Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:17:48.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Lexical Nominalizations in Korean

from Part III - Morphology and Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

By
James Hye Suk Yoon
Edited by
Sungdai Cho  and
John Whitman
Sungdai Cho
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, State University of New York
John Whitman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Chapter 15 investigates the feasibility of an all-syntax approach to lexical nominalizations in Korean. In addition to productive syntactic nominalizations, Korean possesses a rich inventory of deverbal, i.e., lexical, nominalizations. The consensus in the field since the advent of the Lexicalist Hypothesis (Chomsky 1970) that syntactic and lexical nominalizations are formed in different grammatical components has been questioned in recent approaches that advocate a unified syntactic analysis of all nominalizations. The investigation reveals that while there are lexical nominalizations that are argument-bearing, previous arguments purporting to support separation of complex event nominals and simple event, or result, nominals, ultimately do not go through in Korean. Examination of a class of lexical nominalizations that bear some hallmarks of syntactic derivation leads to the same conclusion. Thus, deverbal lexical nominalizations in Korean do not support the kind of unified syntactic analysis of nominalizations that is currently dominant in the literature.

Keywords

syntactic nominalizationslexical nominalizationscomplex event nominalscomplex event diagnosticsnominalizer uniformityhead movement/incorporationreanalysis
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 429 - 457
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackema, P., and Neeleman, A.. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity. Linguistik Actuell 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. 2009. On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: The case of (Greek) derived nominals. In Giannakidou, A. and Rathert, M., eds., Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–80.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., and Grimshaw, J.. 2008. Verbs, nouns and affixation. In Schäfer, Florian, ed., Working Papers of the SFB 732. Incremental Specification in Context 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Borer, H. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In Moore, J. C. and Polinsky, M., eds., The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar
Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense Vol II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruening, B. 2013. By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16(1): 1–41.Google Scholar
Bruening, B. 2018. Word formation is syntactic: Raising in nominalizations. Glossa 3(1): 102.1–25.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P. S., eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
Fabregas, A., and Marin, R.. 2012. The role of Aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages. Journal of Linguistics 48: 35–70.Google Scholar
Fu, J., Roeper, T., and Borer, H.. 2001. The VP within process nominal: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 549–82.Google Scholar
Göksel, A. 2015. Phrasal compounds in Turkish: Distinguishing citations from quotations. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 68: 359–94.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K., and Keyser, S. J.. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J., eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 53–109.Google Scholar
Halle, M., and Marantz, A.. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, K. and Jay Keyser, S., eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 111–76.Google Scholar
Harley, H. 2009a. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In Giannakidou, A. and Rathert, M., eds., Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 320–42.Google Scholar
Harley, H. 2009b. Compounding in distributed morphology. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P., eds., Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–44.Google Scholar
Harley, H., and Noyer, R.. 1998. Mixed nominalizations: Short verb movement and object shift in English. Northeast Linguistic Society 28: 143–58.Google Scholar
Hong, K-S. 1999. Nonhang phankyel-uy kicwun: hankwuke-uy tongsaseng pokhap.e [A test for argumenthood: Verbal compounds in Korean]. Inmwun Nonchong 42: 85–103.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 2003. The etiology of adjunct islands. Nordlyd 31(1): 187–215.Google Scholar
Kaiser, L. 1998. The morphosyntax of clausal nominalization constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Kim, C-S. 1996. Kwuke-uy Tane Hyengseng-kwa Tane Kwuco Yenkwu [Word Formation and Word Structure in Korean]. Monograph 21. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Kim, M-K. 2004. Kwuke cepsa -um, -ki-ey uyhan tan.e hyengseng yenkwu [A study of word formation by the Korean suffixes -um, -ki]. Ph.D. dissertation, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Kim, S-S., and Sells, P.. The morphosyntax of person-denoting nominals. In Cho, S. and Whitman, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ko, Y-K. 1989. Kwuke Hyengthaylon Yenkwu. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrenz, B. 2006. Moderne deutsche Wortbildung: Phrasale Wortbildung im Deutschen: Linguistichse Untersuchung und sprachdidaktiche Behandlung (Philologia 91). Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. 2016. English Nouns: The Ecology of Nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–25.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 2007. Phases and words. In Choe, S-H., ed., Phases in the Theory of Grammar. Seoul: Dong-In Publishing Co, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. 2008. Current challenges to the lexicalist hypothesis: An overview and a critique. In Lewis, W. D., Karimi, S., Harley, H., and Farrar, S. O., eds., Time and Again: Theoretical Perspectives in Formal Linguistics in Honor of D. Terence Langendoen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–117.Google Scholar
Pafel, J. 2015. Phrasal compounds and the morphology-syntax relation. In Trips, C. and Kornfilt, J., eds., Further Investigations into the Nature of Phrasal Compounding. Berlin: Language Science Press, pp. 233–59.Google Scholar
Park, C-W. 2013. Nominal and clausal grounding of Korean verbal nouns. Linguistics 51: 1361–95.Google Scholar
Park, C-W., and Park, B.. 2017. Cognitive grammar and English nominalizations: Event/result nominal and gerundives. Cognitive Linguistics 28: 711–56.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G. 2009. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, I., and Soare, E.. 2012. Naming participants in the eventuality. Manuscript, University of Paris 8.Google Scholar
Sato, Y. 2010. Complex phrase structures within morphological words: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Lingua 120: 379–407.Google Scholar
Shi, C-K. 1998. Kwuke-uy Tane Hyengseng Wenli [Principles of Word Formation in Korean]. Seoul: Hankwukmwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Shi, C-K. 2015. Word formation. In Brown, L. and Yeon, J., eds., Handbook of Korean Linguistics. London: Wiley, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Trips, C., and Kornfilt, J.. 2015. Typological aspects of phrasal compounds in English, German, Turkish, and Turkic. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 68: 281–322.Google Scholar
Yoon, J. 1996a. Nominal gerund phrases in English as phrasal zero derivations. Linguistics 43: 329–56.Google Scholar
Yoon, J. 1996b. A syntactic account of category-changing phrasal morphology: Nominalizations in Korean and English. In Ahn, H. et al., eds., Morphosyntax in Generative Grammar. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Yoon, J. 2017. Lexical integrity and suspended affixation in two types of Korean denominal predicates. Glossa 2(1): 45.1–45.Google Scholar
Yoon, J., and Park, C.. 2003. Process nominals and morphological complexity. In Hudson, M. Endo et al., eds., Japanese-Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 231–42.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×