Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T11:11:00.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 40 - Multimodality in Strategy-as-Practice Research

from Part V - Substantive Topic Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Eric Knight and Matthias Wenzel examine the multimodality of strategizing. Drawing parallels to research in other domains of organization studies, they show that the enactment of strategic practices involves, amongst others, discursive modes (i.e., written or oral texts such as speech acts, emails, documents or newspaper articles), bodily modes (i.e., bodily movements such as gestures, gazes, nodding or pointing) and material modes (i.e., objects and artefacts such as tables, chairs, rooms or tools). As the concept of multimodality signals, these different modes are typically interrelated. That is, one typically finds a constellation of different modes involved in strategy work. The authors review existing strategy as practice research in terms of how they have conceptualized and captured the multimodality of strategy work. They distinguish three different conceptualizations, which they label ‘multimodality as representation’ (treating different modes as reflected in each other), ‘multimodality as co-creation’ (treating different modes as recursively shaping each other) and ‘multimodality as intertwinement’ (treating different modes as amalgamated). They discuss how each view of multimodality allows for different types of insights to be gained on the doing of strategy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnaud, N., Mills, C. E., Legrand, C. and Maton, E. (2016), ‘Materializing strategy in mundane tools: the key to coupling global strategy and local strategy practice?’, British Journal of Management, 27/1: 3857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, B. and Oshima, S. (2018), ‘Strategy making as a communicative practice: the multimodal accomplishment of strategy roles’, M@n@gement, 21/2: 884912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Best, K. and , J. K. (2015), ‘Selling the object of strategy: how frontline workers realize strategy through their daily work’, Organization Studies, 36/10: 1285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, D., Cordes, H., Nolte, S., Schneider, J. C. and Camerer, C. F. (2022), ‘Decision weights for experimental asset prices based on visual salience’, The Review of Financial Studies. 35/11: 5094–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J., Cornelissen, J. P. and Healey, M. P. (2019), ‘Actions speak louder than words: how figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments’, Academy of Management Journal, 62/2: 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dameron, S., , J. K. and LeBaron, C. (2015), ‘Materializing strategy and strategizing materials: why matter matters’, British Journal of Management, 26: S1S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L. and Müller-Seitz, G. (2019), ‘Closing for the benefit of openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process’, Organization Studies, 40/3: 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylfe, P., Franck, H. and Vaara, E. (2019), ‘Living with paradox through irony’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155: 6882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylfe, P., Franck, H., Lebaron, C. and Mantere, S. (2016), ‘Video methods in strategy research: focusing on embodied cognition’, Strategic Management Journal, 37/1: 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2017), ‘Open strategy: dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics’, Long Range Planning, 50/3: 298309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L. and Jacobs, C. D. (2008), ‘Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors’, Organization Studies, 29/1: 4578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höllerer, M. A., van Leeuwen, T., Jancsary, D., Meyer, R. E., Hestbæk Andersen, T. and Vaara, E. (2019), Visual and Multimodal Research in Organization and Management Studies: London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huy, Q. N. (2002), ‘Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47/1: 3169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imschloss, M. and Kuehnl, C. (2019), ‘Feel the music! Exploring the cross-modal correspondence between music and haptic perceptions of softness’, Journal of Retailing, 95/4: 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Constructing spaces for strategic work: a multimodal perspective’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S26S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2022), ‘Presenting as a Chief Strategy Officer: a discourse-analytical study of elite subjectivities and vulnerabilities’, Human Relations, 76/9.Google Scholar
Knight, E. and Tsoukas, H. (2019), ‘When fiction trumps truth: what “post-truth” and “alternative facts” mean for management studies’, Organization Studies, 40/2: 193–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E., Lok, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Wenzel, M. (forthcoming), ‘Sensing the room: the role of atmosphere in collective sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999), Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Handbook. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2021), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.Google Scholar
Küpers, W., Mantere, S. and Statler, M. (2013), ‘Strategy as storytelling: a phenomenological collaboration’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 22/1: 83100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I., Vaara, E., Mackay, R. and Wodak, R. (2020), ‘Using verbal irony to move on with controversial issues’, Organization Science, 31/4: 865–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laine, P.-M. and Vaara, E. (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 2958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016), ‘Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: an ethnomethodological study of handoff routines’, Organization Science, 27/3: 514–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F. and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meziani, N. and Cabantous, L. (2020), ‘Acting intuition into sense: how film crews make sense with embodied ways of knowing’, Journal of Management Studies, 57/7: 1384–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirabeau, L. and Maguire, S. (2014), ‘From autonomous strategic behavior to emergent strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 35/8: 1202–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathues, E., van Vuuren, M., M., Endedijk, M. D. and Wenzel, M. (forthcoming), ‘Shape-shifting: how boundary objects affect meaning-making across visual, verbal, and embodied modes’, Human Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267241236111.Google Scholar
Paroutis, S., Franco, L. A. and Papadopoulos, T. (2015), ‘Visual interactions with strategy tools: producing strategic knowledge in workshops’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S48S66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Balogun, J. (2011), ‘Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 953–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Cloutier, C. (2022), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research’, Strategic Organization, 20/4: 722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003), ‘Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidl, D., von Krogh, G. and Whittington, R. (eds) (2019), Cambridge Handbook on Open Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. K. and Lewis, M. W. (2011), ‘Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing’, Academy of Management Review, 36/2: 381403.Google Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Splitter, V., Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2021), ‘Middle managers’ struggle over their subject position in open strategy processes’, Journal of Management Studies, 60/7: 1884–923.Google Scholar
Statler, M., Jacobs, C. and Roos, J. (2008), ‘Performing strategy – analogical reasoning as strategic practice’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24/2: 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C. and LeBaron, C. (2011), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002), ‘On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change’, Organization Science, 13/5: 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Fritsch, L. (2022), ‘Strategy as language and communication: theoretical and methodological advances and avenues for the future in strategy process and practice research’, Strategic Management Journal, 43/6: 1170–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Monin, P. (2010), ‘A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions’, Organization Science, 21/1: 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittle, A. (2022), ‘Common sense, new sense or non-sense? A critical discursive perspective on power in collective sensemaking’, Journal of Management Studies, 59/3: 755–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuori, T. O. and Huy, Q. N. (2020), ‘Regulating top managers’ emotions during strategy making: Nokia’s socially distributed approach enabling radical change from mobile phones to networks in 2007–2013’, Academy of Management Journal, 65/1: 331–63.Google Scholar
Weiser, A.-K. (2021), ‘The role of substantive actions in sensemaking during strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 58/3: 815–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M. and Koch, J. (2018), ‘Strategy as staged performance: a critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M., Koch, J., Cornelissen, J. P., Rothmann, W. and Senf, N. N. (2019), ‘How organizational actors live out paradoxical tensions through power relations: the case of a youth prison’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155: 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S67S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M. and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategising/organising: broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilber, T. B. (2017), ‘A call for “strong” multimodal research in institutional theory’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 54A: 6384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×