Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Korean Overview
- Part II Phonetics and Phonology
- Part III Morphology and Syntax
- Part IV Semantics and Pragmatics
- Part V Sociolinguistics and Psycholinguistics
- Part VI Language Pedagogy
- Chapter 26 The Genre-Based Approach to Korean Language Teaching: A Curriculum Application
- Chapter 27 Towards Integrated Performance Assessment
- Chapter 28 Interactional Competence in the Korean Language
- Chapter 29 From Bilingual Speakers to Korean Heritage Language Learners
- Chapter 30 Language Policy and Its Effect in South Korea
- Index
- References
Chapter 27 - Towards Integrated Performance Assessment
from Part VI - Language Pedagogy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2022
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Korean Overview
- Part II Phonetics and Phonology
- Part III Morphology and Syntax
- Part IV Semantics and Pragmatics
- Part V Sociolinguistics and Psycholinguistics
- Part VI Language Pedagogy
- Chapter 26 The Genre-Based Approach to Korean Language Teaching: A Curriculum Application
- Chapter 27 Towards Integrated Performance Assessment
- Chapter 28 Interactional Competence in the Korean Language
- Chapter 29 From Bilingual Speakers to Korean Heritage Language Learners
- Chapter 30 Language Policy and Its Effect in South Korea
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 27 stresses the importance of connecting assessment with learning and of assessment prior to implementation of instructional design based on the backward design principle (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Backward design contrasts sharply with the traditional approach of planning instructional activities first and designing assessment later in the general instructional process. It also urges teachers to set clear learning objectives as the first step of curriculum design. After offering a short overview of key assessment types for different purposes, it presents Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA: Adair-Hauck, Glisan & Troyan, 2013) model by discussing how language proficiency and skills in real use of grammar and vocabulary can be measured in actual performance assessment. Actual students’ outcomes after implementation of IPA in an Advanced Korean class are collected and analyzed based on rubrics that can be used as standards for scoring. The chapter also analyzes whether there are correlations between IPA results and Proficiency outcomes.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 769 - 799Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
ACTFL. 1984. ACTFL provisional proficiency guidelines. Foreign Language Annals 17: 453–9.Google Scholar
ACTFL. 2012b. Oral Proficiency Interview Tester Training Manual, edited by Swender, E. and Vicars, R.. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
ACTFL. 2012c. Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century—Produced exclusively for American Association of Teachers of Korean. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press Inc.Google Scholar
Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E. W., and Troyan, F. J.. 2013. Implementing Integrated Performance Assessment. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. 1988. Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10–12: 149–64.Google Scholar
Dandonoli, P., and Henning, G.. 1990. An investigation of the construct validity of the ACTFL proficiency guidelines and oral interview procedure. Foreign Language Annals 23–1: 11–22.Google Scholar
Glisan, E. W., Uribe, D., and Adair-Hauck, B.. 2007. Research on Integrated Performance Assessment at the post-secondary level: Student performance across the modes of communication. The Canadian Modern Language Review 64: 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, G. S., and Dettmer, P. A.. 2004. Assessment for Effective Teaching: Using Context-Adaptive Planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A & B.Google Scholar
Henning, G. 1992. The ACTFL oral proficiency interview: Validity evidence. System 20–3: 365–72.Google Scholar
Interagency Language Roundtable. 2011. ILR Skill Level Descriptions (1986). Available at: www.govtilr.org [last accessed September 6, 2020].Google Scholar
Kang, S. 2016a. Proficiency Assessment: Revisited-Current Issues, Special Interview, Journal of KLACES (Korean Language and Culture Education Society), pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Kang, S. 2016b. Linking assessment and learning via performance and proficiency assessment. International Journal of Korean Language Education 2(2): 97–123.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., and Frawley, W.. 1988. Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in the Second Language Acquisition 10–12: 181–95.Google Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. 1984. The ACTFL proficiency guidelines: An historical perspective. In Higgs, T. V., ed., Teaching for Proficiency: The Organizing Principle. The ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC/Contemporary Publishing Group, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar
The National Standards Collaborative Board. 2015. World Readiness Standards for Learning Languages, 4th ed. Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
Surface, E. A., and Dierdorff, E. C.. 2003. Reliability and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Foreign Language Annals 36: 4.Google Scholar
Surface, E. A., Poncheri, R. M., and Bahvsar, K. S.. 2008. Two Studies Investigating the Reliability and Validity of the English ACTFL OPIc with Korean Test Takers. Raleigh, NC: SWA Consulting Inc.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J.. 2005. Understanding by Design, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar