Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T16:54:29.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Semiotics

from STRUCTURALISM: ITS RISE, INFLUENCE AND AFTERMATH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Stephen Bann
Edited by
Raman Selden
Stephen Bann
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access

Summary

Defining the field

The term ‘semiotics’, derived from the Greek word for ‘sign’, represents not one particular school or tendency within the recent development of criticism, but a loosely connected group of schools and tendencies. Moreover these associated practices contribute to the development of a critical method that is far from being confined to the literary text as its primary subject matter. In the preface to a recent anthology sub-titled ‘Semiotics around the world’, the editors begin by quoting Eisenstein: ‘The forward movement of our epoch in art […] must be to blow up the Chinese Wall that stands between the primary antithesis of the “language of logic” and the “language of images".’ In their view, the distinctive feature of semiotics is that it considers ‘the process by which things and events come to be recognized as signs by a sentient organism’ (Bailey, Matejka and Steiner, The Sign, p. vii). As we shall see, this very broad definition inevitably implies that semiotic investigation takes place over a wide spectrum of cultural practices, involving visual as well as verbal signs and extending from the specialized analysis of the literary text to the consideration of a great diversity of signifying phenomena.

Semiotics is therefore an imperialistic critical practice. Even though it may be based securely within the traditional areas of literary study, it has a tendency to outstep previously established boundaries in its quest for meaning. Jonathan Culler was no doubt justified in claiming in 1981 that: ‘Literature is the most interesting case of semiosis for a variety of reasons’ (Culler, Pursuit of Signs, p. 35).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 85 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, R. W., Matejka, L. and Steiner, P. (eds.), The Sign: Semiotics around the World (Ann Arbor, MI, 1978).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Language in and about the work of art’, Studio International, 942 (1972).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Malcolm Hughes and the open book’, Studio International, 958 (1973).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Par ou commencer’, Poétique, 1 (1970).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Structuralism and the revival of rhetoric’, in Routh, Jane and Wolff, Janet (eds.), The Sociology of Literature: Theoretical Approaches, Sociological Review monograph 25 (Keele, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘Structuralism and the revival of rhetoric’, in Routh, Jane and Wolff, Janet (eds.), The Sociology of Literature: Theoretical Approaches, Sociological Review monograph 25 (Keele, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, ‘The career of Tel Quel: Tel Quel becomes L'lnfin’, Comparative Criticism, 6 (1984).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Barthes, Roland, Eléments de Sémiologie (Paris, 1964); Elements of Semiology, trans. Lavcers, Annette and Smith, Colin (London, 1967).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Dessins (Les Sables d'Olonne, 1981).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Experimental Painting (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Image, Music, Text; ed. and trans. Heath, Stephen (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, L'Obvie et l'obtus (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Michelet, trans. Howard, Richard (New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, S/Z (Paris, 1970); Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Sade, Fourier, Loyola (Paris, 1971); Eng. trans. Miller, Richard (London, 1977).Google Scholar
Bann, Stephen, Systéme de la Mode (Paris, 1967); The Fashion System, trans. Ward, Matthew and Howard, Richard (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Bryson, Norman, Vision and Painting (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Bryson, Norman (ed.), Calligram – Essays in New Art History from France (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Burgin, Victor, Cinema Semiotics and the Work of Christian Metz, Screen special double issue, 14 (1973).Google Scholar
Burgin, Victor, The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity (London, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camile, Michael, ‘The book of signs: writing and visual difference in Gothic manuscript illuminations’, Word & Image, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Framing The Sign: Criticism and its Institutions (Norman, OK, 1989).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Framing the Sign: Criticism and its Institutions (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (Ithaca, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, On Deconstruction (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Saussure (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (Ithaca, 1975).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction (London, 1981).Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert, ‘Equals infinity’, trans. Olorenshaw, R.H., 20th Century Studies, 15/16 (1976).Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert, Fenetre jaune cadmium (Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
Damisch, Hubert, Théorie du nuage (Paris, 1972).Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges, ‘The index of the absent wound’, in Michelson, Annette et al. (eds.), October – The First Decade (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (London, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto, Travels in Hyperreality, trans. Weaver, William (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Francastel, Pierre, ‘Seeing … decoding’, Afterimage, 5 (1974).Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard, ‘La Rhétorique restreinte’, in Figures III (Paris, 1972).Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard, ‘La Rhétorique restreinte’, in Figures III (Paris, 1972).Google Scholar
Heath, Stephen, ‘Film and system’, Screen, 16 (1975).Google Scholar
Holly, Michael Ann, Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History (Ithaca,1984)Google Scholar
Howard, Richard trans. Essais Critiques (1964); Critical Essays, (Evanston, 1974).Google Scholar
Howard, Richardtrans. L'obvie et Vobtus, Essais critiques III (1982); The Responsibility of Forms: Critical Essays on Music, Art and Representation, (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind, ‘Notes on the index’, in Michelson, Annette et al. (eds.), October – The First Decade (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, ‘The Semiotic Activity’, trans. Heath, Stephen and Prendergast, Christopher, in screen, 14 (1973)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, trans. Gora, Thomas et al. (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, La Revolution du langage poetique (Paris, 1974); Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Waller, Margaret, (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, Semiotike: Recherches pour une sémanalyse (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Lebensztejn, Jean-Claude, ‘Un tableau de Titien: un essai de Panofsky’, Critique, 29, nos. 315–16, (1973).Google Scholar
Marin, Louis, ‘Disneyland: a degenerate Utopia’, Glyph, 1, (1977).Google Scholar
Marin, Louis, Le Portrait du Roi (Paris, 1971); Portrait of the King, trans. Houle, Martha M. (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Matejka, Ladislav, ‘The roots of Russian semiotics of art’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.) The Sign.
Matejka, Ladislav, and Titunik, Irwin R. (eds.), Semiotics of Art ‘(London, 1976).Google Scholar
Metz, Christian, Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. Taylor, Michael (New York, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Annette, et al. (eds.) October – The First Decade (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T., Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, 8 vols. (Cambridge, MA, 1931–1958).Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders, Philosophical Writings, ed. Buchler, Justus (New York, 1955).Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, trans. Baskin, Wade (revised edn, London, 1974).Google Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer, ‘On some problems in the semiotics of visual art: field and vehicle in image-signs’, Semiotica, 1 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer, Words and Pictures: On the Literal and the Symbolic in the Illustration of a Text (The Hague, 1973).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Introduction to Poetics, trans. Howard, Richard (Brighton, 1981).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, La Conquête de l'Amérique (Paris, 1982); The Conquest of America (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, La Lumi?ère et la proie (Paris, 1980).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Le Déluge, La peste, Paolo Uccello (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Le Greco ou l‘éveil des ressemblances (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Scénographie d‘un tableau (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis, Theories of the Symbol, trans. Porter, Catherine (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas, ‘The semiotic web: a chronicle of prejudices’, Bulletin of Literary Semiotics, 2 (1975); 3 (1975).Google Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘Semiology and Rhetoric’, in Harari, Josue V. (ed.), Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-structuralist Criticism (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann, ‘Lotman: the dialectic of a semiotician’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign.
Steiner, Wendy, ‘Modern American semiotics’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign.
Sturrock, John (ed.), Structuralism and Since: From Lévi-Strauss to Derrida (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
Tiefenbrun, Susan W., ‘The state of literary semiotics: 1983’, Semiotica, 51 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, ‘The birth of occidental semiotics’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign.
Todorov, Tzvetan, ‘The birth of occidental semiotics’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign.
Todorov, Tzvetan (ed.), French Literary Theory Today (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
White, Hayden, ‘The historical text as a literary artifact’, Clio, 3 (1974).Google Scholar
White, Hayden, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
Winner, Thomas G., ‘On the relation of verbal and non-verbal art in early Prague semiotics: Jan Mukařrovsǩy’, in Bailey, , Matejka, and Steiner, (eds.), The Sign.
Wollen, Peter, Readings and Writings: Semiotic Counter-strategies (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Wollen, Peter, Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (London, 1969).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Semiotics
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Semiotics
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Semiotics
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.006
Available formats
×