General relativity

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.051

48 - General relativity

from 11 - Philosophy and the exact sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Thomas Ryckman

Edited by

Thomas Baldwin

Show author details

Thomas Ryckman: Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Thomas Baldwin: Affiliation:
University of York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The initial empirical corroboration of the General Theory of Relativity (GTR) was announced to the world at a packed joint meeting of the Royal Society of London and the Royal Astronomical Society on 6 November 1919. Lengthy data analysis of solar eclipse observations, made the previous May by a joint British expedition to Brazil and to an island off the coast of West Africa, confirmed that the GTR-predicted amount of ‘bending’ of light rays in the solar gravitational field had indeed been found. Under a portrait of Isaac Newton, J. J. Thompson, president of the Royal Society, pronounced this ‘the most important result obtained in connection with the theory of gravitation since Newton’s day, and … one of the highest achievements of human thought’ (quoted from Pais 1982: 305). There followed the ‘relativity-rumpus’ (Sommerfeld 1949: 101), a public clamour that, regarding a purely scientific theory without apparent military or technological application, was completely unprecedented, and is, as yet, unmatched. Almost overnight, Albert Einstein, hitherto largely unknown outside the rarefied (and by present standards, miniscule) circle of theoretical physicists, became world famous and a favoured target of anti-Semitism.

A plausible explanation of this astonishing spectacle points to the exhausted state of European culture, eager for diversion after the ravages of four years of world war, political revolution, and an influenza pandemic in which millions perished. Diversion the theory certainly provided, with the novelty of claims made on its behalf and its aura of incomprehensibility. But even among the scientifically literate, there was considerable controversy and misunderstanding concerning the theory’s physical content as well as its philosophical implications.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945 , pp. 600 - 607

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.051 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barbour, J. (1999). ‘The Development of Machian Themes in the Twentieth Century’ in Butterfield, J. (ed.), The Arguments of Time, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Barbour, J. B. and Pfister, H. (eds.) (1995). Mach’s Principle; From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Bergmann, P. (1965). ‘Physics and Geometry’ in Bar-Hillel, Y., Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science; Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishers.Google Scholar

Bergmann, P. (1980). Remarks in ‘Open Discussion’ following papers by Hawking, S. and Unruh, W. in Woolf, H. (ed.), Some Strangeness in the Proportion, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishers.Google Scholar

Earman, J. (1995). Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S. (1930). ‘On the Instability of the Einstein World’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 90CrossRef Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, Leipzig: J. Barth; trans. 1923 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B. ‘The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H., The Principle of Relativity; repr. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1917). ‘Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Sitzungsberichte der Preuβ;ischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Math.-Phys. Kl.; trans. 1952 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B., ‘Cosmological Considerations on the General Theory of Relativity’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H., The Principle of Relativity, 1923; repr. New York: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1918). ‘Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 55Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1921). ‘Geometrie und Erfahrung’, Sitzungsberichte der Preuflischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Math.-Phys. Kl.; separately issued in expanded form and trans. 1923 Perrett, W. and Jeffrey, G. B., ‘Geometry and Experience’ in Sidelights on Relativity, New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1949). ‘Autobiographical Notes’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1952). ‘Relativity and the Problem of Space’, Appendix V, in Einstein, A., Relativity: The Special and General Theory, 15th edn, New York: Crown Publishers, 1961.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, B. (1972). Albert Einstein – Creator and Rebel (written in collaboration with Dukas, Helen), New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Holton, G. (1986). The Advancement of Science, and its Burdens, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hubble, E. (1929). ‘A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-galactic Nebulae’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 15CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kretschmann, E. (1917). ‘Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulate, A. Einstein’s neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitätstheorie’, Annalen der Physik 53Google Scholar

Norton, J. D. (1989). ‘How Einstein Found his Field Equations’ in Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Norton, J. D. (1993). ‘General Covariance and the Foundations of General Relativity: Eight Decades of Dispute’, Reports on Progress in Physics 56CrossRef Google Scholar

Pais, A. (1982). ‘Subtle is the Lord’: The Life and Science of Albert Einstein, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1928). Philosophie der Raum-Zeit Lehre, Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter; trans. The Philosophy of Space and Time, New York: Dover, 1957.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryckman, T. A. (1992). ‘(P)oint-(C)oincidence Thinking’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23Google Scholar

Ryckman, T. A. (2004). The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics, 1915–25, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smolin, L. (1992). ‘Space and Time in the Quantum Universe’ in Ashtekar, A. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Sommerfeld, A. (1949). ‘To Albert Einstein’s Seventieth Birthday’ in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1986). ‘What a Physicist Can Learn from the Discovery of General Relativity’ in Ruffini, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishers.Google Scholar

Stachel, J. (1989). ‘Einstein’s Search for General Covariance, 1912–1915’ in Howard, D. and Stachel, J. (eds.), Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Boston-Basle-Berlin: Birkhäuser. (Based on a paper circulating privately since 1980.)Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1989). ‘The Cosmological Constant Problem’, Reviews of Modern Physics: 61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weyl, H. (1918). Raum-Zeit-Materie, Berlin: Springer Verlag. 4th edn 1921, trans. 1922 Brose, H., Space-Time-Matter, London: Methuen.Google Scholar