Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research
- Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Philosophical, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations
- Part II Methodological Considerations
- Chapter 7 Human Values in a Digital-First World: The Implications for Qualitative Research
- Chapter 8 One Picture to Study One Thousand Words
- Chapter 9 Demystifying the Digital
- Chapter 10 Case Study Research Revisited
- Chapter 11 Social Media Qualitative Research Vignettes
- Chapter 12 Co-Inquiring in a Digital Age
- Part III Illustrative Examples and Emergent Issues
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - Human Values in a Digital-First World: The Implications for Qualitative Research
from Part II - Methodological Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2023
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research
- Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Philosophical, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations
- Part II Methodological Considerations
- Chapter 7 Human Values in a Digital-First World: The Implications for Qualitative Research
- Chapter 8 One Picture to Study One Thousand Words
- Chapter 9 Demystifying the Digital
- Chapter 10 Case Study Research Revisited
- Chapter 11 Social Media Qualitative Research Vignettes
- Chapter 12 Co-Inquiring in a Digital Age
- Part III Illustrative Examples and Emergent Issues
- Index
- References
Summary
How should human values be integrated into the studies of digital qualitative research? This chapter proposes an answer to this question. It discusses the implications for qualitative researchers of human values in a digital-first world. In a digital-first world, digital technologies are simply taken for granted, and people see the world through digitally computed reality. The chapter offers a way to address the question of including human values in qualitative research in a digital society. It provides basic definitions of key concepts and illustrates them using practical examples of how human values are informing digital research from cultural, spiritual and Indigenous perspectives. As the diversity of human values contributes to the richness of meaning and everyday experiences, it is hoped that scholars and students of digital technology will examine, describe and integrate those values in their research. It is suggested that integrating human values in qualitative studies can contribute to interdisciplinarity in research.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Qualitative Digital Research , pp. 91 - 103Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Amnesty International. (2019). Facebook and Google’s pervasive surveillance poses an unprecedented danger to human rights, www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/11/google-facebook-surveillance-privacy/.Google Scholar
Answer the Call of Vanuatu. (n.d.). What is Kastom, www.vanuatu.travel/en/local-knowledge/local-knowledge-what-is-kastom.Google Scholar
Baier, K. (1971). What is value? An analysis of the concept. In Baier, K. and Rescher, N. (eds), Values and the Future: The Impact of Technological Change on American Values. New York, NY: Free Press, pp. 33–67.Google Scholar
Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D. and Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brey, P. (2018). The strategic role of technology in a good society. Technology in Society, 52(C), 39–45.Google Scholar
Brey, P. (2010). Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. In Floridi, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 4, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M. and Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505–528.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Sarker, S. and Fuller, M. (2009). Ethical information systems development: A Baumanian postmodernist perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(11), 787–815.Google Scholar
Chughtai, H. (2021). Taking the human body seriously. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 46–68.Google Scholar
Chughtai, H. (2020). Human values and digital work: An ethnographic study of device paradigm. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 49(1), 27–57.Google Scholar
Chughtai, H., Myers, M. D., Young, A. G., Borsa, T., Cardo, V. M., Demirkol, Ö. et al. (2020). Demarginalizing interdisciplinarity in IS research: Interdisciplinary research in marginalization. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 46(1), 296–315.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. and Davison, R. M. (2020). Through whose eyes? The critical concept of researcher perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(2), 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinides, P., Chiasson, M. W. and Introna, L. D. (2012). The ends of information systems research: A pragmatic framework. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fällman, D. (2010). A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction. AI & Society, 25(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (ed.) (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. (ed.) (1997). Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. and Hendry, D. G. (2019). Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, U., Ienca, M., Scheibner, J., Sleigh, J. and Vayena, E. (2020). Digital tools against COVID-19: Taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid. Lancet Digital Health, 2(8), e425–e434.Google Scholar
Geismar, H. and Mohns, W. (2011). Social relationships and digital relationships: Rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(S1), S133–S155.Google Scholar
Haveman, H. A. and Gualtieri, G. (2017). Institutional logics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-137.Google Scholar
Heikkerö, T. (2005). The good life in a technological world: Focal things and practices in the West and in Japan. Technology in Society, 27(2), 251–259.Google Scholar
Hendry, D. G., Woelfer, J. P. and Duong, T. (2017). U-District Job Co-op: Constructing a future vision for homeless young people and employment. Information Technology & People, 30(3), 602–628.Google Scholar
Huang, Q., Davison, R. M. and Gu, J. (2011). The impact of trust, guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer-to-peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 21(6), 557–577.Google Scholar
Kewell, B., Adams, R. and Parry, G. (2017). Blockchain for good? Strategic Change, 26(5), 429–437.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. (1983). Two distinctions in goodness. Philosophical Review, 92(2), 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L. and Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267–277.Google Scholar
McKenna, B. and Chughtai, H. (2020). Resistance and sexuality in virtual worlds: An LGBT perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106–199.Google Scholar
Mingers, J. and Walsham, G. (2010). Toward ethical information systems: The contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 833–854.Google Scholar
Myers, M. D., Chughtai, H., Davidson, E. J., Tsibolane, P. and Young, A. G. (2020). Studying the other or becoming the other: Engaging with indigenous peoples in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 47(1), 382–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, M. D. and Venable, J. R. (2014). A set of ethical principles for design science research in information systems. Information & Management, 51(6), 801–809.Google Scholar
Ortiz, J. C. A., Young, A. G., Myers, M. D., Bedeley, R. T., Carbaugh, D., Chughtai, H. et al. (2019). Giving voice to the voiceless: The use of digital technologies by marginalized groups. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 45(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
Pálsson, G. (2007). Anthropology and the New Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pan, S. L. and Zhang, S. (2020). From fighting COVID-19 pandemic to tackling sustainable development goals: An opportunity for responsible information systems research. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 1–6.Google Scholar
Ricard, M. (2014). A Buddhist view of happiness. Journal of Law and Religion, 29(1), 14–29.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. (2020). Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 1–5.Google Scholar
Sakurai, M. and Chughtai, H. (2020). Resilience against crises: COVID-19 and lessons from natural disasters. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 585–594.Google Scholar
Sellen, A., Rogers, Y., Harper, R. and Rodden, T. (2009). Reflecting human values in the digital age. Communications of the ACM, 52(3), 58–66.Google Scholar
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S. and Kaye, J. J. (2005). Reflective design. Paper presented at the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility. Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, R. (2017). Whose Global Village? Rethinking How Technology Shapes Our World. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Y., Xiong, J., Becerril-Arreola, R. and Iyer, L. (2019). Ethics of blockchain: A framework of technology, applications, impacts, and research directions. Information Technology & People, 33(2), 602–632.Google Scholar
Venable, J. R., Pries‐Heje, J., Bunker, D. and Russo, N. L. (2011). Design and diffusion of systems for human benefit: Toward more humanistic realisation of information systems in society. Information Technology & People, 24(3), 208–216.Google Scholar
Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87–93.Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1983). Technē and politeia: The technical constitution of society. In Durbin, P. T. and Rapp, F. (eds), Philosophy and Technology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 97–111.Google Scholar
Xiao, X., Tan, B., Leong, C. and Tan, F. T. C. (2021). Powered by ‘Qinghuai’: The melding of traditional values and digital entrepreneurship in contemporary China. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 769–802.Google Scholar
Young, A. G. (2018). Using ICT for social good: Cultural identity restoration through emancipatory pedagogy. Information Systems Journal, 28(2), 340–358.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by