Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- 1 Interaction Analysis
- 2 History of Group Interaction Research
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- Appendix
- Index
- References
1 - Interaction Analysis
An Introduction
from Part I - Background and Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- 1 Interaction Analysis
- 2 History of Group Interaction Research
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 3 - 19Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Healing, S., & Tomori, C. (2017). Microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 129–157). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, W. A. (2008). Conversation analysis. In Donsbach, E. W. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1111/b.9781405131995.2008.xGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., Gronewold, K. L., & Western, K. H. (2012). Intergroup argumentation in city government decision making: The Wal-mart dilemma. Small Group Research, 43, 587–612. doi:10.1177/1046496412455435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., & Keyton, J. (2009). Perceiving strategic meeting interaction. Small Group Research, 40, 223–246. doi:10.1177/1046496408330084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., & Keyton, J. (2014). Facilitating social support: Member-leader communication in a breast cancer support group. Cancer Nursing, 37(1), E36–E43. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182813829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonito, J., Keyton, J., & Ervin, J. (2017). Role-related participation in product design teams: Individual- and group-level trends. Communication Research, 44, 263–286. doi:10.1177/0093650215618759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonito, J. A., & Sanders, R. E. (2011). The existential center of small groups: Member’s conduct and interaction. Small Group Research, 42, 343–358. doi:10.1177/1046496410385472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canary, D. J. (2017). Observing relational conflict. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 3–16). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canary, H. E. (2017). Observing family communication. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 17–33). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1984). The relevance of the microstructure of interaction to relationship change. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 239–264. doi:10.1177/0265407584012006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, T. J. (2017). Modeling behavioral interaction as a nonlinear dynamical system. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 261–271). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, J., Bonito, J., & Keyton, J. (2017). Convergence of intrapersonal and interpersonal processes across group meetings. Communication Monographs. doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1185136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Textuality and agency in interaction analysis. Organization, 11, 335–353. doi:10.1177/1350508404041996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., & Cooren, F. (2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis and speech act schematics. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 131–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folger, J. P., Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In Dervin, B. & Voigt, M. J. (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (p. 115–161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Frey, L. R. (1996). Remembering and “re-membering”: A history of theory and research on communication and group decision making. In Hirokawa, R. Y. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd edn., pp. 19–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J., Markman, J., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477. doi:10.2307/350902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political text. Political Analysis, 21, 267–297. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisawn, J., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2014). An examination of CSC methodology practices and the influence of theoretical frameworks 2005–2009. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 305–334. doi:10.1007/s11412-014-9198-3Google Scholar
Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (2012). The analysis of group interaction processes. In Hollingshead, A. B. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams: A guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 358–385). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. E., & Sykes, R. E. (1993). A test of the fit of Gulliver’s phase model to hostage negotiations. Communication Studies, 44, 38–55. doi.10.1080/10510979309368381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L., Gill, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2014). Twitter: A content analysis of personal information. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 843–857. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.848917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepson, K. (2005). Conversation—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms. Language, Learning, and Technology, 9(3), 79–98.Google Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S. (2006). Kompetenzen messen, bewerten, entwickeln—Ein prozessanalytischer Ansatz für Gruppen [Measuring, evaluating, and developing competencies— A process analytical approach for groups]. Stuttgart, Germany: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43, 130–158. doi:10.1177/ 1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Meyers, R. (2009). Complaint and solution-oriented cycles: Interaction patterns in work group discussions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 267–294. doi:10.1080/13594320701693209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyton, J., & Beck, S. J. (2009). The influential role of relational messages in group interaction. Group Dynamics, 13, 14–30. doi:10.1037/a0013495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lee, E., Tsang, A. K. T., Bogo, M., Wilson, G., Johnstone, M., & Herschman, J. (2017). Joining revisited in family therapy: Discourse analysis of cross-cultural encounters between a therapist and an immigrant family. Journal of Family Therapy, 48, 178–189. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2010). The downside of communication: Complaining cycles in group discussions. In Schuman, S. (Ed.), The handbook for working with difficult groups: How they are difficult, why they are difficult and what you can do about it (pp. 33–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.Google Scholar
Manning, P., & Ray, G. B. (2002). Setting the agenda: An analysis of negotiation strategies in clinical talk. Health Communication, 14, 451–473. doi:10.1207/ S15327027HC1404_3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyers, R. A., & Seibold, D. R. (2012). Coding group interaction. In Hollingshead, A. B. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams: A guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 329–357). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyers, R. A., Seibold, D. R., & Brashers, D. (1991). Argument in initial group decision-making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 47–68. doi:10.1080/10570319109374370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paugh, A., & Izquierdo, C. (2009). Why is this a battle every night? Negotiating food and eating in American dinnertime interaction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19, 185–204. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01030.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavitt, C. (2011). Communication, performance, and perceptions in experimental simulations of resource dilemmas. Small Group Research, 42, 283–308. doi:10.1177/ 1046496411399782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A. Q., Cole, D. A., & Bruce, A. E. (2007). Mother-adolescent interactions and adolescent depressive symptoms: A sequential analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 5–19. doi:10.1177/0265407507072564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontecorvo, C., & Arcidiacono, F. (2016). The dialogic construction of justifications and arguments of a seven-year-old child within a ‘democratic’ family. Language and Dialogue, 6, 306–328. doi:10.1075/ld.6.2.05ponCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, M. S., & Dobosh, M. A. (2010). Exploring conflict management processes in jury deliberations through interaction analysis. Small Group Research, 41, 408–426. doi:10.1177/1046496410366310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323–356. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimal, R. N. (2001). Analyzing the physician-patient interaction: An overview of six methods and future research directions. Health Communication, 13, 89–99. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1301_08CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabee, C. M., Koenig, C. J., Wingard, L., Foster, J., Chivers, N., Olsher, D., & Vandergriff, I. (2015). The process of interactional sensitivity coding in health care: Conceptually and operationally defining patient-centered communication. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 773–782. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samter, W., & Macgeorge, E. L. (2017). Coding comforting behavior for verbal person centeredness. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 107–128). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siminoff, L. A., & Step, M. M. (2011). A comprehensive observational coding scheme for analyzing instrumental, affective, and relational communication in health care contexts. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 16, 178–191. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.535109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Trujillo, N. (1986). Toward a taxonomy of small group interaction-coding systems. Small Group Research, 17, 371–394. doi:10.1177/104649648601700401Google Scholar
Tucker, R. K., Weaver, R. L., & Berryman-Fink, C. (1981). Research in speech communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
VanLear, C. A. (2017). Modeling and analyzing behaviors and the dynamics of behavioral interaction. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 235–260). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanLear, C. A., & Canary, D. J. (Eds.). (2017). Researching interactive communication behavior: A sourcebook of methods and measures. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. D., Meyers, J., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). “How happy was I, anyway?” A retrospective impact bias. Social Cognition, 21, 421–446. doi:10.1521/soco.21.6.421.28688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, E. (2016, January 4). The incredible thing we do during conversations. The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/01/the-incredible-thing-we-do-during-conversations/422439Google Scholar
Yu, X., Zhang, S., Yan, Z., Yang, F., Huang, J., Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Burgoon, J. K., & Metaxas, D. N. (2015). Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 45, 492–506. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2014.2329673Google ScholarPubMed
- 11
- Cited by