Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–64. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W.. 2011. Dependencies between grammatical systems. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Language at large: Essays on syntax and semantics, pp. 170–204. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. 2012. Possessive constructions in Likpe (Sɛkpɛlé). In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 224–42. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Antzakas, Klimas 2006. The use of negative head movements in Greek Sign Language. In Zeshan, (ed.), pp. 258–69.Google Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. 2000. The indefinite-interrogative puzzle. Linguistic Typology 4(3): 365–400.Google Scholar

Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cecchetto, Carlo, Geraci, Carlo and Zucchi, Sandro. 2009. Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case of right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85(2): 278–320.Google Scholar

Chen Pichler, Deborah, Schalber, Katharina, Wilbur, Ronnie and Hochgesang, Julie. 2006. Possessives and existentials in three sign languages. Presentation at the Ninth Congress on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR), Florianópolis, Brazil.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 2013. Numeral bases. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds.), http://wals.info/chapter/131.Google Scholar

de Vos, Connie. 2012. Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language inscribes its signing space. PhD thesis, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

de Weerdt, Danny and Vermeerbergen, Myriam. 2008. Observations on possessive and existential constructions in Flemish Sign Language. In Zeshan, and Perniss, (eds.), pp. 195–212.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. III: Further grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.). 2002. Word: A cross-linguistic typology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info [Accessed on 8 March 2015].Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.). 2006. Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Fischer, Susan D. 2006. Questions and negation in American Sign Language. In Zeshan, (ed.), pp. 165–97.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2013. Distributive numerals. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds.), http://wals.info/chapter/54.Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald. 2010. Rarities in numeral systems. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, pp. 11–60. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hanke, Thomas. 2010. Additional rarities in the typology of numerals. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Empirical approaches to language typology: Rethinking universals – How rarities affect linguistic theory, pp. 61–89. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.). 2001. Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive forces, sources, and grammaticalisation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor, Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Schembri, Adam and Leeson, Loraine. 2007. Real data are messy: Considering the cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Australian Sign Language, Vlaamse Gebarentaal and Irish Sign Language. In Perniss, et al. (eds.), pp. 163–206.Google Scholar

Klima, Edward S. and Bellugi, Ursula. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lane, Harlan. 1992. The mask of benevolence. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

Leeson, Lorraine and Saeed, John I.. 2012. Word order. In Pfau, Roland, Steinbach, Markus and Woll, Bencie (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, pp. 245–64. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. and Fennig, Charles D. (eds.). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 18th edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available online at: www.ethnologue.com. style.Google Scholar

Lutalo-Kiingi, Sam. 2014. A descriptive grammar of morphosyntactic constructions in Ugandan Sign Language (UgSL). PhD thesis, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.Google Scholar

Marsaja, I. Gede. 2008. Desa Kolok: A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

McBurney, Susan Lloyd. 2002. Pronominal reference in signed and spoken languages. Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Meier, et al. (eds.), pp. 329–69.Google Scholar

McKee, Rachel. 2006. Aspects of interrogatives and negation in New Zealand Sign Language. In Zeshan, (ed.), pp. 70–90.Google Scholar

McNeill, David (ed.). 2000. Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsey and Quinto-Pozos, David (eds.). 2002. Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Meir, Irit. 1998. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Napoli, Donna Jo and Sutton-Spence, Rachel. 2014. Order of the major constituents in sign languages: Implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1–18.Google Scholar

Neidle, Carol, Lee, Robert, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Ben and Kegl, Judy. 1998. The rightward analysis of WH-movement in ASL: A reply to Petronio and Lillo-Martin. Language 74(4): 819–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nyst, Victoria. 2007. A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Nyst, Victoria. 2008. Pointing out possession and existence in Adamorobe Sign Language. In Zeshan, and Perniss, (eds.), pp. 235–52.Google Scholar

Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

Padden, Carol and Humphries, Tom. 2006. Inside deaf culture. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Palfreyman, Nick. 2014. Sign language varieties of Indonesia: A linguistic and sociolinguistic investigation. PhD thesis, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela, Roland Pfau, and Steinbach, Markus. 2007. Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela and Zeshan, Ulrike. 2008. Possessive and existential constructions in Kata Kolok (Bali). In Zeshan, and Perniss, (eds.), pp. 125–49.Google Scholar

Petronio, Karen and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1997. WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73(1): 18–57.Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland. 2015. The grammaticalization of headshakes: From head movement to negative head. In Smith, Andrew, Trousdale, Graeme and Waltereit, Richard (eds.). New directions in grammaticalization research, pp. 9–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus. 2006a. Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages. Linguistics in Potsdam 24: 5–98.Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus. 2006b. Pluralization in sign and speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10: 135–82.Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus. 2011. Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, pp. 683–95. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quer, Josep and GRIN (Gramaticà i Interpretació de Llengua de Signes). 2008. Structures of possession and existence in Catalan Sign Language. In Zeshan, and Perniss, (eds.), pp. 33–53.Google Scholar

Rosenstock, Rachel. 2008. The role of iconicity in International Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 8(2): 131–59.Google Scholar

Sagara, Keiko. 2014. The numeral system of Japanese Sign Language from a cross-linguistic perspective. MPhil dissertation, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UKGoogle Scholar

Sagara, Keiko and Zeshan, Ulrike. 2013. Typology of cardinal numerals and numeral incorporation in sign languages. Poster presented at the Eleventh Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR) Conference. University College London, July.Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy. 1999. The medium and the message: Prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in sign language. Sign Language and Linguistics 2(2): 187–216.Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinbach, Markus and Pfau, Roland. 2007. Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In Perniss, et al. (eds.), pp. 303–39.Google Scholar

Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional papers (No. 8). Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles and LeBaron, Curtis (eds.). 2011. Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tang, Gladys. 2006. Questions and negatives in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Zeshan, (ed.), pp. 198–224.Google Scholar

Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tervoort, Bernard Th. M. 1953. Structurele Analyse van Visueel Taalgebruik binnen een Groep Dove Kinderen [Structural analysis of visual language use in a group of deaf children]. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Trask, Robert L. 1996. Historical linguistics. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar

von Mengden, Ferdinand. 2010. Cardinal numerals: Old English from a cross-linguistic perspective. Topics in English Linguistics 67. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, Junhui and Fischer, Susan D.. 2002. Expressing negation in Chinese Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 5(2): 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yau, Shun-chiu. 1992. Creations gestuelle et debuts du langage: Creation de langues gestuelles chez des sourds isoles. Paris: Éditions Langages Croisés.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2000. Sign language in Indopakistan: A description of a signed Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2002. Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages. In Dixon, and Aikhenvald, (eds.), pp. 153–79.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004a. Hand, head and face: negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8(1): 1–58.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004b. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Language 80(1): 7–39.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2013. Sign languages. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds.), http://wals.info/chapter/54.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2014. Distinctive features of Indian Sign Language in comparison to foreign sign languages. In Grover, Nisha, Bhattacharys, Tanmoy and Randhawa, Surinder (eds.), The sign language(s) of India, pp. 6–22. (Vol. 38 of the People’s Linguistic Survey of India). Bhasha Research and Publication Centre: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. (ed.). 2006. Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. (Sign Language Typology Series No. 1). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike and Perniss, Pamela (eds.). 2008. Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages. (Sign Language Typology Series No. 2). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike and de Vos, Connie (eds.). 2012. Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights. (Sign Language Typology Series No. 4). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike and Sagara, Keiko (eds.). 2016. Semantic fields in sign languages: Colour, kinship and quantification. (Sign Language Typology Series No. 6). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

Ulrike, Zeshan, Escobedo Delgado, Cesar Ernesto, Dikyuva, Hasan, Panda, Sibaji and de Vos, Connie. 2013. Cardinal numerals in village sign languages: Approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology 17(3): 357–96.Google Scholar