Bilingual Acquisition and Processing

doi:10.1017/9781108955638.029

Part V - Bilingual Acquisition and Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2022

Edited by

John W. Schwieter and

Zhisheng (Edward) Wen

Show author details

John W. Schwieter: Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen: Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 527 - 746

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108955638.029 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdallah, F. (2010). The role of phonological memory in L2 acquisition in adults at different L2 proficiency levels. (Thèse de doctorat inédite, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada).Google Scholar

Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development, 77(6), 1698–1716.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference? System, 37, 627–639.CrossRef Google Scholar

Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie, J. T. (Eds.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 970–983.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417–423.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Baddeley, A. D. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20, 136–140.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Wen, Z. E., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., Allen, R. J., & Hitch, G. (2010). Investigating the episodic buffer. Psychologica Belgica, 50, 223–243.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–62). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 586–595.Google Scholar

Batista, R., & Horst, M. (2016). A new receptive vocabulary size test for French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72, 211–233.Google Scholar

Blom, E., Küntay, A. C., Messer, M., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. (2014). The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 105–119.Google Scholar

Bosma, E., Heeringa, W., Hoekstra, E., Versloot, A., & Blom, E. (2017). Verbal working memory is related to the acquisition of cross-linguistic phonological regularities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1487.Google Scholar

Brown, G., & Yull, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carr, T. H., Brown, T. L., Vavrus, L. G., & Evans, M. A. (1990). Cognitive skill maps and cognitive skill profiles: Componential analysis of individual differences in children’s reading efficiency. In Carr, T. H. & Levy, B. A. (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (p. 1–55). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204‑256. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.1.204Google Scholar

Coxhead, A., Nation, P., & Sim, D. (2014). Creating and trialling six versions of the Vocabulary Size Test. TESOLANZ Journal, 22, 13–27.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

DeBorba, E. (2020). The investigation of temporal order in language learning using behavioural tasks and MMN (Master’s thesis, McMaster University). http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25801 Google Scholar

Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.) (PPVT-4 scale). American Guidance Services.Google Scholar

Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody [French Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test]. ATM.Google Scholar

Efstathiadi, L. (2016). Vocabulary acquisition by young Greek learners of L2 English: The predictive role of complex working memory in early foreign language learning. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 21, 527–547.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, IS, 972–992.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331Google Scholar

Fortkamp, M. B. M., & Verçosa, D. M. (2019). Working memory capacity and the retention of L2 vocabulary. Leitura, 1, 55–74.Google Scholar

Foster, J. L., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition, 43, 226–236.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

French, L. M. (2006). Phonological working memory and L2 acquisition: A developmental study of Quebec Francophone children learning English. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 23, 83–94.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513–543.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 200–213.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1996). The Children’s Test of Nonword Repetition. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E, Hitch, G. J., Service, E., & Martin, A. J. (1997). Phonological short‐term memory and new word learning in children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 966–979.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Assessment of working memory in six- and seven-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 377–390.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., Service, E., Hitch, G. J., Adams, A., & Martin, A. J. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 65–77.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Baddeley, A., & Emslie, H. (1994). The Children’s Test of Nonword Repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103–127.Google Scholar

Gilbert, R. A., Hitch, G. J., & Hartley, T. (2017). Temporal precision and the capacity of auditory-verbal short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(12), 2403–2418.Google Scholar

Goswami, U. (2018). A neural basis for phonological awareness? An oscillatory temporal-sampling perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 56–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greidanus, T., Beks, B., & Wakely, R. (2005). Testing the development of French word knowledge by advanced Dutch-and English-speaking learners and native speakers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(4), 509–532.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., Ehsan, S., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Semantic memory is key to binding phonology: Converging evidence from immediate serial recall in semantic dementia and healthy participants. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 747–760.Google Scholar

Hogan, T. P., Adlof, S. M., & Alonzo, C. N. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 199–207.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (1988). Missing the meaning? A cognitive neuropsychological study of the processing of words by an aphasic patient. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jones, G., & Macken, B. (2015). Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition, 144, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009Google Scholar

Joyce, P. (2019). The relationship between L2 listening proficiency and L2 aural language processing. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 57, 9–32.Google Scholar

Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. W. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching: Reviews and Studies, 42, 137–166.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42, 186–198.Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short term-memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kovács, G., & Racsmány, M. (2008). Handling L2 input in phonological STM: The effect of non-L1 phonetic segments and non-L1 phonotactic sequences on nonword repetition. Language Learning, 58, 597–624.Google Scholar

Laufer, B., & Aviad-Levitzky, T. A. M. I. (2017). What type of vocabulary knowledge predicts reading comprehension: Word meaning recall or word meaning recognition? The Modern Language Journal, 101, 729–741.CrossRef Google Scholar

Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge, size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399–436.CrossRef Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T. & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 861–883. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0565-Google Scholar

Łockiewicz, M., & Jaskulska, M. (2015). Mental lexicon, working memory and L2 (English) vocabulary in Polish students with and without dyslexia. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5, 71–89.Google Scholar

Lopez Ricote, M. d. l. A. (2020). Serial order in language learning in bilinguals. (Master’s thesis, McMaster University). http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25799 Google Scholar

Lu, Y. (2015). Working memory, cognitive resources and L2 writing performance. In Wen, Z. E., Mota, M., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp.175–188). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Macken, B., Taylor, J., & Jones, D. (2015). Limitless capacity: A dynamic object-oriented approach to short-term memory. Frontiers of Psychology, 6, 293.Google Scholar

Majerus, S., & Boukebza, C. (2013). Short-term memory for serial order supports vocabulary development: New evidence from a novel word learning paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(4), 811–828.Google Scholar

Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (2005). Contrasting contributions of phonological short-term memory and long-term knowledge to vocabulary learning in a foreign language. Memory, 13(3-4), 422-429.Google Scholar

Masrai, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review. 11, 423-447.Google Scholar

Matielo, R., Oliveira, R. P. D., & Baretta, L. (2018). Subtitling, working memory, and L2 learning: A correlational study. Revista brasileira de linguística aplicada, 18, 665–696.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (1992). Network structures and vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Béjoint, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 62–70). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1990). The Eurocentres Vocabulary Size Tests. 10KA. Eurocentres.Google Scholar

Meara, P., & Milton, J. (2003). X_Lex, The Swansea Levels Test, Express.Google Scholar

Melby-Lervåg, M., Lervåg, A., Lyster, S. A., Klem, M., Hagtvet, B., & Hulme, C. (2012). Nonword-repetition ability does not appear to be a causal influence on children’s vocabulary development. Psychological Science, 23, 1092–1098.Google Scholar

Milton, J. 2009. Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Nader, M., Simard, D., Fortier, V., & Molokopeeva, T. (2017). Étude de la contribution de la mémoire de travail et de la mémoire phonologique dans la réalisation d’une tâche métasyntaxique chez des enfants de langue d’origine. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée/Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 55–75.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. (2004). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 107–134.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Newbury House.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31, 9–13.Google Scholar

Nesdale, A. R., Herriman, M. L., & Tunmer, W. E. (1984). Phonological awareness in children. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C., & Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children (pp. 56–72). Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2004). The development of comprehension skills. In Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (p. 155–180). Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Garnham, A. (2011). The differential relations between verbal, numerical and spatial working memory abilities and children’s reading comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 83–106.Google Scholar

Ottem, E. J., Lian, A., & Karlsen, P. J. (2007). Reasons for the growth of traditional memory span across age. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 233–270. doi:10.1080/09541440600684653Google Scholar

Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluating an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21, 28–52.Google Scholar

Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355–371.Google Scholar

Repovš, G., & Baddeley, A. (2006). The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience, 139(1): 5–22.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, E. N., Riccio, C. A., Gsanger, K. M., & Jarratt, K. P. (2006). Digit span components as predictors of attention problems and executive functioning in children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of The National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 21, 131–139.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913–951.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N., Ng, J., & Garras, J. (2011). The word associates format validation evidence. Language Testing, 28, 105–126.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing 18, 55–88.Google Scholar

Service, E. (1989). Phonological coding in working memory and foreign-language learning (Vol. B 9). University of Helsinki, General Psychology.Google Scholar

Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21–50.Google Scholar

Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign-language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.Google Scholar

Service, E., Yli-Kaitala, H., Maury, S., & Kim, J.-Y. (2014). Adults’ and 8-Year-olds’ learning in a foreign word repetition task: Similar and different. Language Learning, 64(2), 215–246. doi:10.1111/lang.12051Google Scholar

Simard, D., & Molokopeeva, T. (2019, September). The mediating role of working memory in the relationship between reading comprehension and depth of vocabulary in L2 French. Communication présentée lors du Second Language Research Forum, Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar

Simard, D., Molokopeeva, T., & Zhang, Q. Y. (2020). Production d’autoreformulations autoamorcées par des apprenants adultes du français et capacité de mémoire de travail. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée/Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Snowling, M., Chiat, S., & Hulme, C. (1991). Words, nonwords, and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie, and Baddeley. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 369–373.Google Scholar

St Clair-Thompson, H. L. (2010). Backwards digit recall: A measure of short-term memory or working memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 286–296Google Scholar

Tseng, W.-T., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modelling approach. Language Learning, 58, 357–400.Google Scholar

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar

Vafaee, P., & Suzuki, Y. (2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 383–410.Google Scholar

Varol, B., & Erçetin, G. (2016). Effects of working memory and gloss type on L2 text comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning in computer-based reading. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 759–768.Google Scholar

Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. E. (2016). Phonological and executive working memory in L2 task-based speech planning and performance. The Language Learning Journal, 44, 418-435.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. E., Borges Mota, M., & McNeill, A. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Yamashita, J. (2013). Word recognition subcomponents and passage level reading in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25, 51–70.Google Scholar

Yeari, M. (2017). The role of working memory in inference generation during reading comprehension: Retention, (re)activation, or suppression of verbal information? Learning and Individual Differences, 56, 1–12.Google Scholar

Zaretsky, E. (2020). Verbal working memory and early literacy acquisition: Do ELLs allocate resources similar to their typical monolingual peers or monolingual children with SLI? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 1051–1070.Google Scholar

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.Google Scholar

Arciuli, J. (2017). The multi-component nature of statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372 (20160058).Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20, R136–R140.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2009). Compression in visual working memory: Using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 138, 487–502.Google Scholar

Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 867–873.Google Scholar

Coady, J. A., & Evans, J. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 1–40.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 51–57.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychological Bulletin Review, 24, 1158–1170.Google Scholar

Dale, R., Duran, N. D., & Morehead, J. R. (2012). Prediction during statistical learning, and implications for the implicit/explicit divide. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 196–209.Google Scholar

De Bree, E. H., Verhagen, J., Kerkhoff, A. O., Doedens, W. J., & Unsworth, S. (2017). Language learning from inconsistent input: Bilingual and monolingual toddlers compared. Infant and Child Development, 26, e1996.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C., & Collins, L. (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function: Introduction to special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 329–335.CrossRef Google Scholar

Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 974–986.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.Google Scholar

Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66–108.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.Google Scholar

French, L. M. (2006). Phonological working memory and second language acquisition: A developmental study of Francophone children learning English in Quebec. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463–487.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 23, 83–94.Google Scholar

Gómez, R., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183–206.Google Scholar

Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267–333.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P. (2014). A role for chunk formation in statistical learning of second language syntax. Language Learning, 64, 247–278.Google Scholar

Hamrick, P., Lum, J. G., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(7), 1487–1492.Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H.. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.Google Scholar

Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.Google Scholar

Isbilen, E. S., McCauley, S. M., Kidd, E., & Christiansen, M. H. (2020). Statistically induced chunking recall: A memory-based approach to statistical learning. Cognitive Science, 44, e12848.Google Scholar

Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.Google Scholar

Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case-marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language. Acquisition, 20, 543–587.Google Scholar

Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171–184.Google Scholar

Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301–347.Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271.Google Scholar

Lee, H. J., Kin, Y. T., & Yim, D. (2013). Non-word repetition in Korean-English children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(4), 375–382.Google Scholar

Leseman, P. P. M., Henrichs, L. F., Blom, E. & Verhagen, J. (2019). Young mono- and bilingual children’s exposure to academic language as related to language development and school achievement. In Grøver, V., Ucelli, P., Rowe, M. & Lieven, E. (Eds.), Learning through language (pp. 205–217). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Competition Model. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3–5). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). Routledge.Google Scholar

Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.Google Scholar

Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383–388.Google Scholar

Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (2005). Phonological short-term memory skills and new word learning in young Greek children. Memory, 13, 422–429.Google Scholar

McCauley, S. M., Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Chunking ability shapes sentence processing at multiple levels of abstraction. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2681–2686).Google Scholar

Messer, M. H., Leseman, P. P. M., Boom, J., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 306–323Google Scholar

Messer, M. H., Verhagen, J., Boom, J., Mayo, A. Y., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2015). Growth of verbal short-term memory of nonwords varying in phonotactic probability: A longitudinal study with monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 24–36.Google Scholar

Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302–331.Google Scholar

Morales, M., Mundy, P., Delgado, C. E. F., Yale, M., Messinger, D., Neal, R., & Schwartz, H. K. (2000). Responding to joint attention across the 6- to 24-month age period and early language acquisition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 283–298.Google Scholar

Mundy, P., & Gomes, A. (1998). Individual differences in joint attention skill development in the second year. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 469–482.CrossRef Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D. A., Conway, A., Cowan, N., Donkin, C., Farrell, S. A., Hitch, G. J., Hurlstone, M. J., Ma, W. J., Morey, C. C., Nee, D. E., Schweppe, J., Vergauwe, E., & Ward, G. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144), 885–958.Google Scholar

Palmer, S. D., & Mattys, S. L. (2016). Speech segmentation by statistical learning is supported by domain-general processes within working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2390–2401.Google Scholar

Paradis, J. (2007). Second language acquisition in childhood. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology: Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 387–405). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82(6), 1834–1849.Google Scholar

Romberg, A. S. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1, 906–914.Google Scholar

Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928Google Scholar

Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P. M., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of mono- and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 117–140.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar

Schumann, J. H. (1978). The acculturation model for second-language acquisition. In Gingras, R.C. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Scott, R. M., & Fisher, C. (2012). 2.5-year-olds use cross-situational consistency to learn verbs under referential uncertainty. Cognition, 122, 163–180.Google Scholar

Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21–50.Google Scholar

Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.Google Scholar

Sherman, B. E., Graves, K. N., & Turke-Brown, N. B. (2020). The prevalence and importance of statistical learning in human cognition and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 32, 15–20.Google Scholar

Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105–120.Google Scholar

Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., Christiansen, M. H., & Frost, R. (2017). Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372(20160059).Google Scholar

Smith, L. B., Suanda, S. H., & Yu, C. (2014). The unrealized promise of infant statistical word–referent learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18( 5), 251–258.Google Scholar

Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293–320.Google Scholar

Speidel, G. E. (1993). Phonological short-term memory and individual differences in learning to speak: A bilingual case study. First Language, 13, 69–91.Google Scholar

Speidel, G. E., & Herreshoff, M. J. (1989). Imitation and the construction of long utterances. In Speidel, G. E. & Nelson, K. E. (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 181–197). Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Custode, S., Kuchirko, Y., Escobar, K., Lo, T. (2019). Routine language: Speech directed to infants during home activities. Child Development, 90(6), 2135–2152.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thiessen, E. D. (2017). What’s statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 1711.Google Scholar

Thiessen, E. D., & Erickson, L. C. (2013). Beyond word segmentation: A two-process account of statistical learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 239–243.Google Scholar

Thiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., & Hufnagle, D. G. (2013). The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 792–814.Google Scholar

Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(2), 303–324.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1988). The role of joint attentional processes in early language development. Language Sciences, 10, 69–88.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, J., & Calude, A. S. (2015). The role of statistical learning in the acquisition of motion event construal in a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18, 602–623.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122.Google Scholar

Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, Adult L2, Child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University).Google Scholar

Unsworth, S. (2014). Comparing the role of input in bilingual acquisition across domains. In Grüter, T. & Paradis, J. (Eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development (pp. 181–201). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Spillers, G. J. (2010). Working memory capacity: Attention control, secondary memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 392–406.Google Scholar

Verhagen, J. (2009). Finiteness in Dutch as second language (Doctoral dissertation Free University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Verhagen, J., Messer, M. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2015). Phonological memory and the acquisition of grammar in child L2 learners. Language Learning, 65, 417–448.Google Scholar

Verhagen, J., Boom, J., Mulder, H., de Bree, E. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2019). Reciprocal relationships between nonword repetition and vocabulary during the preschool years. Developmental Psychology, 55, 1125–1137.Google Scholar

Verhagen, J., & de Bree, E. H. (2020). Effects of bilingualism on statistical learning in preschoolers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(5), 611-639.CrossRef Google Scholar

Verhagen, J. & Leseman, P. P. M. (2016). How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar? A comparison between first and second language learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 65–82.Google Scholar

Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265–279.Google Scholar

Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J., & Serratrice, L. (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields. (pp. 37–56). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.Google Scholar

References

American Psychological Association (2020). APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-ability Google Scholar

Atkins, P. W. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(4), 537–552.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2017). Modularity, working memory and language acquisition. Second Language Research, 33(3), 299–311.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. VIII, pp. 47–90). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, B. A. (2002). Prose recall and amnesia: Implications for the structure of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1737–1743.Google Scholar

Borges Mota, M. (2003). Working memory capacity and fluency, accuracy, complexity, and lexical density in L2 speech production. Fragmentos, ( 24 ), 69–104.Google Scholar

Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern language aptitude test. The Psychological Corporation/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85–98.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using “uh” and “um” in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111.Google Scholar

Cochran, B., McDonald, J. & Parault, S. (1999). Too smart for their own good: The disadvantage of superior processing capacity for adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 30–58.Google Scholar

Coughlan, A. K. & Hollows, S. E. (1985). The Adult Memory and Information Processing Battery (AMIPB): Test manual. Psychology Department, St James’s University Hospital.Google Scholar

Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency and working memory based explanations of non-native speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 615–646.Google Scholar

Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Doughty, C., Campbell, S., Mislevy, M., Bunting, M., Bowles, A., & Koeth, J. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In Prior, M., Watanabe, Y, & Lee, S. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 10–31). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 26(4), 443–472.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 234–250.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J. & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W. & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fehringer, C., & Fry, C. (2007). Hesitation phenomena in the language production of bilingual speakers: The role of working memory. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, 41(1–2), 37–72.Google Scholar

Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 187–220.Google Scholar

Frost, R., Siegelman, N., Narkiss, A., & Afek, L. (2013). What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language? Psychological Science, 24, 1243–1252.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., & Thorn, A. (1998). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. In Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 141–158). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). Nonword repetition, phonological memory, and vocabulary: A reply to Snowling, Chiat, and Hulme. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 375–379.Google Scholar

Grey, S., Cox, J., Serafini, E., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short‐term intensive language exposure. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 137–157.Google Scholar

Grey, S., Sanz, C., Morgan-Short, K., & Ullman, M. (2017). Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–25.Google Scholar

Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental language learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.Google Scholar

Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.Google Scholar

Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., Engell, A. D., & McCulloch, K. C. (2009). Implicit working memory. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 18(3), 665–678.Google Scholar

Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subject–object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59, 73–112.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis.” Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226.Google Scholar

Hummel, K. M. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proﬁciency in non-novice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 225–249.Google Scholar

Indrarathne, B., & Kormos, J. (2018). The role of working memory in processing L2 input: Insights from eye-tracking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 355–374.Google Scholar

Issa, B. I. (2019). Examining the relationships between attentional allocation, working memory and second language development: An eye-tracking study. In Leow, R. P. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 464–479). Routledge.Google Scholar

Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. W. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 Learning. Language Teaching: Reviews and Studies, 42, 137–166.Google Scholar

Kapa, L. L., & Colombo, J. (2014). Executive function predicts artificial language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 7, 237–252.Google Scholar

Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2008). Second language learning of complex inflectional systems. Language Learning, 58, 703–746.Google Scholar

Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60, 127–153.Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271.Google Scholar

Lado, B. (2017). Aptitude and pedagogical conditions in the early development of a nonprimary language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 679–701.Google Scholar

Lado, B., Bowden, H., Stafford, C. & Sanz, C. (2014). A fine-grained analysis of the effects of negative evidence with and without metalinguistic information in language development. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 320–344.Google Scholar

Lado, B., Bowden, H. W. & Stafford, C. & Sanz, C. (2017). Two birds, one stone, or how learning a foreign language makes you a better language learner. Hispania, 100(3), 361–378.Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 801–842.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., Smith, B., Bunting, M., & Doughty, C. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566.Google Scholar

Linck, J.A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2015). Can working memory and inhibitory control predict second language learning in the classroom? SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–11.Google Scholar

Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in l2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 379–413.Google Scholar

Martini, M., Sachse, P., Furtner, M. R., & Gaschler, R. (2015). Why should working memory be related to incidentally learned sequence structures? Cortex, 64, 407–410.Google Scholar

McCormick, T. (2020). Early and emergent bilingualism: The role of cognitive control in processing linguistic conflict (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University).Google Scholar

McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2016). The role of statistical learning and working memory in L2 speakers’ pattern learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 428–445.Google Scholar

Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302–331.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M.T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1),154–193.Google Scholar

Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science,14(1), 11–28.Google Scholar

O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377–402.Google Scholar

O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–582.Google Scholar

Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331–347.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.Google Scholar

Radulescu, S., Wijnen, F., & Avrutin, S. (2020). Patterns bit by bit: An entropy model for rule induction. Language Learning and Development, 16(2), 109–140.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 888–896.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005a). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 45–73.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005b). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2010) Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60(2), 245–263.Google Scholar

Sagarra, N. (2007). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Han, Z. & Park, E. S. (Eds.), Understanding second language process. Multilingual Matters, 133–147.Google Scholar

Sagarra, N. (2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 33(3), 341–363Google Scholar

Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120, 2022–2039.Google Scholar

Santamaria, K., & Sunderman, G. (2015). Working memory in processing instruction: The acquisition of French clitics. In Wen, Z., Borges Mota, M., & McNeill, A., (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 205–223). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Sanz, C., Lin., H., Lado, B., Bowden, H. & Stafford, C. (2016). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 669–692.Google Scholar

Sanz, C., & McCormick, T. (2021). VanPatten 1990’s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies. In Leeser, W. Wong, , & Keating, G., (Eds.), Research on second language processing and processing instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten (pp. 153–181). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar

Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 607–646.Google Scholar

Soto, D., & Silvanto, J. (2014). Reappraising the relationship between working memory and conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 520–525.Google Scholar

Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M. & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Working memory, learning context, and the acquisition of L2 Syntax. In Wen, Z., Borges Mota, M., & McNeill, A., (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 224–247). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Tagarelli, K. M., Ruiz, S., Moreno, J. L. & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (Special Issue): Cognitive Perspectives on Difficulty and Complexity in SLA, 38(2), 293–316.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and raven. Intelligence, 33, 67–81.Google Scholar

VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.Google Scholar

Waters, G. S. & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 51–79.Google Scholar

Weissheimer, J., & Borges Mota, M. (2009). Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and the Development of L2 Speech Production. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 17, 34–52.Google Scholar

Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50, 1–31.Google Scholar

Williams, J. N. & Lovatt, P. P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53, 67–121.Google Scholar

Zalbidea, J. & Sanz, C. (2020). Does learner cognition count on modality? Working memory effects on early L2 morphosyntactic attainment across oral and written tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(5), 1171–1196.Google Scholar

References

Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36, 353–372.Google Scholar

Cheng, Y., Rothman, J., & Cunnings, I. (2021). Parsing preferences and individual differences in nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42, 129–151.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.Google Scholar

Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 615–646.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1158–1170.Google Scholar

Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.Google Scholar

Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 659–678.Google Scholar

Cunnings, I., & Fujita, H. (2020). Quantifying individual differences in native and nonnative sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–21.Google Scholar

Dallas, A., DeDe, G., & Nicol, J. (2013). An Event-Related Potential (ERP) investigation of filler-gap processing in native and second language speakers: ERP study of L2 filler-gap processing. Language Learning, 63, 766–799.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 85–103.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 443–472.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.Google Scholar

Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 413–433.Google Scholar

Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2012). Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 571–603.Google Scholar

Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23, 9–36.Google Scholar

Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 453–489.Google Scholar

Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The on-line application of binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 485–502.Google Scholar

Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English–Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 187–220.Google Scholar

Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.Google Scholar

Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1166–1186.Google Scholar

Hemforth, B., Fernandez, S., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Konieczny, L., & Walter, M. (2015). Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length. Lingua, 166, 43–64.Google Scholar

Hopp, H. (2014). Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250–278.Google Scholar

Hopp, H. (2018). The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, 17, 5–27.Google Scholar

Jäger, L. A., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S. (2017). Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 316–339.Google Scholar

Jäger, L. A., Mertzen, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Vasishth, S. (2020). Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104063.Google Scholar

Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121–151.Google Scholar

Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.Google Scholar

Just, Marcel A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar

Just, Marcel Adam, Carpenter, P. A., & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review, 103, 773–780.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D. (2010). The effects of linear distance and working memory on the processing of gender agreement in Spanish. In VanPatten, B. & Jegerski, J. (Eds.), Language acquisition and language disorders (Vol. 53, pp. 113–134). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 154–169.Google Scholar

Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2017). Working memory effects on L1 and L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses by Korean L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 33, 365–388.Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.Google Scholar

Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 375–419.Google Scholar

Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 447–454.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.Google Scholar

Mathy, F., Chekaf, M., & Cowan, N. (2018). Simple and complex working memory tasks allow similar benefits of information compression. Journal of Cognition, 1, 31.Google Scholar

McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.Google Scholar

McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67–91.Google Scholar

Miller, A. K. (2014). Accessing and maintaining referents in L2 processing of wh -dependencies. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 167–191.Google Scholar

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Pan, H.-Y., & Felser, C. (2011). Referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading. Lingua, 121, 221–236.Google Scholar

Pan, H.-Y., Schimke, S., & Felser, C. (2015). Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 298–313.Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 501–528.Google Scholar

Parker, D., Shvartsman, M., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2017). The cue-based based retrieval theory of sentence comprehension: New findings and new challenges. In Escobar, L., Torrens, V., & Parodi, T. (Eds.), Language processing and disorders (pp. 121–144). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 378–395.Google Scholar

Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: A visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 636–643.Google Scholar

Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 873–900.Google Scholar

Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 64–81.Google Scholar

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, J. A., & Johns, C. L. (2012). Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension: Interference in comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 193–211.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, J. A., Johns, C. L., & Kukona, A. (2014). Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition, 131, 373–403.Google Scholar

Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Engelmann, F., & Burchert, F. (2019). Computational models of retrieval processes in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 968–982.Google Scholar

Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 550–564.Google Scholar

Witzel, J., Witzel, N., & Nicol, J. (2012). Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 419–456.Google Scholar

References

Adams, R., & Shahnazari-Dorcheh, M. (2014). The relationship between working memory and L2 reading comprehension. Applied Research on English Language, 3, 19–34.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and RST make a difference? System, 37, 627–639.Google Scholar

Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219.Google Scholar

Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 235–266.Google Scholar

Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Özemir, O. (2014). Effects of variations in RST design on the relationship between working memory capacity and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 98, 536–552.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, research and classroom perspectives. Ablex.Google Scholar

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Converting among effect sizes. In Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis (pp. 45–49). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. S. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test Form G. Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Choi, S. (2013). Working memory capacity, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension of EFL learners. English Education Research, 25, 25–42.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 24, 1158–1170.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.Google Scholar

Drum, P. A., Calfee, R. C., & Cook, L. K. (1981). The effects of surface structure variables on performance in reading comprehension tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 486–514.Google Scholar

Erçetin, G. (2015). Working memory and L2 reading: Theoretical and methodological issues. ELT Research Journal, 4, 101–110.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fontanini, I., & Tomitch, L. M. B. (2009). Working memory capacity and L2 university students’ comprehension of linear texts and hypertexts. International Journal of English Studies, 9, 1–19.Google Scholar

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2005). Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 581–590.Google Scholar

Glanzer, M., Dorfman, D., & Kaplan, B. (1981). Short-term storage in the processing of text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 656–670.Google Scholar

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Graesser, A. C. (2015). Deeper learning with advances in discourse science and technology. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 42–50.Google Scholar

Hammadou Sullivan, J. A. (2002). Advanced foreign language readers’ inferencing. In Hammadou Sullivan, J. A. (Ed.), Literacy and the second language learner (pp. 217–238). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Herman, E., & Leeser, M. J. (in press). The relationship between lexical coverage and type of reading comprehension in beginning L2 Spanish learners.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Linguistic Behavior, 9, 12–20.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. (1984). Prior knowledge and reading comprehension test bias. Reading Research Quarterly,19, 219–239.Google Scholar

Just, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar

Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2018). Reading comprehension theories: A view from the top down. In Schober, M. F., Rapp, D. N., & Britt, M. A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed., pp. 7–21). Routledge.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text processing: Inferences. Discourse Processes,16, 193–202.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (2012). Psychological models of reading comprehension and their implications for assessment. In Sabatini, J. P., Albro, E. R., & O’Reilly, T. (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading abilities (pp. 21–38). Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension. In Paris, S. G. & Stahl, S. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 71–92). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Heinemann.Google Scholar

Lee, J. F. (1986). On the use of the recall task to measure L2 reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 201–212.Google Scholar

Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270.Google Scholar

Leeser, M. J., & Sunderman, G. (2016). Methodological implications of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 89-104). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784.Google Scholar

Lorch, R. F. (2015). What about expository text? In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 348-361). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Magliano, J., Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2007). Beyond language comprehension: Situation models as a form of autobiographical memory. In Schmalhofer, F. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 379–391). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384.Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., de Vega, M., & O’Reilly, T. (2007). Comprehension skill, inference making, and the role of knowledge. In Schmalhofer, F. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 233–251). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.Google Scholar

Millis, K., Magliano, J., & Todaro, S. (2006). Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 225–240.Google Scholar

Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.Google Scholar

Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R. (1993). Language-independent working memory: Evidence from German and French reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 117–118.Google Scholar

Park, H., Nam, K., & Lee, Y. S. (2016). The role of reading span in factual and inferential comprehension and retention in L2 reading. Linguistic Research, 33, 81–106.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.Google Scholar

Rapp, D., & van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289–312.Google Scholar

Riley, G. L., & Lee, J. F. (1996). A comparison of recall and summary protocols as measures of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing, 13, 173–189.Google Scholar

Schmalhofer, F., McDaniel, M. A., & Keefe, D. (2002). A unified model for predictive and bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 33, 105–132.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 26–43.Google Scholar

Shibasaki, H., Tokimoto, S., Ono, Y., Inoue, T., & Tamaoka, K. (2015). English reading comprehension by Japanese high school students: Structural equation modeling including working memory and L1 literacy. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 443–458.Google Scholar

Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 873–900.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066.Google Scholar

Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.Google Scholar

van Moort, M. L., Koornneef, A., & van den Broek, P. W. (2020). Differentiating text-based and knowledge-based validation processes during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, 1–20.Google Scholar

VanPatten, B. (2020). Input processing in adult L2 acquisition. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 105–127). Routledge.Google Scholar

Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25, 315–339.Google Scholar

Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51–79.Google Scholar

Wolf, D. (1993). A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure FL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 473–489.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In: Ross, B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.Google Scholar

References

Ahmadian, M. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning conditions. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 1, 165–175.Google Scholar

Ahmadian, M. (2013). Working memory and task repetition in second language oral production. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 23, 37–55.Google Scholar

Albarqi, G. (2019). Self-monitoring behaviour of L2 learners: Proficiency level, dual task paradigm and working memory capacity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading).Google Scholar

Anderson, J. (1995). Learning and memory. John Wiley.Google Scholar

Awwad, A. & Tavakoli, P. (2019). Task complexity, language proficiency, and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0378 Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–30.Google Scholar

Bui, H. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In Skehan, P. (Ed.). Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bui, G. & Skehan, P. (2018). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. In Nassaji, H. (Ed.), TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Wiley.Google Scholar

Bui, G., Skehan, P., & Wang, Z. (2018). Task condition effects on advanced level foreign language performance. Malovrh, P. & Benati, A. (Eds.), Handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition. (pp. 219–238). Wiley.Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Longman.Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (2018). Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85–98.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (1993). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research: Second language teaching and learning (pp. 437–454). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Duran-Karaoz, Z. (2020). An exploratory study of second language oral performance: Fluence and lexical complexity in L1 Turkish and L2 English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading).Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effect of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language. (pp. 167–192). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (2013) The effects of post-task activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 249–273.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, E., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Investigating executive working memory and phonological short-term memory in relation to fluency and self-repair behavior in L2 speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(4), 877–895.Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. & Munoz, C. (2010). Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 19–42.Google Scholar

Guará-Tavares, M. G. (2013). Working memory capacity and L2 speech performance in planned and spontaneous conditions: A correlational analysis. Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada, 52(1), 9–29.Google Scholar

Guará-Tavares, M. G. (2016). Learners’ processes during pre-task planning and working memory capacity. Ilha do Desterro, 69(1), 79–94.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. & Trebits, A. (2011). Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. In Robinson, P. (Ed.). Second language task complexity (pp. 267–285). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 1670150196.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. (1999). Language production: A blueprint for the speaker. In Brown, C. & Hagoort, P. (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Li, Q. (2014). Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners’ oral performance. In Skehan, P. (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 129–154). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Li, S., & Fu, M. (2016). Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 20, 1–24.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley.Google Scholar

Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.Google Scholar

Mota, M. (2003). Working memory capacity and fluency, accuracy, complexity, and lexical density in L2 speech production. Fragmentos, 24, 69–104.Google Scholar

Nielson, K. (2013). Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity? Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 272–293.Google Scholar

Pang, F. & Skehan, P. (2014). Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In Skehan, P., Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Recio, M. (2011). The effects of task complexity on L2 oral production as mediated by differences in working memory capacity (Master’s thesis, University of Barcelona).Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2011a). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2011b). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second language task complexity (pp 3–38). John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Robinson, P. (2015). The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In Bygate, M. (Ed.). Domains and directions in the development of TBLT. (pp. 87–122). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sanders, A. (1998). Elements of human performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In Richards, B., Daller, H., Malvern, D. D., Meara, & P. (Eds.). Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application. (pp. 107–124). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2013). Nurturing noticing. In Bergsleithner, J., Frota, S. N., & Yoshioka, J. K. (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 169–180). National Foreign Language Center.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2014a). Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2014b). The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. In Skehan, P. (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks vs. conditions: Two perspectives on task research and its implications for pedagogy. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 34–49.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2018). Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, and assessment. Routledge.Google Scholar

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. & Wright, C. (2020). Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Wen, Z., Mota, N., & McNeill, A. (Eds.). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. (pp. 41–62). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Williams, J. (2015). Working memory in SLA research: Challenges and prospects. In Wen, Z., N. Mota, , & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 301–308). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zalbidea, J. (2017). “One size fits all”? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352.Google Scholar

References

(Studies with asterisks are included in the synthesis)

Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167.Google Scholar

*Ahmadian, M. J. (2020). Explicit and implicit instruction of refusal strategies: Does working memory capacity play a role? Language Teaching Research, 24(2), 163–188.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Dornic, S. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–89 ). Academic Press.Google Scholar

*Baralt, M. (2010). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University).Google Scholar

*Baralt, M. (2015). Working memory capacity, cognitive complexity and L2 recasts in online language teaching. In Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 248–269). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

*Chen, X. (2013). Chinese EFL learners’ noticing of recasts: Its relation to target structures, uptake, and working memory capacity (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University).Google Scholar

Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 367–383.Google Scholar

*Dai, B. (2013). Individual differences in learners’ working memory, noticing of L2 forms in recasts and their L2 development in task-based interactions (Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong).Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

*Gass, S., Behney, J. N., & Uzum, B. (2013). Inhibitory control, working memory, and L2 interaction. In Drozdzial-Szelest, K., & Pawlak, M. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching (pp. 91–114). Springer.Google Scholar

*Georgiadou, E., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Investigating executive working memory and phonological short-term memory in relation to fluency and self-repair behavior in L2 speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(4), 877–895.Google Scholar

Gilabert, R., & Muñoz, C. (2010). Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 19–42.Google Scholar

*Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474.Google Scholar

*Goo, J. (2016). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 279–302). Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. J., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Cognition, 1, 129–147.Google Scholar

Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166.Google Scholar

*Kim, Y. J., Jung, Y. J., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Linguistic alignment, learner characteristics, and the production of stranded prepositions in relative clauses: Comparing FTF and SCMC contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 937–969.Google Scholar

*Kim, Y. J., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 549–581.Google Scholar

*Lai, C., Fei, F., & Roots, R. (2009). The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 70–90.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar

*Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654.Google Scholar

*Li, S. (2015). The differential roles of language analytic ability and working memory in mediating the effects of two types of feedback on the acquisition of an opaque linguistic structure. In Sanz, C., and Lado, B. (Eds.), Individual differences, L2 development & language program administration: From theory to application (pp. 32–52). Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2017). The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. In Gurzynski, L. (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors and researchers (pp. 41–70). Benjamins.Google Scholar

*Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722.Google Scholar

Li, S., & Fu, M. (2018). Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 230–253.Google Scholar

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(4), 861–883.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (Vol. 2): Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley.Google Scholar

*Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60(3), 501–533.Google Scholar

*Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62(3), 704–740.Google Scholar

*Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp.181–209). Benjamins.Google Scholar

*Martin, A. (2018). How to synchronize? A study of video-based, voice-based, and text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication, working memory, and second language learning (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University).Google Scholar

McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103.Google Scholar

*McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G. (2016). Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 112–131). Routledge.Google Scholar

*McDonough, K., & Kim, Y. (2016). Working memory and L2 English speakers’ primed and subsequent production of passives. In Granena, G., D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz, (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 205–222). Benjamins.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. & Bourne, L. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–365). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.Google Scholar

*Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning and Technology, 9(3), 35–54.Google Scholar

*Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32.Google Scholar

*Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62(1), 93–132.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2003a). Attention and memory in SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Blackwell.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2003b). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45–105.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In Garcia Mayo, M. P. (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–26). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Benjamins.Google Scholar

*Sachs, R. R. (2010). Individual differences and the effectiveness of visual feedback on reflexive binding in L2 Japanese (Doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University).Google Scholar

*Sagarra, N., & Abbuhl, R. (2013). Optimizing the noticing of recasts via computer-delivered feedback: Evidence that oral input enhancement and working memory help second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 196–216.Google Scholar

*Sanz, C., Lin, H. J., Lado, B., Stafford, C. A., & Bowden, H. W. (2016). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 669–692.Google Scholar

Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89(3), 179–205.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3– 32). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. Arnold.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Benjamins.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125– 44 ). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. (2016). Phonological and executive working memory in L2 task-based speech planning and performance. Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 418–435.Google Scholar

Wen, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Working Memory in L2 Learning and Processing. In Schwieter, J. & Benati, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 365–389). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

*White, M. J. (2021). Phonological working memory and non-verbal complex working memory as predictors of future English outcomes in young ELLs. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 318–337.Google Scholar

*Wright, C. (2013). An investigation of working memory effects on oral grammatical accuracy and fluency in producing questions in English. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 352–374.Google Scholar

*Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 344–368.Google Scholar

*Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2019). Cognitive individual differences as predictors of improvement and awareness under implicit and explicit feedback conditions. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 686–702.Google Scholar

*Yilmaz, Y., & Sağdıç, A. (2019). The interaction between inhibitory control and corrective feedback timing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(2), 204–227.Google Scholar

Zalbidea, J. (2017). “One task fits all”? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352.Google Scholar

*Zhao, Y. (2015). The effects of explicit and implicit recasts on the acquisition of two grammatical structures and the mediating role of working memory (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Auckland).Google Scholar

References

Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of the task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 484–495.Google Scholar

Babcock, L., & Vallesi, A. (2017). Are simultaneous interpreters expert bilinguals, unique bilinguals, or both? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 403–417.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G.H (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47-89). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chen, S. (2017). Exploring the process of note-taking and consecutive interpreting: A pen-eye-voice approach towards cognitive load (Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia).Google Scholar

Chernov, G. V. (1994). Message redundancy and message anticipation in simultaneous interpretation. In Lambert, S. & Moser-Mercer, B. (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 139–153). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Chincotta, D., & Underwood, G. (1998). Simultaneous interpreters and the effect of concurrent articulation on immediate memory: A bilingual digit span study. Interpreting, 3(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Chmiel, A. (2018). In search of the working memory advantage in conference interpreting: Training, experience and task effects. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(3), 371–384.Google Scholar

Christoffels, I. K., de Groot, A. M., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 324–345.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163–191.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dam, H. V. (2010). Consecutive interpreting. In Gambier, Y. & van Doorslaer, L. (Eds.), Handbook of translation studies (Vol. 1, pp. 75–79). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.Google Scholar

Darò, V., & Fabbro, F. (1994). Verbal memory during simultaneous interpretation: Effects of phonological interference. Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 365–381.Google Scholar

Díaz-Galaz, S., Padilla, P., & Bajo, M. T. (2015). The role of advance preparation in simultaneous interpreting: A comparison of professional interpreters and interpreting students. Interpreting, 17(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Dong, Y., & Cai, R. (2015). Working memory in interpreting: A commentary on theoretical models. In Wen, Z., Mota, M., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 63–79). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Dong, Y. & Li, P. (2020). Attentional control in interpreting: A model of language control and processing control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 716–728.Google Scholar

Dong, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016). Classes in translating and interpreting produce differential gains in switching and updating. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1297.Google Scholar

Dong, Y., Liu, Y., & Cai, R. (2018). How does consecutive interpreting training influence working memory: A longitudinal study of potential links between the two. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 875.Google Scholar

Dong, Y., & Xie, Z. (2014). Contributions of second language proficiency and interpreting experience to cognitive control differences among young adult bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 506–519.Google Scholar

Dong, Y., & Zhong, F. (2017). Interpreting experience enhances early attentional processing, conflict monitoring and interference suppression along the time course of processing. Neuropsychologia, 95, 193–203.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.Google Scholar

Gile, D. (1997/2002). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In Pöchhacker, F. & Shlesinger, M. (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader (pp. 162–176). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gile, D. (2001). Consecutive vs. simultaneous: Which is more accurate? Interpretation Studies, 1(1), 8–20.Google Scholar

Gile, D. (2017). Testing the Effort Models’ tightrope hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting: A contribution. HERMES, 12(23), 153–172.Google Scholar

Henrard, S., & van Daele, A. (2017). Different bilingual experiences might modulate executive tasks advantages: Comparative analysis between monolinguals, translators, and interpreters. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1870.Google Scholar

Hiltunen, S., Pääkkönen, R., Vik, G. V., & Krause, C. M. (2014). On interpreters’ working memory and executive control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(3), 297–314.Google Scholar

Holding, D. H., & Reynolds, R. I. (1982). Recall or evaluation of chess positions as determinants of chess skill. Memory & Cognition, 10(3), 237–242.Google Scholar

Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. P., Formoso, J., & Jaichenco, V. I. (2015). Expertise, working memory and articulatory suppression effect: Their relation with simultaneous interpreting performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 56–63. doi:10.5709/acp-0171-1Google Scholar

Isham, W.P. (2000). Phonological interference in interpreters of spoken-languages: An issue of storage or process? In Dimitrova, B. E. & Hyltenstam, K. (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting (pp. 133–150). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar

Köpke, B., & Nespoulous, J. L. (2006). Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters. Interpreting, 8(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Köpke, B., & Signorelli, T. M. (2011). Methodological aspects of working memory assessment in simultaneous interpreters. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(2), 183–197.Google Scholar

Lambert, S. (1988). Information processing among conference interpreters: A test of the depth-of-processing hypothesis. Meta, 33(3), 377–387Google Scholar

Lee, T. H. (2002). Ear voice span in English into Korean simultaneous interpretation. Meta, 47(4), 596–606.Google Scholar

Liang, J., Fang, Y., Lv, Q., & Liu, H. (2017). Dependency distance differences across interpreting types: Implications for cognitive demand. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02132Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Lv, Q., & Liang, J. (2018). Predicting fluency with language proficiency, working memory, and directionality in simultaneous interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1543. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01543Google Scholar

Liang, J., Lv, Q., & Liu, Y. (2019). Quantifying interpreting types: Language sequence mirrors cognitive load minimization in interpreting tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00285Google Scholar

Liu, M., Schallert, D. L., & Carroll, P. J. (2004). Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting, 6(1), 19–42.Google Scholar

Macnamara, B. N., & Conway, A. R. (2016). Working memory capacity as a predictor of simultaneous language interpreting performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 434–444.Google Scholar

Macnamara, B. N., & Conway, A. R. A. (2014). Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21 (2), 520–525.Google Scholar

Mizuno, A. (2005). Process model for simultaneous interpreting and working memory. Meta, 50(2), 739–752.Google Scholar

Morales, J., Padilla, F., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., & Bajo, M. T. (2015). Simultaneous interpretation selectively influences working memory and attentional networks. Acta Psychologica, 155, 82–91.Google Scholar

Nour, S., Struys, E., & Stengers, H. (2020). Adaptive control in interpreters: Assessing the impact of training and experience on working memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 772–779.Google Scholar

Nour, S., Struys, E., Woumans, E., Hollebeke, I., & Stengers, H. (2020). An interpreter advantage in executive functions? A systematic review. Interpreting, 22(2), 163–186.Google Scholar

Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371.Google Scholar

Padilla, P. (1995). Procesos de memoria y atención en la interpretación de lenguas (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Granada. Granada, Spain).Google Scholar

Padilla, P., Bajo, M. T., Canas, J. J., & Padilla, F. (1995). Cognitive processes of memory in simultaneous interpretation. In Tommola, J. (Ed.), Topics in interpreting research (pp. 61–72). Centre for Translation and Interpreting, University of Turku.Google Scholar

Padilla, F., Bajo, M. T., & Macizo, P. (2005). Articulatory suppression in language interpretation: Working memory capacity, dual tasking and word knowledge. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8. 207–219.Google Scholar

Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), 398–422.Google Scholar

Piolat, A. (2007). Effects of notetaking technique and working-memory span on cognitive effort and recall performance. In Torrance, M., Van Waes, L., & Galbraith, D. (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (pp. 109–124). Elsevier.Google Scholar

Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312.Google Scholar

Plevoets, K., & Defrancq, B. (2016). The effect of informational load on disfluencies in interpreting: A corpus-based regression analysis. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 11(2), 202–224.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (2002). Interpreting in legal contexts: Consecutive and simultaneous interpreting. Linstok Press.Google Scholar

Seeber, K. G. (2011). Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories – new models. Interpreting, 13(2), 176–204.Google Scholar

Seleskovitch, D. (1968/1978). Interpreting for international conferences-Problems of language and communication. Pen and Booth.Google Scholar

Shao, Z., & Chai, M. (2020). The effect of cognitive load on simultaneous interpreting performance: An empirical study at the local level. Perspectives, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2020.1770816Google Scholar

Signorelli, T. M., Haarmann, H. J., & Obler, L. K. (2011). Working memory in simultaneous interpreters: Effects of task and age. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(2), 198–212.Google Scholar

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.Google Scholar

Timarová, Š., Čeňková, I., & Meylaerts, R. (2015). Simultaneous interpreting and working memory capacity. In Ferreira, A. & Schwieter, J. W. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and cognitive inquiries into translation and interpreting (pp. 101–126). Benjamins.Google Scholar

Timarová, Š., Čeňková, I., Meylaerts, R., Hertog, E., Szmalec, A., & Duyck, W. (2014). Simultaneous interpreting and working memory executive control. Interpreting, 16(2), 139–168.Google Scholar

Tzou, Y. Z., Eslami, Z. R., Chen, H. C., & Vaid, J. (2012). Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance: Evidence from Mandarin-English speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(2), 213–227.Google Scholar

Wen, H., & Dong, Y. (2019). How does interpreting experience enhance working memory and short-term memory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(8), 769–784.Google Scholar

Woumans, E., Ceuleers, E., van der Linden, L., Szmalec, A., & Duyck, W. (2015). Verbal and nonverbal cognitive control in bilinguals and interpreters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1579–1586.Google Scholar

Wu, G., & Wang, K. (2009). Consecutive interpretation: A discourse approach. Towards a revision of Gile’s effort model. Meta, 54(3), 401–416.Google Scholar

Yenkimaleki, M., & van Heuven, V. J. (2017). The effect of memory training on consecutive interpreting performance by interpreter trainees: An experimental study. International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, 15(1), 157–172.Google Scholar

Yudes, C., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2011). The influence of expertise in simultaneous interpreting on non-verbal executive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 309.Google Scholar

Yudes, C., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2012). Coordinating comprehension and production in simultaneous interpreters: Evidence from the articulatory suppression effect. Bilingualism, 15(2), 329–339.Google Scholar

References

Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.Google Scholar

Brunfaut, T., & Révész, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 141–168.Google Scholar

Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85–98.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in brain research, 169, 323–338.Google Scholar

Cullum, C. M., & Larrabee, G. J. (2010). WAIS-IV use in neuropsychological assessment. In Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D., & Raiford, S. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation (pp. 167–188). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 34, 422–433.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Drozdova, P., Van Hout, R., & Scharenborg, O. (2017). L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142, 3058–3068.Google Scholar

Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 413–433.Google Scholar

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2005). Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 581–590.Google Scholar

Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474.Google Scholar

Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K. (2017). Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33, 325–340.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Y. (2019). Investigating effects of working memory training on foreign language development. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 665–685.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Y., Kobayashi, T., & Toyoshige, T. (2016). Investigating the relative contributions of computerised working memory training and English language teaching to cognitive and foreign language development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 196–213.Google Scholar

Holdnack, J. A. (2019). The development, expansion, and future of the WAIS-IV as a cornerstone in comprehensive cognitive assessments. In Growth-Marnat, G. & Wright, A. J. (Eds), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 103–139). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hopp, H. (2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object-subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 129–173.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. O. (2020). Working memory and second language development: A complex, dynamic future? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 89–109.Google Scholar

Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121–151.Google Scholar

Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.Google Scholar

Kam, E. F., Liu, Y. T., & Tseng, W. T. (2020). Effects of modality preference and working memory capacity on captioned videos in enhancing L2 listening outcomes. ReCALL, 32, 213–230.Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism, 11, 261.Google Scholar

Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270.Google Scholar

Leeser, M., & Sunderman, G. (2016). Methodological issues of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 89–104). John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Li, S., & Roshan, S. (2019). The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–15.Google Scholar

López, E., Steiner, A. J., Hardy, D. J., IsHak, W. W., & Anderson, W. B. (2016). Discrepancies between bilinguals’ performance on the Spanish and English versions of the WAIS Digit Span task: Cross-cultural implications. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23, 343–352.Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.Google Scholar

Malone, J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 651–675.Google Scholar

Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 1–21). Routledge.Google Scholar

Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics 39, 861–904.Google Scholar

Martin, J. D., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Redick, T. S., Bunting, M., & Engle, R. W. (2020). The role of maintenance and disengagement in predicting reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 140.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity: Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality & Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045.Google Scholar

Park, H., Nam, K., Lee, Y. (2016). The role of reading span in factual and inferential comprehension and retention in L2 reading. Linguistic Research, 33, 81–106.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31, 267–278.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 538–553.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36, 583–621.Google Scholar

Prior, A., Degani, T., Awawdy, S., Yassin, R., & Korem, N. (2017). Is susceptibility to cross-language interference domain specific? Cognition, 165, 10–25.Google Scholar

Sagarra, N. (2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 33, 341–363.Google Scholar

Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 873–900.Google Scholar

Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2019). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 320–347.Google Scholar

Stavrakaki, S., Megari, K., Kosmidis, M. H., Apostolidou, M., & Takou, E. (2012). Working memory and verbal fluency in simultaneous interpreters. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 624–633.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. (2008). The effect of working memory, semantic access, and listening abilities on the comprehension of conversational implicatures in L2 English. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16, 517–539.Google Scholar

Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Cross‐language similarity modulates effectiveness of second language grammar instruction. Language Learning, 64, 279–309.Google Scholar

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17, 635–654.Google Scholar

Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51–79.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. E. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Wen, Z. E., Juffs, A., & Winke, P. (2020). Measuring working memory. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 167–176). Routledge.Google Scholar

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Cognitive Abilities. Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Zalbidea, J. (2017). “One task fits all?” The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 335–352.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part V - Bilingual Acquisition and Processing

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive