Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:02:49.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - BUDDHISM AMONG IRANIAN PEOPLES

from PART 6 - RELIGIOUS HISTORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
R. E. Emmerick
Edited by
E. Yarshater
Get access

Summary

The historical Buddha, Śākyamuni, lived in north-east India in the 6th to 5th century b.c. He died at the age of eighty in about 483 b.c., leaving no written records of his teaching. At that time, northern India was dominated by the kingdoms Avanti, Kosala, Vatsa and Magadha. In the north-west, Gandhāra was a province of the Achaemenian empire. In the 4th century the Achaemenian empire fell to the all-conquering Alexander, who came in person to north-west India, the furthest east he ventured. The Indian parts of the Achaemenian empire had in practice under the last Achaemenians recovered their independence. Alexander's control of these regions, which he conquered during 327–324 b.c, was short-lived. His death in 323 b.c. was followed by widespread disaffection in the east. The Indian emperor Chandragupta annexed the Indian kingdoms of the Punjab in 317 b.c. Seleucus Nicator attempted to regain all the possessions lost, but he was not exactly successful, and he was obliged to negotiate with Chandragupta about 304 b.c.

During this period of nearly two hundred years after the death of Śākyamuni, his followers were active in establishing the canonical scriptures and the religious rules for daily life among Buddhist communities. Despite the considerable number and variety of literary sources concerning the events which occurred during this process, few details can be regarded as having any marked degree of authenticity. Prominent in the sources are the events concerning two councils held in order to obtain some measure of agreement among the Buddha's followers.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Iran
Seleucid Parthian
 , pp. 949 - 964
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, H. W. “Saka studies: the ancient kingdom of Khotan”, Iran VIII (1970).Google Scholar
Bareau, A. Les sectes bouddhiques dupetit véhicule, Saigon, 1955 (Publications de l'école française d'extrême-orient 38).Google Scholar
Barthoux, J. Les fouilles de Haḍḍa. Paris, 1933 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 4).Google Scholar
Basham, A. L. (ed.) Papers on the date of Kani⊡ka. Leiden, 1968.Google Scholar
Belenitsky, A. Central Asia, translated from the Russian by Hogarth, J.. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É and Dupont-Sommer, A. “Une inscription indo-araméenne d'Asoka provenant de Kandahar (Afghanistan)”, Journal Asiatique (Paris) 1966.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. “fidits d'Asoka en traduction grecque”, Journal Asiatique (Paris) 1964.Google Scholar
Bivar, A. D. H. “Hāritī and the chronology of the Ku⊡āṇas”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar
Brough, J. “A Kharo⊡ṭhī inscription from China”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXIV (1961).Google Scholar
Brough, J. The Gāndhārī Dharmapada. Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar
Brough, J. “Comments on third-century Shan-shan and the history of Buddhism”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXVIII (1965).Google Scholar
Brough, J. “Supplementary notes on third-century Shan-shan”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar
Bussagli, M. “Afghanistan” in Encyclopedia of World Art (New York, 1959), vol. I.Google Scholar
Daffinà, P. L'immigrazione dei Sakā nella Drangiana. Rome, 1967.Google Scholar
Deydier, H. Contribution à I'étude de I'art du Gandhāra. Paris, 1950.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. ed. and tr.The book of Zambasta,(Oxford, 1968.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. Tibetan texts concerning Khotan. Oxford, 1967 (London Oriental Series 19).Google Scholar
Foucher, A. C. A. “Notes sur la géographie ancienne du Gandhâra (commentaire à un chapitre de Hiuen-tsang)”, Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême Orient (Hanoi-Paris) I (1901).Google Scholar
Foucher, A. C. A. L'art gréco-bouddhique du Gandhâra I (Paris, 1905); II (Paris, 1951).Google Scholar
Foucher, A. C. A. La vieille route de I'lnde de Bactres à Taxila I (Paris, 1942); II (Paris, 1947) (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) I).Google Scholar
Frye, R.N. “The significance of Greek and Kushan archaeology in the history of Central Asia”, Journal of Asian History I (Wiesbaden, 1967).Google Scholar
Fuchs, W. “Huei-ch'ao's Pilgerreise durch Nordwest-Indien und Zentral-Asien um 726”, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. Hist. Klasse) (Berlin) 1938.Google Scholar
Fujita, Kotatsu A study of early pure land Buddhism. Tokyo, 1970.Google Scholar
Gabain, A. von, “Der Buddhismus in Zentralasien”, in Religionsgeschichte des Orients in der Zeit der Weltreligionen (Leiden, 1961), (Handbuch der Orientalistik, ed. Spuler, B. (Leiden-Cologne) I. VIII. 2).Google Scholar
Gafurov, B. Kushan civilisation and world culture. Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar
Ghirshman, R. Iran: From the earliest times to the Islamic conquest. Harmonds-worth, 1954 (Pelican Archaeology Series).Google Scholar
Gray, B. Buddhist cave paintings at Tun-huang. London, 1959.Google Scholar
Hackin, J. Recherches archéologiques à Begram. Paris, 1939 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 9).Google Scholar
Hackin, J. and Carl, J. Nouvelles recherches archéologiques à Bāmiyān. Paris, 1933 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 3).Google Scholar
Hambis, L. “Asia, Central” in Encyclopedia of World Art (New York, 1959), vol. I.Google Scholar
Hambly, G. R. G. (ed.) Zentralasien. Frankfurt am Main, 1966 (Fischer Weltgeschichte 16).Google Scholar
Hofinger, M. Étude sur le concile de Vaiśālī. Louvain, 1946 (Bibliothèque du Museon 20).Google Scholar
Humbach, H. “Die aramäische Inschrift von Taxila”, Akademie der Wissen-schaften und der Literatur (Mainz-Wiesbaden 1969.I).Google Scholar
Humbach, H. “Additional notes on the Aramaic inscription of Taxila”, Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft XXVI (Munich, 1969).Google Scholar
Konow, S. Kharoshṭhī Inscriptions. Calcutta, 1929 (Corpus Inscriptionum Indkarum (Oxford) 11.1).Google Scholar
Lamotte, É. “Sur la formation du Mahāyāna” in Asiatica, Festschrift Friedrich Weller (Leipzig, 1954).Google Scholar
Lamotte, É. Histoire du bouddhisme indien des origines à l'ère Śaka. Louvain, 1958 (Biblio-thèque du Muséon 43).Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von, Auf Hellas Spuren in Ostturkistan, Berichte und Abenteuer der ii. und iii. deutschen Turfan-expedition. Leipzig, 1926.Google Scholar
Le Coq, A. von, Buried treasures of Chinese Turkestan, tr. Barwell, A.. London, 1928.Google Scholar
Litvinsky, B. A. Outline history of Buddhism in Central Asia. Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar
Loewe, M.A.N. “Chinese relations with Central Asia, 260–90”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXII (1969).Google Scholar
Malalasekera, G. P. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Buddhism. Ceylon, 1961–.Google Scholar
Marie-Thérese de Mallmann, , Introduction à l'étude d'Avalokiteçvara. Paris, 1967.Google Scholar
Melikian-Chirvani, A. S. “L'évocation littéraire du Bouddhisme dans l'lran musulman”, Le monde iranien et I'Islam II (Geneva, 1974).Google Scholar
Melikian-Chirvani, A. S. “Recherches sur l'architecture de l'lran bouddhique I”, Le monde iranien et l'Islam III (Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
MeuniÉ, J. Shotorak. Paris, 1942 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 10).Google Scholar
Narain, A. K. The Indo-Greeks. Oxford, 1957.Google Scholar
Nobel, J. “Kumārajīva”, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. Hist. Klasse) (Berlin) 1927.Google Scholar
Norman, K. R. “Some aspects of the phonology of the Prakrit underlying the Aśokan inscriptions”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar
Petech, L. Northern India according to the Shui-ching-chu. Rome, 1950 (Serie orientale Roma 2).Google Scholar
Przyluski, J. La légende de l'empereur Açoka (Açoka-avadāna) dans les textes indiens et chinois. Paris, 1923.Google Scholar
Przyluski, J. Le concile de Rājagṛha. Paris, 1926–8.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. “The Wu-sun and Sakas and the Yüch-chih migration”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar
Rapson, E. J. (ed.) The Cambridge history of India, vol. I, Ancient India. Cambridge, 1922.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, J. M. The dynastic arts of the Kushans. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967.Google Scholar
Seckel, D. The Art of Buddhism. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Smith, V. A. The early history of India, 4th ed. revised by Edwardes, S. M.. Oxford, 1957; repr. 1967.Google Scholar
Stavisky, B. Y. and Bongard-Levin, G. M. Central Asia in the Kushan period. Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar
Takakusu, J. (tr.) A record of the Buddhist religion as practised in India and the Malay archipelago (AD 671–695), by I-Tsing. London, 1896.Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, E. (ed.) Indologen-tagung. Göttingen, 1960.Google Scholar
Zeimal, E. V. Kushan chronology: Review of data bearing on the problem. Moscow, 1968 (in Russian but with detailed English summary).Google Scholar
Zürcher, E. Buddhism, its origin and spread in words, maps and pictures. London, 1962.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×