Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:07:47.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Phenomenology

from READER-ORIENTED THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Robert Holub
Edited by
Raman Selden
Get access

Summary

Introduction

‘Phenomenology’ is usually used to designate a major movement in twentieth-century philosophy. The word itself stems from the Greek verb ‘phaino’ meaning ‘to bring to light’ or ‘to make to appear’, and has the literal meaning of ‘science of appearances’. It was first used by the German philosopher Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777) in his Neues Organon (1764); Lambert, however, considered phenomena to be illusions and thus his notion of phenomenology was a science of illusions. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) employs the word in his natural philosophy to distinguish the study of the realm of appearances for us (phenomena) from the study of the realm of essences or things as they are in themselves (noumena). In Hegel's (1770–1831) philosophy, which denies this Kantian division, phenomenology refers to different appearances of consciousness; the Phenomenology of Mind (1807) describes the various stages of human consciousness as it comes to complete awareness of itself. Later in the nineteenth century, particularly in the writings of Eduard von Hartmann (1842–1906) and C. S. Peirce (1839–1914), the term becomes associated with the study of facts or things as they really are. Only in the early part of the twentieth century, however, in the writings of Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) did phenomenology become a designation for a philosophical school. Today the term is usually identified with Husserl, his students, or the various philosophers who were influenced by Husserl's work. In discussions of literature two distinct tendencies emanate from phenomenology. and poetics, was developed centrally by Husserl's own students, especially the Polish phenomenologist Roman Ingarden (1895-1970); the other, a more practical direction involving literary criticism, is associated with the work of the Geneva School in the middle of the century.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 289 - 318
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachelard, Gaston, Fragments d'une poétique du feu (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, L'Air et les songes (Paris, 1943).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, L'Eau et les rêves (Paris, 1942); Water and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Matter, trans. Farrell, Edith R. (Dallas, 1983).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, La Poétique de I'espace (Paris, 1957); The Poetics of Space, trans. Jolas, Maria (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, La Poétique de la Rêverie (Paris, 1960); The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language and the Cosmos, trans. Russell, Daniel (Boston, 1969).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, La Psychanalyse du feu (Paris, 1938); The Psychoanalysis of Fire, trans. Ross, Alan C. M. (Boston, 1964).Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston, On Poetic Imagination and Reverie: Selections from the Works of Gaston Bachelard, trans. Gaudin, Colette (Indianapolis, 1971).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, Histoire de Voeil (Paris, 1967); Story of the Eye, trans. Neugroschel, Joachim (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, L'Erotisme (Paris, 1957); Eroticism: Death and Sensuality, trans. Dalwood, Mary (San Francisco, 1972).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, L'Expérience intérieure (Paris, 1954); Inner Experience, trans. Boldt, Leslie Anne (Albany, 1988).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, La Littérature et le mal (Paris, 1957); Literature and Evil trans. Hamilton, Alastaire (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Bataille, George, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927–1939, trans. Stoekl, Allan (Minneapolis, 1985).Google Scholar
Béguin, Albert, L'Ame romantique et le rêve: essai sur la romantisme allemand et la poésie francaise, 2 vols. (Marseilles, 1937).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, L'Entretien infini (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, L'Espace littéraire (Paris, 1955); The Space of Literature, trans. Smock, Ann (Lincoln, 1982).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, Lautréamont et Sade (Paris, 1949).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays, trans. Davis, Lydia (Barrytown, NY, 1981).Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice, The Sirens' Song: Selected Essays, trans. Rabinovitch, Sacha (Brighton, 1982).Google Scholar
Man, Paul, Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, 2nd ed. (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Bové, Paul A., Destructive Poetics: Heidegger and Modern American Poetry (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Brodtkorb, Paul, Ishmael's White Whale: A Phenomenological Reading of ‘Moby Dick’, (New Haven, 1965).Google Scholar
Caws, Mary Ann, Surrealism and the Literary Imagination: A Study of Breton and Bachelard (The Hague, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christofides, G. C. ‘Bachelard's aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 20 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christofides, G. C., ‘Gaston Bachelard's phenomenology of the imagination’, Romantic Review, 52 (1961).Google Scholar
Collin, Françhise, Critique, 20 (1964), [On Merleau-Ponty].
