Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Frontispiece
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Introduction and Theoretical Framework
- Part I Theoretical Foundations of Intercultural Training
- Part II Practice of Intercultural Training
- Part III Indigenous Psychology and Intercultural Training
- Part IV New Interdisciplinary Approaches to Intercultural Training
- Part V Summing Up
- 25 Intercultural Training for the New Global Village
- Index
- References
25 - Intercultural Training for the New Global Village
Future Research Directions
from Part V - Summing Up
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Frontispiece
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Introduction and Theoretical Framework
- Part I Theoretical Foundations of Intercultural Training
- Part II Practice of Intercultural Training
- Part III Indigenous Psychology and Intercultural Training
- Part IV New Interdisciplinary Approaches to Intercultural Training
- Part V Summing Up
- 25 Intercultural Training for the New Global Village
- Index
- References
Summary
In chapter 25, changes taking place in our global village are evaluated and how intercultural research and training can both take a lead role in creating the changes and helping people to effectively work with the changes are discussed. The role of economic development, social changes, and the Internet are discussed. Following this, some of the theoretical and methodological innovations that are on the horizon are discussed. Some of the topics identified from the chapters in the Handbook are presented here, which include culture theories, cultural story-telling, social network analysis (SNA), perception, and emotional contagion. Finally, a number of research issues that are of concern in developing a science of intercultural training that is not only produces results that are repeatable but only account for significant amounts of variance. Many more can be identified and will emerge in the future. It is hoped that researchers and practitioners will use the ideas presented in the chapters of the Handbook, to guide future theory-based research and practice in the field of intercultural training.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training , pp. 703 - 721Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Albert, R. D. (1983). The intercultural sensitizer or cultural assimilator: A cognitive approach. In Landis, D. & Brislin, R. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (Vol. 2, pp. 186–217). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (1998). The role of culture theory in cross-cultural training: A multimethod study of culture-specific, culture-general, and culture theory-based assimilators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(5), 630–655.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2001). Evolution of culture assimilators: Toward theory-based assimilators. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(2), 141–163.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2009). Intercultural training for the global workplace: Review, synthesis, and theoretical explorations. In Bhagat, Rabi S. & Steers, R. (Eds.), Handbook of culture, organization, and work (pp. 462–488). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Brislin, R. W. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16(4), 413–436.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S., Landis, D., & Munusamy, V. P. (2008). Understanding the basics of culture. In Moodian, M. A. (Ed.), Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence: Understanding and utilizing cultural diversity to build successful organizations (pp. 7–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Blake, B., & Heslin, R. (1983). Evaluating cross-cultural training. In Landis, D. & Brislin, R. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training. Vol. 1: Issues in theory and design (pp. 203–233). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Blake, B. F., & Heslin, R., & Curtis, S, C. (1996). Measuring impacts of cross-cultural training. In Landis, D. & Bhagat, R. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural training (2nd ed., pp. 165–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1971). Personnel training and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 22, 565–602.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations: III. Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7, 117–132.Google Scholar
Chapple, E. D. (1982). Movement and sound: The musical language of body rhythms in interaction. In Davis, M. (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 31–52). New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Cushner, K, & Landis, D. (1996). The intercultural sensitizer. In Landis, D. & Bhagat, R. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (2nd ed., pp. 185–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
DeVito, D., Shamberg, M., and Sher, S. (Producers), & Sodenberg, Steven (Director). (2000). Erin Brockovich [Motion Picture]. United States: Jersey Films.Google Scholar
Facorro, L. B., & DeFleur, M. L. (1993). A cross-cultural experiment on how well audiences remember news stories from newspaper, computer, television, and radio sources. Journalism Quarterly, 70(3), 585-–601.Google Scholar
Fiedler, F. E., Mitchell, T., & Triandis, H. C. (1971). The culture assimilator: An approach to cross-cultural training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(2), 95–102.Google Scholar
Gagne, R. (1962). Military training and principles of learning. American Psychologist, 18, 83–91.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. W. (1959). “Cognitive control principles and perceptual behavior.” Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 23(6), pp. 241–248.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. W., Holzman, P. S., Klein, G. S. Linton, H. B., & Spence, D. B. (1959). Cognitive control: A study of individual consistencies in cognitive behavior. Psychology Issues, 1(4).Google Scholar
Garofalo, M. (2008). A victim treats his mugger right. Retrieved March 1, 2020, from www.npr.org/2008/03/28/89164759/a-victim-treats-his-mugger-rightGoogle Scholar
Guo, A., & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2019). Chinese Cultural Stories and Children’s Educational Values. Paper presented at the International Academy of Intercultural Research, Shanghai, China, July 6 to 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, R. J., Schoen, L. M., & Hensley, D. L. (1992). A cross-cultural study of story memory. Journal of Cross-Cultural psychology, 23(2), 133–147.Google Scholar
Hausman, M. & Nichols, M. (Producers), & Nichols, M. (Director) (1983). Silkwood [Motion Picture]. Unites States: ABC Motion Picture.Google Scholar
Heinlein, R. A. (1961). Stranger in a Strange Land. New York, NY: Putnam Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Hess, U., & Fischer, A. (2014) Emotional mimicry in social context. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. J., Pedersen, P. B., & Hofstede, G. (2002). Exploring culture: Exercises, stories, and synthetic cultures. London, UK: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Howard, G. S. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy. American psychologist, 46(3), 187–197.Google Scholar
Imada, T. (2012). Cultural narratives of individualism and collectivism: A content analysis of textbook stories in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 576–591.Google Scholar
Imada, T., & Yussen, S. R. (2012). Reproduction of cultural values: A cross-cultural examination of stories people create and transmit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 114–128.Google Scholar
Kealey, D. J. & Protheroe, D. K. (1995). Cross-cultural collaboration: Making North-South cooperation more effective. Hull, Canada: CIDA.Google Scholar
Kidder, L. H. (1992). Requirements for being “Japanese”: Stories of returnees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16(4), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, C. M. M. (2000). Learning from stories: Narrative interviewing in cross-cultural research. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy, 7(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M., Scribner, S., Cole, M., & DeForest, M. (1980). Cross-cultural invariance in story recall. Child Development, 51(1), 19–26.Google Scholar
Mann, M., & Brugge, P. J. (Producers), Mann, M. (Director). (1999). The Insider [Motion Picture]. United States: Touchstone Pictures, Spyglass Entertainment, and Forward Pass.Google Scholar
Morawski, J. (2019). The replication crises: How might philosophy and theory of psychology be of use. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39, 218–238.Google Scholar
Naroll, R. (1961). Two solutions to Galton’s Problem. Philosophy of science, 28(1), 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently ... and why. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Olsson-Collentine, A., van Assen, M., & Hartgerink, C. (2019) The prevalence of marginally significant results in psychology over time. Psychological Science, 30(4), 576–586.Google Scholar
Onyeadoe, I., Wittlin, N. M., Dovidio, J., Perry, S., Hardeman, R., Dyrbye, L., Herrin, J., Phelan, S., & Ryn, M. (2020). The value of interracial contact for reducing anti-black prejudice among non-black physicians: A cognitive habits and growth evaluation [CHANGE] study report. Psychological Science, 31(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paige, R. M. (2004). Instrumentation in intercultural training. In Landis, D., Bennett, J., & Bennett, M. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 85–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rhodes, E., & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2019). The Case of Apple and Kingsoft. Paper presented Paper presented at the International Academy of Intercultural Research, Shanghai, China, July 6 to 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. (1970). On looking at an elephant: An evaluation of cross-cultural research related to organizations. Psychological Review, 74, 327–350.Google Scholar
Stein, N. L., & Policastro, M. (1984). The concept of a story: A comparison between children’s and teachers’ viewpoints. Learning and Comprehension of Text, 1, 113–155.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Brislin, R., & Hui, C. H. (1988). Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12(3), 269–289.Google Scholar
Van Deusen-Phillips, S. B., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Miller, P. J. (2001). Enacting stories, seeing worlds: Similarities and differences in the cross-cultural narrative development of linguistically isolated deaf children. Human Development, 44(6), 311–336.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Conway, M. A. (2004). The stories we keep: Autobiographical memory in American and Chinese middle‐aged adults. Journal of Personality, 72(5), 911–938.Google Scholar
Wiggins, B., & Christopherson, C. (2019). The replication crises in psychology: An overview for theoretical and philosophical psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 202–317.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M. & Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2019). Stories of Whistle Blowers: Multilevel Analyses. Paper presented at the International Academy of Intercultural Research, Shanghai, China, July 6 to 10, 2019.Google Scholar