Theories of space-time in modern physics

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.016

14 - Theories of space-time in modern physics

from 4 - Philosophy and the new physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Luciano Boi

Edited by

Thomas Baldwin

Show author details

Luciano Boi: Affiliation:
Université de Québec à Montréal
Thomas Baldwin: Affiliation:
University of York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Among the most important events of twentieth-century physics, we must surely count the development of the special and the general theories of relativity by Einstein in 1905 and 1916, and that of quantum mechanics, which was worked out about ten years later by Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and de Broglie. Owing to these theories, the physicist’s conception of space-time underwent two major upheavals.

Although they apply on different scales, the general theory of relativity and the quantum field theory play a fundamental role in describing the natural world, so a complete description of nature must encompass both of them. The formal attempt to quantise general relativity, however, leads to nonsensical infinite formulas. In the sixties non-Abelian gauge theory emerged as a framework for describing all natural forces except gravity; however, at the same time, the inconsistency between general relativity and quantum field theory emerged clearly as the limitation of twentieth-century physics. The resulting problem is a theorists’ problem par excellence: experiments provide little help, and the inconsistency illustrates the intermingling of philosophical, mathematical, and physical thought.

It is a fact of great significance that every physical theory of some generality and scope, whether it is a classical or a quantum theory, a particle or a field theory, presupposes a space-time geometry for the formulation of its laws and for its interpretation, and the choice of this geometry predetermines to some extent the laws which are taken to govern the behaviour of matter. Thus Newton’s classical mechanics (and especially its law of gravitation) is based on the assumption of an absolute simultaneity relation between events and a Euclidean geometry; similarly, the physical principle of the universal proportionality of inertial and gravitational mass, as recognised by Einstein between 1907 and 1915, requires the assignment of a non-integrable, that is, path-dependent, linear connection with non-vanishing curvature to space-time (the law of parallel displacement).

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945 , pp. 207 - 218

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adler, R., Bazin, M., and Schiffer, M. (1965). Introduction to General Relativity, San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Barbour, J. B. (1982). ‘Relational Concepts of Space and Time’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bergman, P. G. (1942). Introduction to the Theory of Relativity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bohm, D. (1965). The Special Theory of Relativity, New York: W. A. Benjamin.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boi, L. (1995). Le problème mathématique de l espace. Une quête de l'intelligible, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Boi, L. (1999). ‘Some Mathematical, Epistemological and Historical Reflections on the Relationship between Geometry and Reality, Spacetime Theory and the Geometrization of Theoretical Physics, from B. Riemann to H. Weyl and Beyond’, Preprint C.A.M.S. (EHESS, Paris) no. 176.Google Scholar

Cao, T. Yu (1997). Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cartan, E. (1923). ‘Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée’, Annales de l Ecole Normale Supérieure 40.Google Scholar

Clifford, W. K. (1876). ‘On the Space-Theory of Matter’, Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings 2.Google Scholar

Cohen-Tannoudji, G. and Spiro, M. (1986). La matière-espace-temps, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. A. and Kort, H. (1995). ‘A New Semantics for the Epistemology of Geometry. I: Modeling Spacetime Structure’, Erkenntnis 2, 42. (Special Issue on ‘Reflections on Spacetime: Foundations, Philosophy, History’, ed. Majer, U. and Schmidt, H.-J..)Google Scholar

Damour, Th. (1995). ‘General Relativity and Experiment’ in Iagolnitzer, D. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Mathematical Physics, Boston: International Press.Google Scholar

Earman, J., Glymour, C., and Stachel, J. (eds.) (1977). Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. (1924). The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ehlers, J. (1973). ‘The Nature and Structure of Spacetime’ in Mehra, J. (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. and Infeld, L. (1938). The Evolution of Physics, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1905). ‘Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper’, Annalen der Physik 17.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1916). ‘Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 4, 49.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1956). The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, G. F. R. and Williams, R. M. (1988). Flat and Curved Space-Times, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. (1967). The Character of Physical Laws, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fock, V. (1959). The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and the Philosophy of Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. P. and Horowitz, G. T. (1979). ‘Global structures of spacetimes’ in Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W. (eds.), General Relativity. An Einstein Centenary Survey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Graves, J. C. (1971). The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd, enlarged edn. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holton, G. (1960). ‘On the Origins of the Special Theory of Relativity’, American Journal of Physics 28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kanitscheider, B. (1972). ‘Die Rolle der Geometrie innerhalb physikalischer Theorien’, Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 26.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S. and Nomizu, K. (1962). Foundations of Differential Geometry, 2 vols. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lichnerowicz, A. (1955). Théories relativistes de la gravitation et de l'électromagnétisme, Paris: Masson.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. B. and Margenau, H. (1957). Foundations of Physics, New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H. (1923). The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity, London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A. (1905). Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, Leipzig: Brockhaus. Trans. 1893 McCormack, T., The Science of Mechanics, Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Mainzer, K. (1994). ‘Philosophie und Geschichte von Raum und Zeit’, in Ausdretsch, J. and Mainzer, K. (eds.), Philosophie und Physik der Raum-Zeit, Zurich: Bibliographische Institut.Google Scholar

Malamet, D. (1997). ‘Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity’, Noûs 11.Google Scholar

Minkowski, H. (1909). ‘Raum und Zeit’, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10.Google Scholar

Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1973), Gravitation, San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Paty, M. (1993). Einstein Philosophe, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1981). Theory of Relativity, New York: Dover. 1st German edn 1921.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. (1968). ‘Structure of Space-Time’, in DeWitt, C. M. and Wheeler, J. A. (eds.), Battelle Rencontres. 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, New York: Benjamin.Google Scholar

Petitot, J. (1992). ‘Actuality of Transcendental Aesthetics for Modern Physics’, in Boi, L. et al. (eds.), A Century of Geometry: Epistemology, History and Mathematics, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1902). La Science et l'Hypothèse, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1906). ‘Sur la dynamique de l'électron’, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Regge, T. (1961). ‘General relativity without coordinates’, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 19.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1958). The Philosophy of Space and Time, transl. Reichenbach, M. and Freund, J., New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Ricci, G. and Levi-Civita, T. (1901). ‘Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications’, Mathematische Annalen 54.Google Scholar

Riemann, B. (1867). ‘Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen’, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zur Göttingen 13.Google Scholar

Rindler, W. (1960). Special Relativity, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar

Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1954). Space-Time Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Souriau, J.-M. (1964). Géométrie et Relativité, Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Spivak, M. (1979). A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, Berkeley, CA: Publish or Perish.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1995). ‘History of Relativity’ in Brown, L. M., Pais, A., and Pippard, B.Sir (eds.), Twentieth Century Physics, vol. I, Bristol: Institute of Physics Publ..Google Scholar

Stamatescu, I.-O. (1994). ‘Quantum Field Theory and the Structure of Space-Time’ in Stamatescu, I.-O. (ed.), Philosophy, Mathematics and Modern Physics, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Synge, J. L. (1955). Relativity: The Special Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Synge, J. L. (1964). The Petrov Classification of Gravitational Fields, Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Torretti, R. (1996), Relativity and Geometry, New York: Dover (1st edn Pergamon, 1983).Google Scholar

Trautman, A., Pirani, F. A. E., and Bondi, H. (1965). Lectures on General Relativity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Trautman, A. (1973). ‘Theory of Gravitation’ in Mehra, J. (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie, Berlin: Springer Verlag. 4th edn (1921).Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1973). Gravitation and Cosmology. Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Weyl, H. (1918). Transl. Brose, H. L., Space-Time-Matter, London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. (1962). Geometrodynamics, New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Zahar, E. (1989). Einstein’s Revolution: A Study in Heuristic, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Zeeman, E. C. (1967). ‘The Topology of Minkowski space’, Topology 6.CrossRef Google Scholar