Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:37:01.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Kinship, World Religions, and the Nation-State

from Part VI - Kinship and the Nation-State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Felice, Austin, Axman, Lani, Farrell, Heather, Allgood, Robyn and Ripley, Sheridan. 2012. The Gift of Giving Life: Rediscovering the Divine Nature of Pregnancy and Birth. Culver City, CA: Madison and West Publishing.Google Scholar
Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, eds. 2009. Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Basu, Paul. 2007. Highland Homecomings: Genealogy and Heritage Tourism in the Scottish Diaspora. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, Laura. 2007. Lines of the Nation: Indian Railway Workers, Bureaucracy and the Intimate Historical Self. New York/Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, Laura. 2013. “‘This Body Is Our Body’: Vishwakarma Puja, the Social Debts of Kinship and Theologies of Materiality in a Neoliberal Shipyard.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 155179. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Bear, Laura. 2015. Navigating Austerity: Currents of Debt along a South Asian River. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert. 1997. “Max Weber and World-Denying Love: A Look at the Historical Sociology of Religion.” Humanities Center and Burke Leadership on Religion and Society, University of California, San Diego, CA. October 30. www.robertbellah.com/articles_3.htm, accessed October 4, 2017.Google Scholar
Bennion, Janet. 2012. Polygamy in Primetime. Lebanon, NH: Brandeis University Press, an imprint of the University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Barbara. 2013. “On the Road Again: Movement, Marriage, Mestizaje and the Race of Kinship.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 131154. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2005. “The Christianity of Anthropology.” Malinowski Memorial Lecture, May 20, 2005. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 11(2): 335356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2006. The Anthropology of Christianity. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2010. “The Anthropology of Secularism.Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 85100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2011. “English Ancestors: The Moral Possibilities of Popular Genealogy.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 17(3): 462480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2013. “The Re-Enchantment of Kinship.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 217240. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2017a. “Forever Families: Christian Individualism, Mormonism and Collective Salvation.” In New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties across the Abrahamic Religions, ed. Thomas, Todne, Malik, Asiya and Wellman, Rose, 151169. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2017b. “Mormonism and Anthropology: On Ways of Knowing.” In Mormon Studies Review 4(1): article 2. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr2/vol4/iss1/2, accessed November 13, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. In preparation. Book of Life: Mormon Sacred Kinship in Modern America.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2013. “Ghosts, Commensality and Scuba Diving: Tracing Kinship and Sociality in Clinical Pathology.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 217240. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2011. Gospel Principles. www.lds.org/manual/gospel-principles/chapter-47-exaltation?lang=eng, accessed January 8, 2017.Google Scholar
Collier, Jane and Yanagisako, Sylvia Junko, eds. 1987. Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2006. “Secularism and the Argument from Nature.” In Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, ed. Scott, David and Hirschkind, Charles, 93112. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 2000. The Mormon Culture of Salvation. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 2003. An Introduction to Mormonism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 2010. Joseph Smith, Jesus and Satanic Opposition: Atonement, Evil and the Mormon Vision. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006 [1976]. The Selfish Gene, 30th anniversary ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 1999. “Communities of Blood”: The Natural History of Kinship in Nineteenth-Century America.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41(2): 215262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2001a. “The Ethnography of Creation: Lewis Henry Morgan and the American Beaver.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., 5484. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2001b. “The Mystery of Life in All Its Forms: Religious Dimensions of Culture in Early American Anthropology.” In Religion and Cultural Studies, ed. Mizurchi, S., 140191. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2013. “Placing the Dead: Slavery, Kinship and Free Labor in Pre- and Post-Civil War America.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 179217. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Flake, Kathleen. 2003. The Politics of American Religious Identity: The Seating of Senato Reedr Smoot, Mormon Apostle. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, eds. 2001. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl. 2004. Latter-Day Saint Experience in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl. 2012. When Souls Had Wings: Pre-Mortal Existence in Western Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl. 2014. Wrestling the Angel: The Foundations of Mormon Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. 2002. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, Marcia. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2007. Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klassen, Pamela. 2001. Blessed Events: Religion and Home Birth in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2013. “Kinship, Modernity and the Immodern.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 241260. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno.1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leite, Naomi. 2017. Unorthodox Kin: Portuguese Marranos and the Global Search for Belonging. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberatore, Giulia. 2016. “Imagining an Ideal Husband: Marriage As a Site of Aspiration among Pious Somali Women in London.” Anthropological Quarterly 69(3): 781821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 2013. “Kinship within and beyond the ‘Movement of Progressive Societies.’” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 3962. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella. 2013. “The Difference Kinship Makes.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 338. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Mody, Perveez. 2008. The Intimate State: Love-Marriage and the Law in Delhi. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsi, Robert. 2005. Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars Who Study Them. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orsi, Robert. 2016. History and Presence. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Pool, Fernande. 2016. The Ethical life of Muslims in Secular India: Islamic Reformism in West Bengal. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Elizabeth. 2012. God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Danilyn. 2013. “Kinship and Catastrophe: Global Warming and the Rhetoric of Descent.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 261283. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1996. “The Sadness of Sweetness: The Native Anthropology of Western Cosmology.” Current Anthropology 77(3): 395428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2011a. “What Kinship Is” (Part 1). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(1): 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2011b. “What Kinship Is” (Part 2). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(2): 227242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1980 [1969]. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, Don. 2017. “Kinship As Ethical Relation: A Critique of the Spiritual Kinship Paradigm.” In New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties Across the Abrahamic Religions, ed. Thomas, T., Malik, A. and Wellman, R., 85108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serjeant, Jill. 16 Dec. 2009. “‘Big Love’ Returns to TV with Provocative Gay Story.” Reuters. www.reuters.com/article/us-biglove/big-love-returns-to-tv-with-provocative-gay-story-idUSTRE5BF5O520091216, accessed November 3, 2018.Google Scholar
Shever, Elana. 2012. Resources for Reform: Oil and Neoliberalism in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shever, Elana. 2013. “‘I Am a Petroleum Product”: Making Kinship Work on the Patagonian Frontier.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 85109. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Shipps, Jan. 1987. Mormonism: The Story of a New Religious Tradition. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. “No Nature, No Culture: The Hagen Case.” In Nature, Culture and Gender, ed. MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M., 174222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Todne, Malik, Asiya and Wellman, Rose, eds. 2017. New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties across the Abrahamic Religions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivieros de Castro, Eduardo. 2009. “The Gift and the Given: Three Nano-Essays on Kinship and Magic.” In Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, ed. Bamford, S. and Leach, J., 237268. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1991 [1915]. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” (Zwischenbetrachtung). In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. Wright, 323363. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1991. [c.1920]. “The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. Wright, 302322. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1991. [1922]. “Science As a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. Wright, 129156. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2001. [c.1930]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by T. Parsons from a German original c.1904. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia. 2002. Producing Culture and Capital: Family Firms in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia. 2013. “Transnational Family Capitalism: Producing ‘Made in Italy’ in China.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 6384. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carole, eds. 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×