Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Classical standards in the period
- 2 Innovation and modernity
- 3 The French Revolution
- 4 Transcendental philosophy and Romantic criticism
- 5 Nature
- 6 Scientific models
- 7 Religion and literature
- 8 Language theory and the art of understanding
- 9 The transformation of rhetoric
- 10 Romantic irony
- 11 Theories of genre
- 12 Theory of the novel
- 13 The impact of Shakespeare
- 14 The vocation of criticism and the crisis of the republic of letters
- 15 Women, gender and literary criticism
- 16 Literary history and historicism
- 17 Literature and the other arts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
1 - Classical standards in the period
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Classical standards in the period
- 2 Innovation and modernity
- 3 The French Revolution
- 4 Transcendental philosophy and Romantic criticism
- 5 Nature
- 6 Scientific models
- 7 Religion and literature
- 8 Language theory and the art of understanding
- 9 The transformation of rhetoric
- 10 Romantic irony
- 11 Theories of genre
- 12 Theory of the novel
- 13 The impact of Shakespeare
- 14 The vocation of criticism and the crisis of the republic of letters
- 15 Women, gender and literary criticism
- 16 Literary history and historicism
- 17 Literature and the other arts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
If this topic should seem either too piecemeal or too self-evident to include in a general volume on romantic criticism, it may help to recall that for René Wellek the status of neoclassical criticism among the Romantics is the crucial issue that makes the second volume of his History of modern criticism possible: ‘I think we must recognize that we can speak of a general European Romantic movement only if we take a wide over-all view and consider simply the general rejection of the neoclassical creed as a common denominator.’ But possibly this claim only deepens suspicion. Arthur Lovejoy had famously argued that no criterion of any kind was common to all Romanticisms, and Wellek, who wrote his equally famous rebuttal of Lovejoy while at work on volume two, would have been especially eager at that time to uphold the legitimacy of broad period definitions. Can the exceptions, we may ask – Byron and Chateaubriand, for example – ever be acceptably rationalized from any standpoint, not just Lovejoy's?
Nevertheless, whatever one might feel moved to say on other occasions, this is clearly not the place for the postmodern insistence that only an atomism vastly exceeding even Lovejoy's can do justice to the complexity of literary history (and in any case, Musset had already said that about ‘Romanticism’ in 1824!). One must do what one can, aided in this case by the easily overlooked precision of Wellek's claim: we can try at first to agree, tentatively, that what the spirit of the Romantic age rejects is the neoclassical, not necessarily the Classical or the texts of antiquity, and proceed from there. It may finally be possible to show, however, that there is something even more telling, more truly characteristic and self-defining, albeit more varied, about the Romantic reception of Classical antiquity itself.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 7 - 28Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
References
, The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
, From Classic to Romantic: premises of taste in eighteenth century England, New York: Harper, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Problems of origin in literary history’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
, ‘Problems of origin in modern literary history’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991Google Scholar
, ‘The impact of Classical antiquity on the formation of the Romantic literary theory of the Schlegel brothers’, in Classical models in literature, , and (eds.), (Proceedings of the ixth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association), Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck, 1981Google Scholar
and (eds.), Rhetorical traditions and British Romantic literature, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
, The Classical tradition in English literature: a bibliography, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
, Mythology and the Romantic tradition in English poetry, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937.Google Scholar
, The tyranny of Greece over Germany: a study of the influence exercised by Greek art and poetry over the great German writers of the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Cambridge University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
and , ‘Romantic writers and the Classical literary heritage’, in European Romanticism, , and (eds.), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1977Google Scholar
, Die Antike in der romantischen Theorie: die Gebrüder Schlegel und die Antike, Berlin: Ebering, 1937.Google Scholar
, Forming the critical mind: Dryden to Coleridge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
, (ed.), A. W. Schlegel's lectures on German literature from Gottsched to Goethe (1833 notes by George Toynbee)Oxford: Basil Blackwell,1944Google Scholar
, ‘Shelley and Aristotle: elements of the Poetics in Shelley's theory of poetry’, Studies in Romanticism 9 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Homer in English criticism: the historical approach in the eighteenth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
(ed.), Pope versus Dryden: a controversy in letters to the Gentleman's magazine 1789–91, Victoria, BC: English Literary Studies, 1989.Google Scholar
, “”, The reach of criticism: method and perception in literary theory, New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
, ‘On German architecture’, in Essays on art and literature, (ed.), and (trans.), New York: Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar
, The poetics of Romanticism: toward a reading of John Keats, Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press, 1969.Google Scholar
, ‘Wordsworth's georgic beginnings’, Texas studies in literature and language 33 (1991)Google Scholar
, Polestar of the ancients: the Aristotelian tradition in Classical and English literary criticism, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1979.Google Scholar
, Klassik und Klassizismus in der deutschen Literatur: Studie über zwei literarhistorische Begriffe, Bern: Haupt, 1952.Google Scholar
, The Classical tradition: Greek and Roman influences on Western literature, New York: Oxford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
, ‘Romanticism and Classicism’, in Criticism: the major texts, (ed.), (New York, Harcourt 1970Google Scholar
, Romantiker und Klassiker: die Brüder Schlegel in ihren Beziehungen zu Schiller und Goethe, Berlin: Askanischer Verlag, 1924.Google Scholar
, The broken column: a study in Romantic Hellenism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931.Google Scholar
, Essays in the history of ideas, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
, Countess of Blessington, Conversations of Lord Byron with the Countess of Blessington, London, R. Bentley 1834Google Scholar
, The primary language of poetry in the 1740s and 1840s, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1950.Google Scholar
, Friedrich Hölderlin and the German neo-Hellenic movement, Oxford University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
, Ludwig Tiecks Rezeption der Antike: literarische Kritik und Reflexion griechischer und römischer Dichtung im theoretischen und poetischen Werk Tiecks, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar
, ‘Measure and counter-measure: the Lovejoy-Wellek debate and Romantic periodization’, in Theoretical issues in literary history, (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991Google Scholar
, Breaking and remaking: aesthetic practice in England 1700–1820, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
and (eds.), Klassik und Klassizismus, Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
, A course of lectures on dramatic art and literature, (trans.), (ed.), London: Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
, Dialogue on poetry and literary aphorisms, and (trans.), Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1968.Google Scholar
, Klassik und Romantik der Deutschen. Erster Teil: die Grundlagen der klassisch-romantischen Literatur, Stuttgart: Metzler, 1935.Google Scholar
, The complete poetical works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, (ed.), vol. II, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
, Racine et Shakespeare, (ed.), Paris: Le Divan, 1928 (trans. , Racine and Shakespeare, New York: Crowell-Collier Press, 1962).Google Scholar
, The rise of Romantic Hellenism in English literature 1732–86, Menash, WI: George Banta, 1940.Google Scholar
, ‘Antike und Moderne in der Ästhetik der Goethezeit’, in Poetik und Geschichtsphilosophie i, and (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974Google Scholar
, The influence of Horace on the chief English poets of the nineteenth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1916.Google Scholar
, The course of English Classicism from the Tudor period to the Victorian age, London: Hogarth Press, 1930.Google Scholar
, ‘Romanticism and literary periods: the future of the past’, New German critique 38 (1986)Google Scholar
, ‘Romantic Hellenism’, in The Cambridge companion to British Romanticism, (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1993Google Scholar
, ‘English treatment of the Classical–Romantic problem’, Modern language quarterly 7 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The concept of “Romanticism” in literary history: the term “Romantic” and its derivatives’, Comparative literature 1 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, A history of modern criticism: 1750–1950, vol. II: The Romantic age, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955, 8 vols.Google Scholar
, The rise of English literary history, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1941.Google Scholar
, Prolegomena to Homer (1795) (with introduction and notes) , and (trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
, ‘The opposition to neo-Classicism in England between 1660 and 1700’, PMLA 43 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: the later years, part I: 1821–28, (ed.), (rev.), 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
and , The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: the later years, part II: 1829–34, (ed.), (rev.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
and , The letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: the middle years, part I: 1806–11, (ed.), (rev.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
, The prose works of William Wordsworth, (ed.), rev. edn, vol. II, London: E. Moxon, 1967, 3 vols.Google Scholar
, The prose works of William Wordsworth, and (eds.), 3 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
, Wordsworth: poetical works, (ed.), (rev. edn), London: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by