Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T18:19:36.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The men of the Great Synagogue (circa 400–170 .b.c.e.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Louis Finkelstein
Edited by
W. D. Davies  and
Louis Finkelstein
Louis Finkelstein
Affiliation:
The Jewish Theological Seminary of America
Get access

Summary

The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate the high probability of the following propositions:

  • That the Men of the Great Synagogue (Hebrew, ‘anše keneset hagedolah) constituted a tribunal, which was the supreme judicial authority of the Pharisees in its time.

  • That the members of this tribunal and their followers considered it the body to which Deuteronomy 17:8ff referred in its command that a local judge or other authority in doubt as to the interpretation or application of the law should resort for guidance.

  • That this tribunal was called into being by Ezra and Nehemiah, in an effort to offset the authority of the court consisting of the Temple priests and the lay aristocracy, which gave Nehemiah so much trouble.

  • That the Great Synagogue claimed that its traditions derived from the prophets, and through them for Moses, having been revealed to him on Mount Sinai.

  • That another theory regarding the Great Synagogue ultimately developed, denying that it alone possessed such traditions, but ascribing to it supreme judicial authority, as the legitimate heir to the pre-exilic tribunal of Jerusalem, established by the kings of the Davidic dynasty.

  • That the rabbinic tradition, ascribing to this body the authority of Mishnah Sanhedrin 10.1, and the formulation of the central prayer of the Synagogue, as well as the most important home prayer, namely the Grace after the Meal, is authentic.

    • According to the prevailing rabbinic view, based on Mishnah Aboth 1.1, the Men of the Great Synagogue flourished between the time of the prophets and that of Simeon the Just, the high priest, who was a contemporary of Antiochus III of Syria.

    Type
    Chapter
    Information
    The Cambridge History of Judaism
    , pp. 229 - 244
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 1990

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Albright, W. F. From the Stone Age to Christianity. Baltimore, 1940.Google Scholar
    Babylonian, Talmud, ed. brothers and widow Romm. Vilna, ca 1870–1886. Repr. New York, 1919 and often.Google Scholar
    Bacher, W. ‘Synagogue, the Great’, Jewish Encyclopedia. New York, vol. 11, 1905.Google Scholar
    Bacher, W. Tradition und Tradenten in den Schulen Palästinas und Babyloniens. Leipzig, 1914.Google Scholar
    Baron, S. W. A Social and Religious History of the Jews, vol. 1
    Baron, S. W. A Social and Religious History of the Jews, vol. 3 n. 24. Philadelphia, 1952ff.Google Scholar
    Bickerman, E. ‘“Viri Magnae Congregationis”’, Revue biblique, 55 (1948).Google Scholar
    Bloch, M. A. Ša‘are Torat ha-Taqqanot, 1, Brno, 1879.Google Scholar
    Bondi, J. ‘Simon der Gerechte’, Jahrbuch der jüdisch-literarischen Gesellschaft, 5, (1907).Google Scholar
    Brull, J. M'bo ha-Misna, 2 vols. Vol. I. Frankfurt, 1876–1885.Google Scholar
    Charles, R. H. Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament. 2 vols. Oxford, 1913.Google Scholar
    Elbogen, I. Derjüdische Gottesdienst in seiner geschichtlichen Entwicklung. 2nd edn., Frankfurt, 1924.Google Scholar
    Englander, H. ‘The men of the Great Synagogue’, Hebrew Union College Jubilee Volume. Cincinnati, 1925.Google Scholar
    Finkelstein, L. Akiba, Scholar, Saint and Martyr. New York, 1935.Google Scholar
    Finkelstein, L. Ha-perušim we‘anše keneset hagedola. New York, 1950.Google Scholar
    Finkelstein, L. The Pharisees. Philadelphia, 1938; 3rd edn, 1962.Google Scholar
    Foerster, W. ‘Der Ursprung des Pharisäismus’, Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 34 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Frankel, Z. Darke ha-Mišna. Leipzig, 1859.Google Scholar
    Funk, S. ‘Die Männer der Grossen Versammlung und die Gerichtshöfe im nachexilis- chen Judentum’, Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums, 55 (1911).Google Scholar
    Ginzberg, L. Legends of the Jews, 6 n. 49; n. 56; n. 58; also n. 89. Philadelphia, 1928.Google Scholar
    Ginzberg, L. Perušim we-hiddušim biyrušalmi, 1. New York, 1945.Google Scholar
    Guttmann, J. ‘Anše Keneset Ha-Gedola’, Hašiloah, 21 (1909).Google Scholar
    Halevy, T. Dorot ha-Rišonim, 3. Frankfurt, 1905–1906.Google Scholar
    Hoffmann, D. ‘Über die Männer der “Grossen Versammlung”’, Magazin für die Wissenschaft des Judenthums, 10 (1883).Google Scholar
    Kaufmann, Y. Tolcdotha-'munah ha-yisra'elit, 8. Tel Aviv, 1956.Google Scholar
    Krauss, S. ‘The Great Synod’, Jewish Quarterly Review, 10 (1898).Google Scholar
    Krochmal, N. Moreh N'buke ha-zman, vov, 1851; ed. Ravidovitz, S. . Berlin, 1924; repr. London–Waltham, Mass., 1961.Google Scholar
    Leszynsky, R. Die Sadduzäer. Frankfurt, 1912.Google Scholar
    Loew, I. Gesammelte Schriften, 1. Szegedin, 1889–1900.Google Scholar
    Mantel, H. ‘The nature of the Great Synagogue’, Harvard Theological Review, 60 (1967).Google Scholar
    Megillat Tdanit. Die Fastenrolle, ed. Lichtenstein, H. . Hebrew Union College Annual, 8–9 (1931–1932).Google Scholar
    Mekilta of R. Simeon, ed. Epstein, J. N. and Melammed, E. Z. . Jerusalem, 1955.Google Scholar
    Mekilta, ed. Horovitz, H. S. and Rabin, I. A. . Frankfurt-am-Main, 1931; repr. Jerusalem, 1960.Google Scholar
    Midrasch Tannaim zum Deuteronomium', ed. Hoffmann, D. Z. . 2. Parts. Berlin, 1908–1909.Google Scholar
    Mishna, ed. Albeck, C. . Jerusalem, 1953–1959.Google Scholar
    Moore, G. F. ‘Simeon the Righteous’, Jewish Studies in Memory of Israel Abrahams. New York, 1927.Google Scholar
    Moore, G. F. ‘The rise of normative Judaism, 1. To the reorganization at Jamnia’, Harvard Theological Review, 17 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Moore, G. F. Judaism in the First Two Centuries of the Christian Era. Cambridge, Mass., 1930.Google Scholar
    Saldarini Anthony, J., , S. J. (The Fathers according to Rabbi Nathan, Abot de Rabbi Nathan, version B, Leidein, 1975).Google Scholar
    Schechter, S. and Taylor, C. The Wisdom of Ben Sira. Portions of the Book Ecclesiasticus. (Hebrew Text with an English translation). Cambridge, 1899.Google Scholar
    Sifra, ed. Weiss, I. H. . Schlossberg, J. . Vienna, 1862.Google Scholar
    Sifre on Deuteronomy, ed. Finkelstein, Louis . Berlin, 1939; repr. New York, 1969.Google Scholar
    Sifre on Numbers, and Sifre Zutta, ed. Horovitz, H. S. . Leipzig, 1917; repr. Jerusalem, 1966.Google Scholar
    Sperber, D. ‘Synagogue, the Great’, Roth, C. and Wigoder, J. (eds.), Encyclopedia Judaica (Jerusalem, 1971), vol. 15, cols. 629–31. Jerusalem, 1971.Google Scholar
    Strack, H. L. Einleitungin Talmud und Midrasch. 5th revd. edn. Munich, 1921 Google Scholar
    Strack, H. L. English translation Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash. Philadelphia, 1931.Google Scholar
    Talmud, , Jerusalem, Venice, 1522–1523(?).
    Talmud, : Aboth a’R. Nathan, ed. Schechter, S. . Vienna, 1887.Google Scholar
    Talmudi, (pseudonym), ‘Ha-Talmud’, Hašiloah, 7 (1901).Google Scholar
    The Mishnah on which the Palestinian Talmud rests, ed. Lowe, W. H. . Cambridge, 1883.Google Scholar
    Tosefta Berakoth, ed. Lieberman, S., Jerusalem 1937.Google Scholar
    Tosefta, ed. Zuckermandel, M. S. . Pasewalk, 1877–1882; reproduced with supplement by S. Lieberman. Jerusalem, 1937.Google Scholar
    Tosefta, ed. Lieberman, S. . New York. Zera‘im, 1955; Mo'ed, 1962; Našim, 2 parts, 1967–1973.Google Scholar
    Tschernowitz, C. Toledot ha-halakah. New York, 1950.Google Scholar
    Urback, E. E. The Sages. Trans, from Hebrew. Jerusalem, 1975.Google Scholar
    Weiss, I. H. Dor Dor wedoršaw, 1. Berlin, 1871.Google Scholar
    Yavetz, Z. Tol'dot Yisra'el, 3
    Yavetz, Z. Tol'dot Yisra'el, 4. Tel Aviv, 1934.Google Scholar
    Zeitlin, S. ‘Šimeon ha-Saddiq ū-keneset ha-gedolah’, Ner Maearabi, 2 (1924–1925).Google Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×