Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction and Perspectives
- Part II Overview of Approaches to the Study of Expertise: Brief Historical Accounts of Theories and Methods
- Part III Methods for Studying the Structure of Expertise
- Part IV Methods for Studying the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expertise
- Part V.I Domains of Expertise: Professions
- Part V.II Domains of Expertise: Arts, Sports, Games, and Other Skills
- Part VI Generalizable Mechanisms Mediating Types of Expertise
- Part VII General Issues and Theoretical Frameworks
- Index of Subjects
- References
Part I - Introduction and Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction and Perspectives
- Part II Overview of Approaches to the Study of Expertise: Brief Historical Accounts of Theories and Methods
- Part III Methods for Studying the Structure of Expertise
- Part IV Methods for Studying the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expertise
- Part V.I Domains of Expertise: Professions
- Part V.II Domains of Expertise: Arts, Sports, Games, and Other Skills
- Part VI Generalizable Mechanisms Mediating Types of Expertise
- Part VII General Issues and Theoretical Frameworks
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Amirault, R. J., & Branson, R. K. (2006). Educators and expertise: A brief history of theories and models. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 69–86). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1943). Generation of animals (trans. Pick, A. L.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, J., & Davids, K. (2007). Introduction to special issue on nature, nurture, and sport performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38, 1–3.Google Scholar
Baker, J., & Farrow, D. (eds.) (2015). Routledge handbook of sport expertise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bédard, J. (1991). Expertise and its relation to audit decision quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 8, 198–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, P. E. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (ed.) (1985a). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (1985b). Generalizations about talent development. In Bloom, B. S. (ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 507–549). New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, J. (2004). Australia’s sporting success: The inside story. Sydney: University of South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (1992). Reliability and validity in expert judgment. In Wright, G. & Bolger, F. (eds.), Expertise and decision support (pp. 47–76). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can the experts know so much and predict so badly? In Ericsson, K. A. & Smith, J. (eds.), Towards a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 195–217). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. (1981). Knowledge development and memory performance. In Friedman, M. P., Das, J. P., & O’Connor, N. (eds.), Intelligence and learning (pp. 221–230). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. S. (ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 1–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (2006). Observation of work practices in natural settings. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 127–145). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, G. (2008). Talent is overrated: What really separates world-class performers from everybody else. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2009). The talent code: Greatness isn’t born, it’s grown. Here’s how. New York: Bantam Dell.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. (1978). Thought and choice in chess (2nd edn.). The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published 1946)Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K. (2014). Acquiring expertise: Ability, practice, and other influences [Special issue]. Intelligence, 45, 1–123.Google Scholar
Diderot, D., & D’Alembert, J. L. R. (eds.) (1966–67). Encyclopédie ou dictionnare de raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers (Encyclopedia or dictionary of the sciences, arts and occupations). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann. (Original work published 1751–80)Google Scholar
Djakow, I. N., Petrowski, N. W., & Rudik, P. A. (1927). Psychologie des Schachspiels [Psychology of chess]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, J., & Mayr, U. (1987). Intelligenz und Schachleistung – eine Untersuchung an Schachexperten. [Intelligence and achievement in chess – a study of chess masters]. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 270–289.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. A. (1991). Wage, labor, & guilds in medieval Europe. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 10, S1–S12.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (ed.) (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence on maximal adaptations on task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits in the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In Ericsson, K. A. and Smith, J. (eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1–38). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, G. W., & Newell, A. (1969). GPS: A case study in generality and problem solving. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Farrow, D., & Baker, J. (eds.) (2013). Developing sport expertise: Researchers and coaches put theory into practice (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons, M. P. (2003). The night that the Old Regime ended. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Foer, J. (2011). Moonwalking with Einstein: The art and science of remembering everything. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869/1979). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Julian Friedman Publishers.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R. (ed.) (1992). The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R. (ed.) (2007). Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Ward, P., Feltovich, P. J., DiBello, L., Fiore, S. M., & Andrews, D. (2014). Accelerated expertise: Training for high proficiency in a complex world. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2016). Skill acquisition and training: Achieving expertise in simple and complex tasks. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of guilds: Professions, states and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, R., Payne, C., McCabe, M., & Fielder, C. (1998). Legibility of doctors’ handwriting: Quantitative and comparative study. British Medical Journal, 317, 863–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, G. (2012). Guitar zero: The science of becoming musical at any age. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Montero, B. G. (2016). Thought in action: Expertise and the conscious mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pannabecker, J. R. (1994). Diderot, the mechanical arts and the Encyclopédie: In search of the heritage of technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy (Corrected edition). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension (reprinted in 1983). Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Rees, G., & Wakely, M. (eds.) (2004). The instauratio magna, Part II: Novum organum and associated texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rohr, D. (2001). The careers and social status of British musicians, 1750–1850: A profession of artisans. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosselli, J. (1991). Music & musicians in nineteenth-century Italy. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psychologica, 68, 203–215.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stoeger, H. (2007). Special issue on “Expertise and giftedness research.” High Ability Studies, 18, 1–115.Google Scholar
Taylor, I. A. (1975). A retrospective view of creativity investigation. In Taylor, I. A. & Getzels, J. W. (eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 1–36). Chicago; Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2005). A psychometric analysis of chess expertise. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 29–60.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
References
Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. (1983). Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2011). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy (trans. Burchell, G.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E. S. (2010). Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 17–32.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21–30). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (1990). Artificial experts: Social knowledge and intelligent machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (1996). Embedded or embodied? A review of Hubert Dreyfus’ What Computers Still Can’t Do. Artificial Intelligence, 80, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2000). Four kinds of knowledge, two (or maybe three) kinds of embodiment, and the question of Artificial Intelligence. In Malpas, J. & Wrathall, M. A. (eds.), Heidegger, coping, and cognitive science: Essays in honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus (Vol. 2, pp. 179–195). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2004a). Gravity’s shadow: The search for gravitational waves. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. (2004b). Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 125–143.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2008). Actors’ and analysts’ categories in the social analysis of science. In Meusburger, P., Welker, M., & Wunder, E. (eds.), Clashes of knowledge (Vol. 1, pp. 101–110). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2013a). Gravity’s ghost and big dog: Scientific discovery and social analysis in the twenty-first century (enlarged edn.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2013b). Three dimensions of expertise. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12, 253–273.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2016a). An Imitation Game concerning gravitational wave physics. arXiv:1607.07373 [Physics].Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2016b). Interactional expertise and embodiment. In Sandberg, J., Rouleau, L., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (eds.), Skillful performance: Enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence, and expertise in organizations (pp. 125–146). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32, 235–296.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2014a). Actor and analyst: A response to Coopmans and Button. Social Studies of Science, 44, 786–792.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2014b). Quantifying the tacit: The Imitation Game and social fluency. Sociology, 48, 3–19.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2015). Expertise revisited, Part I: Interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 54, 113–123.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2017). Probes, surveys, and the ontology of the social. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11, 328–341.Google Scholar
Collins, H., Evans, R., Ribeiro, R., & Hall, M. (2006). Experiments with interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37, 656–674.Google Scholar
Collins, H., Evans, R., & Weinel, M. (2016). Expertise revisited, Part II: Contributory expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 56, 103–110.Google Scholar
Collins, H., Evans, R., Weinel, M., Lyttleton-Smith, J., Bartlett, A., & Hall, M. (2017). The Imitation Game and the nature of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11, 510–527.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Kusch, M. (1998). The shape of actions: What humans and machines can do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H., & Sanders, G. (2007). They give you the keys and say “drive it!” Managers, referred expertise, and other expertises. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 38, 621–641.Google Scholar
Collins, H., Weinel, M., & Evans, R. (2010). The politics and policy of the third wave: New technologies and society. Critical Policy Studies, 4, 185–201.Google Scholar
Coopmans, C., & Button, G. (2014). Eyeballing expertise. Social Studies of Science, 44, 758–785.Google Scholar
