Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Baumer, E. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00967.x.Google Scholar

Bell, M. C. (2016). Situational trust: How disadvantaged mothers reconceive legal cynicism. Law & Society Review, 50, 314–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12200.Google Scholar

Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bosick, S. J., Rennison, C. M., Gover, A. R., & Dodge, M. (2012). Reporting violence to the police: Predictors through the life course. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.05.001.Google Scholar

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1994). National Crime Victimization Survey: Questions and answers about the redesign. NCJ 151171. US Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ncsrqa.pdf.Google Scholar

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1994. NCJ 162126. US Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvius94.pdf.Google Scholar

Burke, T. (2021). Unbound: My story of liberation and the birth of the Me Too movement. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Chakraborti, N., Garland, J., & Hardy, S. J. (2014). The Leicester hate crime project. Findings and conclusions. The University of Leicester. https://le.ac.uk/hate-studies/research/the-leicester-hate-crime-project/our-reports.Google Scholar

Clement, S., Brohan, E., Sayce, L., Pool, J., & Thornicroft, G. (2011). Disability hate crime and targeted violence and hostility: A mental health and discrimination perspective. Journal of Mental Health, 20, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2011.579645.Google Scholar

Craig, K. M., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). So, what’s a hate crime anyway? Young adults’ perceptions of hate crimes, victims, and perpetrators. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 113–129. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01499350.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0047707.Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2020). Crime in the United States, 2019. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019.Google Scholar

Felson, R. B., & Paré, P. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00156.x.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001872675400700202.Google Scholar

Finkelhor, D., & Ormrod, R. K. (2001). Factors in the underreporting of crimes against juveniles. Child Maltreatment, 6(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077559501006003003.Google Scholar

Goudriaan, H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2007). Contextual determinants of juveniles’ willingness to report crimes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-007-9030-4.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. R., & Greenberg, M. S. (1982). Crime and justice in Tudor-Stuart England and the modern United States. Law and Human Behavior, 6, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044297.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. S., & Ruback, R. B. (1992). After the crime: Victim decision making. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3334-4.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. S., Ruback, R. B., & Westcott, D. R. (1982). Decision making by crime victims: A multimethod approach. Law & Society Review, 17, 47–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053532.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. S., Ruback, R. B., & Westcott, D. R. (1983). Seeking help from the police: The victim’s perspective. In Nadler, A., DePaulo, B. M., & Fisher, J. D. (Eds.), New directions in helping: Applied perspectives on help-seeking and -receiving (Vol. 3, pp. 71–103). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gutierrez, C. M., & Kirk, D. S. (2017). Silence speaks: The relationship between immigration and the underreporting of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 926–950.Google Scholar

Hart, T. C., & Rennison, C. (2003). Reporting crime to the police, 1992–2000. NCJ 195710. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/rcp00.pdf.Google Scholar

Haynes, S. H., Cares, A. C., & Ruback, R. B. (2015). Reducing the harm of criminal victimization: The role of restitution. Violence & Victims, 30, 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00049.Google Scholar

Hindelang, M., & Gottfredson, M. (1976). The victim’s decision not to invoke the criminal process. In McDonald, W. F. (Ed.), Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 57–78). Sage.Google Scholar

Hu, X., Wu, J., DeValve, M. J., & Fisher, B. S. (2020). Exploring violent crime reporting among school-age victims: Findings from NCVS SCS 2005–2015. Victims & Offenders, 15, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1705452.Google Scholar

Hullenaar, K., Kurpiel, A., & Ruback, R. B. (2021). Youth violent offending in school and out: Reporting, arrest, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Justice Quarterly, 38(7), 1319–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1967426.Google Scholar

Hullenaar, K. L., & Ruback, R. B. (2020). Gender interaction effects on reporting assaults to the police. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260520903134.Google Scholar

Hullenaar, K. L., & Ruback, R. B. (2020). Juvenile violent victimization 1995–2018. Office of Justice Programs: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/library/publications/juvenile-violent-victimization-1995-2018.Google Scholar

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1982). Esteem and control bases of blame: “Adaptive” strategies for victims versus observers. Journal of Personality, 50, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6494.1982.TB01022.X.Google Scholar

Langton, L., Berzofsky, M., Krebs, C., & Smiley-McDonald, H. (2012). Victimizations not reported to the police, 2006–2010. NCJ 238536. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/vnrp0610.pdf.Google Scholar

Langton, L., Planty, M., & Lynch, J. P. (2017). Second major redesign of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 1049–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12335.Google Scholar

Lantz, B., Gladfelter, A. S., & Ruback, R. B. (2019). Stereotypical hate crimes and criminal justice processing: A multi-dataset comparison of bias crime arrest patterns by offender and victim race. Justice Quarterly, 36, 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1399211.Google Scholar

Laub, J. H. (1981). Ecological considerations in victim reporting to the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(81)90088-X.Google Scholar

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1995). Group processes. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Menjívar, C., & Bejarano, C. (2004). Latino immigrants’ perceptions of crime and police authorities in the United States: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan area. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 120–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987032000147968.Google Scholar

Morgan, R. E., & Truman, J. L. (2020). Criminal victimization, 2019. NCJ 255113. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv19.pdf.Google Scholar

Norris, F. H., & Kaniasty, K. (1994). Psychological distress following criminal victimization in the general population: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and prospective analyses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 111–123. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.62.1.111.Google Scholar

Norris, F., Kaniasty, K., & Scheer, D. (1990). Use of mental health services among victims of crime: Frequency, correlates, and subsequent recovery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 538–547. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.58.5.538Google Scholar

Patterson, D., & Campbell, R. (2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20359.Google Scholar

Planty, M., Langton, L., Krebs, C., Berzofsky, M., & Smiley-McDonald, H. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994–2010. NCJ 240655. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvsv9410.pdf.Google Scholar

Pogrebin, M. R., & Poole, E. D. (1990). Culture conflict and crime in the Korean-American community. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 4, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088740349000400105.Google Scholar

Powers, R. A., Khachatryan, N., & Socia, K. M. (2020). Reporting victimisation to the police: The role of racial dyad and bias motivation. Policing and Society, 30(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1523164.Google Scholar

Rennison, C. M., Dragiewicz, M., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2012). Context matters: Violence against women and reporting to police in rural, suburban, and urban areas. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9164-4.Google Scholar

Rossi, P. H., & Berk, R. A. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ruback, R. B. (1994). Advice to crime victims: Effects of crime, victim, and advisor factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854894021004003.Google Scholar

Ruback, R. B., & Ivie, D. L. (1988). Prior relationship, resistance, and injury in rapes: An analysis of crisis center records. Violence and Victims, 3, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.3.2.99.Google Scholar

Ruback, R. B., & Ménard, K. (2001). Rural/urban differences in sexual victimization and reporting: Analyses using UCR and crisis center data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854801028002001.Google Scholar

Ruback, R. B., Ménard, K. S., Outlaw, M. S., & Shaffer, J. N. (1999). Normative advice to campus crime victims: Effects of gender, age, and alcohol. Violence and Victims, 14, 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.4.381.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. (1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022427884021002003.Google Scholar

Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005) Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077801204271476.Google Scholar

Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.Google Scholar

Theodore, N., & Habans, R. (2016). Policing immigrant communities: Latino perceptions of police involvement in immigration enforcement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42, 970–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126090.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44(2), 365–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00405.x.Google Scholar

US Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1985). Reporting crimes to the police. US Department of Justice. www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/46852NCJRS.pdf.Google Scholar

Van Kirk, M. (1978). Response time analysis: Executive summary. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, US Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/rcp.pdf.Google Scholar

Watkins, A. M., & Maume, M. O. (2011). School victims and crime reporting. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1541204011409069.Google Scholar

Whatley, M. A. (1996). Victim characteristics influencing attributions of responsibility to rape victims: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 1, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-1789(95)00011-9.Google Scholar

Wickes, R. L., Pickering, S., Mason, G., Maher, J. M., & McCulloch, J. (2016). From hate to prejudice: Does the new terminology of prejudice motivated crime change perceptions and reporting actions? British Journal of Criminology, 56, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv041.Google Scholar

Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Singer, S. I. (1985). National survey of crime severity. NCJ No. 96017. Bureau of Justice Statistics. www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/national-survey-crime-severity.Google Scholar

Wortman, C. M., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In Berkowitz, L (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 277–336). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Xie, M., & Baumer, E. P. (2019). Crime victims’ decisions to call the police: Past research and new directions. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024748.Google Scholar

Xie, M., Pogarsky, G., Lynch, J. P., & McDowall, D. (2006). Prior police contact and subsequent victim reporting: Results from the NCVS. Justice Quarterly, 23, 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820600985339.Google Scholar

Zaykowski, H. (2010). Racial disparities in hate crime reporting. Violence and Victims, 25, 378–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.378.Google Scholar

Zaykowski, H., Allain, E. C., & Campagna, L. M. (2019). Examining the paradox of crime reporting: Are disadvantaged victims more likely to report to the police? Law & Society Review, 53, 1305–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12440.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, F. (2002). Mandatory reporting of child abuse and neglect: Does it really make a difference? Child and Family Social Work, 7, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00228.x.Google Scholar

Andon, P., Free, C., Jidin, R., Monroe, G. S., & Turner, M. J. (2018). The impact of financial incentives and perceptions of seriousness on whistleblowing intention. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3215-6.Google Scholar

Associated Press. (2021). Woman raped on train as bystanders did nothing, police say. AP News, October 12. https://apnews.com/article/business-arrests-pennsylvania-philadelphia-1d0c62ae547165eabfc40fc6a20f25be.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F, & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.Google Scholar

Bennett, S., Banyard, V. L., & Edwards, K. M. (2017). The impact of bystander’s relationship with the victim and perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(5), 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586373.Google Scholar

Berger, L., Perreault, S., & Wainberg, J. (2017). Hijacking the moral imperative: How financial incentives can discourage whistleblower reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51663.Google Scholar

Bickman, L., & Helwig, H. (1979). Bystander reporting of crime: The impact of incentives. Criminology, 17(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1979.tb01295.x.Google Scholar

Booker, B. (2020, October 14). White woman who called police on black bird-watcher allegedly made a second 911 call. NPR. www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/10/14/923695262/woman-who-called-police-on-black-bird-watcher-allegedly-made-a-second-911-call.Google Scholar

Carson, J. V., & Politte, H. (2021). Implicit bias within public reporting: A virtual reality experiment examining “suspicious” activity. Crime & Delinquency, 67(12), 2135–2162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720981897.Google Scholar

Children’s Bureau. (2019). Penalties for the failure to report and false reporting of child abuse and neglect. www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/report.pdf.Google Scholar

Children’s Bureau. (2021). Child maltreatment 2019. www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/report/child-maltreatment-2019.Google Scholar

Clayman, S., & Skinns, L. (2012). To snitch or not to snitch? An exploratory study of the factors influencing whether young people actively cooperate with the police. Policing and Society, 22(4), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2011.641550.Google Scholar

Crandall, C. S. & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414.Google Scholar

Crandall, C. S., Ferguson, M. A., & Bahns, A. J. (2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In Stangor, C. & Crandall, C. S. (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 53–70). Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Crime Stoppers USA (n.d.). Website. www.crimestoppersusa.org/profile/.Google Scholar

Dario, L. M., Fradella, H. F., Verhagen, M., & Parry, M. M. (2020). Assessing LGBT people’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(7), 885–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1560127.Google Scholar

Davies, M. L., Gilhooly, M. L. M., Gilhooly, K. J., Harries, P. A., & Cairns, P. (2013). Factors influencing decision-making by social care and health sector professionals in cases of elder financial abuse. European Journal of Ageing, 10, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0279-3.Google Scholar

Deitch-Stackhouse, J., Kenneavy, K., Thayer, R., Berkowitz, A., & Mascari, J. (2015). The influence of social norms on advancement through bystander stages for preventing interpersonal violence. Violence Against Women, 21(10), 1284–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215592720.Google Scholar

Diekmann, A. (1985). Volunteer’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29(4), 605–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393335.Google Scholar

Diekmann, A., & Przepiorka, W. (2016). “Take one for the team!”: Individual heterogeneity and the emergence of latent norms in a volunteer’s dilemma. Social Forces, 94(3), 1309–1333. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov107.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Krupa, M. (2017, March 21). Dylann Roof friend sentenced to 27 months in prison. CNN. www.cnn.com/2017/03/21/us/joey-meek-sentencing-dylann-roof-charleston/index.html.Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2020). Crime in the United States, 2019. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019.Google Scholar

Feldman, Y., & Lobel, O. (2010). The incentives matrix: The comparative effectiveness of rewards, liabilities, duties, and protections for reporting illegality. Texas Law Review, 88(6), 1151–1211.Google Scholar

Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., & Hoskin, A. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the police in assaults. Criminology, 37(4), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00510.x.Google Scholar

Felson, R. B., & Paré, P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00156.x.Google Scholar

Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I, Greitemeyer, T., et al. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304.Google Scholar

Galvin, M. A., & Safer-Lichtenstein, A. (2018). Same question, different answers: Theorizing victim and third party decisions to report crime to the police. Justice Quarterly, 35(6), 1073–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1353123.Google Scholar

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., & Stich, S. (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–392). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harries, P., Davies, M., Gilhooly, K., Gilhooly, M., & Tomlinson, C. (2014). Educating novice practitioners to detect elder financial abuse: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-21.Google Scholar

Hart, T. C., & Miethe, T. C. (2008). Exploring bystander presence and intervention in nonfatal violent victimization: When does helping really help? Violence and Victims, 23(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.5.637.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 371–401). Sage.Google Scholar

Katz, J., Pazienza, R., Olin, R., & Rich, O. (2015). That’s what friends are for: Bystander responses to friends or strangers at risk for party rape victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2775–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554290.Google Scholar

Kearns, E. M., Ashooh, E., & Lowrey-Kinberg, B. (2020). Racial differences in conceptualizing legitimacy and trust in police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09501-8.Google Scholar

Kidd, R. F. (1979). Crime reporting: Toward a social psychological model. Criminology, 17(3), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1979.tb01303.x.Google Scholar

LaFree, G., & Adamczyk, A. (2017). The impact of the Boston marathon bombings on public willingness to cooperate with police. Justice Quarterly, 34(3), 459–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1181780.Google Scholar

Lankford, A., Adkins, K. G., & Madfis, E. (2019). Are the deadliest mass shootings preventable? An assessment of leakage, information reported to law enforcement, and firearms acquisition prior to attacks in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 35(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986219840231.Google Scholar

Larson, R. P. (2015). Witness participation in the criminal justice system: Perceptions of the legitimacy of police and the reporting of crime (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1zc3q6zgorg.Google Scholar

Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton–Century Crofts.Google Scholar

Lentz, S. A., & Chaires, R. H. (2007). The invention of Peel’s principles: A study of policing “textbook” history. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.11.016.Google Scholar

Linning, S. J., & Barnes, J. C. (2020). Third-party crime reporting: Examining the effects of perceived social cohesion and confidence in police effectiveness. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1856706.Google Scholar

Lipman, F. D. (2012). Whistleblowers: Incentives, disincentives, and protection strategies. Wiley.Google Scholar

Madfis, E. (2014). Averting school rampage: Student intervention amid a persistent code of silence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204013497768.Google Scholar

Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. (2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62(6), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.6.555.Google Scholar

McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 US 279, 107 S. Ct. 1756, 95 L. Ed. 2d 262 (1987).Google Scholar

Morgan, R. E., & Thompson, A. (2021). Criminal victimization, 2020 (Report No. NCJ 301775). Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing & Society, 18(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802008660.Google Scholar

Osborne, D., & Davies, P. G. (2014). Crime type, perceived stereotypicality, and memory biases: A contextual model of eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3009.Google Scholar

Papp, J., Smith, B., Wareham, J., & Wu, Y. (2019). Fear of retaliation and citizen willingness to cooperate with police. Policing and Society, 29(6), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1307368.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center (2021, April 7). Mobile fact sheet. www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.Google Scholar

Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W., & Lindengaard, M. R. (2020). Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. American Psychologist, 75, 66–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000469.Google Scholar

Pound, R. (1964). The causes of popular dissatisfaction with the administration of justice. Crime & Delinquency, 10(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112876401000403 (reprinted from the Transactions of the American Bar Association’s Annual Meeting, 1906).Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, D. P., Lurigio, A. J., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1989). Enhancing citizen participation and solving serious crime: A national evaluation of crime stoppers programs. Crime & Delinquency, 35(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128789035003006.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, A. M. (1999). Thirty-eight witnesses. University of California Press. (Original work published 1964.)Google Scholar

Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918.Google Scholar

Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment and redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288.Google Scholar

Shatz, S. F., & Shatz, N. R. (2011). Chivalry is not dead: Murder, gender, and the death penalty. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 27, 64–112.Google Scholar

Silver, J. (2020). Space between concern and crime: Two recommendations for promoting the adoption of the threat assessment model and encouraging bystander reporting. Criminology & Public Policy, 19, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12474.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G., & Antunes, G. E. (1979). Information, apprehension, and deterrence: Exploring the limits of police productivity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7, 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(79)90040-0.Google Scholar

Slocum, L. A., Taylor, T. J., Brick, B. T., & Esbensen, F. (2010). Neighborhood structural characteristics, individual-level attitudes, and youths’ crime reporting intentions. Criminology, 48(4), 1063–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00212.x.Google Scholar

Slocum, L. A., & Wiley, S. A. (2018). “Experience of the expected?” Race and ethnicity differences in the effects of police contact on youth. Criminology, 56(2), 402–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12174.Google Scholar

Stylianou, S. (2003). Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have we learned and what else do we want to know. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00198-8.Google Scholar

Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47(4), 1265–1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00175.x.Google Scholar

Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x.Google Scholar

Tapia, M. (2010). Untangling race and class effects on juvenile arrests. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.03.002.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R., & Trinkner, R. (2017). Why children follow rules: Legal socialization and the development of legitimacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van Rooij, B., & Fine, A. D. (2020). Preventing corporate crime from within: Compliance management, whistleblowing, and internal monitoring. In Rorie, M. (Ed.), The handbook of white‐collar crime (pp. 229–245). Wiley.Google Scholar

Warner, B. D. (2007). Directly intervene or call the authorities? A study of forms of neighborhood social control within a social disorganization framework. Criminology, 45, 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00073.x.Google Scholar

Weiss, K. G. (2021). Crime witness accounts. Theoretical Criminology, 25(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620918326.Google Scholar

Wellford, C., & Cronin, J. (2000). Clearing up homicide clearance rates. National Institute of Justice Journal, 243, 1–7. www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/jr000243b.pdf.Google Scholar

Whitman, J. L., & Davis, R. C. (2007). Snitches get stitches: Youth, gangs, and witness intimidation in Massachusetts. National Center for Victims of Crime.Google Scholar

American Bar Association. (2016). Model rules of professional conduct. www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review, 7, 172–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030834.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R, & Ross, L. (1980). The perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077720.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A., & Lindsay, J. J. (1998). The development, perseverance, and change of naive theories. Social Cognition, 16, 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.8.Google Scholar

Bakhshay, S., & Haney, C. (2018). The media’s impact on the right to a fair trial: A content analysis of pretrial publicity in capital cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(3), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000174.Google Scholar

Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240104.Google Scholar

Bornstein, B. H., Whisenhunt, B. L., Nemeth, R. J., & Dunaway, D. L. (2002). Pretrial publicity and civil cases: A two-way street? Law and Human Behavior, 26(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013825124011.Google Scholar

Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006). Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decision-making. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9027-y.Google Scholar

Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91.Google Scholar

Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2010) Comparing oral interviewing with self-administered computerized questionnaires: An experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 154–167, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp090.Google Scholar

Crocker, C. B., & Kovera, M. B. (2010). The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9193-9.Google Scholar

Cuc, A., Ozuru, Y., Manier, D., & Hirst, W. (2006). On the formation of collective memories: The role of a dominant narrator. Memory and Cognition, 34(4), 752–762. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193423.Google Scholar

Daftary-Kapur, T., & Penrod, S. D. (2018). Pre- and midtrial publicity in the age of internet and social media. In Najdowski, C. & Stevenson, M. (Eds.), Criminal juries in the 21st century: Psychological science and the law (pp. 1–19). Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190658113.001.0001.Google Scholar

Daftary-Kapur, T., Penrod, S. D., O’Connor, M., & Wallace, B. (2014). Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: Issues of slant, quantity, persistence, and generalizability. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 462–477. http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000081.Google Scholar

Dexter, H. R., Cutler, B. L., & Moran, G. (1992). A test of voir dire as a remedy for the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00926.x.Google Scholar

Dumas, R., Lepastourel, N. & Testé, B. (2014). Press articles and influence processes: The different effects of incriminating information and crime story information on judgments of guilt. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.854790.Google Scholar

Feigenson, N. (2016). Jurors’ emotions and judgments of legal responsibility and blame: What does the experimental research tell us? Emotion Review, 8, 26–31. http://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915601223.Google Scholar

Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J. L., Cepress, S. L. & Vandello, J. A. (2008). Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism: The Kobe Bryant case. Violence Against Women, 14, 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207313971.Google Scholar

Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719428.Google Scholar

Girvan, E. J. (2016). Wise restraints? Learning legal rules, not standards, reduces the effects of stereotypes in legal decision-making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000068.Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(5–6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<781::AID-EJSP960>3.0.CO;2-3.Google Scholar

Hans, V. P., Virtual juries (2021). DePaul Law Review, Vol. 71 (Forthcoming), Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 21-16. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3860165.Google Scholar

Hans, V. P., & Jehle, A. (2003). Avoid bald men and people with green socks? Other ways to improve the voir dire process in jury selection. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78(3), 1179–1201. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/298.Google Scholar

Honess, T. M., Charman, E. A., & Levi, M. (2003). Factual and affective/evaluative recall of pretrial publicity: Their relative influence on juror reasoning and verdict in a simulated fraud trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1404–1416. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01955.x.Google Scholar

Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 111–119. http://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111.Google Scholar

Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034221.Google Scholar

Imrich, D. J., Mullin, C., & Linz, D. (1995). Measuring the extent of prejudicial pretrial publicity in major American newspapers: A content analysis. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00745.x.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.Google Scholar

Jones, S. E. (1987). Judge- versus attorney-conducted voir dire: An empirical investigation of juror candor. Law and Human Behavior, 11(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040446.Google Scholar

Kelly, A., Carroll, M., & Mazzoni, G. (2002). Metamemory and reality monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.803.Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L., Kramer, G. P., Carroll, J. S., & Alfini, J. J., (1991). On the effectiveness of voir dire in criminal cases with prejudicial pretrial publicity: An empirical study. American University Law Review, 40, 665–701. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2692773.Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (1999). Bias in jurors vs. bias in juries: New evidence from the SDS perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2855.Google Scholar

Kline, G. G., & Jess, P. H. (1966) Prejudicial publicity: Its effect on law school mock juries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 43(1)113–116 https://doi.org/10.1177/107769906604300115.Google Scholar

Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044220.Google Scholar

Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298246001.Google Scholar

Lieberman, J. D. (2011). The utility of scientific jury selection: Still murky after 30 years. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396628.Google Scholar

Lieberman, J. D., & Arndt, J. (2000). Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(3), 677–711.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S., Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027568.Google Scholar

Mu’Min v. Virginia, 500 U.S. 415 (1991)Google Scholar

Nuñez, N., Estrada-Reynolds, V., Schweitzer, K., & Myers, B. (2016). The impact of emotions on juror judgments and decision making. In Bornstein, B. H. & Miller, M. K. (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law, Vol. 2 (pp. 55–92). Springer.Google Scholar

Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499050.Google Scholar

Pantazi, M., Klein, O., & Kissine, M. (2020). Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges. Judgement and Decision Making, 15(2), 214–229.Google Scholar

Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314, 318 (1st Cir. 1968).Google Scholar

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521.Google Scholar

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189.Google Scholar

Qualls, K. F. (2015). The answer to trial publicity is a better question. Journal of Criminal Justice and Legal Issues, 3, 1–15. www.aabri.com/manuscripts/152308.pdf.Google Scholar

Robbennolt, J. K., & Studebaker, C. A. (2003). News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 27(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021622827154.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L. (2018). From the headlines to the jury room: An examination of the impact of pretrial publicity on jurors and juries. In Miller, M. K. and Bornstein, B. H. (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law. (Vol. 3, pp. 1–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75859-6_1.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., & Coy, A. (2020). Your bias is rubbing off on me: The impact of pretrial publicity and jury composition on guilt decisions, trial evidence interpretation, and impression formation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(1), 22–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000220.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., Diaz Ortega, S. E., & O’Grady, K. A. (2022). What drives a jury’s deliberations? The influence of pretrial publicity and jury composition on deliberation slant and content. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 28(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000310.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., & Guenther, C. C. (2015). From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors’ decisions, impressions, and memory. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000117.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., & Guenther, C. C. (2017). Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors’ guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. Law and Human Behavior, 41(5), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000256.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., Guenther, C. C., & Yarbrough, A. (2011). Positive and negative pretrial publicity: The roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811400823.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., & LeVasseur, M. (2012). Behind closed doors: The effect of pretrial publicity on jury deliberations. Psychology. Crime & Law, 18(5), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.502120.Google Scholar

