Aroles, J. and McLean, C. (2016). Rethinking stability and change in the study of organizational routines: Difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory. Organization Science, 27(3), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barley, S. R. (1988). Technology, power, and the social organization of work: Towards a pragmatic theory of skilling and deskilling. In DiTomaso, N. and Bacharach, S., eds., Research in the Sociology of Organizations: A Research Annual, Vol. 7, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 33–80.Google Scholar

Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–677.Google Scholar

Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 775–791.Google Scholar

Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 594–613.Google Scholar

Burns, J. (2000). The dynamics of accounting change: Interplay between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13, 566–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacciatori, E. (2012). Resolving conflict in problem-solving: Systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1559–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In Callon, M., ed., The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244–269.Google Scholar

Canales, R. (2014). Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organization Science, 25(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M. and Winter, S. G. (1996). Routines and other recurring patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 653–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohendet, P. S. and Simon, L. O. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coriat, B. and Dosi, G. (1999). Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the co‐evolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines. In Chandler, A. D., Hagstrom, P. and Sölvell, Ö., eds., The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2001). Crafting the virtual prototype: How firms integrate knowledge and capabilities across organisational boundaries. Research Policy, 30(9), 1409–1424.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2003). Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(3), 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769–789.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unraveled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routines transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 1325–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Adderio, L. and Pollock, N. (2014). Performing modularity: Competing rules, performative struggles, and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organization Studies, 35(12), 1813–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M. and Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716.Google Scholar

Ethiraj, S. K. and Levinthal, D. (2009). Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organization Science, 20(1), 4–21.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaba, V. and Greve, H. R. (2019). Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organization Science, 30(4), 647–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galison, P. (1999). Trading zone: Coordinating action and belief. In Biagioli, M., ed., The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 137–160.Google Scholar

Ganz, S. C. (2018). Ignorant decision making and educated inertia: Some political pathologies of organizational learning. Organization Science, 29(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Glaser, V. (2017). Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2126–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. and Rerup, C. (2017). A process perspective on organizational routines. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 323–337.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. (2015). Truce breaking and remaking: The CEO’s role in changing organizational routines. In Gavetti, G. and Ocasio, W., eds., Advances in Strategic Management. Bingley: Emerald Insight, 32: pp. 1–45.Google Scholar

Kho, J., Spee, A. P. and Gillespie, N. (2019). Enacting relational expertise to change professional routines in technology-mediated service settings. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations; Vol. 61). Bingley: Emerald, pp. 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiwan, L. and Lazaric, N. (2019). Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations; Vol. 61). Bingley: Emerald, pp. 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazaric, N. and Denis, B. (2001). How and why routines change: Some lessons from the articulation of knowledge with ISO 9002 implementation in the food industry. Economies et Sociétés, 6, 585–612.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N. and Mangolte, P. A. (1998). Routines et mémoire organisationelle: un questionnement critique de la perspective cognitiviste. Revue Internationale de Systémique, 12, 27–49.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N., Mangolte, P. A. and Massué, M. L. (2003). Articulation and codification of know-how Organizational routines: A review of the literature in the steel industry: Some evidence from blast furnace control in France. Research Policy, 32, 1829–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinthal, D. and Rerup, C. (2020). The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organization Science, 32(3), 527–543.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. (2006). An Engine, not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mangolte, P. A. (1997). Le concept de ‘routine organisationelle’ entre cognition et institution. PhD Thesis, Université Paris-Nord, U.F.R. de Sciences Economiques et de Gestion, Centre de Recherche en Economie Industrielle.Google Scholar

Mangolte, P. A. (2000). Organisational learning and the organisational link: The problem of conflict, political equilibrium and truce. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 14, 173–190.Google Scholar

March, J. G. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24(4), 662–678.Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815.Google Scholar

Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Organization Science, 54(3), 577–610.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 170–209.Google Scholar

Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S. and Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T. and Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–970.Google Scholar

Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27(3), 759–781.Google Scholar

Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46.Google Scholar

Zbaracki, M. J. and Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–972.Google Scholar

Anand, G., Gray, J. and Siemsen, E. (2012). Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 23(6), 1700–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593.Google Scholar

Blanche, C. and Cohendet, P. (2019). Remounting a ballet in a different context: A complementary understanding of routines transfer theories. In Feldman, M., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 61). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2019). Transferring routines across multiple boundaries: A flexible approach. In Feldman, M., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 61). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 31–53.Google Scholar

Bresman, H. (2013). Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 35–61.Google Scholar

Bruns, H. (2009). Leveraging functionality in safety routines: Examining the divergence of rules and performance. Human Relations, 62(9), 1399–1426.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting Routine Dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–800.Google Scholar

Cajaiba, A. P., Cajaiba Santana, G. and Lazaric, N. (2015). An institutional perspective on routine emergence: A case from the bio-tech industry. Post-Print hal-01298030, HAL.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In Bijker, W., Hughes, T. and Pinch, T., eds., The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Canales, R. (2013). Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organization Science, 25(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Christianson, M. K., Farkas, M. T., Sutcliffe, M. and Weick, K. E. (2009). Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organization Science, 20(5), 846–860.Google Scholar

Claus, L., de Rond, M., Howard-Grenville, J. and Lodge, J. (2019). When fieldwork hurts: On the lived experience of conducting research in unsettling contexts. In Zilber, T. B., Amis, J. M. and Mair, J., eds., The Production of Managerial Knowledge and Organizational Theory: New Approaches to Writing, Producing and Consuming Theory. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations Series, Vol. 59). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 157–172.Google Scholar

Cohendet, P. S. and Simon, L. O. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 1325–1350.Google Scholar

Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659–677.Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.Google Scholar

Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2000). The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M. and Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Essén, A. (2008). Variability as a source of stability: Studying routines in the elderly home care setting. Human Relations, 61(11), 1617–1644.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar

George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A. and Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.Google Scholar

Gersick, C. J. and Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 65–97.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Glaser, V. (2017). Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2126–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 563–727.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. and Rerup, C. (2017). A process perspective on organizational routines. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Handbook of Process Organizational Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 323–339.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (2016). Introduction. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Kremser, W. and Schreyögg, G. (2016). The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27(3), 698–721.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B. and Dover, G. (2015). Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 371–410.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B. and Phillips, N. (2019). Constructing Organizational Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016). Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 514–534.Google Scholar

Lübcke, T., Steigenberger, N., Wilhelm, H. and Maurer, I. (2019). How core actors coordinate distal actors in organizational routines. Proceedings of the 79th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Boston.Google Scholar

Mutch, A. (2016). Bringing history into the study of routines: Contextualizing performance. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1171–1188.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nigam, A., Huising, R. and Golden, B. (2016). Explaining the selection of routines for change during organizational search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 551–583.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. and Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T. and Hillison, D. (2011). The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22(6), 1369–1383.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 223–230.Google Scholar

Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610.Google Scholar

Rogers, K. M., Corley, K. G. and Ashforth, B. E. (2017). Seeing more than orange: Organizational respect and positive identity transformation in a prison context. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 219–269.Google Scholar

Royer, I. and Daniel, A. (2019). Organizational routines and institutional maintenance: The influence of legal artifacts. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 204–224.Google Scholar

Sele, K. and Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: Mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organization Science, 27(3), 722–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sewell, W. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27(3), 759–781.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Fern, M. J. (2012). Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1407–1434.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2018). Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1253–1280.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. (1995). Boundaries of social work or social work of boundaries? The social service review lecture. Social Service Review, 69(4), 545–562.Google Scholar

Abell, P., Felin, T. and Foss, N. (2008). Building micro‐foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280.Google Scholar

Birnholtz, J. P., Cohen, M. D. and Hoch, S. V. (2007). Organizational character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organization Science, 18(2), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. and Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5(4), 554–568.Google Scholar

Davies, A., Frederiksen, L., Cacciatori, E. and Hartmann, A. (2018). The long and winding road: Routine creation and replication in multi-site organizations. Research Policy, 47(8), 1403–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659–677.Google Scholar

Dönmez, D., Grote, G. and Brusoni, S. (2016). Routine interdependencies as a source of stability and flexibility: A study of agile software development teams. Information and Organization, 26(3), 63–83.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Studies, 27(3), 505–513. Special Issue.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Rafaeli, A. (2002). Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 309–331.Google Scholar

Galunic, C. and Weeks, J. (2005). Intraorganizational ecology. In Baum, J. A. C., ed., Blackwell Companion to Organizations, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 75–98.Google Scholar

Geiger, D., Danner-Schröder, A. and Kremser, W. (2021). Getting ahead of time: Performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(1), 220–264. doi:10.1177/0001839220941010.Google Scholar

Glaser, V. L. (2017). Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2126–2154.Google Scholar

Goh, K. T. and Pentland, B. T. (2019). From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1901–1929.Google Scholar

Hansson, M., Hærem, T. and Pentland, B. T. (2018). Repertoire, routinization, and enacted complexity in patterns of action. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 10734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helfat, C. (2018). The behavior and capabilities of firms. In Nelson, R., Dosi, G., Helfat, C., Pyka, A., Saviotti, P. and Lee, K., et al., eds., Modern Evolutionary Economics: An Overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar

Hoekzema, J. (2020). Bridging the gap between ecologies and clusters: Towards an integrative framework of routine interdependence. European Management Review, 17(2), 559–571.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds. (2016). Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed (vol. 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kremser, W. (2017). Interdependente Routinen. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kremser, W. and Blagoev, B. (2021). The Dynamics of Prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role-routine ecologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 339–379. doi:10.1177/0001839220948483.Google Scholar

Kremser, W., Pentland, B. and Brunswicker, S. (2019) Interdependence within and between routines: A performative perspective. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Kremser, W. and Schreyögg, G. (2016). The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27(3), 698–721.Google Scholar

Langley, A., Lindberg, K., Mørk, B. E., Nicolini, D., Raviola, E. and Walter, L. (2019). Boundary work between groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 704–736.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindberg, A. (2020). Developing theory through integrating human and machine pattern recognition. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(1), 90–116.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, Belknap.Google Scholar

Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–453.Google Scholar

Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G. and Shah, R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 730–748.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. (2004). Towards an ecology of inter-organizational routines: A conceptual framework for the analysis of net-enabled organizations. In System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference (pp. 264–271). IEEE.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. (2011). The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: Comment on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 279–293.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Liu, P., Kremser, W. and Haerem, T. 2020. The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 19–47.Google Scholar

Pentland, B.T., Liu, P., Kremser, W. and Hærem, T. (2021). Can small variations accumulate into big changes? In Lounsbury, M., Anderson, D. and Spee, P., eds., Research in the Sociology of Organizations Vol. 71. On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 29–44.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Recker, J. and Wyner, G. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring interdependence between organizational routines. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016), December, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

Peteraf, M. and Tsoukas, H. (2017). How differences in understanding the dynamic capabilities construct may be reconciled through process research. In Sandberg, et al., eds., Skillful Performance: Enacting Capabilities, Knowledge, Competence, and Expertise in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar

Prange, C., Bruyaka, O. and Marmenout, K. (2017). Investigating the transformation and transition processes between dynamic capabilities: Evidence from DHL. Organization Studies, 1–27.Google Scholar

Puranam, P., Raveendran, M. and Knudsen, T. (2012). Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 419–440.Google Scholar

Quick, K. S. and Feldman, M. S. (2014). Boundaries as junctures: Collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 673–695.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. (2009). The contribution of event-sequence analysis to the study of organizational routines. In Becker, M. C. and Lazaric, N., eds., Organizational Routines. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 68–102.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2011). Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37(2), 468–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilke, O., Hu, S. and Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 390–439.Google Scholar

Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1407–1421.Google Scholar

Sele, K. and Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: Mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organization Science, 27(3), 722–738.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27(3), 759–781.Google Scholar

Strauss, A. L., Schatzman, L., Ehrlich, D., Bucher, R. and Sabshin, M. (1963). The Hospital and Its Negotiated Order. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.Google Scholar

Zaheer, S., Albert, S. and Zaheer, A. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 725–741.Google Scholar

Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Archer, M. (2003). Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. (2007). Making Our Way through the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T. and March, J. G. (2006). Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 353–371.Google Scholar

Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 23, 573–593.Google Scholar

Brette, O., Lazaric, N. and de Vierera, V. (2017). Habit, decision making and rationality: Comparing Thorstein Veblen and early Herbert Simon, Journal of Economic Issues, 3, 567–587.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27, 594–613.Google Scholar

Cacciatori, E. (2012). Resolving conflict in problem-solving: Systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1559–1585.Google Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006). Strategy as practical coping : A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27(5), 635–654.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. (1991). Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organization Science, 2(1), 135–139.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), 773–786.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963/1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economy, 7, 197–230.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37, 769–789.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25, 1325–1350.Google Scholar

Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27, 659–677.Google Scholar

Dionysiou, D. D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013). Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionalist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38, 181–205.Google Scholar

Dittrich, K., Guerard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016). Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27(3), 678–697.Google Scholar

Dittrich, K. and Seidl, D. (2018). Emerging intentionality in Routine Dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 111–138.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2003). A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 727–752.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski,. W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction of the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Rafaeli, A. (2002). Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 309–331.Google Scholar

Ferraro, F., Etzion, D. and Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390.Google Scholar

Fuller, C. (2013). Reflexivity, relative autonomy and the embedded individual in economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(1), 109–129.Google Scholar

Glaser, V. L. (2017). Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 2126–2154.Google Scholar

Greve, H. R. (2008). Organizational routines and performance feedback. In Becker, M. C., ed., Handbook of Organizational Routines. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar

Gupta, A., Hoopes, D. G. and Knott, A. M. (2015). Redesigning routines for replication. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 851–871.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. and Rerup, C. (2017). A process perspective on organizational routines. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Sage Handbook of Process Organizational Studies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 323–339.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A., eds. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kiwan, L. and Lazaric, N. (2019). Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N. (2008). Routines and routinization: An exploration of some micro-cognitive foundations. In Becker, M. C., ed., Handbook of Organizational Routines. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 205–227.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N. (2011). Organizational routines and cognition: An introduction to empirical and analytical contributions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 147–156.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N. and Denis, B. (2001). How and why routines change: Some lessons from the articulation of knowledge with ISO 9002 implementation in the food industry. Economie et Sociétés, 585–612.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N. and Denis, B. (2005). Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: The case of the introduction of ISO norms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 873–896.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N., Mangolte, P-A. and Massué, M-L. (2003). Articulation and codification of collective know-how in the steel industry: Evidence from blast furnace control in France. Research Policy, 32, 1829–1847.Google Scholar

Levinthal, D. A. and Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17, 502–513.Google Scholar

March, J. and Simon, H. (1958). Organizations, NY: Wiley, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Obstfeld, D. (2012). Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organization Science, 23(6), 1571–1592.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–427.Google Scholar

Parmentier Cajaiba, A., Lazaric, N. and Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2021). The effortful process of routines emergence: The interplay of entrepreneurial actions and artefacts, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31(1), 33–63.Google Scholar

Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–453.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. (1992). Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 527–548.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. (1995). Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organization Science, 6(5), 541–556.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M.S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235–250.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C. and Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1484–1508.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Ju Jung, E. (2016). Evolutionary and revolutionary change in path-dependent patterns of action. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 96–113.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H.H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484–510.Google Scholar

Possas, M. L, Salles-Filho, S. and Silveira, da J. M. (1996). An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: Some preliminary remarks. Research Policy, 25, 933–945.Google Scholar

Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20, 384–409.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2011). Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37, 468–490.Google Scholar

Sent, E.-M. (2000). Herbert A. Simon as a Cyborg scientist. Perspectives on Science, 8(4), 380–406.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. [1947] (1976). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press, 3rd edition.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. [1947] (1997). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press, 4th edition.Google Scholar

Simon, H.A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment, Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational – Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 53–283.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1991). Theories of bounded rationality. In McGuire, C. B. and Radner, Roy, eds., Decision and Organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, pp. 161–176.Google Scholar

Simpson, B. and Lorino, P. (2016) Re-viewing routines through a Pragmatist lens. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: The Century Co,Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, 567–582.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Cacciatori, E. (2016). The multiplicity of habit: Implications for routines research. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46.Google Scholar

Winter, S. G. (1964). Economic ‘natural selection’ and the theory of the firm. Institute of Public Policy Studies, University of Michigan, 4, 225–272.Google Scholar

Winter, S. G. (2013). Habit, deliberation, and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 120–137.Google Scholar

Winter, S. G. and Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12, 730–743.Google Scholar

Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A. and Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–529.Google Scholar

Arstila, V. and Lloyd, D. (2014). Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ballard, D. I. and Seibold, D. R. (2006). The experience of time at work: Relationship to communication load, job satisfaction, and interdepartmental communication. Communication Studies, 57(3), 317–340.Google Scholar

Bapuji, H., Hora, M., Saeed, A. and Turner, S. (2019). How understanding-based redesign influences the pattern of actions and effectiveness of routines. Journal of Management, 45(5), 2132–2162.Google Scholar

Becker, M. C. and Zirpoli, F. (2009). Innovation routines: Exploring the role of procedures and stable behaviour patterns in innovation. In Becker, M. C. and Lazaric, N., eds., Organizational Routines: Advancing Empirical Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 303–339.Google Scholar

Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–706.Google Scholar

Bergmann, W. (1992). The problem of time in sociology: An overview of the literature on the state of theory and research on the ‘Sociology of Time’, 1900–82. Time & Society, 1(1), 81–134.Google Scholar

Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593.Google Scholar

Bluedorn, A. C. and Denhardt, R. B. (1988). Time and organizations. Journal of Management, 14(2), 299–320.Google Scholar

Bresman, H. (2013). Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 35–61.Google Scholar

Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 594–613.Google Scholar

Cacciatori, E. (2012). Resolving conflict in problem-solving: Systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1559–1585.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), 773–786.Google Scholar

Cohendet, P. S. and Simon, L. O. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963/1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 1325–1350.Google Scholar

Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27(3), 633–658.Google Scholar

Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dionysiou, D. D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013). Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionalist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 181–205.Google Scholar

Dittrich, K., Guerard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016). Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27(3), 678–697.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2003). A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 727–752.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction of the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.Google Scholar

Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A. and Karnoe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774.Google Scholar

Goh, K. T. and Rerup, C. (2018). The role of space and time in balancing conflicting pressures through routine dynamics. Academy of Management Proceedings. Published online.Google Scholar

Grand, S. (2016). Routines, Strategies and Management: Engaging for Recurrent Creation ‘at the Edge’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Grodal, S., Nelson, A. J. and Siino, R. M. (2015). Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Engagement in innovative work. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 136–168.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749.Google Scholar

Hernadi, P. (1992). Objective, subjective, intersubjective times: Guest editor’s introduction. Time & Society, 1(2), 147–158.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. and Rerup, C. (2017). A process perspective on organizational routines. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 323–337.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. (2015). Truce breaking and remaking: The CEO’s role in changing organizational routines. In Gavetti, G. and Ocasio, W., eds., Cognition and Strategy. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar

Kho, J., Spee, A. P. and Gillespie, N. (2019). Enacting relational expertise to change professional routines in technology-mediated service settings. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 191–213.Google Scholar

Kiwan, L. and Lazaric, N. (2019). Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar

Kremser, W., Pentland, B. T. and Brunswicker, S. (2019). Interdependence within and between routines: A performative perspective. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar

Kremser, W. and Schreyögg, G. (2016). The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27(3), 698–721.Google Scholar

Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (2017). Introduction: Process thinking, process theorizing and process researching. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Lazaric, N. (2008). Routines and routinization: An exploration of some micro-cognitive foundations. In Becker, M. C., ed., Handbook of Organizational Routines. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 205–227.Google Scholar

LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016). Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 514–534.Google Scholar

Lin, Y. (2013). The Intersubjectivity of Time: Levinas and Infinite Responsibility. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar

McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 17(68), 457–474.Google Scholar

Mutch, A. (2016). Bringing history into the study of routines: Contextualizing performance. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1171–1188.Google Scholar

Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–453.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. (1992). Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 527–548.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C. and Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1484–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Reuter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484–510.Google Scholar

Ravasi, D., Rindova, V. and Stigliani, I. (2019). The stuff of legend: History, memory and the temporality of organizational identity construction. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1523–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinecke, J. and Ansari, S. (2017). Time, temporality, and process studies. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 402–416.Google Scholar

Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610.Google Scholar

Rowell, C., Gustafsson, R. and Clemente, M. (2016). How institutions matter ‘in time’: The temporal structure of practices and their effects on practice reproduction. In Gehman, J., Lounsbury, M. and Greenwood, R., eds., How Institutions Matter, Vol. 48A, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 305–330.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20(2), 384–409.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 170–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sele, K. and Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the dynamics of ecologies of routines: Mediators and their generative effects in routine interactions. Organization Science, 27(3), 722–738.Google Scholar

Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R. and Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P. and Smets, M. (2016). The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 23(3), 759–781.Google Scholar

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening up the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Fern, M. J. (2012). Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1407–1434.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2018). Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1253–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urry, J. (1996). Sociology of time and space. In Turner, B. S., ed., The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 369–395.Google Scholar

van Mierlo, J., Loohuis, R. and Bondarouk, T. (2019). The role of multiple points of view in non-envisioned routine creation: Taking initiative, creating connections, and coping with misalignments. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar

Yakura, E. K. (2002). Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zbaracki, M. J. and Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21(5), 955–972.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Aroles, J. and McLean, C. (2016). Rethinking stability and change in the study of organizational routines: Difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory. Organization Science, 27(3), 535–550.Google Scholar

Baden‐Fuller, C. and Winter, S. G. (2005). Replicating organizational knowledge: rinciples or templates? (No. 0515). Papers on Economics and Evolution.Google Scholar

Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016). Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27(3), 573–593.Google Scholar

Birnholtz, J. P., Cohen, M. D. and Hoch, S. V. (2007). Organizational character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organization Science, 18(2), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanche, C. and Cohendet, P. (2019). Remounting a Ballet in a Different Context: A Complementary Understanding of Routines Transfer Theories. Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 61). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2019). Transferring Routines across Multiple Boundaries: A Flexible Approach. Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 61). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016). The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 594–613.Google Scholar

Collins, H. M. (2005). What is tacit knowledge? In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 115–128.Google Scholar

Collins, H. (2007). Bicycling on the moon: Collective tacit knowledge and somatic-limit tacit knowledge. Organization Studies, 28(2), 257–262.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769–789.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2014). The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25(5), 1325–1350.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2017). Performativity and the innovation–replication dilemma. In The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. and Pollock, N. (2020). Making routines the same: Crafting similarity and singularity in routines transfer. Research Policy, 49(8), 104029.Google Scholar

Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27(3), 633–658.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar

George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A. and Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2016.4007.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J., Davis, G. F., Dyllick, T., Miller, C. C., Thau, S. and Tsui, A. S. (2019). Sustainable development for a better world: Contributions of leadership, management, and organizations. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(4), 355–366. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2019.0275.Google Scholar

Jensen, R. J. and Szulanski, G. (2007). Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Science, 53(11), 1716–1730.Google Scholar

Kiwan, L. and Lazaric, N. (2019). Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team. In Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

March, J. S. and Simon, H. A. (1958). HA (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Sidney, G. (2005). Winter 1982: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 413–453.Google Scholar

Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484–510.Google Scholar

Schmidt, T., Braun, T. and Sydow, J. (2019). Copying routines for new venture creation: How replication can support entrepreneurial innovation. Research in Sociology of Organizations,(61), 55–78.Google Scholar

Sonenshein, S. (2016). Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organization Science, 27(3), 739–758.Google Scholar

Stene, E. O. 1940. An approach to a science of administration. American Political Science Review, 34(6), 1124–1137.Google Scholar

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43.Google Scholar

Szulanski, G. and Jensen, R. J. (2004). Overcoming stickiness: An empirical investigation of the role of the template in the replication of organizational routines. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(6–7), 347–363.Google Scholar

Szulanski, G. and Jensen, R. J. (2008). Growing through copying: The negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1732–1741.Google Scholar

Szulanski, G. and Winter, S. (2002). Getting it right the second time. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 62–69.Google Scholar

Winter, S. G. and Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743.Google Scholar

Winter, S. G., Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. and Jensen, R. J. (2012). Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organization Science, 23(3), 672–685.Google Scholar

Adler, P. S. (1995). Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organization Science, 6(2), 147–167.Google Scholar

Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B. and Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68.Google Scholar

Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. (2002). The key to success in innovation part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58.Google Scholar

Ashforth, B. E. and Fried, Y. (1988). The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations, 41(4), 305–329.Google Scholar

Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social-order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.Google Scholar

Bartel, C. A. and Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107–117.Google Scholar

Bartunek, J. M., Trullen, J., Immediato, S. and Schneider, F. (2007). Front and backstages of the diminished routinization of innovations: What innovation research makes public and organizational research finds behind the scenes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 295–314.Google Scholar

Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330.Google Scholar

Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–677.Google Scholar

Becker, M. C. and Zirpoli, F. (2009). Innovation routines: Exploring the role of procedures and stable behaviour patterns in innovation. In Becker, M. C. and Lazaric, N., eds., Organizational Routines: Advances in Empirical Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 303–339.Google Scholar

Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.Google Scholar

Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244.Google Scholar

Burns, T. and Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Cacciatori, E. (2012). Resolving conflict in problem‐solving: Systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1559–1585.Google Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.Google Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.Google Scholar

Christiansen, J. K. and Varnes, C. J. (2009). Formal rules in product development: Sensemaking of structured approaches. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 502–519.Google Scholar

Cohendet, P. S. and Simon, L. O. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. G. (1996). Overhauling the new product process. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 465–482.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage‐gate idea‐to‐launch process update, what’s new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213–232.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1991). New product processes at leading industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 20(2), 137–147.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. G. and Sommer, A. F. (2016). The Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model: A promising new approach and a new research opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(5), 513–526.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2001). Crafting the virtual prototype: How firms integrate knowledge and capabilities across organizational boundaries. Research Policy, 30(9), 1409–1424.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769–789.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230.Google Scholar

Deken, F., Carlile, P. R., Berends, H. and Lauche, K. (2016). Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organization Science, 27(3), 659–677.Google Scholar

Deken, F. and Lauche, K. (2014). Coordinating through the development of a shared object: An approach to study interorganizational innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11(1).Google Scholar

Dionysiou, D. D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013). Understanding the (re) creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 181–205.Google Scholar

Dittrich, K. and Seidl, D. (2018). Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: A pragmatist view. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 111–138.Google Scholar

Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.Google Scholar

Dougherty, D. and Heller, T. (1994). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200–218.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.Google Scholar

Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Rafaeli, A. (2002). Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 309–331.Google Scholar

Ford, C. M. and Gioia, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26(4), 705–732.Google Scholar

Garud, R., Gehman, J. and Kumaraswamy, A. (2011). Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies, 32(6), 737–767.Google Scholar

Garud, R., Nayyar, P. R. and Shapira, Z. B., eds. (1997). Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garud, R. and Rappa, M. A. (1994). A sociocognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5(3), 344–362.Google Scholar

Garud, R., Tuertscher, P. and Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819.Google Scholar

Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), 429–458.Google Scholar

Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. R. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. (2005). Technology brokering and innovation: Linking strategy, practice, and people. Strategy and Leadership, 33(1), 32–36.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. B. and Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476–501.Google Scholar

Harvey, S. (2013). A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 822–832.Google Scholar

Hoekzema, J. (2020). Bridging the gap between ecologies and clusters: Towards an integrative framework of routine interdependence. European Management Review. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/emre.12391Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636.Google Scholar