Ackerman, Farrell, and Stump, Gregory. 2004. Paradigms and periphrastic expression: A study in realization-based lexicalism. In Sadler, Louisa and Spencer, Andrew (eds.), Projecting Morphology, 111–57. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Farrell; Blevins, James P., and Malouf, Robert. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Blevins, James P. and Blevins, Juliette (eds.), Analogy in Grammar, 54–82. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aihkenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentials. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arcodia, Giorgio F. 2011. A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese. Morphology 21, 89–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ascoop, Kristin, and Leuschner, Torsten. 2006. Affixoidhungrig? Skitbra! Comparing affixoids in Swedish and German. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59, 241–52.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald; Burani, Christina, and Schreuder, Rob. 1997. Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian. Yearbook of Morphology 1996, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald; McQueen, James M., Dijkstra, Ton, and Schreuder, Rob. 2003. Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In Baayen, R. Harald and Schreuder, Rob (eds.), Morphological Structure in Language Processing, 355–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie; Lieber, Rochelle, and Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, David, and Mel’cuk, Igor. 2011. Morphological phrasemes and Totonacan verbal morphology. Linguistics 49, 175–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benigni, Valentina, and Masini, Francesca. 2009. Compounds in Russian. Lingue e Linguaggio 8, 171–93.Google Scholar

Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42, 531–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2002. Separable complex verbs in Dutch: A case of periphrastic word formation. In Dehé, Nicole, Jackendoff, Ray, McIntyre, Andrew, and Urban, Silke (eds.), Verb-particle Explorations, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2005. Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Kastovsky, Dieter, Pfeiffer, Oskar E., and Rainer, Franz (eds.), Morphology and Its Demarcations, 109–32. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2008. Constructional idioms as products of language change: The aan het + INFINITIVE construction in Dutch. In Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), Construction Grammar and Language Change, 79–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2009. Lexical integrity as a morphological universal: A constructionist view. In Scalise, Sergio, Magni, Elisabetta, and Bisetto, Antonietta (eds.), Universals of Language Today, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2012. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Morphology. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Booij, Geert, and Hüning, Matthias. 2014. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Boogaart, Ronny, Colleman, Timothy, and Rutten, Gijsbert (eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, 77–105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert. In press. Inheritance and motivation in Construction Morphology. In Gisborne, Nikolas and Hippisley, Andrew (eds.), Defaults in Morphological Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Caballero, Gabriela, and Inkelas, Sharon. 2013. Word construction: Tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Morphology 23, 103–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ceccagno, Antonella, and Basciano, Bianca. 2007. Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology 17, 207–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chumakina, Marina, and Corbett, Greville G. (eds.) 2013. Periphrasis: The role of Syntax and Morphology in Paradigms. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felíu Arquiola, Elena. 2011. Las reduplicaciones léxicas nominales en Español actual. Verba 38, 95–126.Google Scholar

Finkel, Raphael, and Stump, Gregory. 2007. Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology 17, 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, Raphael, and Stump, Gregory. 2009. Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency. In Blevins, James P. and Blevins, Juliette (eds.), Analogy in Grammar, 13–53. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ghomeshi, Jila; Jackendoff, Ray, Rosen, Nicole, and Russell, Kevin. 2004. Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The salad-salad paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, 307–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. 2009. Exuberant exponence in Batsbi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27, 267–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey, and McPherson, Laura. 2013. Tonosyntax and reference restriction in Dogon NPs. Language 89, 265–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation and Syntax. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Hoeksema, Jack. 2012. Elative compounds in Dutch: Properties and developments. In Oebel, Guido (ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachenvergleich / Crosslinguistic Comparison of Intensified Adjectives and Adverbs, 97–142. Hamburg: Verlag dr. Kovač.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas, and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.) 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hüning, Matthias, and Booij, Geert. 2014. From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization.” Folia Linguistica 48, 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon. 2014. The Interplay of Morphology and Phonology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Semantic and morphological regularities in the lexicon. Language 51, 639–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2011. What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language 87, 586–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 1999. Word formation. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 297–325. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kageyama, Taro. 2010. Variation between endocentric and exocentric word structures. Lingua 120, 2405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2013. Conspiring to mean: Experimental and computational evidence for a usage-based harmonic approach to morphophonology. Language 89, 110–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khanjan, Alireza, and Alinezhad, Batool. 2010. A morphological doubling approach to full reduplication in Persian. SKY Journal of Linguistics 23, 169–98.Google Scholar

Kiefer, Ferenc. 1998. Morphology and pragmatics. In Spencer, Andrew and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology, 272–80. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki, and Booij, Geert. 2014. Negative complex adjectives in Japanese: The relation between syntactic and morphological constructions. Word Structure 7, 55–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 1994. Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic language of Zaire. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Seung-Ah. 2007. Ing forms and the progressive puzzle: A construction-based approach to English progressives. Journal of Linguistics 43, 153–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leuschner, Torsten, and Decroos, Nancy. 2008. Wortbildung zwischen System und Norm. Affixoïden im Deutschen und im Niederländischen. Sprachwissenschaft 33, 1–34.Google Scholar

Los, Bettelou; Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marion, and Van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lúis, Ana. 2014. The layering of form and meaning in creole word-formation: A view from construction morphology. In Rainer, Franz, Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gardani, Francesco, and Lüschützky, Hans (eds.), Morphology and Meaning, 223–38. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Masini, Francesca. 2009. Phrasal lexemes, compounds and phrases: A constructionist perspective. Word Structure 2, 254–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesset, Tore. 2008. Abstract Phonology in a Concrete Model: Cognitive Linguistics and the Morphology-phonology Interface. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Namiki, Takayasu. 2010. Morphological variation in Japanese compounds: The case of hoodai and the notion of “compound-specific meaning.” Lingua 120, 2367–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orie, Olanike Ola. 2012. Unifying Yoruba reduplication constructions and their semantic relatives. The Linguistic Review 29, 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadler, Louisa, and Spencer, Andrew. 2001. Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 71–96.Google Scholar

Scholz, Cosima. 2012. Romanische Verb-Nomen Komposita: Grammatiktheoretische Perspektiven auf das Verhältnis von Komposition, Kompositionalität und Exozentrizität. Ph.D. dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin].Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornton, Anna M. 2008. Italian verb-verb reduplicative action nouns. Lingue e Linguaggio 7, 209–32.Google Scholar

Traugott, Elisabeth C. and Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Goethem, Kristel. 2008. Oud-leerling versus ancien élève: A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology 18, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Goethem, Kristel, and Hiligsmann, Philippe. 2014. When two paths converge: Debonding and clipping of Dutch reuze. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26, 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Von Heusinger, Klaus, and Schwarze, Christoph. 2013. Italian V+N compounds, inflectional features and conceptual structure. Morphology 23, 325–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar