Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:09:35.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - The Orthodox Church and the schism

from Part III - Russia Under the First Romanovs (1613–1689)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Maureen Perrie
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

The seventeenth century was a time of bitter conflict and wrenching change in the Orthodox Church of Russia and its relationship with the tsars’ government and society. In this respect, the Church reflected the fissures in Muscovite society and culture of which it was an integral part. After the successful building of a ‘national’ Church in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, described in an earlier chapter, its leaders faced grave challenges. Critics from within demanded liturgical purity and moral reform and representatives of other branches of Eastern Orthodoxy challenged the legitimacy of Russian national tradition. At critical moments – especially in the pivotal years, 1649–67 – the clashing interests of the tsars’ government and Church’s leaders disrupted the ‘symphony’ that, in Orthodox tradition, ideally characterises the relations of Church and state. And laymen and women increasingly rebelled against the Church’s claims and its economic power and social privilege. By the first decades of the eighteenth century, the results of these conflicts included a radical redefinition of the relationship between Church and state and a schism among the faithful.

The legacy of the past

Several of the most important themes in the history of the Russian Church after 1613 can be traced to pivotal events at the end of the sixteenth century and beginning of the seventeenth. First, in 1589, while visiting the Russian capital in search of financial support, Patriarch Jeremiah of Constantinople agreed, under extreme pressure, to the creation of the Patriarchate of Moscow and, in 1590 and 1593, the other Orthodox patriarchs accepted the fait accompli.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAE, 4 vols. (St Petersburg: Tipografiia II Otdeleniia Sobstvennoi E. I. V. Kantseliarii, 1836).
Avvakum, Archpriest, Zhitie protopopa Avvakuma, im samim napisannoe, idrugie ego sochineniia, ed. Gudzii, N. K. (Moscow: Goslitizdat, 1960).
Avvakum, Archpriest, Archpriest Avvakum, the Life Written by Himself : With the Study of V. V. Vinogradov, trans. and ed. Brostrom, Kenneth N. (Michigan Slavic translations; no. 4) (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, University of Michigan Press, 1979).
Bushkovitch, Paul, ‘The Epiphany Ceremony of the Russian Court in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,’ RR 49 (1990).Google Scholar
Bushkovitch, Paul, Religion and Society in Russia: The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
Crummey, Robert O., ‘Court Spectacles in Seventeenth-Century Russia: Illusion and Reality’, in Waugh, Daniel C. (ed.), Essays in Honor of A. A. Zimin (Columbus, Oh.: Slavica Publishers, 1985).Google Scholar
Crummey, Robert O., The Old Believers & the World of Antichrist. The Vyg Community and the Russian State, 1694–1855 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970).
Deianiia Moskovskogo tserkovnogo sobora 1649 goda’, ed. Belokurov, S. A., ChOIDR 171 (1894, kn. 4).Google Scholar
Dokumenty Razriadnogo, Posol’skogo, Novgorodskogo i Tainogo Prikazov o raskol’nikakh v gorodakh Rossii, 1654–1684 gg., ed. Rumiantseva, V. S. (Moscow: AN SSSR, Institut istorii SSSR, 1990).
Felmy, Karl Christian. Die Deutung der Göttlichen Liturgie in der russischen Theologie: Wege und Wandlungen russischer Liturgie-Auslegung (Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte, 54) (Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 1984).
Flier, Michael S., ‘Breaking the Code: The Image of the Tsar in the Muscovite Palm Sunday Ritual’, in Michael, S. Flier and Rowland, Daniel (eds.), Medieval Russian Culture, vol. II (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Flier, Michael S., ‘Court Ceremony in an Age of Reform: Patriarch Nikon and the Palm Sunday Ritual’, in Baron, Samuel H. and Kollmann, Nancy Shields (eds.), Religion and Culture in Early Modern Russia and Ukraine (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gorchakov, M. I., Monastyrskii prikaz, 1649–1725 g. Opyt istoriko-iuridicheskogo issledovaniia (St Petersburg: A. Transhel’, 1868).
Got’e, Iu. V., Zamoskovnyi krai v XVII veke (Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial’noekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo, 1937).
Hamm, Michael (ed.), The City in Russian History (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1976).
Kaiser, Daniel H., ‘“Whose Wife Will She Be at the Resurrection?” Marriage and Remarriage in Early Modern Russia’, SR 62 (2003).Google Scholar
Kapterev, N. F., Patriarkh Nikon i Tsar’ Aleksei Mikhailovich, 2 vols. (Sergiev Posad: Tipografiia Sviato-Troitskoi Sergievoi Lavry, 1909–12).
Kartashev, A. V., Ocherki po istorii russkoi tserkvi, 2 vols. (Moscow: Nauka, 1991).
Kharlampovich, K. V., Malorossiiskoe vliianie na velikorusskuiu tserkovnuiu zhizn’, vol. I (Kazan’: Izdanie knizhnogo magazina M. A. Golubeva, 1914; reprinted The Hague: Mouton, 1968).
Kharuzin, N., ‘K voprosu o bor’be moskovskogo pravitel’stva s narodnymi iazycheskimi obriadami i sueveriiami v polovine XVII v.’, Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, 1879, no. 1.Google Scholar
Kharuzin, N., ‘K voprosu o bor’be moskovskogo pravitel’stva s narodnymi iazycheskimi obriadami i sueveriiami v polovine XVII v.’, Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, 1879, no. 1, 143–51; AI, vol. iv (St Petersburg: Tipografiia II Otdeleniia Sobstvennoi E. I. V. Kantseliarii, 1842).Google Scholar
Makarii, , Metropolitan of Moscow, Istoriia russkoi tserkvi, 12 vols. (Düsseldorf: Brücken-Verlag, 1968–9).Google Scholar
Materialy dlia istorii raskola za pervoe vremia ego sushchestvovaniia, ed. Subbotin, N., 9 vols. (Moscow, Redaktsiia ‘Bratskoe Slovo’, 1874–90).
Meyendorff, Paul, Russia, Ritual, and Reform: the Liturgical Reforms of Nikon in the 17th Century (Crestwood, N.Y.: St Vladimir’s Press, 1991).
Michels, Georg B., ‘The Violent Old Belief: An Examination of Religious Dissent on the Karelian Frontier’, RH 19 (1992).Google Scholar
Michels, Georg B., At War with the Church: Religious Dissent in Seventeenth-Century Russia (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999).
Nikolaeva, S. V., ‘Vklady i vkladchiki v Troitse-Sergiev Monastyr’ v XVI–XVII vekakh. (Povkladnym knigam XVII veka)’, in Tserkov’ v istorii Rossii, 3 vols. (Moscow: Institut rossiiskoi istorii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 1997–9): vol. II (1998).Google Scholar
Nikon, Patriarch, Patriarch Nikon on Church and State – Nikon’s ‘Refutation’ (Vozrazhenie ili razorenie smirennogo Nikona, Bozhieiu milostiiu Patriarkha, protivo voprosov boiarina Simeona Streshneva), ed. Tumins, Valerie A. and Vernadsky, George (Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton, 1982).
Palmer, William, The Patriarch and the Tsar, 6 vols. (London: Trübner and Co., 1871–6).
Pascal, Pierre, Avvakum et les débuts du raskol, 2nd edn (Paris and The Hague: Mouton, 1969).
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie pervoe, 45 vols. (St Petersburg: Tipografiia II Otdeleniia S. I. V. Kantseliarii, 1830–43).
Rozhdestvenskii, N. V., ‘K istorii bor’by s tserkovnymi bezporiadkami, otgoloskami iazychestva i porokami v russkom bytu XVII v.’, ChOIDR 201 (1902), kn. 2.Google Scholar
Snosheniia Rossii s Kavkazom. Materialy izvlechennye iz Moskovskogo Ministerstva Inostrannykh del, 1578–1613, comp. Belokurov, S. L. (Moscow: Universitetskaia Tipografiia, 1889).
Stroev, P. M., Spiski ierarkhov i nastoiatelei monastyrei rossiiskiia tserkvi (St Petersburg: Tipografiia V. S. Balasheva, 1877).
Uspensky, Boris A., ‘The Schism and Cultural Conflict in the Seventeenth Century’, in Batalden, Stephen K. (ed.), Seeking God: the Recovery of Religious Identity in Orthodox Russia, Ukraine, and Georgia (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Vodarskii, Ia. E., ‘Tserkovnye organizatsii i ikh krepostnye krest’iane vo vtoroi polovine XVII – nachale XVIII v.’, in Istoricheskaia geografiia Rossii. XII–nachalo XX v. (Moscow: Nauka, 1975).Google Scholar
Zabelin, I., Domashnii byt russkikh tsarei v XVI i XVII st. (Moscow: Tipografiia A. I. Mamontova, 1895)
Zenkovsky, Serge A., Russkoe staroobriadchestvo; dukhovnye dvizheniia semnadtsatogo veka (Forum Slavicum, Bd. 21) (Munich:W. Fink, 1970).
Zernova, A. S., Knigi Kirillovskoi pechati, izdannye v Moskve v XVI–XVII vekakh. Svodnyi katalog (Moscow: Gosudarstvennaia biblioteka SSSR, 1958).
Zguta, Russell, Russian Minstrels: A History of the Skomorokhi (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978).
Zyzykin, M. V., Patriarkh Nikon. Ego gosudarstvennye i kanonicheskie idei, 3 vols. (Warsaw: Sinodal’naia Tipografiia, 1931–8).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×