Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:38:22.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Functional Acquisition Processes in Child Language

Links to Role and Reference Grammar

from Part Four - Applications of RRG

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

By
Richard M. Weist
Edited by
Delia Bentley ,
Ricardo Mairal Usón ,
Wataru Nakamura  and
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
Delia Bentley
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Ricardo Mairal Usón
Affiliation:
Universidad National de Educación a Distancia, Madrid
Wataru Nakamura
Affiliation:
Tohoku University, Japan
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Get access

Summary

This chapter proposes a functional theory of language acquisition based on the idea that children utilize their understanding of cognitive and communicative principles to construct a grammar that integrates semantic and pragmatic notions. The chapter explores child language data that are relevant to such issues as how layered clause structure, operator projection, predicate structure and grammatical relations are acquired within a communication-and-cognition framework. In showing how the language acquisition data map to the Role and Reference Grammar framework, the chapter includes contrasts with alternative theories, such as autonomous syntax theory. From the perspective of conceptual development, the infant-toddler is viewed as a relatively proficient information processor with the capacity to discover fundamental linguistic relationships, in the spirit of the theory of Operating Principles (Slobin 1985).

Keywords

language acquisitionOperating Principlesclause structureoperator scopegrammatical relationsWH-questionsTurkishJapanesePolish
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Role and Reference Grammar , pp. 666 - 692
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 1988. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 1998. The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of the tense-aspect morphology: Evidence from Turkish. First Language 18: 255–280.Google Scholar
Antinucci, Francesco and Miller, Ruth. 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3: 167–190.Google Scholar
Bauer, Patricia. J. 1996. What do infants recall of their lives? Memory for specific events by one- to two-year-olds. American Psychologist 51: 29–41.Google Scholar
Bauer, Patricia. J. 2007. Remembering the Times of Our Lives: Memory in Infancy and Beyond. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1973. Early Syntactic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1981. Notes for the Nijmegen Workshop. MPI, Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1985. What shapes children’s grammars? In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2, 1257–1319. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1990. Mapping semantic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics 28: 1253–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, Jean-Paul and Sinclair, Hermina. 1973. Time, tense, and aspect. Cognition 2: 107–130.Google Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S. 1976. Children’s first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S. 1992. What sort of innate structure is needed to ‘bootstrap’ into syntax? Cognition 45: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Roger. 1973. A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Soonja. 1991. Early acquisition of epistemic meanings of Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language 11: 93–120.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja. 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In Bybee, Joan and Fleichman, Suzanne (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse, 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia. 1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The data, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert, (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, William J. 1978. Development of time concepts in children. In Ruse, H. W. and Lipsitt, Lewis P. (eds.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 12, 267–298. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liang, Lu Yao, Wu, Dandan and Li, Hui. 2019. Chinese preschoolers’ acquisition of temporal adverbs indicating past, present, and future: a corpus-based study. Journal of Child Language 46: 760–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieven, Elena V. M., Pine, Julian M. and Baldwin, Gillian. 1997. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24: 189–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, Brian and Snow, Catherine. 1985. The child language data system (CHILDES). Journal of Child Language 1: 271–296.Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M. 1990. A new perspective on cognitive development in infancy. American Scientist 78: 236–243.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 1994. Getting FAT: Finiteness, agreement, and tense in early grammars. In Meisel, Jürgen M. (ed.), Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Development, 89–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Nora and Huttenlocher, Janelle. 2003. Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1954. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1971. The Child’s Conception of Time. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Review of Slobin, Cross-linguistic evidence for language making capacity, and Bowerman, What shapes children’s grammar? Journal of Child Language 16: 456–463.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rovee-Collier, Carolyn K. 1997. Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Review 104: 467–498.Google Scholar
Rowland, Caroline F. and Pine, Julian M.. 2000. Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ Journal of Child Language 27: 157–182.Google Scholar
Rowland, Caroline F. and Pine, Julian M.. 2003. The development of inversion in wh-questions: A reply to Van Valin. Journal of Child Language 30: 197–212.Google Scholar
Sano, Tetsuya and Hyams, Nina. 1994. Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null agreements. Proceedings of NELS 24: 543–558.Google Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1993. Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese. In Nakajima, Heizo and Otsu, Yukio (eds.), Argument Structure: Its Syntax and Acquisition, 185–211. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1998. The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition. First Language 18: 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro and Andersen, Roger W.. 1995. The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71: 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2, 1175–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 2001. Form–function relations: How do children find out what they are? In Bowerman, Melissa and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, 406–449. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smoczyńska, Magdalena. 1985. The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, 595–686. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stephany, Ursula. 1986. Modality. In Fletcher, Paul and Garman, Michael (eds.), Language Acquisition, 375–400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stoll, Sabine. 1998. The role of lexical Aktionsart for the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language 18: 351–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth S. 1991. Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory. In Carey, Susan and Gelman, Rochel (eds.), The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition, 133–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth S. 2000. Core knowledge. American Psychologist 55: 1233–1243.Google Scholar
Toivainen, Jorma. 1980. Inflectional Affixes Used by Finnish-Speaking Children Aged 1–3 Years. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 61–82.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1991. Functionalist linguistic theory and language acquisition. First Language 11: 7–40.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1992. An overview of ergative phenomena and their implications for language acquisition. In Slobin, Dan I. (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 3, 15–38. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1993. A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Van Valin, Robert (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1998. The acquisition of wh-questions and the mechanisms of language acquisition. In Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, 221–249. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2002. The development of subject–auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: An alternative analysis. Journal of Child Language 29: 161–175.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. The Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface: An Introduction to Role and Reference Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M. 1986. Tense and aspect. In Fletcher, Paul and Garman, Michael (eds.), Language Acquisition, 356–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weist, Richard M. 1990. Neutralization and the concept of subject in child Polish. Linguistics 11: 1332–1348.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M. 2002. The first language acquisition of tense and aspect. In Salaberry, Rafael and Shirai, Yasuhiro (eds.), The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology, 25–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard, M. 2009. One-to-one mapping of temporal and spatial relations. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K. and Özçalişkan, S. (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 69–80. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M. 2014a. Developing temporal systems. Psychology of Language and Communication 18(2): 126–142.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M. 2014b. Future temporal reference in child language. In De Brabanter, Philippe, Kissine, Mikhail and Sharifzadeh, Saghie (eds.), Future Times: Future Tenses, 87–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M. and Buczowska, Ewa. 1987. The emergence of temporal adverbs in child Polish. First Language: 7, 217–229.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M., Pawlak, Aleksandra and Carapella, Jenell. 2004. Syntactic–semantic interface in the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Child Language 31: 31–60.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M., Pawlak, Aleksandra and Hoffman, Karen. 2009. Finiteness systems and lexical aspect in child Polish and English. Linguistics 47(6): 1321–1350.Google Scholar
Weist, Richard M., Wysocka, Hanna, Witkowska-Stadnik, Katarzyna, Buczowska, Ewa and Konieczna, Emilia. 1984. The defective tense hypothesis: On the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language 11: 347–374.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×