Book contents
- The Cambridge History of the Kurds
- The Cambridge History of the Kurds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Additional material
- Introduction
- Part I Historical Legacies
- Part II Regional Political Developments and the Kurds in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Part III Domestic Political Developments and the Kurds in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Part IV Religion and Society
- Part V Kurdish Language
- Part VI Art, Culture and Literature
- Part VII Transversal Dynamics
- 32 A People beyond the State
- 33 Kurdish Transnational Indigeneity
- 34 Kurdish Diaspora
- 35 The Women’s Movement in Kurdistan-Iraq
- 36 A Struggle within a Struggle
- Index
- References
33 - Kurdish Transnational Indigeneity
from Part VII - Transversal Dynamics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2021
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of the Kurds
- The Cambridge History of the Kurds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Additional material
- Introduction
- Part I Historical Legacies
- Part II Regional Political Developments and the Kurds in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Part III Domestic Political Developments and the Kurds in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Part IV Religion and Society
- Part V Kurdish Language
- Part VI Art, Culture and Literature
- Part VII Transversal Dynamics
- 32 A People beyond the State
- 33 Kurdish Transnational Indigeneity
- 34 Kurdish Diaspora
- 35 The Women’s Movement in Kurdistan-Iraq
- 36 A Struggle within a Struggle
- Index
- References
Summary
“This chapter traces the transformation of the Kurdish issue into a transnational indigenous one. It argues that we rethink and shift our analyst categories in tandem with this transformation. By considering the impact of diaspora, Rojava and indigeneity, the chapter argues that the Kurdish issue should no longer simply be conceived as ‘minority rights within a state/regional system’ but one which centres on the issue of Kurdish transnational indigeneity. It argues that Kurdish roots will continue to be articulated through transnational routes. The chapter considers the significance of Kurdish transnational indigeneity for understanding indigeneity and transnationality, as well as the various possible consequences of the Kurdish issue being increasingly framed and understood as a transnational indigenous one. It calls for a linguistic and conceptual shift towards transnational indigeneity in the field of Kurdish studies.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the Kurds , pp. 829 - 847Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Allison, C. F. (2016). The shifting borders of conflict, difference, and oppression: Kurdish folklore revisited. In Stansfield, G. and Shareef, M. (eds), Kurdish Studies Revisited (pp. 115–33). London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Anantram, K., Chase-Dunn, C. and Reese, E. (2009). Global civil society and the world social forum. In Turner, B. S. (ed.), Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies (pp. 589–604). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ayata, B. (2011). Kurdish transnational politics and Turkey’s changing Kurdish policy: The journey of Kurdish broadcasting from Europe to Turkey. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19 (4), 523–33.Google Scholar
Aydın, D. (2014). Mobilizing the Kurds in Turkey: Newroz as a myth. In Gunes, C. and Zeydanlıoğlu, W. (eds), The Kurdish Question in Turkey (pp. 68–88). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aykan, B. (2014). Whose tradition, whose identity? The politics of constructing ‘Nevruz’ as intangible heritage in Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 19, 1–24.Google Scholar
Başer, B. (2015). Diasporas and Homeland Conflicts: A Comparative Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
BBC (2019). ‘Who are the Kurds?’ 15 October. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-29702440.Google Scholar
Bilgen, B. H. (2018). Kurdish group dance as resistance in Turkey. Unpublished MA thesis, York University.Google Scholar
Bingol, H. B. and Benjamin, J. J. (2014). Mesopotamia’s indigenous revival: Political discourse, imagined sovereignty, and contemporary Kurdish representations of identity. In Adebayo, A. G., Benjamin, J. J. and Lundy, B. D. (eds), Indigenous Conflict Management Strategies: Global Perspectives (pp. 217–38). Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Bozarslan, H. (2014). The Kurds and Middle Eastern ‘State of Violence’: The 1980s and 2010s. Kurdish Studies, 2 (1), 4–13.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (2013). Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, K. and Mitchell, T. (2013). ‘UNDRIP changes indigenous peoples’ articulation of both problems and solutions’. www.cigionline.org/articles/undrip-changes-indigenous-peoples-articulation-both-problems-and-solutions.Google Scholar
Council of Foreign Relations (2015). ‘The time of the Kurds’. www.cfr.org/interactives/time-kurds#!/#who-are-the-kurds.Google Scholar
Demir, I. (2015). Battlespace diaspora: How the Kurds of Turkey revive, construct and translate the Kurdish struggle in London. In Christou, A. and Mavroudi, E. (eds), Dismantling Diasporas: Rethinking the Geographies of Diasporic Identity, Connection and Development (pp. 71–84). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Demir, I. (2017a). Shedding an ethnic identity in diaspora: De-Turkification and the transnational discursive struggles of the Kurdish diaspora. Critical Discourse Studies, 14 (3), 276–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, I. (2017b). The Global South as foreignization: The case of Kurdish diaspora in Europe. The Global South, 11 (2), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccarius-Kelly, V. (2002). Political movements and leverage points: Kurdish activism in the European diaspora. The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 22 (1), 91–118.Google Scholar
Eliassi, B. (2013). Contesting Kurdish Identities in Sweden: Quest for Belonging among Middle Eastern Youth. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Faist, T. (2010). Diaspora and transnationalism: What kind of dance partners? In Baubock, R. and Faist, T. (eds), Diaspora and Transnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Gambetti, Z. (2009) Politics of place/space: The spatial dynamics of the Kurdish and Zapatista movements. New Perspectives on Turkey, 41 (Fall), 43–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, M. (2017) Democratisation and Memories of Violence: Ethnic Minority Rights Movements in Mexico, Turkey and El Salvador. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gunes, C. (2012). The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gupta, R. (2016). ‘Military fatigues and floral scarves’. New Internationalist, 1 May. https://newint.org/features/2016/05/01/rojava-women-syria/.Google Scholar
Hamelink, W. (2016). The Sung Home: Narrative, Morality, and the Kurdish Nation. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamelink, W. and Baris, H. (2014). Dengbêjs on the borderlands: Borders and the state as seen through the eyes of Kurdish singer-poets. Kurdish Studies, 2 (1), 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, C. (2009). An anti-history of a non-people: Kurds, colonialism, and nationalism in the history of anthropology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15 (1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keles, J. (2015). Media, Diaspora and Conflict: Nationalism and Identity amongst Kurdish and Turkish Migrants in Europe. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Leezenberg, M. (2016). The ambiguities of democratic autonomy: The Kurdish movement in Turkey and Rojava. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (4), 671–90.Google Scholar
Lyon, A. and Uçarer, E. (2001). Mobilizing ethnic conflict: Kurdish separatism in Germany and the PKK. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24 (6), 925–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macklem, P. (2015). The Sovereignty of Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. (2002). The many faces of cosmo-politics: Border thinking and critical cosmopolitanism. In Brenckendridge, C. A. et al. (eds), Cosmopolitanism (pp. 157–87). Duke, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Østergaard-Nielsen, E. K. (2001). Transnational political practices and the receiving state: Turks and Kurds in Germany and the Netherlands. Global Networks, 1 (3), 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozok-Gundogan, N. (2014). Ruling the periphery, governing the land: The making of the modern Ottoman state in Kurdistan, 1840–70. Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, 34 (1), 160–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, W. I. (1998). Beyond nation-state paradigms: Globalization, sociology, and the challenge of transnational studies. Sociological Forum, 13 (4), 561–94.Google Scholar
Samson, C. (2008). The rule of terra nullius and the impotence of international human rights for indigenous peoples. Essex Human Rights Review, 5 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Samson, C. and Gigoux, C. (2015). Globalization and indigenous peoples: New old patterns. In Turner, B. S. and Holton, R. J. (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies (pp. 287–311). 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sarıtaş, B. S. E. (2010). Articulation of Kurdish identity through politicized music of koms. Unpublished MA thesis, Middle East Technical University. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12611651/index.pdf.Google Scholar
Scalbert-Yücel, C. (2009). The invention of a tradition: Diyarbakir’s dengbêj project.European Journal of Turkish Studies, 10, 1–25.Google Scholar
United Nations (2007). ‘United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’. www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Wahlbeck, Ö. (1999). Kurdish Diasporas: A Comparative Study of Kurdish Refugee Communities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watts, N. F. (2010). Activists in Office: Kurdish Politics and Protest in Turkey. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Withers, J. S. (2016). ‘Kurdish music-making in Istanbul: Music, sentiment, and ideology in a changing urban context’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493329.Google Scholar
Yadirgi, V. (2017). The Political Economy of the Kurds of Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahawi, N. (2017). ‘Kurdish independence referendum is a win-win for Britain and the Kurds’. The Telegraph, 21 September. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world/kurdistan-independence-referendum/win-win-for-britain-and-kurds/.Google Scholar
Zeydanlıoğlu, W. (2008). The white Turkish man’s burden: Orientalism, Kemalism and the Kurds in Turkey. In Rings, G. and Ife, A. (eds), Neo-colonial Mentalities in Contemporary Europe? Language and Discourse in the Construction of Identities (pp. 155–74). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Zeydanlioglu, W. (2012). Turkey’s Kurdish language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 217, 99–125.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by