Delborne, J. A. (2008). Transgenes and transgressions: Scientific dissent as heterogeneous practice. Social Studies of Science, 38, 509–541.Google Scholar
Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). An introduction to The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its development, organization, and content. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 3–19). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (2011). Collective epistemology: The intersection of group membership and expertise. In Schmid, H. B., Sirtes, D., & Weber, M. (eds.), Collective epistemology (pp. 177–202). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
Evans, R., & Collins, H. (2010). Interactional expertise and the Imitation Game. In Gorman, M. E. (ed.), Trading zones and interactional expertise creating new kinds of collaboration (pp. 53–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evans, R., & Crocker, H. (2013). The Imitation Game as a method for exploring knowledge(s) of chronic illness. Methodological Innovations Online, 8, 34–52.Google Scholar
Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 863–907.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, E., O’Rourke, M., Evans, R., Kennedy, E. B., Gorman, M. E., & Seager, T. P. (2015). Mapping the integrative field: Taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2, 39–61.Google Scholar
Fortun, K. (2001). Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (trans. Hurley, R.) (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755.Google Scholar
Galison, P. L. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goddiksen, M. (2014). Clarifying interactional and contributory expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 47, 111–117.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. E. (2002). Levels of expertise and trading zones: A framework for multidisciplinary collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 32, 933–938.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, S. (2000). Science on stage: expert advice as public drama. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, “The third wave of science studies.” Social Studies of Science, 33, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laurent-Ledru, V., Thomson, A., & Monsonego, J. (2011). Civil society: A critical new advocate for vaccination in Europe. Vaccine, 29, 624–628.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M., & Cole, S. (2005). Science and technology studies on trial: Dilemmas of expertise. Social Studies of Science, 35, 269–311.Google Scholar
Maasen, S., & Weingart, P. (eds.) (2008). Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. M. (1999). The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28, 491–521.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. M. (2008). Role conflict as an interactional resource in the multimodal emergence of expert identity. Semiotica, 2008, 15–49.Google Scholar
Mazur, A. (1998). A hazardous inquiry: The Rashomon effect at Love Canal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nattrass, N. (2012). The AIDS conspiracy: Science fights back. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ottinger, G. (2010). Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 244–270.Google Scholar
Plaisance, K. S., & Kennedy, E. B. (2014). A pluralistic approach to interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 47, 60–68.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prior, L. (2003). Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology – belief, knowledge and expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, 41–57.Google Scholar
Reyes-Galindo, L. I., & Duarte, T. R. (2015). Bringing tacit knowledge back to contributory and interactional expertise: A reply to Goddiksen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 49, 99–102.Google Scholar
Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54, 251–268.Google Scholar
Selinger, E., Dreyfus, H., & Collins, H. M. (2007). Interactional expertise and embodiment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 38, 722–740.Google Scholar
Selinger, E., & Mix, J. (2004). On interactional expertise: Pragmatic and ontological considerations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 145–163.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (2007). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, T. (2009). Dutch public health experts refute claims that human papillomavirus vaccination has health risks. British Medical Journal, 338, b1109.Google Scholar
Turner, S. P. (2001). What is the problem with experts? Social Studies of Science, 31, 123–149.Google Scholar
Turner, S. P. (2003). Liberal democracy 3.0: Civil society in an age of experts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wehrens, R. (2014). The potential of the Imitation Game method in exploring healthcare professionals’ understanding of the lived experiences and practical challenges of chronically ill patients. Health Care Analysis, 23, 253–271.Google Scholar
Weinel, M. (2007). Primary source knowledge and technical decision-making: Mbeki and the AZT debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 38, 748–760.Google Scholar
Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolgar, S., & Neyland, D. (2013). Mundane governance: Ontology and accountability. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281–304.Google Scholar
References
Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 247–260.Google Scholar
Benner, P., Tanner, C. A., & Chesla, C. A. (1996). Expertise in nursing practice: Caring, clinical judgment, and ethics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Borko, H., Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers’ experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100, 273–306.Google Scholar
Carillo, L., Lee, C., & Rickey, D. (2005). Enhancing science teaching by doing more: A framework to guide chemistry students’ thinking in the laboratory. Science Teacher, 72, 60.Google Scholar
Carter, K., Cushing, K., Sabers, D., Stein, P., & Berliner, D. (1988). Expert–novice differences in perceiving and processing visual classroom information. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 25–31.Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167–184). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (2006). Observation of work practices in natural settings. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 127–145). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 679–691.Google Scholar
Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 705–725). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–706). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, S., de Mey, M., Shinn, T., & Woolgar, S. (eds.) (1989). The cognitive turn: Sociological and psychological perspectives on science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hake, R. (2012). Helping students to think like scientists in Socratic dialogue-inducing labs. Physics Teacher, 50, 48–52.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, D. (2011). The cognitive turn in the age of information and communication. In Waters, P., van Hoorn, N. Westpalm, & Wisse, P. (eds.), Interoperabel Nederland (pp. 80–89). The Hague: Forum Standaardisatie.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (trans. Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E.). New York: SCM Press. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1998). Plato’s doctrine of truth (trans. Sheehan, T.). In McNeill, W. (ed.), Pathmarks (pp. 155–182). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1967)Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of the European sciences (trans. Carr, D.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert–novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 36–42.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (trans. Smith, C.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
Norman, G., Eva, K., Brooks, L., & Hamstra, S. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 339–353). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, K. G., Shafer, J. L., & Klein, G. (2006). Professional judgments and “naturalistic decision making.” In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 403–419). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scully, J. L. (2012). Disability and the thinking body. In Gonzalez Arnal, S., Jagger, G., & Lennon, K. (eds.), Embodied selves (pp. 139–159). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Volmer, J. (2006). Expertise in software design. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 373–387). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The phenomenological movement (3rd edn.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
References
Alexander, R. D. (1990). How did humans evolve? Reflections on the uniquely unique species. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291, 1748–1753.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. H, & Geary, D. C. (2009). Hominid brain evolution: Testing climatic, ecological, and social competition models. Human Nature, 20, 67–79.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.Google Scholar
Campitelli, G., & Gobet, F. (2011). Deliberate practice necessary but not sufficient. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 280–285.Google Scholar
Chapais, B. (2010). The deep structure of human society: Primate origins and evolution. In Kappeler, P. M. & Silk, J. B. (eds.), Mind the gap: Tracing the origins of human universals (pp. 19–51). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Conard, N. J. (2010). Cultural modernity: Consensus or conundrum? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 7621–7622.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10, 242–249.Google Scholar
Epstein, D. (2014). The sports gene: Inside the science of extraordinary athletic performance. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 988–994.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85, 114.Google Scholar
ESPN Hollinger Ratings (December 14, 2015). NBA centers player efficiency ratings. http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/statistics/_/position/c.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. R. (2008). The when, where, and how of novices in craft production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15, 51–67.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. V., Geary, D. C., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 10–46.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In Carlson, J. S. & Levin, J. R. (eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 1–99, 177–202). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C., & Huffman, K. J. (2002). Brain and cognitive evolution: Forms of modularity and functions of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 667–698.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K., & Bliege Bird, R. (2002). Showing off, handicap signaling, and the evolution of men’s work. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11, 58–67.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.Google Scholar
Lycett, S. J., Collard, M., & McGrew, W. C. (2009). Cladistic analyses of behavioural variation in wild Pan troglodytes: Exploring the chimpanzee culture hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 57, 337–349.Google Scholar
McAndrew, F. T. (2002). New evolutionary perspectives on altruism: Multilevel-selection and costly-signaling theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 79–82.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2008). An experimental simulation of the “copy-successful-individuals” cultural learning strategy: Adaptive landscapes, producer–scrounger dynamics, and informational access costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 350–363.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Olausson, D. J. (2008). Does practice make perfect? Craft expertise as a factor in aggrandizer strategies. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15, 28–50.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2010). The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 8993–8999.Google Scholar
Potts, R. (1998). Variability selection in hominid evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 7, 81–96.Google Scholar
Potts, R. (2013). Hominin evolution in settings of strong environmental variability. Quaternary Science Reviews, 73, 1–13.Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A., & Nowicki, S. (2010). The evolution of animal communication: Reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shultz, S., & Maslin, M. (2013). Early human speciation, brain expansion and dispersal influenced by African climate pulses. PloS ONE, 8, e76750.Google Scholar
Stout, D. (2011). Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1050–1059.Google Scholar
Stout, D., Toth, N., Schick, K., & Chaminade, T. (2008). Neural correlates of Early Stone Age toolmaking: Technology, language and cognition in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363, 1939–1949.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. (2007). Understanding early civilizations: A comparative study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wadley, L. (2001). What is cultural modernity? A general view and a South African perspective from Rose Cottage Cave. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 201–221.Google Scholar
Winegard, B., Winegard, B., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Eastwood’s brawn and Einstein’s brain: An evolutionary account of dominance, prestige, and precarious manhood. Review of General Psychology, 18, 34–48.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R., & Carmody, R. (2010). Human adaptation to the control of fire. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 19, 187–199.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zilhao, J. (2007). The emergence of ornaments and art: An archaeological perspective on the origins of “behavioral modernity.” Journal of Archaeological Research, 15, 1–54.Google Scholar
References
Agnew, N. M., Ford, K. M., & Hayes, P. J. (1994). Expertise in context: Personally constructed, socially selected, and reality-relevant? International Journal of Expert Systems, 7, 65–88.Google Scholar
Caro, T. M. (1994). Cheetahs of the Serengeti plains: Group living in an asocial species. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carson, H. J., Collins, D., & Richards, J. (2014). Intra-individual movement variability during skill transitions: A useful marker? European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 327–336.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2004). Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 125–143.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2005). Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15, 5–26.Google Scholar
Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs: Canine consciousness and capabilities. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forslund, P., & Pärt, T. (1995). Age and reproduction in birds: Hypotheses and tests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 374–378.Google Scholar
Guinet, C. (1991). Intentional stranding apprenticeship and social play in killer whales (Orcinus orca). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 2712–2716.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (2007). Deliberate practice in dogs: A canine model of expertise. Journal of General Psychology, 134, 247–257.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (2008). Expertise acquisition as sustained learning in humans and other animals: Commonalities across species. Animal Cognition, 11, 99–107.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (ed.) (2009a). Canine ergonomics: The science of working dogs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (2009b). Exceptional running skill in dogs requires extensive experience. Journal of General Psychology, 136, 323–336.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (2010). Does perceived trainability of dog (Canis lupus familiaris) breeds reflect differences in learning or differences in physical ability? Behavioural Processes, 83, 315–323.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (2011a). Animal expertise: Evidence of phase transitions by utilizing running estimates of performance variability. Ecological Psychology, 23, 59–75.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S. (2011b). Performance constraints in strength events in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 86, 149–151.Google Scholar
Helton, W. S., & Helton, N. D. (2010). Physical size matters in the domestic dog’s (Canis lupus familiaris) ability to use human pointing cues. Behavioural Processes, 85, 77–79.Google Scholar
Kemp, T. J., Bachus, K. N., Nairn, J. A., & Carrier, D. R. (2005). Functional trade-offs in the limb bones of dogs selected for running versus fighting. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208, 3475–3482.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N. (2004). Social learning strategies. Animal Learning & Behavior, 32, 4–14.Google Scholar
Menache, S. (2000). Hunting and attachment to dogs in the pre-modern period. In Podberscek, A. L., Paul, E. S., & Serpell, A. (eds.), Companion animals and us (pp. 42–60). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, E. M., Krzyszczyk, E., & Mann, J. (2016). Age-specific foraging performance and reproduction in tool-using wild bottlenose dolphins. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 401–410.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2010). The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107 (Supplement 2), 8993–8999.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. J. (2003). Expertise and the evolution of consciousness. Cognition, 89, 207–236.Google Scholar
Sanquist, T. F., Mahy, H. A., Posse, C., & Morris, F. (2006). Psychometric survey methods for measuring attitudes toward homeland security systems and personal privacy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 1808–1811.Google Scholar
Schilhab, T. (2013). Derived embodiment and imaginative capacities in interactional expertise. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12, 309–325.Google Scholar
Scott, J. P., & Fuller, J. L. (1965). Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Serpell, J. (1995). The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex cognition: The psychology of human thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, D. (2011). Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1050–1059.Google Scholar
Thornton, A., & McAuliffe, K. (2006). Teaching in wild meerkats. Science, 313, 227–229.Google Scholar
- 27
- Cited by