Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J., eds. (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Abramson, M. J., Benke, G. P., Dimitriadis, C., et al. (2009). Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics, 30(8), 678–686.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American Society of Plastic Surgery. (2015). Plastic surgery procedural statistics. www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics.Google Scholar

Arnold, K., & Zuberbühler, K. (2006). The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini. Animal Behaviour, 72(3), 643–653.Google Scholar

Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., et al. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 573–590.Google Scholar

Bivin, J. B., Mathew, P., Thulasi, P. C., & Philip, J. (2013). Nomophobia – Do we really need to worry about? Reviews of Progress, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bruni, O., Sette, S., Fontanesi, L., et al. (2015). Technology use and sleep quality in preadolescence and adolescence. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11(12), 1433–1441.Google Scholar

Byun, Y., Ha, M., Kwon, H., et al. (2013). Mobile phone use, blood lead levels, and attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms in children: A longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59742.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Monographs in Population Biology, 16, 1–388.Google Scholar

Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How Monkeys See the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chielens, K., & Heylighen, F. (2005). Operationalization of meme selection criteria: Methodologies to empirically test memetic predictions. In Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Socially Inspired Computing (AISB’05). Hove: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, pp. 14–20.Google Scholar

Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370–379.Google Scholar

Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 119–135.Google Scholar

Csányi, V. (2000). The “human behavior complex” and the compulsion of communication: Key factors of human evolution. Semiotica, 128(3–4), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K., & Pomiankowski, A. (2000). Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature, 406(6792), 186–188.Google Scholar

David-Barrett, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Language as a coordination tool evolves slowly. Royal Society Open Science, 3(12), 160259.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation. In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds., Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 282–309.Google Scholar

Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 842–849.Google Scholar

Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Gossip, Grooming and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Cognitive constraints on the structure and dynamics of social networks. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(1), 7–16.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Social cognition on the Internet: Testing constraints on social network size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2192–2201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ericsson, J. (2014). Ericsson mobility report. https://edna.iea-4e.org/files/otherfiles/0000/0438/11_-_Ericsson_Mobility_Report_-_Patrik_Cerwall.pdf.Google Scholar

Ezoe, S., & Toda, M. (2013). Relationships of loneliness and mobile phone dependence with Internet addiction in Japanese medical students. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3(6), 407–412.Google Scholar

Facebook. (2016). Facebook Reports Third Quarter 2016. https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2016/Q3/3.-Facebook-Reports-Third-Quarter-2016-Results.pdf.Google Scholar

Fan, J., Dai, W., Liu, F., & Wu, J. (2005). Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272(1560), 219–226.Google Scholar

Fink, B., Weege, B., Manning, J. T., & Trivers, R. (2014). Body symmetry and physical strength in human males. American Journal of Human Biology, 26(5), 697–700.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139(3), 603–622.Google Scholar

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 731–746.Google Scholar

Frein, S. T., Jones, S. L., & Gerow, J. E. (2013). Computers in human behavior when it comes to Facebook there may be more to bad memory than just multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2179–2182.Google Scholar

Getty, T. (2006). Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(2), 83–88.Google Scholar

Go, A. S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V. L., et al. (2013). Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2013 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 127(1), e6–e245.Google Scholar

Grafen, A. (1990). Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144(4), 517–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haufe, C. (2007). Sexual selection and mate choice in evolutionary psychology. Biology & Philosophy, 23(1), 115–128.Google Scholar

Herman, L. M. (1987). Receptive competencies of language-trained animals. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 17, 1–60.Google Scholar

Hickok, G., Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. S. (1996). The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language. Nature, 381(6584), 699–702.Google Scholar

Hill, G. E., & Montgomerie, R. (1994). Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 258(1351), 47–52.Google Scholar

Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(3), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kautiainen, S., Koivusilta, L., Lintonen, T., Virtanen, S. M., & Rimpelä, A. (2005). Use of information and communication technology and prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents. International Journal of Obesity, 29(8), 925–933.Google Scholar

Kemp, S. (2014). Social, Digital and Mobile in 2015. http://zenithmalaysia.com/infobank/Digital_social_and_mobile_in_2015_Executive_summary.pdf.Google Scholar

