Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- I 1870–1914
- 1 Positivism, Idealism, and Pragmatism
- 2 Psychology and Philosophy
- 3 Logic, mathematics, and judgement
- 4 Philosophy and the new physics
- 5 The idea of social science
- 6 Ethics, politics, and legal theory
- 18 Utilitarians and idealists
- 19 Nietzsche
- 20 The new realism in ethics
- 21 Individualism vs. collectivism
- 22 Marxism and anarchism
- 23 Legal theory
- 7 Philosophy of religion and art
- Interlude
- II 1914–1945
- Biobibliographical appendix
- Bibliography
- INDEX
- References
21 - Individualism vs. collectivism
from 6 - Ethics, politics, and legal theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- I 1870–1914
- 1 Positivism, Idealism, and Pragmatism
- 2 Psychology and Philosophy
- 3 Logic, mathematics, and judgement
- 4 Philosophy and the new physics
- 5 The idea of social science
- 6 Ethics, politics, and legal theory
- 18 Utilitarians and idealists
- 19 Nietzsche
- 20 The new realism in ethics
- 21 Individualism vs. collectivism
- 22 Marxism and anarchism
- 23 Legal theory
- 7 Philosophy of religion and art
- Interlude
- II 1914–1945
- Biobibliographical appendix
- Bibliography
- INDEX
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
In Britain, the period from 1870 to 1914 was one of a general movement, both in politics and in philosophical reflection on it, from individualism to collectivism (Collini 1979: ch. 1; Gaus 1983: ch. 1; Greenleaf 1983; Bellamy 1992: ch. 1). These are loose and disputed terms (M. Taylor 1996). Roughly, individualism meant leaving the individual as free as possible to pursue his own interests as he saw fit, society being simply a collection of individuals and a means to their ends. Collectivism was more or less the opposite, holding that individuals are not isolated atoms but social beings with shared interests, and that society may act through the state to promote them. Collectivism ranged in degree from occasional government action to effect particular social reforms, to state socialism’s control of the means of production and restructuring of society.
The dominant political theory, Liberalism, adapted itself to the new political conditions. Earlier in the nineteenth century, Liberalism had sought to maximise individual freedom and assumed that this entailed minimising state action. It restricted state action to what was unavoidable because all state action was by its very nature an interference with individual liberty and therefore intrinsically bad, and also bad in its effects, especially by reducing individuals' self-reliance. But later many Liberals accepted state action. They realised that for most individuals freedom from interference was worthless because they lacked the means to utilise it. State action could secure those means, and thus was not necessarily opposed to individual liberty.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945 , pp. 289 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
(1869). Culture & Anarchy: An Essay in Political and Social Criticism, London: Smith. New edn 1993, ed. , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Liberalism and Modern Society: An Historical Argument, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1885). Knowledge and Reality: A Criticism of Mr. F. H. Bradley’s ‘Principles of Logic’, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1888). Logic, or the Morphology of Knowledge, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edn 1911.Google Scholar
(1895a). A Companion to Plato’s Republic for English Readers: Being a Commentary adapted to Davies and Vaughan’s Translation, London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
(1895b). The Essentials of Logic Being Ten Lectures On Judgement and Inference, London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1899). The Philosophical Theory of the State, London: Macmillan, 4th edn 1923. New edn 2001, and (eds.), B. Bosanquet: The Philosophical Theory of the State and Related Essays, South Bend, IN: St Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
(1912). The Principle of Individuality and Value: The Gifford Lectures for 1911, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1913). The Value and Destiny of the Individual: The Gifford Lectures for 1912, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1917). Social and International Ideals: Being Studies in Patriotism, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1927). Science and Philosophy and Other Essays, and (eds.), London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1999a). The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet, vol. I: Selected Essays, (ed.), Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
(1999b). The Collected Works of Bernard Bosanquet, vol. XIV: Essays on ‘Aspects of the Social Problem’ and Essays on Social Policy, (ed.), Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
and (2000). British Idealism and Political Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). T. H. Green and the Development of Ethical Socialism, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
(1976). ‘Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the State: Philosophical Idealism and Political Argument in England 1880–1918’, Past and Present 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979). Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England 1880–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). T. H. Green’s Moral and Political Philosophy: A Phenomenological Perspective, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1994). ‘Green, Bosanquet and the Philosophy of Coherence’ in (ed.), The Routledge History of Philosophy, vol. VII: The Nineteenth Century, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1881). Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract: A Lecture, Oxford: Slatter and Rose. New edn 1986, and (eds.), T. H.Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1886). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, in (ed.), Works of Thomas Hill Green, vol. II: Philosophical Works, London: Longmans, Green. New edn 1986, and (eds), T. H. Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1883). Prolegomena to Ethics by the Late Thomas Hill Green, ed. , Oxford: Clarendon Press. New edn 2003, (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Thomas Hill Green and the Development of Liberal-Democratic Thought, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
(1944). The Neo-Idealist Political Theory: Its Continuity with the British Tradition, New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
(1896). The Theory of Knowledge: A Contribution to Some Problems of Logic and Metaphysics, London: Methuen, 3rd edn 1921.Google Scholar
(1906). Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics, 2 vols., London: Chapman and Hall, 3rd edn 1913.Google Scholar
(1911a). Liberalism, London: Williams and Norgate. New edn 1994, (ed.), L. T. Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1911b). Social Evolution and Political Theory, New York: Columbia University Press. Ch. IX reprinted 1994 in (ed.), L. T. Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1913a). Development and Purpose: An Essay Towards a Philosophy of Evolution, London: Macmillan, 2nd edn 1929.Google Scholar
(1913b). ‘The Historical Evolution of Property, in Fact and Idea’ in (ed.), Property, Its Duties and Rights: Historically, Philosophically and Religiously Regarded, London and New York: Macmillan. Repr. 1994 in (ed.), L. T. Hobhouse: Liberalism and Other Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1921). The Rational Good: A Study in the Logic of Practice, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1924). Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1954). Le néo-hégélianisme en Angleterre: la philosophie de Bernard Bosanquet, Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
(1986). Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1905). ‘Memoir’ in (ed.), Philosophical Studies by David George Ritchie, London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1995). Conceptualizing the State: Innovation and Dispute in British Political Thought 1880–1914, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1848). Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, London: Parker. New edn 1965, (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. II–III, Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1859). On Liberty, London: Parker. New edition 1977, ed. , Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society, Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1873). Autobiography, London: Longmans, Green. New edn 1981, (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. I, Toronto: University of Toronto Press and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1908). The Service of the State: Four Lectures on the Political Teaching of T. H. Green, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1935). Bernard Bosanquet and His Friends: Letters Illustrating the Sources and the Development of His Philosophical Opinions, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1888). ‘Memoir’ in (ed.), Works of Thomas Hill Green, vol. III, Miscellanies and Memoir, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
(1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists: Selected Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). British Idealism and Social Explanation: A Study in Late Victorian Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1938). Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation, London: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn 1968.Google Scholar
(1968). Moral Obligation and Duty and Interest: Essays and Lectures, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1960–5). La nature et l'esprit dans la philosophie de T. H. Green: La Renaissance de l'Idéalisme en Angleterre au XIXe siècle, 2 vols., Paris: Beatrice Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
(1966). ‘Idealistic Social Philosophy and Bernard Bosanquet’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 Repr. 1977 in (ed. ), Philosophy After Darwin: Chapters for the Career of Philosophy, vol. III, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1964). The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and His Age, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
(1891). The Principles of State Interference: Four Essays on the Political Philosophy of Mr. Herbert Spencer, J. S. Mill, and T. H. Green, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 4th edn 1902.Google Scholar
(1894). Natural Rights: A Criticism of Some Political and Ethical Conceptions, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1902). Studies in Political and Social Ethics, London: Swan Sonnenschein and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1998). Collected Works of D. G. Ritchie, vol. VI: Miscellaneous Writings, ed. , Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
(1902). Lectures on the Ethics of T. H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer, and J. Martineau, (ed.) , London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (2001). The New Liberalism: Reconciling Liberty and Community, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). English-Language Philosophy 1750–1945, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). Idealism and Rights: The Social Ontology of Human Rights in the Political Thought of Bernard Bosanquet, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
(1998). ‘Bernard Bosanquet’ in (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(1992). Men versus the State: Herbert Spencer and Late Victorian Individualism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1996). Herbert Spencer and the Limits of the State: The Late Nineteenth-century Debate between Individualism and Collectivism, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Thomas Hill Green and the Philosophical Foundations of Politics: An Internal Critique, Lewiston and Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
and (1984). Philosophy, Politics and Citizenship: The Life and Thought of the British Idealists, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1986). Beyond Equality: A Study of T. H. Green’s Theory of Positive Freedom, Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
(1975). From Radicalism to Socialism: Men and Ideas in the Formation of Fabian Socialist Doctrines, 1881–1889, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar