Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 148–156.Google Scholar

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.Google Scholar

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1987, April). The impact of peekability on feedback effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 5–25.Google Scholar

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 188–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A. F., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shiffrin, R. M. (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Black, H. (1986). Assessment for learning. In Nuttall, D. L. (Ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In Gardner, J. (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.Google Scholar

Blodgett, H. C. (1929). The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4(8), 113–134.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 289–328.Google Scholar

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Braun, K. F. (1909). Electrical oscillations and wireless telegraphy. In Alfred Nobel Memorial Foundation (Ed.), Nobel prize lectures (pp. 226–245). Stockholm: Alfred Nobel Memorial Foundation.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N. (1991). Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–76.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N. (1992). Using tests to promote learning: A neglected classroom resource. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 213–217.Google Scholar

Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth.Google Scholar

Education Endowment Foundation. (2015). Teaching and learning toolkit. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit/toolkit-a-z/.Google Scholar

Elshout-Mohr, M. (1994). Feedback in self-instruction. European Education, 26(2), 58–73.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. M. (1954). Training devices and simulators: Some research issues. American Psychologist, 9(3), 95–107.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

James, M. (1992, April). Assessment for learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Jay, J. M. (1865, May 16). Improvement in machines for making the spindles of wagon-axles. US Patent No. US47769 A. US Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Jenkins, D. H. (1948). Feedback and group self-evaluation. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 50–60.Google Scholar

Jenkins, W. O., & Stanley, Julian C. Jr. (1950). Partial reinforcement: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 193–234.Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.Google Scholar

Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79–97.Google Scholar

Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54, 421–431.Google Scholar

McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462–476.Google Scholar

Mittler, P. (1973). Purposes and principles of assessment. In Mittler, P. (Ed.), Assessment for learning in the mentally handicapped (pp. 1–16). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar

Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis. Master’s thesis, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 85–102.Google Scholar

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

Roseborough, M. E. (1953). Experimental studies of small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 275–303.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (2nd edn., pp. 215–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 369–393.Google Scholar

Schimmel, B. J. (1983, April). A meta-analysis of feedback to learners in computerized and programmed instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, L. A. (2008). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. In Dwyer, C. A. (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 279–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5–11.Google Scholar

Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 176–199.Google Scholar

Stenhouse, L. (1980). Product or process? A reply to Brian Crittenden. New Education, 2, 137–140.Google Scholar

Sutton, R. (1995). Assessment for learning. Salford, UK: RS Publications.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1913). The psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Washburne, J. N. (1935). An electro-chemical theory of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 99–122.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (1992). Special needs and the distribution of attainment in the national curriculum. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 397–403.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011a). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011b). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 2–14.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2013). Feedback and instructional correctives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (2nd edn., pp. 197–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2016a). La evaluación formative del desempeño de la enseñanza. In Niebla, G. G., Irigoyen, M. T. M., Castaño, F. E. R., Pérez, H. S., & Segura, F. T. (Eds.), La evaluación docente en el mundo (pp. 166–199). Mexico City: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2016b). Leadership for teacher learning: Creating a culture where all teachers improve so that all learners succeed. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K-12 classrooms. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In Dwyer, C. A. (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. C., High, W. S., & Beem, H. P. (1954). A factor-analytic study of supervisory and group behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 89–92.Google Scholar

Yan, V. (2016). Retrieval strength vs. storage strength. Learning Scientists. Retrieved from www.learningscientists.org/blog/2016/5/10-1.Google Scholar

Yeager, D. S., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Hooper, S. Y., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Loss of institutional trust among racial and ethnic minority adolescents: A consequence of procedural injustice and a cause of life-span outcomes. Child Development, 88, 658–676.Google Scholar

Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops: Linking feedback and learning. In Askew, S. (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Assessment Reform Group (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 Principles. Assessment Reform Group.Google Scholar

Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Berliner, D. C. (1988). The development of expertise in pedagogy. Charles W. Hunt Memorial Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans.Google Scholar

Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482.Google Scholar

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th edn.). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children to learn to love maths. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 149–167.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. (2006). Self-regulation and effort investment. In Renninger, K. A. & Sigel, I. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 4: Child psychology in practice (6th edn.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (Eds). (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education, understanding it and doing it well. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Broadfoot, P. (1979). Assessment, schools and society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: The effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 474–482.Google Scholar

Charness, N., Krampe, R., & Mayr, U. (2009). The role of practice and coaching in entrepreneurial skill domains: An international comparison of life-span chess skill acquisition. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 51–80). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.Google Scholar

Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Christodoulou, D. (2014). Seven myths about education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

De Groot, A. D. (1946, trans. 1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition, Berkeley: University of California Operations Research Center.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26, 779–792.Google Scholar

Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 247–274.Google Scholar

Eraut, M. (2005). Expert and expertise: Meanings and perspectives. Learning in Health and Social Care, 4, 173–179.Google Scholar

Eraut, M. (2007). Feedback and formative assessment in the workplace, 3rd Seminar, Assessment of significant learning outcomes project. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/237739544_ASSESSMENT_OF_SIGNIFICANT_LEARNING_OUTCOMES_3RD_SEMINAR_Feedback_and_Formative_Assessment_in_the_Workplace1.Google Scholar

Eriksen, J. W. (2010). Should soldiers think before they shoot? Journal of Military Ethics, 9, 195–210.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–783). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2009). The acquisition of expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesche-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar

Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foer, J. (2011). Moonwalking with Einstein. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20, 150–169.Google Scholar

Glaser, R. (2009). Changing the agency for learning: Acquiring expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 41–67). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gobet, F., & Chassy, P. (2009). Expertise and intuition: A tale of three theories. Minds and Machines, 19, 151–180.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Conference on Building Teacher Quality, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. (1987), Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Klein, G. A. (2003). Intuition at work. New York: Currency and Doubleday.Google Scholar

Klein, G. (2004). The power of intuition: How to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, C. W. (2016). Assessment practices in teacher education: Presenting preliminary data analysis. Unpublished paper, Agder University.Google Scholar

Kumar, M. (2009). Quantum, Einstein, Bohr and the great debate about the nature of reality. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar

Lehmann, A. C., & Gruber, H. (2006). Music. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 457– 470). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lemov, D., Woolway, E., & Yezzi, K. (2012). Practice perfect. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Handbook of human social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 347–367.Google Scholar

Molloy, E. K., Borrell-Carrio, F., & Epstein, R. (2013). The impact of emotions in feedback. In Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 50–71). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nater, S., & Gallimore, R. (2010). You haven’t taught until they have learned. Morgantown, WV: FIT.Google Scholar

Roos, B., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Formative assessment: A cybernetic viewpoint. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 12, 7–20.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1989). Models of thought (vol. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Spurling, H. (2005). Matisse the master. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Stobart, G. (2014). The expert learner: Challenging the myth of ability. Maidenhead, UK: Oxford University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Trope, Y., Ferguson, M., & Raghunathan, R. (2001). Mood as a resource in processing self-relevant information. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 256–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2013). Feedback and instructional correctives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 196–214). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Young, M. F. D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Allal, L. (2011). Pedagogy, didactics and the co-regulation of learning: A perspective from the French-language world of educational research. Research Papers in Education, 26, 329–336.Google Scholar

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.Google Scholar

Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology, 73, 87–95.Google Scholar

Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2016). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. In press. Assessment in Education: Princples, Policy and Practice.Google Scholar

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment is for learning: 10 principles. Retrieved from www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-10-principles.pdf.Google Scholar

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of pupil learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698–712.Google Scholar

Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R. (Eds). 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students’ formative and summative use of assessment information. Assessment in Education, 8, 153–169.Google Scholar

Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative assessment: A review of the literature. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Brookhart, S. M. (2017). Formative assessment in teacher education. In Clandinin, D. J. & Husu, J. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210–216.Google Scholar

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on pupils. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.Google Scholar

Dann, R. (2016). Developing understanding of pupil feedback using Habermas’ notion of communicative action. Assessment in Education, 23, 396–414.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Douglas, T., Salter, S., Iglesias, M., Dowlman, M., & Eri, R. (2016). The feedback process: Perceptions of first and second year undergraduate students in the disciplines of education, health science and nursing. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 13(1), article 3.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar

Elton, L. (1982). Assessment for learning. In Bligh, D. (Ed.), Professionalism and flexibility in learning (pp. 106–135). Guildford, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.Google Scholar

Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 51–62.Google Scholar

Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20, 150–169.Google Scholar

Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 523–547.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 107–133.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 176–190.Google Scholar

Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31.Google Scholar

James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. The Curriculum Journal, 17(2), 109–138.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar

Kroog, H. I., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Sands, D. (2014). Understanding the interplay between the cultural context of classrooms and formative assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009a). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009b). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 347–367.Google Scholar

Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html.Google Scholar

Minstrell, J., Anderson, R., & Li, M. (2009). Assessing teacher competency in formative assessment. Annual Report to the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar

Murtagh, L. (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback: Teacher and student perceptions. Curriculum Journal, 25, 516–541.Google Scholar

Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Developing learners (8th edn.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar

Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1998). Formalist thinking and language arts instruction: Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about truth and caring in the teaching conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 855–870.Google Scholar

Page, E. B. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 173–181.Google Scholar

Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18, 238–250.Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In Schunk, D. H. & Meece, J. L. (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Pokorny, H., & Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity, cues, and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 21–30.Google Scholar

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Using feedback to improve learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in the classroom. In Ames, C. and Ames, R. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education, vol. 2: The classroom milieu. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.Google Scholar

Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18, 42–50.Google Scholar

Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658.Google Scholar

Schneider, M. C., & Gowan, P. (2013). Investigating teachers’ skills in interpreting evidence of student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 191–204.Google Scholar

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Tyler, R. W., Gagne, R. M., & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1066–1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969–977.Google Scholar

Stewart, L. G., & White, M. A. (1976). Teacher comments, letter grades, and student performance: What do we really know? Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 488–500.Google Scholar

Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C.(2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41, 147–156.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational Psychology, vol. 1: The original nature of man. New York: Columbia University Teachers College.Google Scholar

Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389–404.Google Scholar

Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 475–511.Google Scholar

Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 379–394.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In Andrade, H. L. & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22, 140–160.Google Scholar

Zhan, L. (2016). Written teacher feedback: Student perceptions, teacher perceptions, and actual teacher performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73–84.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performances. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., & Mewborn, C. (2016). Towards a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: A mixed methods study. Reading and Writing, 29, 349–370.Google Scholar

Bevan, R., Badge, J., Cann, A., Wilmott, C., & Scott, J. (2008). Seeing eye-to-eye? Staff and student views on feedback. Bioscience Education, 12, 1–15.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of writing corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Learning, 17, 102–118.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar

Brown, E., & Glover, C. (2005, September). Refocusing written feedback. Paper presented at the 13th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar

Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, T. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63, 97–107.Google Scholar

Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 105–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

Hyatt, D. F. (2005). “Yes, a very good point!”: A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 339–353.Google Scholar

Ivanic, R., Clark, R., & Rimmershaw, R. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 47–65). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Lea, M., & Street, B. (2008). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 32–46). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Murray, J. (2018). The consistency and effectiveness of written feedback provided by markers in tertiary education. Doctor of Education thesis, University of Otago.Google Scholar

Mutch, A. (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 24–38.Google Scholar

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.Google Scholar

Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 125–136.Google Scholar

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277–289.Google Scholar

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sadler, R. D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.Google Scholar

Smith, J. K. (2005). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement, 22(4), 26–33.Google Scholar

Spinks, S. (1998). Relating marker feedback to teaching and learning in psychology. In Candlin, C. & Plum, G. (Eds.), Researching academic literacies (pp. 148–203). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.Google Scholar

Stern, L. A., & Solomon, A. (2006). Effective faculty feedback: The road less travelled. Assessing Writing, 11, 22–41.Google Scholar

Sutton, P. (2009). Towards dialogic feedback. Critical and Reflective Practice in Education, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar

Tuck, J. (2012). Feedback-giving as social practice: Teachers’ perspectives on feedback as institutional requirement, work and dialogue. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 209–221.Google Scholar

Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265.Google Scholar

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–257.Google Scholar

Autoimmunity Research Foundation. (2012). Differences between in vitro, in vivo, and in silico studies. Retrieved from http://mpkb.org/home/patients/assessing_literature/in_vitro_studies.Google Scholar

Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198.Google Scholar

Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. Southampton, UK: National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf.Google Scholar

Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In Hancock, G. R. & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 93–114). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A. J. Z., & Marcia, J. E. (2000). Coded semistructured interviews in social psychological research. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 286–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bayerlein, L. (2014). Students’ feedback preferences: How do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 916–931.Google Scholar

Bevan, R., Badge, J., Cann, A., Willmott, C., & Scott, J. (2008). Seeing eye-to-eye? Staff and student views on feedback. Bioscience Education, 12(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Björklund Boistrup, L. (2010). Assessment discourse in mathematics classrooms: A multimodal social semiotic study. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Brannen, J. (Ed.). (1992). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot, UK: Avebury Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.Google Scholar

Brenner, M. E. (2006). Interviewing in educational research. In Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 357–370). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Brown, G. T. L. (2016). The qualitative secret within quantitative research: It’s not just about numbers. In McDermott, C. J. & Kožuh, B. (Eds.), Modern approaches in social and educational research (pp. 33–42). Los Angeles, CA: Antioch University.Google Scholar

Brown, G. T. L., Harris, L. R., & Harnett, J. (2012). Teacher beliefs about feedback within an assessment for learning environment: Endorsement of improved learning over student well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 968–978.Google Scholar