King, A. L. S., Valença, A. M., Silva, A. C. O., et al. (2013). Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 140–144.Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245.Google Scholar

Klemmer, E. T., & Snyder, F. W. (1972). Measurement of time spent communicating. Journal of Communication, 22(2), 142–158.Google Scholar

Konok, V., Pogány, Á., & Miklósi, Á. (2017). Mobile attachment: Separation from the mobile induces physiological and behavioural stress and attentional bias to separation-related stimuli. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 228–239.Google Scholar

Kramer, S., Zebrowitz, L. A., San Giovanni, J. P., & Sherak, B. (1995). Infant preferences for attractiveness and babyfaceness. In Bardy, B. G., Bootsma, R. J., & Guillard, Y., eds., Studies in Perception and Action III. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 389–392.Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., et al. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.Google Scholar

Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction – A review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(12), 3528–3552.Google Scholar

Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Evolution, 78(6), 3721–3725.Google Scholar

Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., et al. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.Google Scholar

Lavie, C. J., Milani, R. V, & Ventura, H. O. (2009). Obesity and cardiovascular disease: Risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(21), 1925–1932.Google Scholar

Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350.Google Scholar

Levitas, D. (2013). Always Connected: How Smartphones And Social Keep Us Engaged. Framingham, MA: International Data Corporation (IDC).Google Scholar

Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: Data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter–gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1629), 3113–3117.Google Scholar

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). The many faces of research on face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1634–1637.Google Scholar

Logicalis (2016). The age of digital enlightenment. www.uk.logicalis.com/globalassets/united-kingdom/microsites/real-time-generation/realtime-generation-2016-report.pdf.Google Scholar

Lui, K. F. H., & Wong, A. C.-N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 647–653.Google Scholar

Lycett, J. E., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2000). Mobile phones as lekking devices among human males. Human Nature, 11(1), 93–104.Google Scholar

Lyn, H. (2012). Apes and the Evolution of Language: Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lyon, B. E., & Montgomerie, R. (2012). Sexual selection is a form of social selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1600), 2266–2273.Google Scholar

Lyon, B. E., Eadie, J. M., & Hamilton, L. D. (1994). Parental choice selects for ornamental plumage in American coot chicks. Nature, 371, 240–243.Google Scholar

Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maples, W. C., DeRosier, W., Hoenes, R., Bendure, R., & Moore, S. (2008). The effects of cell phone use on peripheral vision. Optometry – Journal of the American Optometric Association, 79(1), 36–42.Google Scholar

Mason, N. A., Shultz, A. J., & Burns, K. J. (2014). Elaborate visual and acoustic signals evolve independently in a large, phenotypically diverse radiation of songbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788), 20140967.Google Scholar

Masters, R. K., Reither, E. N., Powers, D. A., et al. (2013). The impact of obesity on US mortality levels: The importance of age and cohort factors in population estimates. American Journal of Public Health, 103(10), 1895–1901.Google Scholar

Mennella, J. A. (2014). Ontogeny of taste preferences: Basic biology and implications for health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(3), 704S–711S.Google Scholar

Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138.Google Scholar

Minear, M., Brasher, F., Mccurdy, M., Lewis, J., & Younggren, A. (2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1274–1281.Google Scholar

Møller, A. P. (1992). Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature, 357(6375), 238–240.Google Scholar

Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D., & Wolf, J. B. (1997). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51(5), 1352–1362.Google Scholar

Nakamaru, M., & Dieckmann, U. (2009). Runaway selection for cooperation and strict-and-severe punishment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Nasar, J., Hecht, P., & Wener, R. (2008). Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(1), 69–75.Google Scholar

Nasar, J. L., & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 91–95.Google Scholar

Nie, N. H., & Hillygus, D. S. (2002). The impact of Internet use on sociability: Time-diary findings. IT & Society, 1(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect and mating mutualism of partner choice in cooperation. Behavioral Ecology, 35(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.Google Scholar

Pachucki, M. A., Jacques, P. F., & Christakis, N. A. (2011). Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 2170–2177.Google Scholar

Pennay, D. (2006). ATSB Research and Analysis Report. Road Safety Consultant Report CR 229, Community Attitudes to Road Safety – Wave 19. Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.Google Scholar

Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 229–241.Google Scholar

Pepperberg, I. M. (2010). Functional vocalizations by an African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 55(2), 139–160.Google Scholar

Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368(6468), 239–242.Google Scholar

Perrin, A. (2015). Social Media Usage: 2005–2015 (October), 2005–2015. Pew Research Center. October 2015. www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015.Google Scholar

Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86(2), 184–195.Google Scholar

Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 253–258.Google Scholar

Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Miklósi, A., & Csányi, V. (2005). Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(2), 136–144.Google Scholar

Progovac, L. (2016). A gradualist scenario for language evolution: Precise linguistic reconstruction of early human (and Neandertal) grammars. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pryke, S. R., Andersson, S., & Lawes, M. J. (2001). Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: Female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution, 55(7), 1452–1463.Google Scholar

Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., Dehaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.Google Scholar

Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453–458.Google Scholar

Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.Google Scholar

Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., et al. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31–46.Google Scholar

Rideout, V., & Saphir, M. (2012). Social Media, Social Life: How Teens View Their Digital Lives. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. G. B., Dunbar, R. I. M., Pollet, T. V., & Kuppens, T. (2009). Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks, 31, 138–146.Google Scholar

Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958.Google Scholar

Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Psicología Educativa 17, 163–177.Google Scholar

Rosser, S. V. (1992). Biology and Feminism. A Dynamic Interaction. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar

Salesforce Marketing Cloud (2014). 2014 mobile behavior report. https://brandcdn.exacttarget.com/sites/exacttarget/files/deliverables/etmc-2014mobilebehaviorreport.pdf.Google Scholar

Schassburger, R. M. (1993). Vocal Communication in the Timber Wolf, Canis lupus, Linnaeus: Structure, Motivation, and Ontogeny. Berlin: Paul Parey Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 299–306.Google Scholar

Scissors, L., Burke, M., & Wengrovitz, S. (2016). What’s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing – CSCW, 16, 1499–1508.Google Scholar

Searcy, W. A., & Nowicki, S. (2005). The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sharma, N., Sharma, P., Sharma, N., & Wavare, R. (2015). Rising concern of nomophobia amongst Indian medical students. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(3), 705–707.Google Scholar

Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1994). A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem. Philosophy of Science, 61(4), 534–555.Google Scholar

Stald, G. (2008). Mobile identity: Youth, identity, and mobile communication media. In Buckingham, D., ed., Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar

Strano, M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), 1–13.Google Scholar

Számadó, S., & Szathmáry, E. (2006). Selective scenarios for the emergence of natural language. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(10), 555–561.Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452–460.Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 72(4), 497–548.Google Scholar

Uzzell, T., & Pilbeam, D. (1971). Phyletic divergence dates of hominoid primates: A comparison of fossil and molecular data. Evolution, 25(4), 615–635.Google Scholar

van den Eijnden, R. J., Meerkerk, G.-J., Vermulst, A. A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R. C. (2008). Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 655–665.Google Scholar

Verhulst, S., Dieleman, S. J., & Parmentier, H. K. (1999). A tradeoff between immunocompetence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(8), 4478–4481.Google Scholar

Vodafone (2013). Digital lives: How do teenagers in the UK navigate their digital world? www.vodafone.com/content/dam/vodafone/parents/assets_2013/pdf/digital_lives_report.pdf.Google Scholar

Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?: Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455.Google Scholar

West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123(4), 222–234.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C., & Crymes, L. (1998). Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature, 391(6664), 276–279.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 585–608.Google Scholar

Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D., & Moore, A. J. (1999). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. American Naturalist, 153(3), 254–266.Google Scholar

Wood, B., & Harrison, T. (2011). The evolutionary context of the first hominins. Nature, 470(7334), 347–352.Google Scholar

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection – A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214.Google Scholar

Zephoria (2015). The Top 20 Valuable Facebook Statistics – Updated October 2015. https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics.Google Scholar

Zheng, F., Gao, P., He, M., et al. (2014). Association between mobile phone use and inattention in 7102 Chinese adolescents: A population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, 1022.Google Scholar

Zuberbühler, K. (2012). Communication in nonhuman primates. In Vonk, J. & Shakelford, T. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 320–338.Google Scholar

Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In Ellis, B. J. & Bjorklund, D. F., eds., Origins of the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Child Development. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 468–492.Google Scholar

Bering, J. M., & Povinelli, D. J. (2003). Comparing cognitive development. In Maestripieri, D., ed., Primate Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 205–233.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192.Google Scholar

Chandler, M., Fritz, A., & Hala, S. (1989). Small-scale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds’ early theories of mind. Child Development, 60, 1263–1277.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds., Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, pp. 282–309.Google Scholar

Debey, E., De Schryver, M., Logan, G. D., Suchotzki, K., & Verschuere, B. (2015). From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception. Acta Psychologica, 160, 58–68.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2013). Emergence of lying in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1958–1963.Google Scholar

Feldman, R. S., Jenkins, L., & Popoola, O. (1979). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355.Google Scholar

Freire, A., Eskritt, M., & Lee, K. (2004). Are eyes windows to a deceiver’s soul? Children’s use of another’s eye gaze cues in a deceptive situation. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1093–1104.Google Scholar

Gosselin, P., Warren, M., & Diotte, M. (2002). Motivation to hide emotion and children’s understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(4), 479–495.Google Scholar

Griffith, S. B., trans. (1963). The Art of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hala, S., Chandler, M., & Fritz, A. S. (1991). Fledgling theories of mind: Deception as a marker of three-year-olds’ understanding of false belief. Child Development, 62(1), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, N. (1976). The social function of intellect. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A., eds., Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–317.Google Scholar

Josephs, I. E. (1993). The Regulation of Emotional Expression in Preschool Children. Münster, NY: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Josephs, I. E. (1994). Display rule behavior and understanding in preschool children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(4), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaFreniere, P. J. (1988a). L’evolution at la function de la tromperie. Anthropologie et Societes, 12(3), 63–75.Google Scholar

LaFreniere, P. J. (1988b). The ontogeny of tactical deception in humans. In Byrne, R. & Whiten, A., eds., Evolution of Social Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 238–252.Google Scholar

LaFreniere, P. J. (1998). Card sharks and poker faces: Links between developmental research on deception and evolutionary models. Presented at the International Society for Human Ethology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar

LaFreniere, P. J., & Ménard, J. M. (1990). Le développement de la tromperie tactique chez le jeune enfant. Enfance, 45(4), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, M., Stanger, C., & Sullivan, M. W. (1989). Deception in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 439–443.Google Scholar

Lockard, J. S., & Paulhus, D. S. (1988). Self-Deception: An Adaptive Mechanism. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. W. (1986). A framework for discussing deception. In Mitchell, R. W. & Thompson, N. S., eds., Deception: Perspectives on Human and Nonhuman Deceit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar

Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Martin Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar

Owings, D. H., & Morton, E. S. (1998). Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Povinelli, D. J., & O’Neill, D. K. (2000). Do chimpanzees use their gestures to instruct each other? In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J., eds., Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 459–487.Google Scholar

Premack, D. (1988). “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind” revisited. In Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A., eds., Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 160–179.Google Scholar

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.Google Scholar

Reddy, V. (2007). Getting back to the rough ground: Deception and ‘social living’. In Emery, N., Nicola, C., & Frith, C., eds., Social Intelligence: From Brain to Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar

Ruihe, H., & Guoliang, Y. (2006). Children’s understanding of emotional display rules and use of strategies. Psychological Science (China), 29(1), 18–21.Google Scholar

Saarni, C. (1984). An observational study of children’s attempts to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 55(4), 1504–1513.Google Scholar

Schultz, T. R., & Cloghesy, K. (1981). Development of recursive awareness of intention. Developmental Psychology, 17(4), 465–471.Google Scholar

Smith, R., & LaFreniere, P. (2013). Development of tactical deception from 4 to 8 years of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 30–41.Google Scholar

Sodian, B., & Schneider, W. (1990). Children’s understanding of cognitive cuing: How to manipulate cues to fool a competitor. Child Development, 61(3), 697–704.Google Scholar

Sodian, B., Taylor, C., Harris, P. L., & Perner, J. (1991). Early deception and the child’s theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62(3), 468–483.Google Scholar

Talwar, V., & Crossman, A. (2011). From little white lies to filthy liars: The evolution of honesty and deception in young children. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 40, 139–179.Google Scholar

Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children’s lying behavior. Child Development, 79, 866–881.Google Scholar

Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: Verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 804–810.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Ethology, 20(4), 410–433.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. (1976). Forward. In Dawkins, R., ed., The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 114–131.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. (2012). The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar

von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 16–56.Google Scholar

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.Google Scholar

Woodruff, G., & Premack, D. (1979). Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition, 7(4), 333–362.Google Scholar

Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1363–1377.Google Scholar

Arbib, M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 105–168.Google Scholar

Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 10808–10823.Google Scholar

Buckner, R. L. (2010). The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 27–48.Google Scholar

Burling, R. (1999). Motivation, conventionalization, and arbitrariness in the origin of language. In King, B. J., ed., The Origins of Language: What Human Primates can Tell Us. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 307–350.Google Scholar

Call, J., & Michael Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 187–192.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2007). Biolinguistic explorations: design, development, evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, 1–21.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2010). Some simple evo devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., & Yamakido, H., eds., The Evolution of Human Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–62.Google Scholar

Clayton, N. S., Bussey, T. J., & Dickinson, A. (2003). Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 685–691.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2002). From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2004). The origins of modernity: Was autonomous speech the critical factor? Psychological Review, 111, 543–552.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2013). Mental time travel: A case for evolutionary continuity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 5–6.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dor, D. (2015). The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, Cognition, and Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Evans, N. (2009). Dying Words. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.Google Scholar

Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–646.Google Scholar

Foster, D. J., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Reverse replay of behavioural sequences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature, 440, 680–683.Google Scholar

Fujita, K. (2009). A prospect for evolutionary adequacy: Merge and the evolution and development of human language. Biolinguistics, 3, 128–153.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. A. & Gardner, B. T. (1969). Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science, 165, 664–672.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Widening the lens: what the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130295.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gupta, A. S., van der Meer, M. A. A., Touretzky, D. S., & Redish, A. D. (2010). Hippocampal replay is not a simple function of experience. Neuron, 65, 695–705.Google Scholar

Hewes, G. W. (1973). Primate communication and the gestural origins of language. Current Anthropology, 14, 5–24.Google Scholar

Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2011). Serial gesturing by wild chimpanzees: Its nature and function for communication. Animal Cognition, 14, 827–838.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origins of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–96.Google Scholar

Hoffecker, J. F. (2005). Innovation and technological knowledge in the Upper Paleolithic. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 186–198.Google Scholar

Hopkins, W. D., Taglialatela, J. P., & Leavens, D. A. (2007). Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Animal Behaviour, 73, 281–286.Google Scholar

Janmaat, K. R. L., Polansky, L., Ban, S. D., & Boesch, C. (2014). Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 16343–16348.Google Scholar

Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for “fast mapping”. Science, 304, 1682–1683.Google Scholar

Karlsson, F. (2007). Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 365–392.Google Scholar

Klein, R. G. (2008). Out of Africa and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 17, 267–281.Google Scholar

Knott, A. (2012). Sensorimotor Cognition and Natural Language Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Krupenye, C., Fumihiro, K., Hirata, S., & Call, J. (2016). At apes anticipate that other individual will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354, 110–116.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 958.Google Scholar

Martin, V. C. Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2011). A role for the hippocampus in encoding simulations of future events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13858–13863.Google Scholar

McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453–563.Google Scholar

Mellars, P. A. (2009). Origins of the female image. Nature, 459, 176–177.Google Scholar

Moser, M. B., Rowland, D. C., & Moser, E. I. (2015). Place cells, grid cells, and memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7, a021808.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1675). Letter from Sir Isaac Newton to Robert Hooke. Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, August 7, 2016. https://discover.hsp.org/Record/dc-9792/Description#tabnav.Google Scholar

Niles, J. D. (2010). Homo narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, N. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Patterson, F. G. P., & Gordon, W. (2001). Twenty-seven years of project Koko and Michael. In Galdikas, B. M. F., Briggs, N. E., Sheeran, L. K., & Goodall, J., eds., All Apes Great and Small, Vol. 1: African Apes. New York: Kluver, pp. 165–176.Google Scholar

Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 31, 108–178.Google Scholar

Pepperberg, I. M. (1999). The Alex Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, B. E., & Foster, D. J. (2013). Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature, 497, 74–79.Google Scholar

Pfenning, A. R., Hara, E., Whitney, O., et al. (2014). Convergent specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds. Science, 346, 1333–1346.Google Scholar

Pietrandrea, P. (2002). Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2, 296–321.Google Scholar

Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86, 184–195.Google Scholar

Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.Google Scholar

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.Google Scholar

Raffaele, P. (2006). Speaking bonobo. Smithsonian Magazine. www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/speaking-bonobo-134931541.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3–34.Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 264–274.Google Scholar

Rosati, A. G., & Santos, L. R. (2016). Spontaneous metacognition in rhesus monkeys. Psychological Science, 27, 1181–1191.Google Scholar

Sassoon, S. (1920). Limitations. In Sassoon, S, ed., Picture-Show. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Shanker, S. G., & Taylor, T. J. (1998). Apes, Language, and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, T. (2015). Speaking Our Minds: Why Human Communication Is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make It Special. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1960). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Gumperz, J & Levinson, S. C., eds., Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–96.Google Scholar

Slocombe, K. E., & Zuberbühler, K. (2007). Chimpanzees modify recruitment screams as a function of audience composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17228–17233.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17, 3–23.Google Scholar

Studdert-Kennedy, M. (2005). How did language go discrete? In Tallerman, M., ed., Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–67.Google Scholar

Suddendorf, T. (2013). Mental time travel: Continuities and discontinuities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 151–152.Google Scholar

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs, 123, 133–167.Google Scholar

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 30, 299–351.Google Scholar

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2010). Behavioural evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals. Behavioural Brain Research, 215, 292–298.Google Scholar

Tattersall, I. (2012). Masters of the Planet: The Search for Human Origins. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2008). The Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2009). Universal grammar is dead. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 470–471.Google Scholar

Villa, P., & Roebroeks, W. (2014). Neandertal demise: An archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS ONE, 9, e96424.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar

Alphen, J. J. M., Bernstein, C., & Driessen, G. (2003). Information acquisition and time allocation in insect parasitoids. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 81–87.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar

Barrett, H. C. (2018). The varieties of foraging experience. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 135–138.Google Scholar

Bell, W. J. (1991). Searching Behaviour: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Binford, L. (1990). Mobility, housing, and environment: A comparative study. Journal of Anthropological Research, 46, 119–152.Google Scholar

Blanchard, T. C., Wilke, A., & Hayden, B. Y. (2014). Hot hand bias in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 280–286.Google Scholar

Castel, A. D., Drolet Rossi, A., & McGillivray, S. (2012). Beliefs about the “hot hand” in basketball across adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 27, 601–605.Google Scholar

Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129–136.Google Scholar

Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from Casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195–209.Google Scholar

Czienskowski, U. (2005a). The Fishing Task Experiment [computer software]. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar

Czienskowski, U. (2005b). The Word Puzzle Experiment [computer software]. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (1975). Perception of randomness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (in Hebrew, with English abstract), Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1997). Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review, 104, 301–318.Google Scholar

Fawcett, T. W., Fallenstein, B., Higginson, A. D., et al. (2014). The evolution of decision rules in complex environments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 153–161.Google Scholar

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive psychology, 17, 295–314.Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., Bryant, G. A., Wilke, A., et al. (2009). Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Social Cognition, 27, 733–763.Google Scholar

Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., & Jones, M. N. (2015). Foraging in semantic fields: How we search through memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 513–534.Google Scholar

Hodgins, D. C., Stea, J. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011). Gambling disorders. Lancet, 378, 1874–1884.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioral biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97–124.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. M. C., Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2008). Patch leaving in humans: Can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches? Animal Behaviour, 75, 1331–1349.Google Scholar

Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M., & Yamamura, N. (1981). Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. American Naturalist, 117, 710–723.Google Scholar

Kelly, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in Groups: Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krebs, J. R., Ryan, J. C., & Charnov, E. L. (1974). Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study of patch use by chickadees. Animal Behavior, 22, 953–964.Google Scholar

Legge, E. L. G., Spetch, M. L., Cenker, A., et al. (2012). Not all locations are created equal: Exploring how adults hide and search for objects. PLOS ONE, 7, e36993.Google Scholar

Livoreil, B., & Giraldeau, L.-A. (1997). Patch departure decisions by spice finches foraging singly or in groups. Animal Behavior, 54, 967–977.Google Scholar

Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Cognitive aging and adaptive foraging behavior. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64, 474–481.Google Scholar

Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2013). Foraging across the life span: Is there a reduction in exploration with aging? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 53.Google Scholar

McNamara, J. M. (1982). Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 269–288.Google Scholar

McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (1985). Optimal foraging and learning. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 117, 231–249.Google Scholar

Nickerson, R. S. (2002). The production and perception of randomness. Psychological Review, 109, 330–357.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Nature, 364, 56–58.Google Scholar

Oskarsson, A. T., van Boven, L., McClelland, G. H., & Hastie, R. (2009). What’s next? Judging sequences of binary events? Psychological Bulletin, 135, 262–285.Google Scholar

Pirolli, P. (2007). Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Raab, M., Gula, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). The hot hand exists in volleyball and is used for allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 81–94.Google Scholar

Reifman, A. (2011). Hot Hand: The Statistics behind Sports’ Greatest Streaks. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books.Google Scholar

Scheibehenne, B., Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2011). Expectations of clumpy resources influence predictions of sequential events. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 326–333.Google Scholar

Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Bilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the Prevalence of Disordered Gambling Behavior in the United States and Canada: A Meta-analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar

Talbot, K. J., Legge, E. L. G., Bulkito, V., & Spetch, M. L. (2009). Hiding and searching strategies of adult humans in a virtual and a real-space room. Learning and Motivation, 40, 221–233.Google Scholar

Taylor, L. R. (1961). Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, 189, 732–735.Google Scholar

Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P., & Perry, J. N. (1978). The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 383–406.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). What is ecological rationality? In Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & The ABC Research Group, eds., Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., Hills, T. T., & Robbins, T. W., eds. (2012). Cognitive Search: Evolution, Algorithms, and the Brain (Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In Kinsey, W. G., ed., The Evolution of Primate Behavior: Primate Models. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar

Waage, J. K. (1979). Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 353–371.Google Scholar

Wajnberg, E., Fauvegue, X., & Pons, O. (2000). Patch leaving decision rules and the marginal value theorem: An experimental analysis and a simulation model. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 577–586.Google Scholar

Wajnberg, E., Gonsard, P.-A., Tabone, E., et al. (2003). A comparative analysis of patch-leaving decision rules in a parasitoid family. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 618–626.Google Scholar

Wilke, A. (2006). Evolved responses to an uncertain world. Unpublished PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., & Barrett, H. C. (2009). The hot hand phenomenon as a cognitive adaptation to clumped resources. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 161–169.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., & Mata, R. (2012). Cognitive bias. In Ramachandran, V. S., ed., Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Past and present environments: The evolution of decision making. Psicothema, 22, 4–8.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Hutchinson, J. M. C., Todd, P. M., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Fishing for the right words: Decision rules for human foraging behavior in internal search tasks. Cognitive Science, 33, 497–529.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Scheibehenne, B., Gaissmaier, W., McCanney, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2014). Illusionary pattern detection in habitual gamblers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 291–297.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Minich, S., Panis, M., et al. (2015). A game of hide and seek: Expectations of clumpy resources influence hiding and searching patterns. PLoS ONE, 10, e0130976.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Lydick, J., Bedell, V., et al. (2018). Spatial dependency in local resource distributions. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 163–172.Google Scholar

Winterhalder, B., & Smith, E. A. (1981). Hunter–Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Archaeological Analyses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (1992). ICD-10 Classifications of Mental and Behavioural Disorder: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar