Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Intelligence and Its Measurement
- 1 The Concept of Intelligence
- 2 A History of Research on Intelligence
- 3 A History of Research on Intelligence
- 4 An Alternative View on the Measurement of Intelligence and Its History
- 5 Factor-Analytic Models of Intelligence
- Part II Development of Intelligence
- Part III Intelligence and Group Differences
- Part IV Biology of Intelligence
- Part V Intelligence and Information Processing
- Part VI Kinds of Intelligence
- Part VII Intelligence and Its Role in Society
- Part VIII Intelligence and Allied Constructs
- Part IX Folk Conceptions of Intelligence
- Part X Conclusion
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
3 - A History of Research on Intelligence
Part 2: Psychological Theory, Research, and Practice in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
from Part I - Intelligence and Its Measurement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Intelligence and Its Measurement
- 1 The Concept of Intelligence
- 2 A History of Research on Intelligence
- 3 A History of Research on Intelligence
- 4 An Alternative View on the Measurement of Intelligence and Its History
- 5 Factor-Analytic Models of Intelligence
- Part II Development of Intelligence
- Part III Intelligence and Group Differences
- Part IV Biology of Intelligence
- Part V Intelligence and Information Processing
- Part VI Kinds of Intelligence
- Part VII Intelligence and Its Role in Society
- Part VIII Intelligence and Allied Constructs
- Part IX Folk Conceptions of Intelligence
- Part X Conclusion
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, I review the history of psychological accounts of intelligence in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. I open with an account of the thinking of Galton and Binet. Although Binet is often viewed as atheoretical, I show this not to be the case at all. I then discuss some of their successors, including Spearman, Thomson, Holzinger, Thurstone, Guilford, Guttman, Burt, Vernon, Cattell, Carroll, and Johnson and Bouchard.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 31 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916a). The development of intelligence in children (trans. E. S. Kite). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916b). The intelligence of the feeble-minded (E. S. Kite, trans.).Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In Siegler, R. (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In Kail, R. V. & Hagen, J. W. (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble-mindedness. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. H. (1914). Feeble-mindedness: Its causes and consequences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology’s ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J. E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Holzinger, K. J. (1938). Relationships between three multiple orthogonal factors and four bifactors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1967). On subjectivity in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 127, 811–820.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33–43.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. B., Frost, N., & Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to intelligence. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 7, pp. 87–122). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1970). Hierarchical theories of mental ability. In Dockrell, W. B. (Ed.), On intelligence (pp. 119–190). Toronto, ON: Ontario Institutes for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T., Jr. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 2. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, P. C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 2, pp. 47–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of “intelligence” and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984a). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1984b). What should intelligence tests test? Implications of a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13, 5–15.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (1985). Human abilities: An information-processing approach. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? In Hartman, H. J. (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 247–260). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS: A model for leadership in organizations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 386–401.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, 37–44.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1983). Insight in the gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18, 51–57.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1937). Measuring intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., & Merrill, M. A. (1973). Stanford-Binet intelligence scale: Manual for the third revision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius, vol. 4, The gifted group at midlife. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. (1939). The factorial analysis of human ability. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., Bregman, E. D., Cobb, M. V., & Woodyard, E. I. (1926). The measurement of intelligence. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1944). The measurement of adult intelligence (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wissler, C. (1901). The correlation of mental and physical tests. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, 3(6).Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by