Brown, G. T. L., Harris, L. R., O’Quin, C., & Lane, K. E. (2017). Using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate cross-cultural research: Identifying and understanding non-invariance. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(1), 66–90.Google Scholar

Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., & Peterson, E. R. (2009, August). The more I enjoy it the less I achieve: The negative impact of socio-emotional purposes of assessment and feedback on academic performance. Paper presented at biennial conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Yao, E. (2016). Student conceptions of feedback: Impact on self-regulation, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 606–629.Google Scholar

Bruno, I., & Santos, L. (2010). Written comments as a form of feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(3), 111–120.Google Scholar

Burnett, P. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students’ perceptions of the classroom environment. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 5–16.Google Scholar

Burnett, P. C., & Mandel, V. (2010). Praise and feedback in the primary classroom: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10, 145–154.Google Scholar

Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290–298.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.Google Scholar

Chase, J. A., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). The differential effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance in a modified, personalized system of instruction course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 245–265.Google Scholar

Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 33–49.Google Scholar

Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338.Google Scholar

Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. G. (2009). Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 455–465.Google Scholar

Crocker, L. (2006). Introduction to measurement theory. In Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 371–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

de Leeuw, E. (2008). Self-administered questionnaires and standardized interviews. In Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L., & Brannen, J. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 313–327). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Dempsey, N. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 349–367.Google Scholar

Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(621).Google Scholar

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251.Google Scholar

Field, A. (2016). An adventure in statistics: The reality enigma. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Flores, M. A., Veiga Simão, A. M., Barros, A., & Pereira, D. (2015). Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: A study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1523–1534.Google Scholar

Furneaux, C., Paran, A., & Fairfax, B. (2007). Teacher stance as reflected in feedback on student writing: An empirical study of secondary school teachers in five countries. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(1), 69–94.Google Scholar

Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20(2), 150–169.Google Scholar

Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014). Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task. Instructional Science, 42(6), 861–878.Google Scholar

Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315.Google Scholar

Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40–53.Google Scholar

Hamer, J., Purchase, H., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Denny, P. (2015). A comparison of peer and tutor feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 151–164.Google Scholar

Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543–560.Google Scholar

Harber, K. D., Gorman, J. L., Gengaro, F. P., Butisingh, S., Tsang, W., & Ouellete, R. (2012). Students’ race and teachers’ social support affect the positive feedback bias in public schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1149–1161.Google Scholar

Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229–246.Google Scholar

Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269–290.Google Scholar

Harper, A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). Students’ use of online feedback in a first year tertiary biology course. Assessment Matters, 11, 99–121.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R. (2011). Phenomenographic perspectives on the structure of conceptions: The origins, purposes, strengths, and limitations of the what/how and referential/structural frameworks. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 109–124.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2010). Mixing interview and questionnaire methods: Practical problems in aligning data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(1). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v15n11.pdf.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016, April). “Everything you do is giving them feedback”: A phenomenographic study of teacher conceptions of feedback. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., Harnett, J. A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). “Drawing” out student conceptions: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In McInerney, D. M., Brown, G. T. L., & Liem, G. A. D. (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 321–330). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. (2014a). Analysis of New Zealand primary and secondary student peer- and self-assessment comments: Applying Hattie & Timperley’s feedback model. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(2), 265–281.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. (2014b). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107–133.Google Scholar

Harris, L. R., Harnett, J., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013, April). Exploring the content of teachers’ feedback: What are teachers actually providing to students? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.Google Scholar

Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53–64.Google Scholar

Hofferth, S. L., Moran, E. F., Entwistle, B., Aber, J. L., Brady, H. E., Conley, D., … & Hubacek, K. (2017). Introduction: History and motivation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 669(1), 6–17.Google Scholar

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (2001). The desperate need for replications. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 149–158.Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230.Google Scholar

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212.Google Scholar

Irving, S. E., Harris, L. R., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). “One assessment doesn’t serve all the purposes” or does it?: New Zealand teachers describe assessment and feedback. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 413–426.Google Scholar

Irving, S. E., Petersen, E. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2007, August). Student conceptions of feedback: A study of New Zealand secondary students. Paper presented at the biannual conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar

Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2008, July). Feedback and academic achievement: The relationship between students’ conceptions of feedback and achievement. Paper presented at the sixth biennial conference of the International Test Commission, Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar

Jodaie, M., Farrokhi, F., & Zoghi, M. (2011). A comparative study of EFL teachers’ and intermediate high school students’ perceptions of written corrective feedback on grammatical errors. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 36–48.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.Google Scholar

Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2). Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/466/996.Google Scholar

Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 411–425.Google Scholar

Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional feedback II: How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63(4), 498–517.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.Google Scholar

Kim, S.-I., Lee, M.-J., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2010). Comparison of brain activation during norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced feedback: The role of perceived competence and performance-approach goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(2), 141–152.Google Scholar

Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121.Google Scholar

Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387–404.Google Scholar

Kvale, S. (2002, March 7–9). Dialogue as oppression and interview research. Paper presented at the Nordic Educational Research Association Conference Tallinn, Estonia. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2mROjhH.Google Scholar

Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198.Google Scholar

Li, J., & Barnard, R. (2011). Academic tutors’ beliefs about and practices of giving feedback on students’ written assignments: A New Zealand case study. Assessing Writing, 16(2), 137–148.Google Scholar

Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in psychological science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. (2009a). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(4), 347–367.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009b). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319–333.Google Scholar

Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275.Google Scholar

Maier, U. (2010). Accountability policies and teachers’ acceptance and usage of school performance feedback: A comparative study. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 21(2), 145–165.Google Scholar

Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537–542.Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 181–220.Google Scholar

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–220.Google Scholar

Matsumura, L. C., Patthey-Chavez, G. G., Valdes, R., & Garnier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students’ revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban schools. Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 3–25.Google Scholar

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385.Google Scholar

McLean, A. J., Bond, C. H., & Nicholson, H. D. (2015). An anatomy of feedback: A phenomenographic investigation of undergraduate students’ conceptions of feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 921–932.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education, 71, 56–76.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401.Google Scholar

Nesbit, P. L., & Burton, S. (2006). Student justice perceptions following assignment feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(6), 655–670.Google Scholar

Neuliep, J. W. (1990). Editorial bias against replication research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 85.Google Scholar

NIST/SEMATECH. (2003). e-Handbook of statistical methods. Retrieved from www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook.Google Scholar

Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125–136.Google Scholar

Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15, 68–85.Google Scholar

Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115–124.Google Scholar

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105.Google Scholar

Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250.Google Scholar

Pond, K., & Ul-Haq, R. (1997). Learning to assess students using peer review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 331–348.Google Scholar

Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154.Google Scholar

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.Google Scholar

Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655–660.Google Scholar

Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students’ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73.Google Scholar

Raosoft. (2017). Sample size calculator. Retrieved from www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415.Google Scholar

Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 260–272.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013). Analyzing teachers’ feedback practices in response to students’ work in science classrooms. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 163–175.Google Scholar

Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. (2010). The use of performance feedback in school improvement in Louisiana. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1389–1403.Google Scholar

Sendziuk, P. (2010). Sink or swim? Improving student learning through feedback and self-assessment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(3), 320–330.Google Scholar

Shadish, W. R., & Luellen, J. K. (2006). Quasi-experimental design. In Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 539–550). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120.Google Scholar

Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 76–80.Google Scholar

Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., & Smith, B. K. (2017). The reproducibility crisis in psychology: Attack of the clones or phantom menace? In Makel, M. C. & Plucker, J. A. (Eds.), Toward a more perfect psychology: Improving trust, accuracy, and transparency in research (pp. 273–287). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Smith, M. L. (2006). Multiple methodology in education research. In Green, J. L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 457–475). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4). Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/m7grwph.Google Scholar

Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291–303.Google Scholar

Tang, J., & Harrison, C. (2011). Investigating university tutor perceptions of assessment feedback: Three types of tutor beliefs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 583–604.Google Scholar

Teo, T., & Fan, X. (2013). Coefficient alpha and beyond: Issues and alternatives for educational research. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(2), 209–213.Google Scholar

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.Google Scholar

Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1997). Comparison of teacher and student perspectives of tasks and feedback. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16(4), 388–400.Google Scholar

Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161–1174.Google Scholar

Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996a). “How does your teacher help you to make your work better?” Children’s understanding of formative assessment. Curriculum Journal, 7(2), 185–203.Google Scholar

Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996b). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389–404.Google Scholar

Van der Kleij, F., Adie, L., & Cumming, J. (2016). Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1111/bjet.12536.Google Scholar

Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1107–1115.Google Scholar

Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 589–602.Google Scholar

Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290.Google Scholar

Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.Google Scholar

Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, J. B. (1981). Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences (2nd edn.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1973). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In Naroll, R. & Cohen, R. (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398–420). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study methods. In Green, J., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Zumbo, B. D. (2015). Consequences, side effects and the ecology of testing: Keys to considering assessment in vivo. Paper presented at the plenary address to the 2015 annual conference of the Association for Educational Assessment – Europe, Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar