knaw.nl/.Google Scholar
Piper, Andrew. 2015. “Novel Devotions: Conversional Reading, Computational Modeling, and the Modern Novel.” New Literary History, Vol. 46, No. 1: 6398. Project MUSE, doi: 10.1353/nlh.2015.0008.Google Scholar
Piper, Andrew. 2018. Enumerations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Plaisant, Catherine, Rose, James, Bei, Yu, Loretta Auvil, Matthew G. Kirshenbaum, Martha Smith, Nell, Clement, Tanya, and Lord, Greg. 2006. “Exploring Erotics in Emily Dickinson’s Correspondence with Text Mining and Visual Interfaces.” In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Association for Computing Machinery, 141–51. www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/trs/2006–01/2006–01.pdf.Google Scholar
Putnam, Lara. 2016. “The Transnational and the Text-Searchable: Digitized Sources and the Shadows They Cast.” American Historical Review, Vol. 121, No. 2 (1 April): 377402. doi: 10.1093/ahr/121.2.377.Google Scholar
Risam, Roopika. 2015. “Beyond the Margins: Intersectionality and the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2: 1–33. www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000208/000208.html.Google Scholar
Risam, Roopika. 2017. “Colonial and Postcolonial Digital Humanities Roundtable.” Roopika Risam blog, Oct. 27. http://roopikarisam.com/uncategorized/colonial-and-postcolonial-digital-humanities-roundtable/.Google Scholar
Ross, Shawna. 2018. “Toward a Feminist Modernist Digital Humanities.” Feminist Modernist Studies., Vol. I, No. 3: 211–29. doi: 10.1080/24692921.2018.1505821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussy, Haun. 2004. “Exquisite Cadavers Stitched from Fresh Nightmares: Of Memes, Hives, and Selfish Genes.” Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, edited by Saussy, Haun, Johns Hopkins University Press, 342.Google Scholar
Smith, Vanessa. 2016. “Novel Worlds.” Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, Vol. 63, Nos. 2–3: 9195. doi: 10.1080/20512856.2016.1244906.Google Scholar
So, Richard Jean, and Long, Hoyt. 2013. “Network Analysis and the Sociology of Modernism.” Boundary2, Vol. 40, No. 2: 147–82.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1993. Outside in the Teaching Machine. Routledge.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 2003. Death of a Discipline. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
St. Clair, William. 2004. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanford University. 2008. Mapping the Republic of Letters. http://republicofletters.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar
Trumpener, Katie. 2009. “Critical Response I. Paratext and Genre System: A Response to Franco Moretti.” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 36, No. 1: 159–71. JSTOR, ww.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/606126.Google Scholar
Underwood, Ted, and Sellers, Jordan. 2016. “The Longue Durée of Literary Prestige.” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3: 321–44. doi: 10,1215.00267929-3570634.Google Scholar
Ungar, Steven. 2004. “Writing in Tongues: Thoughts on the Work of Translation.” Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization, ed. Saussy, Haun, Johns Hopkins University Press, 127–38.Google Scholar
University of Chicago. N.d. PhiloLogic: The University of Chicago Full-Text System. www.lib.uchicago.edu/efts/ARTFL/philologic/.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 1999. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. Routledge.Google Scholar
Warren, Christopher N. 2018. “Historiography’s Two Voices: Data Infrastructure and History at Scale in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB).” Journal of Cultural Analytics ( November 22). https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11031.Google Scholar
Wilkens, Matthew. 2013. “The Geographic Imagination of Civil War-Era American Fiction.” American Literary History, Vol. 25, No. 4: 803–40. Project MUSE, muse.jhu.edu/article/527788.Google Scholar
Wilkens, Matthew. 2017. “Genre, Computation, and the Varieties of Twentieth-Century U.S. Fiction.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, Vol. 1, No. 1. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11065.Google Scholar
Women Writers Project. 1999–2016. Women Writers Project. Northeastern University. www.wwp.northeastern.edu.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×