Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:04:58.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - American Legal Issues in Addiction Treatment and Research

from Part V - Ongoing and Future Research Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2020

By
Daniel H. Willick
Edited by
Steve Sussman
Steve Sussman
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses the relevance of addiction to the law in the United States. Current law pertains almost solely to substance addictions, as there is no legal status pertaining to most behavioral addictions. Particular emphasis is placed on the law’s impact on the provision of care and research of addiction. The conflicting legal concerns for confidentiality of treatment and research, on the one hand, and apprehension of addicts who break the law, on the other hand, are examined.

Keywords

addiction lawpatient confidentialityapprehensionalcoholdrugsgamblingsexthe SUPPORT ActPDMPs
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Substance and Behavioral Addictions , pp. 418 - 425
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2018). Position Statement on Inquiries about Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders in Connection with Professional Credentialing and Licensing.Google Scholar
Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. sections 12101, et seq., 12102(1)(A), 12114, 12210, 12211, 12214.Google Scholar
Azim, A. (2018). Note: Common sense; Rethinking the new Common Rule’s weak protections for human subjects. Vanderbilt Law Review, 71, 1704–1736.Google Scholar
Belmont Report (1979). National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Bollas, C. & Sundelson, D. (1995) The New Informants: The Betrayal of Confidentiality in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. Northvale, N.J.: Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
Bower v. Bower, 758 So.2d 405 (Miss. 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Business and Professions Code sections 740-742, 2241.5.Google Scholar
California Civil Code sections 43.92, 51, 51.5, 56.10(c)(19), 56.104, 56.35.Google Scholar
California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, Civil Code sections 56.10(c)(19), 56.104, 56.35.Google Scholar
California Constitution, Article I, sections 1 and 13.Google Scholar
California Evidence Code sections 990-1007. Physician-patient privilege.Google Scholar
California Evidence Code sections 995, 1015.Google Scholar
California Evidence Code sections 1010-1027. Psychotherapist-patient privilege.Google Scholar
California Health and Safety Code sections 11165.4, 11480-11481, 11812, 11845.5, 24170-24179.5, 111515-111545, 123100-123149.5.Google Scholar
California Insurance Code sections 791.01-791.22. California Insurance Information And Privacy Protection Act.Google Scholar
California Penal Code sections 1203.067(b)(3), 3500, 3521-3523.Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code section 5328-5330. Lanterman, Petris, Short Act confidentiality provisions.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016), Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain. www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/Guidelines_Factsheet-a.pdf.Google Scholar
Cox v. Miller, 296 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2002).Google Scholar
Hason v. Medical Board of California, 279 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2002).Google Scholar
Hedegaard, H., Minino, A. & Warner, M. (2018). Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2017. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No. 329, Nov. 2018. www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db329.htm.Google Scholar
In Re: Menna, 11 Cal.4th 975 (1995).Google Scholar
Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S.Ct. 1923 (1996).Google Scholar
Lewis v. Superior Court, 3 Cal.5th 561 (2017).Google Scholar
Medical Board of California (2010). Guidelines for Prescribing Controlled Substances for Pain.Google Scholar
Medical Board of California (2018). Authorization for Release of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Information.Google Scholar
National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws (2014) Prescription Drug Abuse, Addiction and Diversion, Part 1. www.namsdl.org/library/884CB2C5-1372-636C-DD54DCC00FD31313/.Google Scholar
People v. Ignacio Garcia, 2 Cal.5th 792 (2017).Google Scholar
People v. Gonzales, 56 Cal.4th 353, 371-372 (2013).Google Scholar
Petersen, A., Peters, S. C., Richard, M. H. & Whites, A. (2018). State legislative responses to the opioid crisis: Leading examples. Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law, Feb. 2018, 11, 30.Google Scholar
Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514 (1968).Google Scholar
Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705 (1973).Google Scholar
SAMHSA (2017). Substance Abuse Confidentiality Regulations, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs regarding the Substance Abuse Confidentiality Regulations). September 15, 2017. www.samhsa.gov/about-us/who-we-are/laws-regulations/confidentiality-regulations.htm.Google Scholar
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protection (SACHRP) (2017). Attachment B to December 12, 2017, SACHRP Letter to the HHS Secretary Recommendations on the Interpretation and Application of Exemption §_.104(d)(4), the “HIPAA Exemption”. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/recommendations/attachment-b-december-12-2017/index.html.Google Scholar
Seth, P., Scholl, L., Rudd, R. & Bacon, S. (2018). Overdose deaths involving opioids, cocaine, and psychostimulants in United States, 2015–2016. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, March 30, 2018, 67(12), 349–358. www.cdc.gov/mmur/volume/67/wr/mm6712al.htm.Google Scholar
Slater, M. (2018) Note: Is Powell still valid? The Supreme Court’s changing stance on cruel and unusual punishment. Virginia Law Review, 104, 547–588.Google Scholar
SUPPORT ACT (Public Law No. 115-271).Google Scholar
Surgeon General of the United States (1999). Mental Health – A Report of the Surgeon General, Chapter 7, pp. 440–441. https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/NNBBHS.pdf.Google Scholar
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425 (1976).Google Scholar
Unger, D. (2014). Student note: Minding your meds: Balancing the needs for patient privacy and law enforcement in prescription drug monitoring programs. West Virginia Law Review, 117, 345–388.Google Scholar
United States Constitution, Fourth Amendment, Eighth Amendment.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Guidelines (2004) Section 5K2.13.Google Scholar
U.S. v. Brooks, 628 F.3d 79 (6th Cir. 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Caro, 309 F.3d 1348 (11th Cir. 2002).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Carucci, 33 F.Supp.2d 302 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Davis, 182 Fed.Appx. 741 (9th Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Lighthall, 389 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2004).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Liu, 267 F.Supp.2d 371 (E.D.N.Y. 2003).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Miller, 178 Fed.Appx. 70 (2d Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Long, 185 F.Supp.2d 30 (D.D.C. 2001).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Romualdi, 101 F.3d 971 (3d Cir. 1996).Google Scholar
U.S. v. Sadolsky, 234 F.3d 938 (6th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Venezia v. U.S., 884 F.Supp. 919 (D.N.J. 1995) affd. without opin., 77 F.3d 465 (3d Cir. 1995).Google Scholar
Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLC, 499 F.3d 1078, 1081 (9th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 97 S.Ct. 869 (1977).Google Scholar
21 C.F.R. Parts 50 and 56.Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. sections 822-824.Google Scholar
42 C.F.R. Part 2.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. section 280g-3.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. section 290dd-2.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. section 300gg-22.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. sections 1320d, et seq.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C section 12132.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. Part 46.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. sections 164.508 and 164.512.Google Scholar
82 Federal Register 6053, Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records (2017).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×