Ruva, C. L., & McEvoy, C. (2008). Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.226.Google Scholar

Ruva, C., McEvoy, C., & Bryant, J. D. (2007). Effects of pre-trial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1254.Google Scholar

Salerno, J. M., Campbell, J. C., Phalen, H. J., et al. (2021). The impact of minimal versus extended voir dire and judicial rehabilitation on mock jurors’ decisions in civil cases. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000455.Google Scholar

Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, L. C. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486988.Google Scholar

Schum, D. A. (1993). Argument structuring and evidence evaluation. In Hastie, R. (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 175–191). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sommers, S. R., & Kassin, S. M. (2001). On the many impacts of inadmissible testimony: Selective compliance, need for cognition, and the overcorrection bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710012.Google Scholar

Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 219–235. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022325019080.Google Scholar

Steblay, N., Hosch, H. M, Culhane, S. E., & McWethy, A. (2006). The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7.Google Scholar

Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(2–3), 428–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428.Google Scholar

Thorley, C., Beaton, L., Deguara, P., et al. (2020). Misinformation encountered during a simulated jury deliberation can distort jurors’ memory of a trial and bias their verdicts. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12174.Google Scholar

Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973.Google Scholar

Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). Academic Press.Google Scholar

APA brief for Commonwealth v. Walker (2014). www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/walker.aspx.Google Scholar

Bornstein, B. H., Deffenbacher, K. A., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2012). Effects of exposure time and cognitive operations on facial identification accuracy: A meta-analysis of two variables associated with initial memory strength. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(5), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.508458.Google Scholar

Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-5690-7.Google Scholar

Commonwealth v. Walker, 92 A.3d 766 (2014).Google Scholar

Costanzo, M. & Levett, L. M. (2020). The American Psychology-Law Society scientific review paper on the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000362.Google Scholar

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness’s memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14,139–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.14.2.139.Google Scholar

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover Publications. https://doi.org/10.5214%2Fans.0972.7531.200408.Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie, J. (2013). Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the “weapon focus” literature. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R. J., & Price, H. L. (2015). Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1228−1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000013.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R. J., Price, H. L., Oriet, C., & Charman, S. D. (2013). The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 151–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030618.Google Scholar

Garrett, B. (2012). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grabman, J. H., & Dodson, C. S. (2020). Stark individual differences: Face recognition ability influences the relationship between confidence and accuracy in a recognition test of Game of Thrones actors. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.02.007.Google Scholar

Greathouse, S. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2009). Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x.Google Scholar

Innocence Project. (n.d.). DNA Exonerations in the United States. www.innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/.Google Scholar

Katzman, J. & Kovera, M. B. (2022). Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers’ decisions to place a suspect in a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 46(1), 30−44. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000476.Google Scholar

Kovera, M. B., & Evelo, A. J. (2017). The case for double-blind lineup administration. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(4), 421−437. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000139.Google Scholar

Kovera, M. B., & Evelo, A. J. (2020). Improving eyewitness identification evidence through double-blind administration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(6), 563−568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420969366.Google Scholar

Lampinen, J. M., Erickson, W. B., Moore, K. N., & Hittson, A. (2014). Effects of distance on face recognition: Implications for eyewitness identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1489−1494. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0641-2.Google Scholar

Leippe, M. R., Wells, G. L., & Ostrom, T. M. (1978). Crime seriousness as a determinant of accuracy in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(3), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.3.345.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. C. L., Semmler, C., Weber, N., Brewer, N., & Lindsay, M. R. (2008). How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 32(6), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9128-x.Google Scholar

Loftus, G. R., & Harley, E. M. (2005). Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1),43–65. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196348.Google Scholar

Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3.Google Scholar

Memon, A., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2004). The ageing eyewitness. In Adler, J. R. (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Concepts, debates and practice (pp. 96–112). Willan Publishing.Google Scholar

Modjadidi, K., & Kovera, M. B. (2018). Viewing videotaped identification procedure increases jurors’ sensitivity to single-blind lineup administration. Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000288.Google Scholar

Molinaro, P. F., Charman, S. D., & Wylie, K. (2021). Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions. Law and Human Behavior, 45(6), 524–541. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000452.Google Scholar

Neuschatz, J. S., Wetmore, S. A., Key, K. N., et al. (2016). A comprehensive evaluation of showups. In Bornstein, B. & Miller, M. K. (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 43–69). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29406-3_2.Google Scholar

Orfield, M. W., Jr. (1987). The exclusionary rule and deterrence: An empirical study of Chicago narcotics officers. Chicano Law Review, 54, 1016–1069. http://doi.org/10.2307/1599834.Google Scholar

Papailiou, A. P., Yokum, D. V. & Robertson, C. T. (2015). The novel New Jersey eyewitness instruction induces skepticism but not sensitivity. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0142695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142695.Google Scholar

Semmler, C., Dunn, J., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2018). The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000157.Google Scholar

Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139.Google Scholar

Slobogin, C. (1996). Testifying: Police perjury and what to do about it. University of Colorado Law Review, 67, 1037–1060.Google Scholar

Smalarz, L. (2021). Suspect bias: A neglected threat to the reliability of eyewitness identification evidence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.06.005.Google Scholar

Smith, A. M., Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Penrod, S. D. (2017). Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability. Law and Human Behavior, 41(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000219.Google Scholar

Sporer, S. L. (1992). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220205.Google Scholar

Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02352267.Google Scholar

Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024890732059.Google Scholar

Steblay, N. K. (2013). Lineup instructions. In Cutler, B. L. (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 65–86). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14094-004.Google Scholar

Steblay, N. K., Wells, G. L., & Douglass, A. B. (2014). The eyewitness post identification feedback effect 15 years later: Theoretical and policy implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000001.Google Scholar

Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024890732059.Google Scholar

Wagenaar, W. A., & van der Schrier, J. H. (1996). Face recognition as a function of distance and illumination: A practical tool for use in the courtroom. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2, 321−332. http://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001715123.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1546–1557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1546.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., et al. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000359.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., et al. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22(6), 603–647. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025750605807.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L., Yang, Y., & Smalarz, L. (2015). Eyewitness identification: Bayesian information gain, base-rate effect equivalency curves, and reasonable suspicion. Law and Human Behavior, 39(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000125.Google Scholar

Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, D. M., Chorn, J. A., Rhead, , et al. (2017). Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000147.Google Scholar

Abramovitch, R., Higgins-Biss, K. L., & Biss, S. R. (1993). Young persons’ comprehension of waivers in criminal proceedings. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35(3), 309–321.Google Scholar

Baker, S., Haney-Caron, E., Diaz Ortiz, E., & Hellgren, J. (2021, March). Race, perceptions of police legitimacy, and parent advice to children during interrogations. [Poster presentation]. American Psychology-Law Society Virtual Poster Session.Google Scholar

Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010).Google Scholar

Blackwood, H. L., Rogers, R., Steadham, J. A., & Fiduccia, C. E. (2015). Investigating Miranda waiver decisions: An examination of the rational consequences. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 42, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.002.Google Scholar

Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2012). Emerging findings from research on adolescent development and juvenile justice. Victims & Offenders, 7(4), 428–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2012.713901.Google Scholar

Cleary, H. M. D. (2014). Police interviewing and interrogation of juvenile suspects: A descriptive examination of actual cases. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000070.Google Scholar

Cleary, H. M., & Warner, T. C. (2017). Parents’ knowledge and attitudes about youths’ interrogation rights. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(8), 777–793. http://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1324030.Google Scholar

Colwell, L. H., Cruise, K. R., Guy, L. S., et al. (2005). The influence of psychosocial maturity on male juvenile offenders’ comprehension and understanding of the Miranda warning. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 444–454.Google Scholar

Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). Psychiatric patients’ comprehension of Miranda rights. Law and Human Behavior, 32(5), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9099-3.Google Scholar

Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994).Google Scholar

Domanico, A. J., Cicchini, M. D., & White, L. T. (2012). Overcoming Miranda: A content analysis of the Miranda portion of police interrogations. Idaho Law Review, 49(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Erickson, S. L., Salekin, K. L., Johnson, L. N., & Doran, S. C. (2020). The predictive power of intelligence: Miranda abilities of individuals with intellectual disability. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000356.Google Scholar

Evans, J. R., Schreiber-Compo, N., & Russano, M. B. (2009). Intoxicated witnesses and suspects: Procedures and prevalence according to law enforcement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(3), 194–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016837.Google Scholar

Farber, H. B. (2004). The role of the parent/guardian in juvenile custodial interrogations: Friend or foe? American Criminal Law Review, 41, 1277–1312.Google Scholar

Fare v. Michael C., 439 U.S. 1310 (1978).Google Scholar

Feld, B. C. (2013). Behind closed doors: What really happens when cops question kids. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 23, 395–462.Google Scholar

Frumkin, B. (2000). Competency to waive Miranda rights: Clinical and legal issues. Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter, 24(2), 326–331.Google Scholar

Fulero, S. M., & Everington, C. (1995). Assessing competency to waive Miranda rights in defendants with mental retardation. Law and Human Behavior, 19(5), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499342.Google Scholar

Goldstein, N. E. S., Condie, L., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. (2003). Juvenile offenders’ Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions. Assessment, 10(4), 359–369.Google Scholar

Goldstein, N. E. S., Haney-Caron, E., Levick, M., & Whiteman, D. (2018). Waving good-bye to waiver: A developmental argument against youths’ waiver of their Miranda rights. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 21(1), 1–67.Google Scholar

Goldstein, N. E. S., Messenheimer, S., Romaine, C. L. R., & Zelle, H. (2012). Potential impact of juvenile suspects’ linguistic abilities on Miranda understanding and appreciation. Oxford Handbooks Online.Google Scholar

Grisso, T. (1980). Juveniles’ capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68(6), 1134.Google Scholar

Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles’ waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Grisso, T. (2013). Forensic evaluation of juveniles (2nd ed.). Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90035-4.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales manual. Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H., Vagni, M., Maiorano, T., & Pajardi, D. (2016). Age and memory related changes in children’s immediate and delayed suggestibility using the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.029.Google Scholar

Guillot, C. R., Fanning, J. R., Bullock, J. S., McCloskey, M. S., & Berman, M. E. (2010). Effects of alcohol on tests of executive functioning in men and women: A dose response examination. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 18(5), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0021053.Google Scholar

Haney-Caron, E., & Fountain, E. (2021). Young, Black, and wrongfully charged: A cumulative disadvantage framework. Dickinson Law Review, 125, 653–726.Google Scholar

Hazelwood, L. L . (2009). Deficits in Miranda comprehension and reasoning: The effects of substance use and attention deficits. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar

In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).Google Scholar

J. D. B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 (2011).Google Scholar

Johnson, M. B., Citron-Lippmann, K., Massey, C., Raghavan, C., & Kavanagh, A. M. (2015). Interrogation expectations: Individual and race/ethnic group variation among an adult sample. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13(1), 16–29. http://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2014.936641.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., et al. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5.Google Scholar

Leijenhorst, L. V., Moor, B. G., Macks, Z. A. O. D., et al. (2010). Adolescent risky decision-making: Neurocognitive development of reward and control regions. NeuroImage, 51(1), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.038.Google Scholar

Leo, R. A. (2001). Questioning the relevance of Miranda in the twenty-first century. Michigan Law Review, 99(5), 1000–1029.Google Scholar

Leo, R. A., & White, W. S. (1999). Adapting to Miranda: Modern interrogators’ strategies for dealing with the obstacles posed by Miranda. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 397–472.Google Scholar

McLachlan, K., Roesch, R., & Douglas, K. S. (2010). Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents. Law and Human Behavior, 35(3), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9198-4.Google Scholar

McLachlan, K., Roesch, R., Viljoen, J. L., & Douglas, K. S. (2014). Evaluating the psycholegal abilities of young offenders with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000037.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. R., & Reppucci, N. D. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(6), 757–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.774.Google Scholar

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).Google Scholar

Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986).Google Scholar

Najdowski, C. J. (2011). Stereotype threat in criminal interrogations: Why innocent Black suspects are at risk for confessing falsely. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(4), 562–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023741.Google Scholar

NIDA. (2021, July 27). Drugs and the brain. www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/drugs-brain.Google Scholar

North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 (1979).Google Scholar

Oberlander, L. B., & Goldstein, N. E. (2001). A review and update on the practice of evaluating Miranda comprehension. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.453.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. J., Garmoe, W., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2005). Miranda comprehension in adults with mental retardation and the effects of feedback style on suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2965-y.Google Scholar

Powell, J. L. (2016). Do you understand your rights as I have read them to you: Understanding the warnings fifty years post Miranda. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 43, 435–464.Google Scholar

Redlich, A. D., Silverman, M., & Steiner, H. (2003). Pre‐adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.543.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Wooley, C. N., & Fiduccia, C. E. (2011). Decrements in Miranda abilities: An investigation of situational effects via a mock-crime paradigm. Law and Human Behavior, 35(5), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9248-y.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Hazelwood, L. L., & Sewell, K. W. (2007). Knowing and intelligent: A study of Miranda warnings in mentally disordered defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 31(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9070-8.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Rogstad, J. E., LaFortune, K. A., & Hazelwood, L. L. (2010). The role of suggestibility in determinations of Miranda abilities: A study of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9186-8.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Shuman, D. W., Sewell, K. W., & Hazelwood, L. L. (2007). An analysis of Miranda warnings and waivers: Comprehension and coverage. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9054-8.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Hazelwood, L. L., Sewell, K. W., Harrison, K. S., & Shuman, D. W. (2008). The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: A replication and vocabulary analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9091-y.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Hazelwood, L. L., Sewell, K. W., Shuman, D. W., & Blackwood, H. L. (2008). The comprehensibility and content of juvenile Miranda warnings. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013102.Google Scholar

Rost, G. C., & McGregor, K. K. (2012). Miranda rights comprehension in young adults with specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1044%2F1058-0360(2011%2F10-0094).Google Scholar

Scherr, K. C., & Madon, S. (2012). You have the right to understand: The deleterious effect of stress on suspects’ ability to comprehend Miranda. Law and Human Behavior, 36(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093972.Google Scholar

Scherr, K. C., & Madon, S. (2013). “Go ahead and sign”: An experimental examination of Miranda waivers and comprehension. Law and Human Behavior, 37(3), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000026.Google Scholar

Steinberg, L. (2014). The science of adolescent brain development and its implication for adolescent rights and responsibilities. In Bhabha, J. (Ed.), Human rights and adolescence (pp. 59–76). University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Viljoen, J. L., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2.Google Scholar

Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P. A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between competency to stand trial, competency to waive interrogation rights, and psychopathology. Law and Human Behavior, 26(5), 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020299804821.Google Scholar

Woolard, J. L., Cleary, H. M., Harvell, S. A., & Chen, R. (2008). Examining adolescents’ and their parents’ conceptual and practical knowledge of police interrogation: A family dyad approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9288-5.Google Scholar

Zelle, H., Romaine, C. L. R., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2015). Juveniles’ Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000116.Google Scholar

Beecher-Monas, E. (2003). Heuristics, biases, and the importance of gatekeeping. Michigan State Law Review, 4, 987–1022.Google Scholar

Bornmann, L. (2011), Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 197–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112.Google Scholar

Caudill, D. S., & LaRue, L. H., (2003). Why judges applying the Daubert trilogy need to know about the social, institutional, and rhetorical – and not just the methodological – aspects of science. Boston College Law Review, 45(1), 1–53.Google Scholar

Dahir, V. B., Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., et al. (2005). Judicial application of Daubert to psychological syndrome and profile evidence: A research note. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 62–82. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.62.Google Scholar

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 (1993).Google Scholar

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995).Google Scholar

DeMatteo, D., Fishel, S., & Tansey, A. (2019). Expert evidence: The (unfulfilled) promise of Daubert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(3), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619894336.Google Scholar

Faigman, D. (2013). The Daubert revolution and the birth of modernity: Managing scientific evidence in the age of science. University of California at Davis Law Review, 46, 101–138.Google Scholar

Faigman, D., Cheng, E., Mnookin, J., et al. (2020). Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony (Vol. 1). Thomas West.Google Scholar

Federal Rules of Evidence. (1975). www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/federal_rules_of_evidence_-_december_2020_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).Google Scholar

Gatowski, S. I., Dobbin, S. A., Richardson, J. T., et al. (2001). Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012899030937.Google Scholar

Giannelli, P. C. (1980). The admissibility of novel scientific evidence: Frye v. United States, a half-century later. Columbia Law Review, 80, 1197–1250.Google Scholar

Godlee, F., Gales, C. R., & Martyn, C. N. (1998). Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.237.Google Scholar

Groscup, J. L., Penrod, S. D., Studebaker, C. A., Huss, M. T., & O’Neil, K. M. (2002). The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(4), 339–372. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.339.Google Scholar

Hagen, M. A. (1997). Whores of the court: The fraud of psychiatric testimony and the rape of American justice. HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Haug, M., & Baird, E. (2011). Finding the error in Daubert. Hastings Law Journal, 62, 737–756.Google Scholar

Jefferson, T, Alderson, P., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2784–2786. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2784.Google Scholar

Jurs, A. W. (2012). Questions from the bench and independent experts: A study of the practices of state court judges. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 74(1), 47–83. https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2012.191.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582–591. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582.Google Scholar

Kovera, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (2000). The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.574.Google Scholar

Krauss, D. A., Cassar, D., & Strother, A. (2009). The admissibility of expert testimony in the United States, the Commonwealth, and elsewhere. In Krauss, D. A. & Lieberman, J. D. (Eds.), Psychological expertise in court: Psychology in the courtroom (Vol. II, pp. 1–24). Ashgate.Google Scholar

Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(2), 267–310. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.267.Google Scholar

Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 US 137 (1999).Google Scholar

Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784.Google Scholar

Mabe, M. (2003). The growth and number of journals. Serials, 16(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1629/16191.Google Scholar

MacLean, C. L., & Dror, I. E. (2016). A primer on the psychology of cognitive bias. In Kesselheim, A. & Robertson, C. (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias (pp. 13–24). Elsevier.Google Scholar

Malone, D. M., & Zwier, P. (2014). Effective expert testimony (3rd ed.). National Institute for Trial Advocacy.Google Scholar

Meixner, J. B., & Diamond, S. S. (2014). The hidden Daubert factor: How judges use error rates in assessing scientific evidence. Wisconsin Law Review, 2014(6), 1063–1133.Google Scholar

Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., et al. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (4th ed.). Guilford.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2011). Reference manual on scientific evidence (3rd ed.). National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Neal, T. M. S., Slobogin, C., Saks, M. J., Faigman, D. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2019). Psychological assessments in legal contexts: Are courts keeping “junk science” out of the courtroom? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(3), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1529100619888860.Google Scholar

Raitz, A., Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1990). Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on jurors’ decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 14(4), 385–395. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01068163.Google Scholar

Slobogin, C. Hafemeister, T. L., & Mossman, D. (2020). Law and the mental health system: Civil and criminal aspects (7th ed.). West Publishing.Google Scholar

State v. DeLeon, 319 P.3d 382 (Haw. 2014).Google Scholar

State v. Johnson, 290 Neb. 862 (Neb. 2015).Google Scholar

Stern, L. H., & Horvitz, S. A. (2002). A test for “general acceptance” under Daubert. Journal of Forensic Economics, 15(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.5085/0898-5510-15.3.285.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.Google Scholar

Weiss, D., & LaPorte, G. (2018). Uncertainty ahead: A shift in how federal scientific experts can testify. National Institute of Justice Journal, January 17. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/uncertainty-ahead-shift-how-federal-scientific-experts-can-testify.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.Google Scholar

Appleby, S., Hasel, L., & Kassin, S. (2011). Police-induced confessions: An empirical analysis of their content and impact. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 19(2), 111–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.613389.Google Scholar

Appleby, S. C., Perillo, J. T., Wright, J. A., & Rinberger, T. M. (2018). Impoverished cognition: Effects of poverty on confessions decisions. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Annual Meeting, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252.Google Scholar

Björkman, M. (1984). Decision making, risk taking and psychological time: Review of empirical findings and psychological theory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1984.tb00999.x.Google Scholar

Bond, C. F. Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234.Google Scholar

Brimbal, L., Meissner, C. A., Kleinman, S. M., et al. (2021). Evaluating the benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviews: A training study with law enforcement investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000437.Google Scholar

Cassell, P. G., & Hayman, B. S. (1996). Police interrogation in the 1990s: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. UCLA Law Review, 43, 839–931.Google Scholar

CBS News. (2017). Robert Springsteen interrogation. www.cbsnews.com/video/robert-springsteen-interrogation/.Google Scholar

Chokshi, N. (2018). False confessions, mistaken witnesses, corrupt investigators: Why 139 innocent people went to jail. www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/us/convict-exonerations-2017.html.Google Scholar

Costanzo, M. & Krauss, D. (2012). Forensic and legal psychology: Psychological science applied to law. Worth Publishers.Google Scholar

Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.Google Scholar

Feld, B. C. (2014). Cops and kids in the interrogation room. In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 35–61). Springer Science: Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_3.Google Scholar

Forrest, K. D., Wadkins, T. A., & Larson, B. A. (2006). Suspect personality, police interrogations, and false confessions: Maybe it is not just the situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(3), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2005.09.002.Google Scholar

Friese, M., Loschelder, D. D., Gieseler, K., Frankenbach, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Is ego depletion real? An analysis of arguments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088868318762183.Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 324–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90012-X.Google Scholar

Gross, S. R., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D. J., & Montgomery, N. (2005). Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 95(2), 523–560.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2018). The psychology of false confessions: Forty years of science and practice. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119315636.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clark, N. K. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model. Social Behavior, 1(2), 83–104.Google Scholar

Guyll, M., Madon, S., Yang, Y., et al. (2013). Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: Effects on physiologic activity. Law and Human Behavior, 37(5), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000044.Google Scholar

Guyll, M., Yang, Y., Madon, S., Smalarz, L., & Lannin, D. G. (2019). Mobilization and resistance in response to interrogation threat. Law and Human Behavior, 43(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000337.Google Scholar

Hartwig, M., Anders Granhag, P., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600750264.Google Scholar

Hawai’i v. Baker, 146 Hawai’i 299, 463 P.3d 956 (2020).Google Scholar

Horvath, F., Jayne, B., & Buckley, J. (1992). Trained evaluators’ judgments of behavioral characteristics of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects during structured interviews. Report submitted to the US Department of Defense, National Security Agency (Grant #MDA904-90-C-1164).Google Scholar

Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar

Innocence Project (2016, October). Must-see wrongful conviction films and TV shows. https://innocenceproject.org/wrongful-conviction-media/.Google Scholar

Innocence Project (2020, August). Remembering exoneree Richard Lapointe, who died from COVID-19. https://innocenceproject.org/exoneree-richard-lapointe-died-covid19-coronavirus-wrongful-conviction/.Google Scholar

Innocence Project (2021a). All cases. https://innocenceproject.org/all-cases/.Google Scholar

Innocence Project (2021b). DNA exonerations in the United States. https://innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/.Google Scholar

Innocence Project (2021c). False confessions. https://innocenceproject.org/false-confessions-recording-interrogations/.Google Scholar

John E. Reid & Associates, Inc. (2010, May). What is the PEACE model for interviewing? https://reid.com/resources/whats-new/2010-what-is-the-peace-model-for-interviewing.Google Scholar

John E. Reid & Associates, Inc. (2017, January). The Reid technique: A position paper. http://archive.reid.com/newmedia/The%20Reid%20Technique%20A%20Position%20Paper%20Jan%202017.pdf.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–228. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M. (2021, January). It’s time for police to stop lying to suspects. Innocent people are in jail because police tricked them. www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/opinion/false-confessions-police-interrogation.html.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., et al. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., et al. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1) 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15(3), 233–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01061711.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022323.74584.f5.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In Kassin, S. & Wrightsman, L. (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (pp. 67–94). Sage Books.Google Scholar

Keedy, E. R. (1937). Third degree and legal interrogation of suspects. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 85(8), 761–777.Google Scholar

Lassiter, G. D., & Irvine, A. A. (1986). Videotaped confessions: The impact of camera point of view on judgments of coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(3), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01139.x.Google Scholar

Leo, R. A. (1996). Miranda’s revenge: Police interrogation as a confidence game. Law & Society Review, 30(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053960Google Scholar

Leo, R. A. (2001). Questioning the relevance of Miranda in the twenty-first century. Michigan Law Review, 99(5), 1000–1029.Google Scholar

Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leo, R. A. (2009). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and implications. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(3), 332–343.Google Scholar

Madon, S., Guyll, M., Scherr, K., Greathouse, S., & Wells, G. (2012). Temporal discounting: The differential effect of proximal and distal consequences on confession decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1)13–20. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0093962.Google Scholar