Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Texts and Contexts
- 1 The Greek Background
- 2 The Muslim Context
- 3 Textual Traditions
- 4 Philosophical Interpretations of the Bible
- 5 Mysticism and Philosophy
- II Logic and Language
- III Natural Philosophy
- IV Epistemology and Psychology
- V Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology
- VI Practical Philosophy
- Biobibliographical Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
4 - Philosophical Interpretations of the Bible
from 1 - Texts and Contexts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Texts and Contexts
- 1 The Greek Background
- 2 The Muslim Context
- 3 Textual Traditions
- 4 Philosophical Interpretations of the Bible
- 5 Mysticism and Philosophy
- II Logic and Language
- III Natural Philosophy
- IV Epistemology and Psychology
- V Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology
- VI Practical Philosophy
- Biobibliographical Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
In both introductions to his two commentaries on Genesis, written in Hebrew for his non-Arabic speaking Jewish readers living in western Europe, the twelfth-century Spanish Jewish exegete Abraham ibn Ezra outlines five different approaches to interpreting the Torah. Using the analogy of a circle, he indicates, in rhymed prose, how far each approach is from the center. The one that is furthest, in his view, is that of the Christian scholars, who treat the Torah in its entirety as allegory – whether the stories in Genesis or the laws given by Moses. Although Ibn Ezra agrees that “it is proper that these matters have secrets,” he stresses that not only is the esoteric level true but also the literal one (peshat). In denying the truth of the plain meaning of the Torah, the approach of the Christians is placed by Ibn Ezra outside the circle entirely. The authority of the Torah is clearly undermined once its legal pronouncements are treated as allegorical in nature. Moreover, the allegorical method enables Christian exegetes to read into the Torah their fundamental religious beliefs.
The second approach he presents is that of the Karaites, who although accepting the literal truth of the Torah, deny the authenticity of the oral tradition presented by the Sages of the Talmud. According to Ibn Ezra, at times their interpretations “are at the center [of the circle], at times close by and at times outside its boundaries.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Jewish PhilosophyFrom Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century, pp. 88 - 120Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(2004). Livyat Ḥen: Account of Creation by R. Levi ben Avraham. (ed.). Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(2007). Livyat Ḥen: The Quality of Prophecy and the Secrets of the Torah by R. Levi ben Avraham. (ed.). Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(2003b). “The Tension between Jewish Literal Interpretation and Exegetical Freedom: Comparative Observations on Saadia’s Method,” in , , and (eds.), With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptual Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1979). The Jewish-Christian Debate in the High Middle Ages. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
(2002). Maimonides and the Hermeneutics of Concealment: Deciphering Scripture and Midrash in the Guide of the Perplexed. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
(1970). “Biblical Exegesis of Maimonides in Jewish Scholarship,” in (ed.), Samuel K. Mirsky Memorial Volume. Jerusalem: Sura.Google Scholar
(2003). Philosophy in a Time of Crisis: Don Isaac Abravanel, Defender of the Faith. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
(2004). Moses Ibn Tibbons Kommentar zum Hohelied und sein Poetologisch-Philosophisches Programm. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). The Wars of the Lord, volume 1: Book One. (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
(1987). The Wars of the Lord, volume 2: Books Two, Three, Four. (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
(1998a). Commentary on the Song of Songs, Levi ben Gershom (Gersonides), (trans.). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1999). The Wars of the Lord, volume 3: Books Five and Six. (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
(1966). “Why was Levi ben Hayyim Hounded?” Proceedings of the American Academy of Jewish Research. 34:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (2000a). The Medieval Hebrew Encyclopedias of Science and Philosophy. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). “Bibliographia Gersonideana. An Annotated List of Writings by and About R. Levi ben Gershom,” in Freudenthal 1992.Google Scholar
(1926). (ed.), The Commentary of David Kimhi on Isaiah. New York: Columbia University Press. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
, , and (2003). “Les commentaries bibliques,” in Sirat, Klein-Braslavy, and Weijers 2003.Google Scholar
(1986). Maimonides’ Interpretation of the Adam Stories in Genesis. Jerusalem: R. Mas Publ. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1987). Maimonides’ Interpretation of the Story of Creation. Jerusalem: R. Mas Publ. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1988). “Maimonides’ Interpretations of Jacob’s Dream of the Ladder,” Sefer Bar-Ilan. 22–23:. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1996). King Solomon and Philosophical Esotericism in the Thought of Maimonides. Jerusalem: Magnes Press. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1998). “Gersonides on the Mode of Communicating Knowledge of the Future to the Dreamer and Clairvoyent,” in , , and (eds.), Perspectives on Jewish Thought and Mysticism. Amsterdam: Harwood.Google Scholar
(1999). Maimonides’ Political Thought, Studies in Ethics, Law, and the Human Ideal. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
(2001a). Prophecy: The History of an Idea in Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b). “The Torah Commentary of R. Nissim b. Moshe of Marseilles: A Medieval Approach to Torah u-Madda,” The Torah U-Madda Journal. 10:.Google Scholar
and (2007). “Kaspi, Joseph,” Encyclopedia Judaica. 22 vols. 2nd edition. Detroit: Thomas Gale, vol. 11.Google Scholar
(2003). Deconstructing the Bible: Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Introduction to the Torah. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
(1993). “Some Astrological Themes in the Thought of Abraham Ibn Ezra,” in and (eds.), Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth-Century Jewish Polymath. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1995). “Saadya Gaon on Christianity and Islam,” in (ed.), The Jews of Medieval Islam. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
(2001). Isaac Abarbanel’s Stance toward Tradition: Defense, Dissent, and Dialogue. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
(2003). “Introducing Scripture: The Accessus ad autores in Hebrew Exegetical Literature from the Thirteenth through the Fifteenth Centuries,” in , , and (eds.), With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptual Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1989). “Tradition or Context: Two Exegetes Struggle with Peshat,” in , , (eds.), From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism: Intellect in Quest of Understanding. 3 vols. Atlanta: Scholars Press, vol. 3.Google Scholar
(2003). “Rashbam as a ‘Literary’ Exegete,” in , and (eds.), With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptual Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1938). Treatise on the Art of Logic. (trans. and ed.), “Maimonides’ Treatise on Logic (Makalah Fi-Sina ⼸at Al-Mantiq).” Proceedings of the American Academy of Jewish Research. 8: [English sect.]; 8: [Hebrew sect.].Google Scholar
(1963). The Guide of the Perplexed. 2 vols., (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Ma⼸aseh Nissim by R. Nissim of Marseilles. (ed.). Jerusalem: Mekize Nirdamim. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1981a). “Samuel Ibn Tibbon and the Esoteric Character of the Guide of the Perplexed,” Association for Jewish Studies Review. 6:.Google Scholar
(1984). “The Anthropological Theory of Miracles in Medieval Jewish Philosophy,” in (ed.), Studies in Medieval Jewish History and Literature. vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1990b). “The Secrets of the Guide of the Perplexed: Between the Thirteenth and the Twentieth Centuries,” in (ed.), Studies in Maimonides. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1943). “Saadya’s Purification of the Idea of God,” in (ed.), Saadya Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). “Samuel Ibn Tibbon,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (http://plato.standford.edu/entries/tibbon)Google Scholar
(1985a). “Divine Omniscience, Contingency and Prophecy in Gersonides,” in Rudavsky 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1915). Saadia’s Polemic against Hiwi al-Balkhi. (ed. and trans.). New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America.Google Scholar
(1948). The Book of Beliefs and Opinions. (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1984). Saadya’s Commentary on Genesis. (ed.). New York: Jewish Theological Seminary. [Hebrew and Arabic]Google Scholar
(ed.) (2000). Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. vol. 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
(1996). “Your Voice Like a Ram’s Horn:” Themes and Texts in Traditional Jewish Preaching. Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press.Google Scholar
(2003). “The Method of Doubts,” in , , and (eds.), With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptual Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1935). Faith and Reason: The Conflict over the Rationalism of Maimonides. Williamsport, PA: Bayard Press.Google Scholar
(1993b). “Abraham Ibn Ezra as an Exegete,” in and (eds.), Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth-Century Jewish Polymath. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Origins of the Kabbalah. (ed.) and (trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1993). “Rabbi Obadiah Sforno’s Philosophical Interpretation of the Torah,” Mahanayyim. 4:. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1996). The Philosophy of a Fourteenth Century Jewish Neoplatonic Circle. Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1999). Astrology and Biblical Exegesis in Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Thought. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1992). Sforno’s Commentary on the Torah. (ed.). Jerusalem: Mossad HaRav Kook. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
(1993). “Interpreting the Interpreter: Supercommentaries on Ibn Ezra’s Commentaries,” in and (eds.), Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth-Century Jewish Polymath. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). “Biblical Commentaries and Christian Influence: The Case of Gersonides,” in (ed.), Hebrew Scholarship and the Medieval World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). “Philosophic Allegory in Medieval Jewish Culture: The Crisis in Languedoc (1304-6),” in (ed.), Interpretation and Allegory. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
(1975). David Kimhi: The Man and the Commentaries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Apples of Gold in Settings of Silver: Studies in Medieval Jewish Exegesis and Polemics. (ed.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
(2004). “The Bible in the Jewish Philosophical Tradition,” in and (eds.), The Jewish Study Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1968). “Le problème de l⼹inerrance prophetique dans la théologie juive du moyen-āge,” Revue de l⼹histoire des religions. 174:.Google Scholar
(1973). La Pensée philosophique et théologique de Gersonide. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
(1979). Repercussions of the Kalām in Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar