Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:33:32.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Predicting Academic Effort

The Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) Model

from Part III - Interest and Internal Motivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

K. Ann Renninger  and
Suzanne E. Hidi
By
Ulrich Trautwein ,
Benjamin Nagengast ,
Brent Roberts  and
Oliver Lüdtke
K. Ann Renninger
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Suzanne E. Hidi
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Academic effort is a key construct in research on motivational variables such as interest and in research on conscientiousness, one of the Big Five domains of human personality. Surprisingly, the two lines of research have rarely been brought together. In this chapter, we describe the differences and similarities in the theoretical foundation of the two constructs and review research on their predictive power for academic effort. We then introduce the Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model which postulates that conscientiousness and interest (partly) compensate for each other in predicting academic effort. Subsequently, we present empirical evidence for the model. In the final section of the chapter, we formulate some next steps in a research program on conscientiousness and interest.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning , pp. 353 - 372
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, M. & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. In Pekrun, R. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 205–27). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Personality-relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629–66. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.7104005.Google Scholar
Bidjerano, T. & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.23.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
De Raad, B. & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303–36. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<303::AID-PER262>3.3.CO;2-U.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I'm able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78, 430–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880.Google Scholar
Di Domenico, S. I. & Fournier, M. A. (2015). Able, ready, and willing: Examining the additive and interactive effects of intelligence, conscientiousness, and autonomous motivation on undergraduate academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 156–62. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.016.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. In Rosenzweig, M. R. & Porter, L. W. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 417–46). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.Google Scholar
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–47. doi: 10.2307/1131221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, R. A. (1989). Exploring the relations between motives and traits: The case of narcissism. In Buss, D. & Cantor, N. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 32–44). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Fayard, J. V., Roberts, B. W., Robins, R. W., & Watson, D. (2012). Uncovering the affective core of conscientiousness: The role of self-conscious emotions. Journal of Personality, 80, 1–32.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–114. doi: 10.1037/a0016786.Google Scholar
Funder, D. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Parrisius, C., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2016). Assessing task values in five subjects during secondary school: Measurement structure and mean level differences across grade level, gender, and academic subject. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.09.003.Google Scholar
Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Parrisius, C., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2017). Assessing task values in five subjects during secondary school: Measurement structure and mean level differences across grade level, gender, and academic subject. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 67–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.09.003.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.48.1.26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Göllner, R., Roberts, B.W., Damian, R.I., Lüdtke, O., Jonkmann, K., & Trautwein, U. (2017). Whose “storm and stress” is it? Parent and child reports of personality development in the transition to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 83(3), 376–87. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12246.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77–109). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–27. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.Google Scholar
Hill, P. L., Nickel, L.B., & Roberts, B.W. (2014). Are you in a healthy relationship? Linking conscientiousness to health via implementing and immunizing behaviors. Journal of Personality, 82, 485–92.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Misconceptions of traits continue to persist: A response to Bandura. Journal of Management, 38, 745–52. doi: 10.1177/0149206312438775.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Harms, P. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 501–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, M., Lüdtke, O., & Schroeders, U. (2016). Evidence for a positive relation between interest and achievement: Examining between-person and within-person variation in five domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 116–27.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–58). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–38). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kandler, C., Zimmermann, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–43. doi: 10.1002/per.1952.Google Scholar
Klein, A. & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457–74. doi: 10.1007/BF02296338.Google Scholar
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 620–37. doi: 10.1037/a0023743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–91. doi: 10.1037/a0019227.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–17. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203428412.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 273–94). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323–45. doi: 10.1080/13803610600765687.Google Scholar
Noftle, E. E. & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116–30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–38. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.Google Scholar
Reeve, J., Lee, W., & Won, S. (2015). Interest as emotion, as affect, and as schema. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 79–92). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46, 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.). (2015). Interest in mathematics and science learning. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
Rieger, S., Göllner, R., Spengler, M., Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Social cognitive constructs are just as stable as the Big Five between grades 5 and 8. AERA Open, 3(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
Rieger, S., Göllner, R., Spengler, M., et al. (2018). The development of students academic effort: Unique and joint effects of conscientiousness and individual interest, under review.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 137–45.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., & Hill, P. L. (2014). What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1315–30.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. & Nickel, L. B. (2017). A critical evaluation of the Neo-Socioanalytic Model of personality. In Specht, J. (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 157–77). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Thoman, D. B., & Smith, J. L. (2010). Interest and self-regulation: Understanding individual variability in choices, effort, and persistence over time. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 192–217). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C. L. (1999). Self-regulating motivation: The moderating role of hardiness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67, 701–33.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Song, J., Gaspard, H., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Predicting academic effort and achievement: Generalizability of the Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) model across domains, outcomes, and predictors, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Spengler, M., Brunner, M., Damian, R. I., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R., & Roberts, B. W. (2015a). Does it help to be a responsible student? Student characteristics and behaviors at age 12 predict occupational success 40 years later over and above childhood IQ and parental SES. Developmental Psychology, 51 (9), 1329–40.Google Scholar
Spengler, M., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2013). Personality is related to educational outcomes in late adolescence: Evidence from two large-scale achievement studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 613–25.Google Scholar
Spengler, M., Roberts, B. W., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R. & Brunner, M. (2015b). The kind of student you were in elementary school predicts mortality. Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12180.Google ScholarPubMed
Spengler, M., Roberts, B. W., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2016). Student characteristics and behaviors in childhood predict self-reported health in middle adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 30(5), 456–66.Google Scholar
Stoll, G., Rieger, S., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Vocational interests assessed at the end of high school predict life outcomes assessed 10 years later over and above IQ and Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 167–84. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000117.Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Silva, P. J. (2011). The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 592–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trautwein, U. & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students’ self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-student differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 432–44. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.432.Google Scholar
Trautwein, U. & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, 19, 243–58. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.001.Google Scholar
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Kastens, C. & Köller, O. (2006). Effort on homework in grades 5 through 9: Development, motivational antecedents, and the association with effort on classwork. Child Development, 77(4), 1094–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00921.x.Google Scholar
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, N., Lenski, A., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2015). Using individual interest and conscientiousness to predict academic effort: Additive, synergistic, or compensatory effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 142–62. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1115–28. doi: 10.1037/a0017048.Google Scholar
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I. & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–56. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438.Google Scholar
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763–77. doi: 10.1037/a0027470.Google Scholar
Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situation and person factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460–72. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–50. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.105.2.230.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Beller, A. H., Roberts, B. W., & Brown, J. R. (2015). Personality and young adult financial distress. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 90–100.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×