Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- 27 The Work–Family Interface and Careers in the Global Workplace: Insights from Cross-National Research
- 28 Managing Work–Life Effectiveness in a Multinational Firm: An Organizational Case Study
- 29 Workplace Flexibility: Strategies to Help Organizations Navigate Global Expansion
- 30 Organizational Culture in the Context of National Culture
- 31 Family-Supportive Supervision around the Globe
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
30 - Organizational Culture in the Context of National Culture
from Part VI - Organizational Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- 27 The Work–Family Interface and Careers in the Global Workplace: Insights from Cross-National Research
- 28 Managing Work–Life Effectiveness in a Multinational Firm: An Organizational Case Study
- 29 Workplace Flexibility: Strategies to Help Organizations Navigate Global Expansion
- 30 Organizational Culture in the Context of National Culture
- 31 Family-Supportive Supervision around the Globe
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Organizational culture is important from a work-family perspective. This chapter examines the role of national culture in shaping employees’ work-family perceptions via culture frameworks and work-family role preferences. We discuss the relationship between national culture and organizational work-family culture, before discussing the consequences of cultural alignment or misalignment – the match or mismatch between an employee’s work-family role preferences and the role demands of an organization set forth by their work-family culture and policies. We posit that when there is no shared national culture framework influencing both individual preferences and organizational role demands, the propensity for mismatch will be higher. We conclude the chapter by presenting a new model of global work-family culture and briefly introduce its implications for theory and practice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 555 - 569Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Allen, T. (2013). Some future directions for work–family research in a global world. In Poelmans, S., Greenhaus, J., & Las Heras Maestro, M. (Eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Work–Family Research: A Vision for the Future (pp. 333–347). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Andreassi, J. K., & Thompson, C. A. (2008). Work–family culture: Current research and future directions. In Korabik, K., Lero, D. S., & Whitehead, D. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Work–Family Integration: Research, Theories and Best Practices (pp. 331–351). London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beauregard, T. A. (2011a). Direct and indirect links between organizational work–home culture and employee well‐being. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 218–237.Google Scholar
Beauregard, T. A. (2011b). Corporate work–life balance initiatives: Use and effectiveness. In Kaiser, S., Ringlstetter, M., Pina e Cunha, M., & Eikhof, D. R. (Eds.), Creating Balance? International Perspectives on the Work–Life Integration of Professionals (pp. 193–208). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Beauregard, T. A. (2008). Managing diversity in organisations: Practitioner and academic perspectives. Report from a Gender in Management Special Interest Group research event. Equal Opportunities International, 27(4), 392–395.Google Scholar
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviewers’ perceptions of person–organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546.Google Scholar
Donley, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person–environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 292–339.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person–environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(2), 85–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 254–275.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Ziegert, J. C., & Allen, T. D. (2012). When family-supportive supervision matters: Relations between multiple sources of support and work–family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 266–275.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Huo, Y. P., & von Glinow, M. A. (1995). On transplanting human resource practices to China: A culture-driven approach. International Journal of Manpower, 16(9), 3–11.Google Scholar
Jahn, E. W., Thompson, C. A., & Kopelman, R. E. (2003). Rationale and construct validity evidence for a measure of perceived organizational family support (POFS): Because purported practices may not reflect reality. Community, Work and Family, 6, 23–140.Google Scholar
Karimi, L. (2008). Do female and male employees in Iran experience similar work–family interference, job and life satisfaction? Journal of Family Issues, 30(1), 124–142.Google Scholar
Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Tranby, E. (2011). Changing workplaces to reduce work–family conflict schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Barber, A. E., & Winters, D. (1999). Using flexible schedules in the management world: The power of peers. Human Resource Management, 38, 33–49.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Noe, R. A., & DeMarr, B. J. (1999). Work–family role synthesis: Individual and organizational determinants. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(2), 102–129.Google Scholar
Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work–home segmentation or integration: A person–environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485–507.Google Scholar
Lambert, A. D., Marler, J. H., & Gueutal, H. G. (2008). Individual differences: Factors affecting employee utilization of flexible work arrangements. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2009). Work–Family Balance, Gender and Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Kropf, M. B. (2005). The relationships of national gender equality and organizational support with work–family balance: A study of European managers. Human Relations, 58(1), 33–60.Google Scholar
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.Google Scholar
Matharu, H. (2015, October 1). Sweden introduces six-hour work day. Independent. Retrieved from www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sweden-introduces-six-hour-work-day-a6674646.html.Google Scholar
Muse, L.A. (2011). Flexibility implementation to a global workforce: a case study of Merck and Company, Inc. Community, Work and Family, 14(2), 249–256.Google Scholar
Nippert-Eng, C (1996). Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Britt, T. W., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2012). Organizational work–family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes: The process of work–family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 28.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2016). Cross-national work–life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management, doi: 10.1177/0149206316655873.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., Valcour, M., Den Dulk, L., & Kossek, E. E. (2013). Theorizing national context to develop comparative work–life research: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 31(5), 433–447.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.Google Scholar
Piszczek, M. M., & Berg, P. (2014). Expanding the boundaries of boundary theory: Regulative institutions and work–family role management. Human Relations, 67(12), 1491–1512.Google Scholar
Pearson, C., & Entrekin, L. (2001). Cross-cultural value sets of Asian managers: the comparative cases of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 39(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
Powell, G. N., Francesco, A. M., & Ling, Y. (2009). Toward culture‐sensitive theories of the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(5), 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. P., & Rivoli, P. (1991). The effect of American and Japanese-style employment and compensation practices on innovation. Organization Science, 2(4), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Fourth Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388.Google Scholar
Shockley, K.M. (in press). Managing the work–family interface. In Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., Sinangil, H.K., & Ones, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, Sage.Google Scholar
Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2010). Investigating the missing link in flexible work arrangement utilization: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K.M., Thompson, C.A., & Andreassi, J.K. (2013). Workplace culture and work–life integration. In Major, D. & Burke, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Work–Life Integration among Professionals: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 310–333). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Snir, R., & Harpaz, I. (2009). Cross-cultural differences concerning heavy work investment. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 309–319.Google Scholar
Sparrow, P. R., & Budhwar, P. S. (1997). Competition and change: Mapping the Indian HRM recipe against world-wide patterns. Journal of World Business, 32(3), 224–243.Google Scholar
Tams, S., & Arthur, M. B. (2007). Studying careers across cultures: Distinguishing international, cross-cultural, and globalization perspectives. Career Development International, 12(1), 86–98.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A. (2008). Barriers to the implementation and usage of work–life policies. In Poelmans, S. P. & Caliguiri, P. (Eds.), Harmonizing Work, Family, and Personal Life: From Policy to Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 54(3), 392–415.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2006). The mediating role of perceived control on the relationship between organizational family support, job autonomy, and employee wellbeing. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 100–118.Google Scholar
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473–489.Google Scholar
Working Mother (2015). 2015 Working Mother 100 Best Companies. Retrieved from www.workingmother.com/2015-working-mother-100-best-companies-hub?page=2.Google Scholar
Yang, L. Q., Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. I., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L., … & Antoniou, A. S. (2012). Individualism–collectivism as a moderator of the work demands–strains relationship: A cross-level and cross-national examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 424–443.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by