Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations of Morphological Theory
- Part II Issues in Morphological Theory
- Part III Morphological Principles
- Part IV Morphological Frameworks
- Part V The Role of Morphology in Theories of Phonology and Syntax
- 19 The Role of Morphology in Generative Phonology, Autosegmental Phonology, and Prosodic Morphology
- 20 The Role of Morphology in Optimality Theory
- 21 The Role of Morphology in Transformational Grammar
- 22 Morphology in Constraint-based Lexicalist Approaches to Grammar
- 23 Dependency Grammar
- Part VI Domains for the Evaluation of Morphological Theories
- Index of languages
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
- References
19 - The Role of Morphology in Generative Phonology, Autosegmental Phonology, and Prosodic Morphology
from Part V - The Role of Morphology in Theories of Phonology and Syntax
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations of Morphological Theory
- Part II Issues in Morphological Theory
- Part III Morphological Principles
- Part IV Morphological Frameworks
- Part V The Role of Morphology in Theories of Phonology and Syntax
- 19 The Role of Morphology in Generative Phonology, Autosegmental Phonology, and Prosodic Morphology
- 20 The Role of Morphology in Optimality Theory
- 21 The Role of Morphology in Transformational Grammar
- 22 Morphology in Constraint-based Lexicalist Approaches to Grammar
- 23 Dependency Grammar
- Part VI Domains for the Evaluation of Morphological Theories
- Index of languages
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology , pp. 513 - 549Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 2011. Featural affixes. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren (eds.), Companion to Phonology: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Phonology, 1945–1971. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Allen, Margaret. 1978. Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana. 1983. The root CV-template as a property of the affix: Evidence from Yawelmani. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 348–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana. 1991. Syllabification and prosodic templates in Yawelmani. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 231–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, and Sridhar, S. N.. 1983. Morphological levels in English and Kannada, or Atarizing Reagan. Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, 3–16. Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Brame, Michael. 1974. The cycle in phonology: Stress in Palestinian, Maltese and Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 39–60.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron. 1993. Subtractive Morphology in Southern Muskogean. International Journal of American Linguistics 59, 416–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, and McCarthy, John. 1983. A theory of internal reduplication. The Linguistic Review 3, 25–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bye, Patrik, and Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Exponence, phonology and non-concatenative morphology. In Trommer, Jochen (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, 427–95. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam; Halle, Morris, and Lukoff, Fred. 1956. On accent and juncture in English. In Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace, and McLean, Hugh (eds.), For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1980. Vowel Harmony in Nonlinear Generative Phonology: An Autosegmental Model. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1985. The problem of transfer in nonlinear morphology. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 38–73.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer, and Kisseberth, Charles. 1995. Paradoxical strength conditions in harmony systems. Papers from the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 25, 17–29.Google Scholar
Conteh, Patrik; Cowper, Elizabeth, James, Deborah, Rice, Keren, and Szamosi, Michael. 1983. A reanalysis of tone in Mende. In Kaye, Jonathan, Koopman, Hilda, Sportiche, Dominique, and Dugas, André (eds.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Hodges, Adam, and Rood, David (eds.), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, 25–49. Studies in Language Companion Series 72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudas, Karen Marie. 1976. The Phonology and Morphology of Modern Javanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Dwyer, David. 1978. What sort of tone language is Mende? Studies in African Linguistics 9, 167–208.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. An overview of Autosegmental Phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2, 22–68.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1979. The aims of Autosegmental Phonology. In Dinnsen, D. A. (ed.), Current Approaches to Phonology Theory, 202–22. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1978. The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. In Al-Ani, S (ed.), Readings in Arabic Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Hall, Tracy 1990. Syllable Structure and Syllable-related Processes in German. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1973. Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 3–16.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Mohanan, K. P.. 1985. Segmental phonology of modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 57–116.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1983. On the framework of Autosegmental Phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part I). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hansson, Gunnar 2001. Theoretical and Typological Issues in Consonant Harmony. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 1988. The Lexical Phonology of Sekani. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 1993. Metathesis and Domain Membership in Sekani. Talk given at Department of Linguistics, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1983. Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Sheldon, and Albert, Salich Y.. 1976. Mokilese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R. 1971. Internal labialization in the tt-group of Outer South-Ethiopic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 91, 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José. 1988. A Lexical Phonology of Basque. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Hualde, José. 1989. The strict cycle condition and noncyclic rules. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 675–80.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1985. Word domains and downstep in Bamileke-Dschang. Phonology Yearbook 2, 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1987. Prosodic domains in Kukuya. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 311–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2011. The representation of tone. In Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. 2: Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 1989. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 2008. The dual theory of reduplication. Linguistics 46, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon, and Zec, Draga. 1990. The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: CSLI Publications and the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon, and Zoll, Cheryl. 2007. Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45, 133–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1990. Prosodic minimality in Japanese. In Ziolkowski, Michael, Noske, Manuela, and Deaton, Karen (eds.), Papers from the Twenty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. vol. 2: The Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, 213–39. Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 1986. The phonology of voicing in Japanese: Theoretical consequences for morphological accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 49–73.Google Scholar
