Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:04:29.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The End of Kurdish Autonomy

The Destruction of the Kurdish Emirates in the Ottoman Empire

from Part I - Historical Legacies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2021

By
Sabri Ates
Edited by
Hamit Bozarslan ,
Cengiz Gunes  and
Veli Yadirgi
Hamit Bozarslan
Affiliation:
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Cengiz Gunes
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
Veli Yadirgi
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access

Summary

This chapter argues that one of the longest-surviving forms of local, indirect administration that actually predated the Ottomans were the Kurdish emirates. In most parts of the empire, the Ottomans, like the European governments, for example, relied on a system of indirect rule whereby the local magnates recognized the ruler’s suzerainty. The rise of the modern state and the expansion of its institutions diminished the need for what might be called a symbiotic relationship between the imperial centre and the peripheral power-holders like the Kurdish aristocracy. This practice of ending local autonomies, whereby central states abandoned their ‘confederal organization’ during widespread civil wars, allowed them to replace decentralized structures of politics with administratively and territorially cohesive regimes (Maier, 2006: 43). In Ottoman Kurdistan, the process of centralization and replacing the indirect rule of the Kurdish aristocracy with the direct rule of the government appointees was made possible by a parallel development: the making of the Ottoman-Iranian boundaries and the permanent division of Kurdistan that has been evolving for quite some time. The elimination of Kurdish dynasts, who hitherto held power at the borderland, facilitated the making of the boundary even as the making of the boundary facilitated their elimination.

Keywords

Ottoman KurdistanautonomyborderscentralizationOttoman-Iranian borderlandborderland peoples
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of the Kurds , pp. 73 - 103
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atmaca, M. (2019). Resistance to centralisation in the Ottoman periphery: The Kurdish Baban and Bohtan emirates. Middle Eastern Studies, 55 (4), 519–39.Google Scholar
Aydın, S. and Verheij, J. (2012). Confusion in the cauldron: Some notes on the ethno-religious groups, local powers and the Ottoman state in Diyarbekir province, 1800–1870. In Jongerden, J. and Verheij, J. (eds), Social Relations in Ottoman Diyarbekir, 1870–1915 (pp. 15–54). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Aziz Efendi, (1985). Kanûn-nâme-i Sultânî Li ʿAzîz Efendi: Aziz Efendi’s Book of Sultanic Laws and Regulations: An Agenda for Reform by a Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Statesman, ed. and trans. Murphey, R.. Sources of Oriental Languages and Literatures 9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Badger, G. P. (1852). The Nestorians and Their Rituals. London: J. Masters.Google Scholar
Bevan, R. (2016). The Destruction of Memory: Architecture at War – Second Expanded Edition. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Brant, J. and Glascott, A. G. (1840). Notes of a journey through a part of Kurdistán, in the summer of 1838. The Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 10, 341–434.Google Scholar
Burdett, A. L. P. (2015). Records of the Kurds: Territory, Revolt and Nationalism, 1831–1979, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Çadırcı, M. (1985). Osmanlı İmpartorluğunda Askere Almada Kura Usulüne Geçilmesi -1846 Tarihli Askerlik Kanunu. Askeri Tarih Bülteni, Sayı 18.Google Scholar
Çadırcı, M. (1991). Tanzimat Döneminde Anadolu Kentlerinin Sosyal ve Ekonomik Yapıları. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.Google Scholar
Doğan, C. (2011). Tanzimat’ın Uygulanması ve Han Mahmud İsyanı. History Studies, 3 (2), 147–62.Google Scholar
Eppel, M. (2008). The demise of the Kurdish emirates: The impact of Ottoman reforms and international relations on Kurdistan during the first half of the nineteenth century. Middle Eastern Studies, 44 (2), 237–58.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. B. (1840). Travels in Koordistan, Mesopotamia, &c. Including an Account of Parts of Those Countries Hitherto Unvisited by Europeans. With Sketches of the Character and Manners of the Koordish and Arab Tribes. London: Richard Bentley.Google Scholar
Gencer, F. (2010). Merkeziyetçi İdari Düzenlemeler Bağlamında Bedirhan Bey Olayı. Unpublished PhD thesis, Ankara University.Google Scholar
Grant, A. (1843). Mountain Nestorians: Letters from Dr. Grant. The Missionary Herald, 39 (11), 434–37.Google Scholar
Gündoğan, N. Ö. (2014). Ruling the periphery, governing the land: The making of the modern Ottoman state in Kurdistan, 1840–70. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 34 (1), 160–75.Google Scholar
Hakan, S. (2002). Müküs Kürt Mirleri Tarihi ve Han Mahmud. Istanbul: Peri Yayınları.Google Scholar
Hakan, S. (2007). Osmanlı Arṣiv Belgelerine Göre Kürtler ve Kürt Direnişleri. Istanbul: Doz.Google Scholar
Henning, B. (2018). Narratives of the History of the Ottoman-Kurdish Bedirhani Family in Imperial and Post-imperial Contexts: Continuities and Changes. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Houston, C. (2007). ‘Set aside from the pen and cut off from the foot’: Imagining the Ottoman Empire and Kurdistan. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 27 (2), 397–411.Google Scholar
Jones, J. F. (1998). Memoirs of Baghdad, Kurdistan and Turkish Arabia, 1857. Reprint. Buckinghamshire: Archive Editions.Google Scholar
Karal, E. Z. (1994). Osmanlı Tarihi, Vol. 5. Ankara: TTK Basımevi.Google Scholar
Kardam, A. (2011). Cizre-Bohtan Beyi Bedirhan: Direniş ve İsyan Yılları. Istanbul: Dipnot Yayınları.Google Scholar
Kinneir, J. M. (1813). A Geographical Memoir of the Persian Empire. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2011). The Margins of Empire: Kurdish Militias in the Ottoman Tribal Zone. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Layard, H. A. (1852). Nineveh and Its Remains: With an Account of a Visit to the Chaldean Christians of Kurdistan, and the Yezidis or Devil-Worshippers; and an Inquiry in the Manners and Arts of the Ancient Assyrians. New York: George P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Longrigg, S. H. (1925). Four Centuries of Modern Iraq. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, C. S. (2006). Transformations of territoriality 1600–2000. In Janz, O., Conrad, S. and Budde, G. (eds), Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien (pp. 32–55). Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehmed, H. P. (1997). Sehâhatnâme-i Hudûd, transcribed by Alaatin Eser. Istanbul: Simurg.Google Scholar
Özoğlu, H. (1996). State–tribe relations: Kurdish tribalism in the 16th- and 17th-century Ottoman Empire. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 23 (1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzmann, A. (2004). Tocqueville in the Ottoman Empire. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
al-Sayyid Marsot, A. L. (1984). Egypt in the Reign of Muhammed Ali. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süreyya, M. (1996). Sicilli Osmani. 2 vols. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yurt Yayıları.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D. and Skocpol, T. (eds), Bringing the State Back (pp. 169–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Bruinessen, M. (1992). Agha Shaikh and State: The Social and Political Structures of Kurdistan. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
von Moltke, H. (1893). Essays, Speeches, and Memoirs, Vol. 1. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Wood, R. (1966). The Early Correspondence of Richard Wood, 1831–1841, ed. Cunningham, A. B.. London: Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Wright, A. and Breath, E. (1846). Visit of Messrs, Wright and Breath to Bader Khan Bey. The Missionary Herald, 42 (11), 378–83.Google Scholar
Wunder, J. R. and Hämäläinen, P. (1999). Of lethal places and lethal essays. The American Historical Review, 104 (4), 1232–3.Google Scholar
Yadırgı, V. (2017). The Political Economy of the Kurds of Turkey: From the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×