Febert, Heidi. “The Poor Sisters of Söflingen: Religious Corporations as Property Litigants, 1310–1317.” Traditio 68 (2013), 327–433.Google Scholar

Forrest, Ian. Trustworthy Men: How Inequality and Faith Made the Medieval Church. Princeton, 2018.Google Scholar

Fowler-Magerl, Linda. Ordines iudiciarii and Libelli de ordine iudiciorum: From the Middle of the Twelfth to the End of the Fifteenth Century. Turnhout, 1994.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Wilfried, and Pennington, Kenneth, eds. The History of Courts and Procedure in Medieval Canon Law. Washington, DC, 2016.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. Canon Law and the Law of England. London, 1987.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. Marriage Litigation in Medieval England. Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar

Lange, Tyler. Excommunication for Debt in Late Medieval France: The Business of Salvation. Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Mary. The Humiliation of Sinners: Public Penance in Thirteenth-Century France. Ithaca, NY, 1995.Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang P. The Criminalization of Abortion in the West: Its Origins in Medieval Law. Ithaca, NY, 2012.Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang P. “The Internal Forum of the Later Middle Ages: A Modern Myth?” Law and History 33 (2015), 887–913.Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang P. Marriage Litigation in the Western Church, 1215–1517. Cambridge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, Friederike. Öffentliche Sünder in der Kirche des Spätmittelalters: Verfahren – Sanktionen – Rituale. Cologne, 2008.Google Scholar

Poos, Lawrence. Lower Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in Late Medieval England. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

Struck, Wolf-Heino. “Die Sendgerichtsbarkeit am Ausgang des Mittelalters nach den Regesten des Archipresbyterats Wetzlar.” Nassauische Annalen 82 (1971), 104–145.Google Scholar

Wunderli, Richard. London Church Courts and Society on the Eve of the Reformation. Cambridge, Mass., 1981.Google Scholar

Benson, R.L. The Bishop-Elect: A Study in Medieval Ecclesiastical Office. Princeton, 1968.Google Scholar

Chiffoleau, Jacques. “Pour une économie de l’institution ecclésiale à la fin du Moyen Âge.” Mélanges de L’École française de Rome/Moyen Âge 96 (1984), 247–279.Google Scholar

Cortese, Ennio. “Per la storia di una teoria dell’arcivescovo Mosé di Ravenna (m. 1154) sulla proprietà ecclesiastica.” In Proceedings Salamanca 1976, 117–155.Google Scholar

Gilchrist, John. “Eleventh- and Early Twelfth-Century Canonical Collections and the Economic Policy of Gregory VII.” Studi Gregoriani 9 (1972), 377–417.Google Scholar

Gilchrist, John “Simoniaca haeresis and the Problem of Orders from Leo IX to Gratian.” In Proceedings Boston 1962, 209–235.Google Scholar

Heintschel, Donald Edward. The Mediaeval Concept of an Ecclesiastical Office. Washington, DC, 1956.Google Scholar

Kerff, Franz. “‘Altare’ und ‘ecclesia’: Zur Frühgeschichte des ‘beneficium ecclesiasticum’.” In Proceedings Munich 1992, 849–870.Google Scholar

Landau, Peter. Ius patronatus: Studien zur Entwicklung des Patronats im Dekretalenrecht und der Kanonistik des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts. Cologne, 1975.Google Scholar

Landau, Peter “Zum Ursprung des ‘ius ad rem’ in der Kanonistik.” In Proceedings Strasbourg 1968, 81–102.Google Scholar

Lesne, Émile. “Les origines de la prébende.” Revue historique de droit français et étranger 8 (1929), 242–290.Google Scholar

Lynch, J.H. Simoniacal Entry into Religious Life from 1000 to 1200: A Social, Economic and Legal Study. Columbus, Ohio, 1976.Google Scholar

Maffei, Domenico. La donazione di Costantino nei giuristi medievali. Milan, 1964.Google Scholar

Miramon, Charles de. “Spiritualia et temporalia – naissance d’un couple.” ZRG: KA 92 (2006), 224–287.Google Scholar

Viard, Paul. Histoire de la dîme ecclésiastique. Paris, 1912.Google Scholar

Viard, Paul Histoire de la dîme ecclésiastique, principalement en France, jusqu’au Décret de Gratien. Dijon, 1909.Google Scholar

Villemin, Laurent. Pouvoir d’ordre et pouvoir de juridiction: histoire théologique de leur distinction. Paris, 2003.Google Scholar

Weitzel, Joseph. Begriff und Erscheinungsformen der Simonie bei Gratian und den Dekretisten. Münchener theologische Studien 3.25. Munich, 1967.Google Scholar

Barraclough, Geoffrey. Papal Provisions: Aspects of Church History Constitutional, Legal and Administrative in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford, 1935.Google Scholar

Esders, Stefan, and Mierau, Heike Johanna. Der altdeutsche Klerikereid: Bischöfliche Diözesangewalt, kirchliches Benefizialwesen und volkssprachliche Rechtspraxis im frühmittelalterlichen Baiern. MGH: Studien und Texte 28. Hanover, 2000.Google Scholar

Ganzer, Klaus. Papsttum und Bistumsbesetzungen in der Zeit von Gregor IX. bis Bonifaz VIII: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der päpstlichen Reservationen. Cologne, 1968.Google Scholar

Göller, Emil. “Einführung.” In Göller, Emil, Die Einnahmen der apostolischen Kammer unter Johann XXII.: Vatikanische Quellen zur Geschichte der päpstlichen Hof- und Finanzverwaltung 1316–1378. Paderborn, 1910.Google Scholar

Kerff, Franz. “Altare und ecclesia: Zur Frühgeschichte des ‘beneficium ecclesiasticum’.” Proceedings. Munich 1992, 849–870.Google Scholar

Landau, Peter. Ius patronatus: Studien zur Entwicklung des Patronats im Dekretalenrecht und der Kanonistik des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts. Cologne, 1975.Google Scholar

Lunt, William E. Papal Revenues in the Middle Ages. 2 vols. New York, 1934.Google Scholar

Meyer, Andreas. Arme Kleriker auf Pfründensuche: Eine Studie über das in forma pauperum-Register Gregors XII. von 1407 und über päpstliche Anwartschaften im Spätmittelalter. Cologne, 1990.Google Scholar

Meyer, Andreas Zürich und Rom: Ordentliche Kollatur und päpstliche Provisionen am Frau- und Großmünster 1316–1523. Bibliothek des Deutschen Historischen Instituts in Rom 64. Tübingen, 1986.Google Scholar

Pennington, Kenneth. Pope and Bishops: The Papal Monarchy in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries. Philadelphia, 1984.Google Scholar

Petersen, Stefan. Benefizientaxierungen an der Peripherie: Pfarrorganisation – Pfründeneinkommen – Klerikerbildung im Bistum Ratzeburg. Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Geschichte 166. Göttingen, 2001.Google Scholar

Samaran, Charles, and Mollat, Guillaume. La fiscalité pontificale en France au XIVe siècle (période d’Avignon et Grand Schisme d’Occident). Paris, 1905.Google Scholar

Schieffer, Rudolf. Die Entstehung von Domkapiteln in Deutschland. Bonn, 1976.Google Scholar

Schneidmüller, Bernd. “Verfassung und Güterordnung weltlicher Kollegiatstifte im Hochmittelalter.” ZRG: KA 72 (1986), 115–151.Google Scholar

Schöller, Wolfgang. Die rechtliche Organisation des Kirchenbaues im Mittelalter, vornehmlich des Kathedralbaues: Baulast, Bauherrschaft, Baufinanzierung. Vienna, 1989.Google Scholar

Biller, Peter. “Words and the Medieval Notion of ‘Religion’.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 36 (1985), 351–369.Google Scholar

Burton, Janet, and Karen, Stöber. Monasteries and Society in the British Isles in the Later Middle Ages. Woodbridge, 2008.Google Scholar

Burton, Janet Women in the Medieval Monastic World. Turnhout, 2015.Google Scholar

Constable, Giles. “Liberty and Free Choice in Monastic Thought and Life, especially in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries.” In La notion de liberté au Moyen Âge: Islam, Byzance, Occident, ed. Makdisi, George, Sourdel, Dominique, and Sourdel-Thomine, Janine, 99–118. Paris, 1985.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Fiona, and Hotchin, Julie. Partners in Spirit: Women, Men, and Religious Life in Germany, 1100–1500. Turnhout, 2014.Google Scholar

Harper-Bill, Christopher. “Monastic Apostasy in Late Medieval England.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 32 (1981), 1–18.Google Scholar

Logan, F. Donald. Runaway Religious in Medieval England, c. 1240–1540. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar

Makowski, Elizabeth. Apostate Nuns in the Later Middle Ages. Woodbridge, 2019.Google Scholar

Makowski, Elizabeth Canon Law and Cloistered Women. Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar

Makowski, Elizabeth English Nuns and the Law in the Middle Ages: Cloistered Nuns and Their Lawyers, 1293–1540. Woodbridge, 2011.Google Scholar

Makowski, Elizabeth “A Pernicious Sort of Woman”: Quasi-Religious Women and Canon Lawyers in the Later Middle Ages. Washington, DC, 2005.Google Scholar

Swanson, Robert N. Religion and Devotion in Europe, c. 1215–c. 1515. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

Brundage, James A. Medieval Canon Law (London, 1995).Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L. Faith, Fiction & Force in Medieval Baptismal Debates. Washington, DC, 2014.Google Scholar

Coulet, Noël. Les visites pastorales. Turnhout, 1977.Google Scholar

Cushing, Kathleen G. Reform and the Papacy in the Eleventh Century: Spirituality and Social Change. Manchester, 2005.Google Scholar

Izbicki, Thomas M. The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar

Izbicki, Thomas M. “How the Language of Transubstantiation Entered Medieval Canon Law.” In Proceedings Toronto 2012, 1023–1043. Vatican City, 2016.Google Scholar

Kelly, Henry Ansgar. The Devil at Baptism: Ritual, Theology, and Drama. Ithaca, NY, 1985.Google Scholar

Macy, Gary. The Banquet’s Wisdom: A Short History of the Theologies of the Lord’s Supper. New York, 1992.Google Scholar

Macy, Gary “The Dogma of Transubstantiation in the Middle Ages.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 45 (1984), 11–51.Google Scholar

Pixton, Paul B. German, The Episcopacy and the Implementation of the Decrees of the Fourth Lateran Council, 1216–1245: Watchmen on the Tower. Leiden, 1995.Google Scholar

Rubin, Miri. Corpus Christi: The Eucharist in Late Medieval Culture. Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar

Schabel, Christopher. “The Quarrel over Unleavened Bread in Western Theology, 1234–1439.” In Greeks, Latins, and Intellectual History 1204–1500, ed. Hinterberger, Martin and Schabel, Christopher, 85–127. Leuven, 2011.Google Scholar

Swanson, R.N. Religion and Devotion in Europe, c. 1215–c. 1515. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

Swanson, R.N. ed. The Routledge History of Medieval Christianity 1050–1500. London, 2015.Google Scholar

Vodola, Elisabeth. “Legal Precision in the Decretist Period: A Note on the Development of the Glosses on De consecratione with Reference to the Meaning of cautio sufficiens.” BMCL 6 (1976), 55–63.Google Scholar

Angenendt, Arnold. Geschichte der Religiosität im Mittelalter. Darmstadt, 1997.Google Scholar

Arnold, John. Inquisition and Power: Catharism and the Confessing Subject in Medieval Languedoc. Philadelphia, 2001.Google Scholar

Austin, Greta. Shaping Church Law around the Year 1000: The Decretum of Burchard of Worms. Aldershot, 2009.Google Scholar

Biller, Peter, and Minnis, Alistair J., ed. Handling Sin: Confession in the Middle Ages. York Studies in Medieval Theology 2. Woodbridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Firey, Abigail, ed. A New History of Penance. Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar

Herwaarden, Jan van. Opgelegde Bedevaarten: Een studie over de praktijk van opleggen van bedevaarten (met name in de stedelijke rechtspraak) in de Nederlanden gedurende de late middeleeuwen (ca. 1300–ca. 1550). Assen, 1978.Google Scholar

Larson, Atria A. Master of Penance: Gratian and the Development of Penitential Thought and Law in the Twelfth Century. Studies in Medieval and Early Modern Canon Law 11. Washington, DC, 2014.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Mary. The Humiliation of Sinners: Public Penance in Thirteenth Century France. Ithaca, NY, 1995.Google Scholar

Meens, Rob. Penance in the Middle Ages, 600–1200. Cambridge, 2014.Google Scholar

Neumann, Friederike. Öffentliche Sünder in der Kirche des späten Mittelalters: Verfahren – Sanktionen – Rituale. Cologne, 2008.Google Scholar

Ohst, Martin. Pflichtbeichte: Untersuchungen zum Buβwesen im hohen und späten Mittelalter. Tübingen, 1995.Google Scholar

Paxton, Frederick S. Christianizing Death: The Creation of a Ritual Process in Early Medieval Europe. Ithaca, NY, 1990.Google Scholar

Poschmann, Bernhard. Penance and the Anointing of the Sick. New York, 1964.Google Scholar

Treffort, Cécile. L’église carolingienne et la mort: Christianisme, rites funéraires et pratiques commemoratives. Lyons, 1993Google Scholar

Angenendt, Arnold. Heilige und Reliquien: Die Geschichte ihres Kultes vom frühen Christentum bis zur Gegenwart. 2nd ed. Hamburg, 2007.Google Scholar

Benedictus XIV (Prosper Lambertini). De servorum beatificatione et beatorum canonizatione. Opera omnia 1.5. Venice, 1767.Google Scholar

Herrmann-Mascard, Nicole. Les reliques des saints: formation coutumière d’un droit. Société d’histoire du droit: Collection d’une histoire institutionelle et sociale 6. Paris, 1975.Google Scholar

Kühne, Hartmut. Ostensio reliquiarum: Untersuchungen über Entstehung, Ausbreitung, Gestalt und Funktion der Heiltumsweisungen im römisch-deutschen Regnum. Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 75. Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar

Paciocco, Roberto. Canonizzazioni e culto dei santi nella “Christianitas.” Medioevo Francescano, saggi 11. Assisi, 2006.Google Scholar

Paciocco, Roberto Il negotium imperfectum per Ambrogio da Massa (1240–1257): con l’edizione del rotolo processuale per la canonizzazione. Medioevo Francescano 39. Spoleto, 2019.Google Scholar

Paciocco, Roberto “Sublimia negotia”: le canonizzazione dei santi nella curia papale e il nuovo ordine dei frati minori. Centro studi Antoniani 25. Padua, 1996.Google Scholar

Sieger, Marcus. Die Heiligsprechung: Geschichte und heutige Rechtslage. Forschungen zur Kirchenrechtswissenschaft 23. Würzburg, 1995.Google Scholar

Vauchez, André. La sainteté en Occident aux derniers siècles du Moyen Âge d’après les procès de canonisation et les documents hagiographiques. Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 241. Rome, 1981.Google Scholar

Wetzstein, Thomas. Heilige vor Gericht: Das Kanonisationsverfahren im europäischen Spätmittelalter. Forschungen zur kirchlichen Rechtsgeschichte und zum Kirchenrecht 28. Cologne, 2004.Google Scholar

Brundage, James A. Law, Sex and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Charageat, Martine. “Typologie des procès canoniques matrimoniaux à Saragosse (XV–XVI).” In Sínodos diocesanos y legislación particular: estudios históricos en honor al Dr. D. Francisco Cantelar Rodríguez, ed. Justo Fernández, J., 217–232. Salamanca, 1999.Google Scholar

D’Avray, David. Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society. Oxford, 2005.Google Scholar

Donahue, Charles, Jr. Law, Marriage, and Society in the Later Middle Ages: Arguments about Marriage in Five Courts. Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar

Helmholz, R.H. Marriage Litigation in Medieval England. Cambridge Studies in English Legal History. Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar

Herlihy, David. “Making Sense of Incest: Women and the Marriage Rules of the Early Middle Ages.” In Women, Family and Society in Medieval Europe, ed. Herlihy, David and Molho, Anthony, 96–112. Providence, RI, 1995.Google Scholar

Korpiola, Mia. Between Betrothal and Bedding: Marriage Formation in Sweden 1200–1600. Leiden, 2009.Google Scholar

Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne. Les officialités à la veille du concile de Trente. Bibliothèque d’histoire du droit et droit romain 19. Paris, 1973.Google Scholar

Marchetto, Giuliano. Il divorzio imperfetto: I giuristi medievali e la separazione dei coniugi. Annali dell’Instituto storico italo-germanico in Trento 48. Bologna, 2008.Google Scholar

Reid, Charles J., Jr. Power over the Body, Equality in the Family: Rights and Domestic Relations in Medieval Canon Law. Grand Rapids, Mich., 2004.Google Scholar

Rolker, Christof. “Kings, Bishops, and Incest: Extension and Subversion of the Ecclesiastical Marriage Jurisdiction around 1100.” Studies in Church History 43 (2007), 159–168.Google Scholar

Schmugge, Ludwig. Ehen vor Gericht: Paare der Renaissance vor dem Papst. Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar

Seidel Menchi, Silvana, and Quaglioni, Diego, eds. Coniugi nemici: la separazione in Italia dal XII al XVIII secolo; I processi matrimoniali degli archivi ecclesiastici italiani 1. Annali dell’Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento, Quaderni, 53. Bologna, 2000.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Michael M. Marriage, Family, and Law in Medieval Europe: Collected Studies. Ed. Farge, James K. Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar

Ubl, Karl. Inzestverbot und Gesetzgebung: Die Konstruktion eines Verbrechens (300–1100). Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar

Caillemer, Robert. Origines et développement de l’exécution testamentaire (époque franque et Moyen Âge). Lyons, 1901.Google Scholar

Chiodi, Giovanni. L’interpretazione del testamento nel pensiero dei glossatori. Università degli studi di Milano, Facoltà di giurisprudenza, Pubblicazioni dell’Istituto di storia del diritto italiano 21. Milan, 1997.Google Scholar

Condorelli, Orazio, Roumy, Franck, and Schmoeckel, Mathias, eds. Der Einfluss der Kanonistik auf die europäische Rechtskultur, vol. 1, Zivil- und Zivilprozessrecht. Norm und Struktur 37/1. Cologne, 2009.Google Scholar

Demoulin-Auzary, Florence. Les actions d’état en droit romano-canonique. Bibliothèque de droit privé 387. Paris, 2004.Google Scholar

Genestal, Robert. Histoire de la légitimation des enfants naturels en droit canonique. Bibliothèque de l’École des hautes études: sciences religieuses 18. Paris, 1905.Google Scholar

Jussen, Bernhard. Patenschaft und Adoption in frühen Mittelalter: Künstlische Verwandtschaft als soziale Praxis. Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Geschichte 98. Göttingen, 1991. English translation: Spiritual Kinship as Social Practice: Godparenthood and Adoption in the Early Middle Ages. Trans. Pamela Selwyn. Newark, 2000.Google Scholar

Kogler, Ferdinand. Die legitimatio per rescriptum vom Justinian bis zum Tode Karls IV. Weimar, 1904.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Thomas. Emancipation in Late Medieval Florence. New Brunswick, NJ, 1982.Google Scholar

Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne. Autour de l’enfant: du droit canonique et romain médiéval au code civil de 1804. Medieval Law and Its Practice 2. Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar

Lynch, Joseph. Godparents and Kinship in Early Medieval Europe. Princeton, 1986.Google Scholar

Metz, René. La femme et l’enfant dans le droit canonique médiéval. Collected Studies CS 222. London, 1985.Google Scholar

Vidari, Pene, Savino, Gian. Ricerche sul diritto agli alimenti, vol. 1, L’obligo “ex lege” dei familiari nei giuristi dei sec. XII–XIV. Università di Torino: Memoria dell’Istituto giuridico, série II, 144. Turin, 1972.Google Scholar

Roumy, Franck. L’adoption dans le droit savant du XII^e au XVI^e siècle. Bibliothèque de droit privé 279. Paris, 1998.Google Scholar

Villata di Renzo, Gigliola. La tutela: indagini sulla scuola dei Glossatori. Pubblicazioni dell’Instituto di storia del diritto italiano 6. Milan, 1975.Google Scholar

Duggan, Charles. “The Becket Dispute and the Criminous Clerks.” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 35 (1962), 1–28. Repr. in Charles Duggan, Canon Law in Medieval England: The Becket Dispute and Decretal Collections, no. X. Collected Studies CS 151. London, 1982.Google Scholar

Dusil, Stephan. “Zur Entstehung und Funktion von Sendgerichten: Beobachtungen bei Regino von Prüm und in seinem Umfeld.” In Der Einfluss der Kanonistik auf die europäische Rechtskultur, vol. 3, Straf- und Strafprozessrecht, ed. Schmoeckel, Mathias, Condorelli, Orazio, and Roumy, Franck, 369–409. Cologne, 2012.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Wilfried. “Der Bischof als Richter: Zum geistlichen Gericht über kriminelle Vergehen von Laien im früheren Mittelalter (6.–11. Jahrhundert).” Römische historische Mitteilungen 29 (1986), 103–124.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Wilfried “Probleme des geistlichen Gerichts im 10. und 11. Jahrhundert: Bischöfe und Synoden als Richter im ostfränkisch-deutschen Reich.” La giustizia nell’alto medievo (secoli IX–XI), 631–667. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo 44. Spoleto, 1997.Google Scholar

Kéry, Lotte. Gottesfurcht und irdische Strafe: Der Beitrag des mittelalterlichen Kirchenrechts zur Entstehung des öffentlichen Strafrechts. Konflikt, Verbrechen und Sanktion in der Gesellschaft Alteuropas 10. Cologne, 2006.Google Scholar

Kéry, Lotte “Inquisitio – denunciatio – exceptio: Möglichkeiten der Verfahrenseinleitung im Dekretalenrecht.” ZRG: KA 87 (2001), 226–268.Google Scholar

Kuttner, Stephan. Kanonistische Schuldlehre von Gratian bis auf die Dekretalen Gregors IX. systematisch auf Grund der handschriftlichen Quellen dargestellt. Studi e testi 64. Vatican City, 1935.Google Scholar

Landau, Peter. Die Entstehung des kanonischen Infamie-Begriffs von Gratian bis zur Glossa ordinaria. Cologne, 1966.Google Scholar

Landau, Peter “Ursprünge und Entwicklung des Verbotes doppelter Strafverfolgung wegen desselben Verbrechens in der Geschichte des kanonischen Rechts.” ZRG: KA 56 (1970), 124–156.Google Scholar

Neumann, Friedrike. Öffentliche Sünder in der Kirche des späten Mittelalters: Verfahren – Sanktionen – Rituale. Norm und Struktur 28. Cologne, 2008.Google Scholar

Pennington, Kenneth. “‘Pro peccatis patrum puniri’: A Moral and Legal Problem of the Inquisition.” Church History 47 (1978), 137–154. Repr. in Kenneth Pennington, Popes, Canonists, and Texts, 1150–1550, no. xi. Collected Studies CS 412. Aldershot, 1993.Google Scholar

Schimmelpfennig, Bernhard. Die Absetzung von Klerikern in Recht und Ritus vornehmlich des 13. und 14. Jahrhunderts. In Proceedings Salamanca 1976, 517–532.Google Scholar

Trusen, Winfried. “Der Inquisitionsprozeß: Seine historischen Grundlagen und frühen Formen.” ZRG: KA 74 (1988), 168–230.Google Scholar

Ubl, Karl. Inzestverbot und Gesetzgebung: Die Konstruktion eines Verbrechens (300–1100). Millenium-Studien 20. Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar

Vodola, Elisabeth. Excommunication in the Middle Ages. Berkeley, 1986.Google Scholar

Ames, Christine Caldwell. Righteous Persecution: Inquisition, Dominicans, and Christianity in the Middle Ages. Philadelphia, 2009.Google Scholar

Bailey, Michael D. Spirits, Fearful, Reasoned Follies: The Boundaries of Superstition in Late Medieval Europe. Ithaca, NY, 2013.Google Scholar

Bauer, Walter. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. Trans. R.A. Kraft and G. Krodel. Philadelphia, 1971; repr. 1996.Google Scholar

Deane, Jennifer Kolpacoff. A History of Medieval Heresy and Inquisition. Lanham, 2011.Google Scholar

Flint, Valerie I.J. The Rise of Magic in Early Medieval Europe. Princeton, 1991.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Herbert. Herbert Grundmann (1902–1970): Essays on Heresy, Inquisition, and Literacy. Ed. Kolpacoff Deane, Jennifer. Trans. Steven Rowan. York, 2019.Google Scholar

Hersperger, Patrick. Kirche, Magie und “Aberglaube”: Superstitio in der Kanonistik des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts. Forschungen zur kirchliche Rechtsgeschichte und zum Kirchenrecht 31. Cologne, 2010.Google Scholar

Kelly, Henry Ansgar. Inquisitions and Other Trial Procedures in the Medieval West. Aldershot, 2001.Google Scholar

Kéry, Lotte. Gottesfurcht und irdische Strafe: Der Beitrag des mittelalterlichen Kirchenrechts zur Entstehung des öffentlichen Kirchenrechts. Cologne, 2008.Google Scholar

Kieckhefer, Richard. Magic in the Middle Ages. Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar

Lambert, Malcolm D. Medieval Heresy: Popular Movements from the Gregorian Reform to the Reformation. 3rd ed. Oxford, 2002.Google Scholar

Maisonneuve, Henri. Étude sur les origines de l’inquisition. 2nd ed. Paris, 1960.Google Scholar

Sennis, Antonio, ed. Cathars in Question. York, 2016.Google Scholar

Bachrach, David. Religion and the Conduct of War c. 300–1215. Woodbridge, 1993.Google Scholar

Belch, S.F. Paulus Vladimiri and His Doctrine concerning International Law and Politics. 2 vols. The Hague, 1965.Google Scholar

Brundage, James. Medieval Canon Law and the Crusader. Madison, 1969.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Ryan. “Law and War in Late Medieval Italy: The Jus Commune on War and Its Application in Florence, c. 1150–1450.” Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto, 2011.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Paris, 1983.Google Scholar

Johnson, J.T. Ideology, Reason and Limitation of War: Religious and Secular Concepts, 1200–1740. Princeton, 1975.Google Scholar

Muldoon, James. Popes, Lawyers and Infidels: The Church and the Non-Christian World, 1250–1550. Philadelphia, 1979.Google Scholar

Regout, Robert. La doctrine de la guerre juste de Saint Augustin à nos jours. Paris, 1935.Google Scholar

Richard, Jean. The Crusades, c. 1071–c. 1291. Trans. Jean Birrell. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar

Riley-Smith, Jonathan. The Crusades: A Short History. New Haven, 1987.Google Scholar

Russell, Frederick H. “Just War”. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, Robert and Christina, van Dyke, 2.593–606. Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar

Russell, Frederick H. The Just War in the Middle Ages. Cambridge, 1975.Google Scholar

Russell, Frederick H. “Paulus Vladimiri’s Attack on the Just War: A Case Study in Legal Polemics.” In Authority and Power: Studies on Medieval Law and Government presented to Walter Ullmann, ed. Tierney, Brian and Linehan, Peter, 237–254. Cambridge, 1980.Google Scholar

Tyerman, Christopher. Fighting for Christendom: Holy War and the Crusades. Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar

Beaulande, Véronique. Le malheur d’être exclu? Excommunication, réconciliation et société à la fin du Moyen Âge. Paris, 2006.Google Scholar

Clarke, Peter D. The Interdict in the Thirteenth Century: A Question of Collective Guilt. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. “Excommunication as a Legal Sanction: The Attitudes of the Medieval Canonists.” ZRG: KA 68 (1982), 202–218.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. “Excommunication in Twelfth Century England.” Journal of Law and Religion 11 (1995), 235–253.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard H. The Spirit of Classical Canon Law. Athens, Ga., 1996.Google Scholar

Hill, Rosalind. “Public Penance: Some Problems of a Thirteenth-Century Bishop.” History 36 (1951), 213–226.Google Scholar

Hill, Rosalind “The Theory and Practice of Excommunication in Medieval England.” History 42 (1957), 1–11.Google Scholar

Jaser, Christian. Ecclesia maledicens: Rituelle und Zeremonielle Exkommunikations-formen im Mittelalter. Tübingen, 2013.Google Scholar

Jaser, Christian, Daniels, Tobias and Woelki, Thomas, eds. Das Interdikt in der europäischen Vormoderne. Berlin: 2021.Google Scholar

Kaufhold, Martin. Gladius spiritualis: Das päpstliche Interdikt über Deutschland in der Regierungszeit Ludwigs des Bayern (1324–1347). Heidelberg, 1994.Google Scholar

Logan, F. Donald. Excommunication and the Secular Arm in Medieval England. Toronto, 1986.Google Scholar

Murray, Alexander. Excommunication and Conscience in the Middle Ages. John Coffin Memorial Lecture, University of London. London, 1991.Google Scholar

Russo, François. “Pénitence et excommunication: étude historique sur les rapports entre la théologie et le droit canonique dans le domaine pénitentiel du XI^e et XIII^e siècle.” Recherches de science religieuse 33 (1946), 257–279 and 431–461.Google Scholar

Trexler, Richard C. The Spiritual Power: Republican Florence under Interdict. Leiden, 1974.Google Scholar

Vodola, Elisabeth. Excommunication in the Middle Ages. Berkeley, 1986.Google Scholar

Brundage, James A. Medieval Canon Law. London, 1995.Google Scholar

Condorelli, Orazio, Roumy, Franck, Schmoeckel, Mathias et al., eds. Der Einfluss der Kanonistik auf die europäische Rechtskultur. 6 vols. Cologne, 2009–20.Google Scholar

Helmholz, R.H. The Spirit of Classical Canon Law. Athens, Ga., 1996.Google Scholar