Collin, Françhise, Maurice Blanchot et la question de Vécriture (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
Conrad, Waldemar, ‘Der ästhetische Gegenstand: Eine ph¨nomenologische Studie’, Zeitschriftfur Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, 3 (1908) and 4 (1909).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, ‘Force et signification’, Critique, 19 (1963).Google Scholar
Descombes, Vincent, Modern French Philosophy, trans. Scott-Fox, L. and Harding, J. M. (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Detweiler, Robert, Story, Sign, and Self: Phenomenology and Structuralism as Literary Critical Methods (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar
Donato, Eugenio, ‘Language, vision and phenomenology: Merleau-Ponty as a test case’, Modern Language Notes, 85 (1970).Google Scholar
Douglas, Kenneth, ‘Blanchot and Sartre’, Yale French Studies, 2 (1949).Google Scholar
Dubrovsky, Serge, Pourquoi la nouvelle critique (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, ‘On the phenomenology and semiology of art’, Phenomenology and Natural Existence, ed. Riepe, Dale (Albany, 1973).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, Esthétique et philosophic, 3 vols. (Paris: 1967–1981).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, In the Presence of the Sensuous: Essays in Aesthetics, trans. Roberts, Mark S. and Gallagher, Dennis (Atlantic Highlands, 1987).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, Le poétique (Paris, 1963).Google Scholar
Dufrenne, Mikel, Phénoménologie de Vexpérience esthétique (Paris, 1952); The Phenom enology of Aesthetic Experience, trans. Casey, Edward S. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
Ehrmann, Jacques, ‘Introduction to Gaston Bachelard’, Modern Language Notes 81 (1966).Google Scholar
Falk, Eugene H., The Poetics of Roman Ingarden (Chapel Hill, 1981).Google Scholar
Farber, Marvin, The Aims of Phenomenology: The Motives, Methods, and Impact of Husserl's Thought (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
Gagey, J., Gaston Bachelard ou la conversion à Vimaginaire (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Gaudin, Colette, ‘LTmagination et la rêverie: remarques sur la poétique de Gaston Bachelard’, Symposium, 20 (1966).Google Scholar
Geiger, Moritz, ‘Beiträge zur Phänomenologie des ästhetischen Genusses’, Jahrbuch für Philosophic und phänomenologische Forschung, 1 (1913).Google Scholar
Geiger, Moritz, Die Bedeutung der Kunst: Zugänge zu einer materialen Wertästhetik, ed. Berger, Klaus and Henckmann, Wolfhart (Munich, 1976). (Collection of published and unpublished writings on aesthetics.)
Ginestier, Paul, La Pensée de Bachelard (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Gras, Vernon W., European Literary Theory and Practice: From Existential Phenomenology o Structuralism (New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Grossmann, Reinhardt, Phenomenology and Existentialism: An Introduction (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Hartmann, Geoffrey, ‘The fulness and nothingness of literature’, Yale French Studies, 16 (1955).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerks (Stuttgart, 1960).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung (Frankfurt, 1944; 4th expanded edn 1971)Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt, 1976–).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Holzwege (Frankfurt, 1950).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Hofstadter, Albert (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen, 1959); On the Way to Language, trans. Hertz, Peter D. (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Cartesianische Meditationen: Eine Einleitung in die Phänomenologie (The Hague, 1950); Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Cairns, Dorion (The Hague, 1960).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phanomenologie (Bel grade, 1936); The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. Carr, David (Evanston, 1970).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Husserliana: Gesammelte Werke ed. Breda, H. L. (The Hague, 1950–). Collected Works (1980–).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie undphänomenologischen Philosophic (Halle, 1913); Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. Gibson, W. R. Boyce (New York, 1931).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. (Halle, 1900 and 1901); Logical Investigations, trans Findlay, F. J., 2 vols. (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, Shorter Works (Brighton, 1981).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund, The Idea of Phenomenology, trans. Alston, William P. and Nakhnikian, George (The Hague, 1964).Google Scholar
Hyppolite, Jean, Sens et existence dans la philosophic de Maurice Merleau-Ponty (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, Das literarische Kunstwerk (Tübingen, 1930); The Literary Work of Art, trans. Grabowicz, George G. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, Selected Papers in Aesthetics (Washington, 1985).Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, trans. Czerniawski, Adam (Berkeley, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingarden, Roman, Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks (Tübingen, 1968); The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art, trans. Crowly, Ruth Ann and Olson, Kenneth R. (Evanston, 1973).Google Scholar
Johnson, Bruce, True Correspondence: A Phenomenology of Thomas Hardy's Novels (Tallahassee, 1983).Google Scholar
Kaelin, Eugene F., An Existentialist Aesthetic: The Theories of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty (Madison, 1962).Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J. (ed.), Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Its Interpretation (New York, 1967).Google Scholar
Krenzlin, Norbert, Das Werk “rein für sich": Zur Geschichte des Verhältnisses von Phänomenologie, Ästhetik und Literaturwissenschaft (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
Kushner, Eva M., ‘The critical method of Gaston Bachelard’, in Slote, Bernice (ed.), Myth and Symbol (Lincoln, NE, 1963).Google Scholar
Lawall, Sarah N., Critics of Consciousness: The Existential Structures of Literature (Cambridge, MA, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecourt, Dominique, Marxism and Epistemology: Bachelard, Canguilhem and Foucault (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Leibfried, Erwin, Kritische Wissenschaft vom Text: Manipulation. Reflexion, transparente Poetologie (Stuttgart, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentricchia, Frank, After the New Criticism: (Chicago, 1980).Google Scholar
LeSage, Laurent (ed.), The French New Criticism: An Introduction and a Sampler (University Park, 1967).Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, Sur Maurice Blanchot (Montpellier, 1975).Google Scholar
Lewis, Philip E., ‘Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenology of language’, Yale French Studies, 36–37 (1966).Google Scholar
Liberstson, Joseph, Proximity, Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille, and Consciousness (The Hague, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magliola, Robert R., Phenomenology and Literature: An Introduction (West Lafayette, IN, 1977).Google Scholar
Magowan, Robin, ‘Jean-Pierre Richard and the criticism of sensation’, Criticism, 6 (1964).Google Scholar
Mansuy, Michel, Gaston Bachelard et les éléments (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar
Margolin, Jean Claude, Bachelard (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, ‘Le Primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques’, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, 41 (1947), 1197ndash;53.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, L'Oeil et l'esprit (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Le Visible et l'invisible: suivi de notes de travail (Paris, 1964); The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Lingis, Alphonso (Evanston, 1968).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Ph7eacute;noménologie de la perception (Paris, 1945); Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, Colin (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Sens et non-sens (Paris, 1948); Sense and Nonsense, trans. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Dreyfus, Patricia Allen (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Signes (Paris, 1960); Signs, trans. McCleary, Richard C. (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Essential Writings of Merleau-Ponty, ed. Fisher, Alden L. (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology (Evanston, 1964).Google Scholar
Métraux, Alexandre, ‘Zur phänomenologischenÄsthetik Moritz Geigers’, Studia Philosophica, 28 (1968).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis ‘Geneva or Paris: the recent work of Georges Poulet’, University of Toronto Quarterly, 39 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis ‘The Geneva School: the criticism of Marcel Raymond, Albert Béguin, Georges Poulet, Jean Rousset, Jean-Pierre Richard, and Jean Starobinski’, Critical Quarterly, 8 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, ‘The literary criticism of Georges Poulet’, Modern Language Notes, 78 (1963).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, Charles Dickens: The World of His Novels (Cambridge, MA, 1958).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, Poets of Reality (Cambridge, MA, 1965).Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis, The Disappearance of God (Cambridge, MA, 1963).Google Scholar
Miller, J. ‘But are things as we think they are?’ Times Literary Supplement (9–15 October 1987).Google Scholar
Oxenhandler, Neal, ‘Paradox and negation in the criticism of Maurice Blanchot’, Symposium, 16 (1962).Google Scholar
Picon, Gaëtan, ‘L'Oeuvre critique de Maurice Blanchot’, Critique 14 (1956).Google Scholar
Pire, Francois, Del Imagination dans Voeuvre de Gaston Bachelard (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Bachelard et la critique contemporaine’, in Currents of Thought in French Literature (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Maurice Blanchot, critique et romancier’, Critique 22 (1966).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Phenomenology of reading’, New Literary History, 1 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, Georges, ‘Poulet on Poulet: the self and the other in critical consciousness’, Diacritics, 2, no. 1 (1971).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Entre moi et moi: Essais critiques sur la conscience de soi (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Etudes sur le temps humain (Edinburgh, 1949); Studies in Human Time, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, L'Espace proustien (Paris, 1963); Proustian Space, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Balti more, 1977).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, La Distance intérieure: Etudes sur le temps humain II (Paris, 1952); The Interior Distance, trans. Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1959).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, La pensée indéterminée (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, La poésie éclatée: Baudelaire, Rimbaud (Paris, 1980); Exploding Poetry: Baudelaire, Rimbaud, trans. Meltzer, Francoise (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Le Point de départ: Etudes sur le temps humain III (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Les Métemorphoses du cercle (Paris, 1961); The Metamorphoses of the Circle, trans. Dawson, Carley and Coleman, Elliott (Baltimore, 1967).Google Scholar
Poulet, Georges, Mesure de Vinstant: Etudes sur le temps humain IV (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Preli, Georges, La Force du dehors: extériorité, limit et nonpouvoir à partir de Maurice Blanchot (Fontenay-sous-Bris, 1977).Google Scholar
Quillet, Pierre, Gaston Bachelard (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Ray, William, Literary Meaning: From Phenomenology to Deconstruction (Oxford, 1984).Google Scholar
Ray, William, Research in Phenomenology, 10 (1980) [special issue on Merleau-Ponty].Google Scholar
Raymond, Marcel, De Baudelaire au surréalisme (Paris, 1933); From Baudelaire to Surrealism (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
Raymond, Marcel, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la quête de soi et la rêverie (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, L'Univers imaginaire de Mallarmé (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, Littérature et sensation (Paris, 1954).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, Onze études sur la poésie moderne (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
Richard, Jean-Pierre, Poésie et profundeur (Paris, 1955).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (Evanston, 1967).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, Forme et signification (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, L'Intérieure et l'extérieure: Essais sur la poésie et sur le théâtre du XVIIe siécle (Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean, La Littérature de Vâge baroque en France (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar
Said, Edward W., ‘Labyrinth of incarnations: the essays of Maurice Merleau- Ponty’, Kenyon Review, 29 (1967).Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, Imagination, trans. Williams, F. (Ann Arbor, 1962).Google Scholar
Simon, John K. (ed.), Modern French Criticism: From Proust and Valeéy to Structuralism (Chicago, 1972).Google Scholar
Smith, Roch Charles, Gaston Bachelard (Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
Spanos, William V., Martin Heidegger and the Question of Literature (Bloomington, 1976).Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert, Les Temps Modernes, 17 (1961) [issue on Merleau-Ponty].Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert, The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, 3rd rev. edn (The Hague, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, ‘Consideration on the present state of literary criticism’, Diogenes, 74 (1971).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, ‘Criticism and authority’, Daedalus, 106, no. 4 (1977).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, ‘On the fundamental gestures of criticism’, New Literary History, 5 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, Jean-Jacques Rousseau: la transparence et l'obstacle (Paris, 1957); Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago, 1988).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, L'Oeil vivant (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, La Relation critique: L'Oeil vivant 2 (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean, Montaigne en mouvement (Paris, 1982); Montaigne in Motion, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago, 1985).Google Scholar
Therrien, Vincent, La Révolution de Gaston Bachelard en critique littéaire (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Valdés, Mario J.Phenomenological Hermeneutic and the Study of Literature (Toronto, 1987).Google Scholar
Valdés, Mario J., Shadows in the Cave: A Phenomenological Approach to Literary Criticism Based on Hispanic Texts (Toronto, 1982).Google Scholar
Man, Paul, ‘Vérité et méthode dans l'oeuvre de George Poulet’, Critique, 25 (1969).Google Scholar
Zeltner, Hermann, ‘Moritz Geiger zum Gedachtnis’, Zeitschrift füosophische orschung, 7 (1960).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Phenomenology
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Phenomenology
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Phenomenology
  • Edited by Raman Selden
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300131.012
Available formats
×