Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice?
- PART I ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL QUESTIONS
- PART II THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
- PART III METHODOLOGICAL TRACKS
- PART IV APPLICATION VARIATIONS
- 18 Institutional change and strategic agency: an empirical analysis of managers' experimentation with routines in strategic decision-making
- 19 Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: do strategy workshops produce strategic change?
- 20 Struggling over subjectivity: a critical discourse analysis of strategic development
- 21 Strategizing and history
- Author Index
- Index
- References
19 - Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: do strategy workshops produce strategic change?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice?
- PART I ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL QUESTIONS
- PART II THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
- PART III METHODOLOGICAL TRACKS
- PART IV APPLICATION VARIATIONS
- 18 Institutional change and strategic agency: an empirical analysis of managers' experimentation with routines in strategic decision-making
- 19 Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: do strategy workshops produce strategic change?
- 20 Struggling over subjectivity: a critical discourse analysis of strategic development
- 21 Strategizing and history
- Author Index
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The recent turn of strategy research towards practice-based theorizing (Balogun et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2003, 2007; Whittington 1996, 2006) has increased interest in the everyday micro-activities of strategy practitioners. Strategy, it is argued, is better conceptualized as something people do rather than something that firms in their markets have. The interest in what managers actually do has a long tradition in the field of strategy process, starting with the seminal studies of Mintzberg (1973). Yet, in contrast to earlier research on organizational practices (Dalton 1959; Kotter 1982; Mintzberg, 1973), which emphasized the informal side of managerial work, the Strategy as Practice approach – whilst acknowledging the importance of emergence – calls for a reappreciation of the role of formal strategic practices. As Whittington (2003, p. 118) argued, formal practices deserve our particular attention for two reasons: not only are they pervasive phenomena in organizational life – a large part of organizational activity is in some way concerned with formal practices – but they also inflict considerable costs on the respective organizations. Responding to such calls, several researchers have looked into the organizational effects of various formal practices such as different administrative routines (Jarzabkowski 2003, 2005; Jarzabkowski and Wilson 2002) or strategy meetings (Jarzabkowski and Seidl 2008), discussing their role in organizational strategizing.
More recently, attention has begun to centre on the role of strategy workshops as a particular formal strategic practice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 291 - 309Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(2003), ‘Beyond neopositivists, romantics and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research’, Academy of Management Review, 28/1: 13–33.Google Scholar
, and (2007) (eds), ‘Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1 [Special Issue].
(2000), ‘Narrative styles of managers and workers’, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 36/2: 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), ‘The storytelling organisation: Study of story performance in an office-supply firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007), ‘Strategy workshops and “away-days” as ritual’, in G. Hodgkinson and W. Starbuck (eds), Oxford handbook of organizational decision making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 552–564.Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘The art of continuous change: Linking and time-pacing evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1959), Men who manage: Fusions of feeling and theory in administration. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
and (1987), ‘A process model of strategic redirection in large complex firms: The case of multinational corporations’, in (ed.), The management of strategic change. Oxford: Blackwell, 63–82.
and (1996), ‘Action research for management research’, British Journal of Management, 7/1: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘Building theories from case study research’, Academy of Management Review, 14/4: 532–550.Google Scholar
, , , , and (1994), The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
, and (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), ‘Closing the gap: A polemic on plant-based research in operations management’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19/2: 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: Formality, communication, coordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–496.CrossRef
. and (2002), ‘Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: Learning from failure’, Organization Studies, 23/6: 949–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘Changes in organizational knowledge production: 1999 presidential address’, Academy of Management Review, 25/2: 288–293.Google Scholar
and (2001), ‘Re-focusing the business school agenda’, British Journal of Management, 12/S1: 34–46.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008), ‘Meetings as strategizing episodes in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002), ‘Top teams and strategy in a UK university’, Journal of Management Studies, 39/3: 355–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007), Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
, and (2003), ‘Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006), ‘Toward a mid-range theory of strategy workshops’, AIM Working Chapter Series, 35-March-2006.
and (1999), ‘Conditioned emergence: A dissipative structures approach to transformation’, Strategic Management Journal, 20/4: 297–316.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002), ‘One process, two audiences: On the challenges of management research’, European Management Journal, 20/4: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002), ‘Mode 2 management research’, British Journal of Management, 13/3: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
and (2001) (eds), Handbook of action research. London: Sage.
and (1996), Managing strategy processes in emergent industries: The case of media firms. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007), ‘Strategy workshops for strategic reviews: A case of semi-structured emergent dialogues’, AIM Research Working Chapter Series, 54-February-2007.
, and (2007), ‘Switching strategic perspective: The reframing of accounts of responsibility’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), The production of knowledge: The challenge of social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1978), ‘An assessment of the scientific merits of action research’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23/4: 582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998), ‘The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy’, British Journal of Management, 9/4: 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001), ‘Complex thinking, complex practice: A narrative approach to organizational complexity’, Human Relations, 54/8: 979–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003), ‘The work of strategizing and organizing: For a practice perspective’, Strategic Organization, 1/1: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–634.Google Scholar
- 19
- Cited by