Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Editors’ introduction
- Part I The changing fortunes of liberal democracy
- Part II Varieties of Marxism
- Part III Science, modernism and politics
- 15 Positivism: reactions and developments
- 16 Postmodernism: pathologies of modernity from Nietzsche to the post-structuralists
- 17 Weber, Durkheim and the sociology of the modern state
- 18 Freud and his followers
- 19 Modernism in art, literature and political theory
- 20 The new science of politics
- 21 Utilitarianism and beyond: contemporary analytical political theory
- Part IV New social movements and the politics of difference
- Part V Beyond Western political thought
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Subject index
- Name index
- References
21 - Utilitarianism and beyond: contemporary analytical political theory
from Part III - Science, modernism and politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- Editors’ introduction
- Part I The changing fortunes of liberal democracy
- Part II Varieties of Marxism
- Part III Science, modernism and politics
- 15 Positivism: reactions and developments
- 16 Postmodernism: pathologies of modernity from Nietzsche to the post-structuralists
- 17 Weber, Durkheim and the sociology of the modern state
- 18 Freud and his followers
- 19 Modernism in art, literature and political theory
- 20 The new science of politics
- 21 Utilitarianism and beyond: contemporary analytical political theory
- Part IV New social movements and the politics of difference
- Part V Beyond Western political thought
- Biographies
- Bibliography
- Subject index
- Name index
- References
Summary
General features
In this chapter we sketch a body of political thought that became predominant in the second half of the twentieth century among academic political philosophers, primarily in the English-speaking world, but increasingly elsewhere, too. To call this type of political thought ‘analytical’ may not be particularly revealing, but no other term better describes the movement in question. Sometimes ‘liberal political theory’ is used, and there is indeed a close connection between analytical theory and liberalism. But that label is in one way too broad and in another too narrow for this kind of political thinking: too broad because liberalism has assumed many different philosophical guises in the course of a history much longer than that of our subject; and too narrow because those who engage in this kind of political theory use methods of analysis and techniques of argument that are not confined to liberals.
Indeed, the political theorists and philosophers of the analytical school often disagree sharply over questions of practical politics, and some have embraced positions, such as Marxism, that have been historically hostile to liberalism. They form a school not because of a common ideological stance, then, but because of certain shared assumptions about the aims and methods of political thought. These assumptions fall under the following five headings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought , pp. 446 - 470Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
- 3
- Cited by