Iverson, Greg, and Wheeler, D. W.. 1988. Blocking and the elsewhere condition. In Hammond, Michael and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical Morphology, 325–38. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kean, Mary-Louise. 1974. The strict cycle in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 179–203.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael, and Kisseberth, Charles. 1979. Generative Phonology: Description and Theory. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel J., and Kiparsky, Paul. 1984. Syllable structure in Finnish phonology. In Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard (eds.), Language Sound Structure, 7–31: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973a. Phonological representations: Abstractness, opacity and global rules. In Fujimura, Osamu (ed.), Three Dimensions in Linguistic Theory, 57–86. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973b. Phonological representations: Sase studies. In Fujimura, Osamu (ed.), Three Dimensions in Linguistic Theory, 87–136. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, I.-S. (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982b. Word-formation and the lexicon. In Ingemann, Frances (ed.), 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers, 3–32. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982c. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part I. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1984. On the lexical phonology of Icelandic. In Elert, Claes-Christian, Johansson, Iréne, and Strangert, Eva (eds.), Nordic Prosody II: Papers from a Symposium, 135–64. Umeå: University of Umeå.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1993. Blocking in non-derived environments. In Hargus, Sharon and Kaisse, Ellen (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology, vol. 4: Studies in Lexical Phonology, 277–313. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Fenno-Swedish Quantity: Contrast in Stratal OT. In Vaux, Bert and Nevins, Andrew (eds.), Rules, Constraints and Phonological Phenomena, 185–220. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1965. On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. Report to the National Science Foundation. Computation Laboratory of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1993. Cognitive phonology. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The Last Phonological Rule. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1978. The representation of tone. In Fromkin, V. A (ed.), Tone: A Linguistic Survey, 177–219. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M. 1968. On the use of minor rules in Russian phonology. Journal of Linguistics 4, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightner, Theodore M. 1972. Remarks on exceptions and on co-existent systems in phonology. In Worth, Dean S. (ed.), The Slavic Word. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack. 1988. Subtractive morphology as dissociation. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan. 1976. Catalan Phonology and the Phonological Cycle. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1981. A Prosodic Theory of Non-Concatenative Morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1983. Consonantal morphology in the Chaha verb. In Barlow, Michael, Flickinger, Daniel, Wescoat, Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 176–88. Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 43, 176–88.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16, 331–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2003. Comparative markedness. Theoretical Linguistics 29, 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2007. Hidden Generalizations: Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1990. Foot and word in Prosodic Morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 209–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill, Dickey, Laura, and Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1999. Prosodic Morphology (1986). In Goldsmith, John (ed.), Phonological Theory: The Essential Readings, 238–88. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin. 1986. Studies in Tier Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin, and Itô, Junko. 1989. Feature predictability and underspecification: Palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Language 65, 258–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1995. The organization of the grammar. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P., and Mohanan, Tara. 1984. Lexical phonology of the consonant system in Malayalam. Linguistic Inquiry 15.4, 575–602.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1986. Tone and affixation in Hausa. Studies in African Linguistics 17, 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Stanley. 1944. Yokuts Language of California. New York: Viking Fund Publications.Google Scholar
Noske, Roland. 1985. Syllabification and syllable-changing processes in Yawelmani. In van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds.), Advances in Nonlinear Phonology, 335–61. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-Based Morphology and Phonology: With Special Attention to Optimality Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1979. Russian Morphology and Lexical Theory. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar
Poser, William J. 1984. The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Poser, William J. 1990. Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Language 66, 78–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William J. 1993. Are strict cycle effects derivable? In Hargus, Sharon and Kaisse, Ellen (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology, vol. 4: Studies in Lexical Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Prince, A., and Smolensky, P.. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1988. Vocalic underspecification in Yoruba. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 233–70.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey, and Zwicky, Arnold. 1988. The syntax-phonology interface. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 1, 255–80. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Sharon, and Walker, Rachel. 2004. A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Language 80, 475–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, Richard. 1986. Malayalam compounding: A non-stratum ordered account. In Dalrymple, Mary, Goldberg, Jeffrey, Hanson, Kristin, Inman, Michael, Piñon, Chris, and Wechsler, Stephen (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 268–88. Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1988. Reduplication and syllable transfer in Sanskrit. Phonology 5, 73–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 114–74. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Sumukti, Rukmantoro Hadi. 1971. Javanese Morphology and Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie. 1973. The Phonology of Reduplication. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1976. Underlying tone in Margi and Igbo. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 463–84.Google Scholar
Williamson, Kay. 1968. Deep and surface structure in tone languages. Journal of West African Languages 2, 77–81.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988. Template morphology and the direction of association. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 551–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C.-L. 2005. Toward a typology of compensatory reduplication. In Alderete, John, Han, Chung-hye, and Kochetov, Alexei (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 397–405. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, Wim. 1978. A Formal Theory of Exceptions in Generative Phonology. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar