Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PART I THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE
- 1 The Byzantine Commonwealth 1000–1550
- 2 Byzantium and the west 1204–1453
- 3 The culture of lay piety in medieval Byzantium 1054–1453
- 4 The rise of hesychasm
- 5 Art and liturgy in the later Byzantine Empire
- 6 Mount Athos and the Ottomans c. 1350–1550
- 7 The Great Church in captivity 1453–1586
- 8 Orthodoxy and the west: Reformation to Enlightenment
- 9 Bars’kyj and the Orthodox community
- 10 The legacy of the French Revolution: Orthodoxy and nationalism
- PART II THE RUSSIAN CHURCH
- PART III EASTERN CHRISTIANITIES
- PART IV THE MODERN WORLD
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
7 - The Great Church in captivity 1453–1586
from PART I - THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- PART I THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE
- 1 The Byzantine Commonwealth 1000–1550
- 2 Byzantium and the west 1204–1453
- 3 The culture of lay piety in medieval Byzantium 1054–1453
- 4 The rise of hesychasm
- 5 Art and liturgy in the later Byzantine Empire
- 6 Mount Athos and the Ottomans c. 1350–1550
- 7 The Great Church in captivity 1453–1586
- 8 Orthodoxy and the west: Reformation to Enlightenment
- 9 Bars’kyj and the Orthodox community
- 10 The legacy of the French Revolution: Orthodoxy and nationalism
- PART II THE RUSSIAN CHURCH
- PART III EASTERN CHRISTIANITIES
- PART IV THE MODERN WORLD
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
According to Byzantine juridical thought the state had two poles: the emperor (basileus) and the patriarch, the former exercising political power (potestas) and the latter ecclesiastical authority (auctoritas). The capture of Constantinople on 29 May 1453 by the Ottomans meant the end of the Byzantine state. But if the Byzantine emperor was no more, the ecumenical patriarchate survived, though only because the religion of the conqueror permitted its existence.
Byzantium had existed under the shadow of the Ottomans for more than half a century before its final fall. This produced a series of problems for the ecumenical patriarch, now that the majority of the metropolitan and episcopal sees in Thrace and the southern Balkans, which constituted the core of the patriarchate of Constantinople, came under Turkish domination, leaving Constantinople as an island in the middle of Ottoman territories. Nevertheless, representatives of the Greek Orthodox Church were present and active in these territories. This situation had its roots in the aftermath of the battle of Mantzikert (1071), when much of Asia Minor passed under the control of the Seljuq Turks. By the end of the fourteenth century the Seljuqs were a distant memory and the dominant Anatolian power was now the Ottomans, who had already conquered Thrace and much of the Balkans. Both Seljuqs and Ottomans applied the principles of the Koran, which recognizes the Peoples of the Book, that is, the Jews and the Christians. The Orthodox Church survived under the Seljuq sultans with metropolitans and bishops established in several Anatolian towns.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Christianity , pp. 169 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
- 6
- Cited by