Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology Volume 2
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Methods
- Part II Embodied Environmental Sociology
- Part III Beyond the Human
- Part IV Sustainability and Climate Change
- 12 Possibilities and Politics in Imagining Degrowth
- 13 Sustainable Consumption
- 14 Sustainability Cultures: Exploring the Relationships Between Cultural Attributes and Sustainability Outcomes
- 15 Socio-Ecological Sustainability and New Forms of Governance: Community Forestry and Citizen Involvement with Trees, Woods, and Forests
- 16 Carbon Markets and International Environmental Governance
- 17 The Multi-Level Governance Challenge of Climate Change in Brazil
- Part V Resources
- Part VI Food and Agriculture
- Part VII Social Movements
- Index
- References
17 - The Multi-Level Governance Challenge of Climate Change in Brazil
from Part IV - Sustainability and Climate Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology Volume 2
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Methods
- Part II Embodied Environmental Sociology
- Part III Beyond the Human
- Part IV Sustainability and Climate Change
- 12 Possibilities and Politics in Imagining Degrowth
- 13 Sustainable Consumption
- 14 Sustainability Cultures: Exploring the Relationships Between Cultural Attributes and Sustainability Outcomes
- 15 Socio-Ecological Sustainability and New Forms of Governance: Community Forestry and Citizen Involvement with Trees, Woods, and Forests
- 16 Carbon Markets and International Environmental Governance
- 17 The Multi-Level Governance Challenge of Climate Change in Brazil
- Part V Resources
- Part VI Food and Agriculture
- Part VII Social Movements
- Index
- References
Summary
Most of the literature on climate policy is occupied by research on global and regional levels of governance, focusing on norms, rules and decision processes regarding the international climate regime. Despite these necessary contributions, taking account of the regional and local dimension of the theme is also relevant, since most human activities that contribute to global climate changes take place at these levels and, at the same time, these level is the most affected by the impacts of these changes. In this sense, this article analyzes political responses to the climate issue in Brazil in multi-level governance. Within social and political dimensions of the climate issue, this article highlights governments as relevant stakeholders in proposing appropriate forms of climate change governance understanding that they are not the only ones facing this challenge Following the growing international movement of local responses to climate change in Brazil, this type of action was more expressive first at the city level. Then, it reached the state level and finally, the federal level.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology , pp. 285 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Barbi, F., & Ferreira, L. 2013. Climate change in Brazilian cities: Policy strategies and responses to global warming. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 4(1): 49–51.Google Scholar
Barbi, F.; Ferreira, L. & Guo, S. 2016. Climate change challenges and China’s response: mitigation and governance. Journal of Chinese Governance 1(2): 324–339.Google Scholar
Basso, L., & Viola, E. 2014. O Progresso da política energética chinesa e os desafios na transição para o desenvolvimento de baixo carbono, 2006–2013. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 57: 174–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. 2000. Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes. In The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, ed. Adam, B, Beck, U, & Loon, J. V. London: Sage Publications, pp. 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. 2010. Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture & Society 27(2–3): 254–266.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. 2007. Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research. Local Governments 12(5): 447–456.Google Scholar
Bizikova, L., Burch, S., Cohen, S. & Robinson, J. 2010. Linking sustainable development with climate change adaptation and mitigation. In Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security eds. O’Brien, K. L., Clair, A. L. St. & Kristoffersen, B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. 2003. Cities and Climate Change – Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., & Kern, K. 2006. Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies 43(12): 2237–2259.Google Scholar
Burch, S., & Robinson, J. 2007. A framework for explaining the links between capacity and action in response to global climate change. Climate Policy 7(4): 304–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R., & Brulle, R. 2015. Climate Change and Society. Sociological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodman, D. 2009. Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment and Urbanization 21(1): 185–198.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L. (ORG). 2017. O Desafio das mudanças climáticas. Os casos Brasil e China. Jundiaí, Brazil: Paco Editorial.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L. 2018. The Sociology of Environmental Issues. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Curitiba, Brazil: CRV Editor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Leila, and Martinelli, M. 2016. Anthropocene: Governing Climate Change in China and Brazil. Sociology and Anthropology 4(12): 1084–1092. www.hrpub.org DOI:10.13189/sa.2016.041207.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Leila, Martins, R. D, Barbi, F, et al. 2012. Risk and Climate Change in Brazilian Coastal Cities. In Risk and Social Theory in Environmental Management eds. Measham, T. G. & Lockie., S Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 133–146.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Leila, and Barbi, F. 2016. The challenge of global environmental change in the Anthropocene: An analysis of Brazil and China. Chinese Political Science Review 1(4): 685–697.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 2000. Runaway World. How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. 2007. The multi-level governance challenge of climate change. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 4(3): 131–137.Google Scholar
Hoornweg, D., Sugar, L, L., and Gomez, C. L. T. 2011. Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: moving forward. Environment and Urbanization 23(1): 207–227.Google Scholar
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. Metz, B, Davidson, O. R, Bosch, P. R, Dave, R & Meyer, L. A, Cambridge,: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change eds. McCarthy, J. J, Canziani, O. F, Leary, N. A, Dokken, D. J, & White, K. S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Klein, R. J. T., Schipper, E. L. F., & Dessai, S. 2005. Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(1): 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., Patterberg, P., & Schroeder, H. 2012. Multiactor Governance and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37: 365–387.Google Scholar
Nobre, Carlos A. 2011. Vulnerabilidades das Megacidades Brasileiras às Mudanças Climáticas: Região Metropolitana de São Paulo: Relatório Final. São José dos Campos, SP Brasil: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais.Google Scholar
OC – Observatório do Clima. 2014. Análise da evolução das emissões de GEE no Brasil (1990–2012). Documento Síntese. São Paulo: Instituto de Energia e Meio Ambiente.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. 2009. Conceptualizing Climate Governance Beyond the International Regime. Global Environmental Politics 9(1): 58–78.Google Scholar
PBMC. Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas. 2013. Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 2 ao Primeiro Relatório de Avaliação Nacional do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas. Sumário Executivo do GT2. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: PBMC.Google Scholar
Renn, O., & Klinke, A. 2012. Complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in inclusive risk governance. In Risk and Social Theory in Environmental Management, eds. Measham, T. G. & Lockie, S. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, D. 2010. The contribution of cities to global warming and their potential contributions to solutions. Environment and Urbanization Asia 1(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Storbjörk, S. 2007. Governing climate adaptation in the local arena: Challenges of risk management and planning in Sweden. Local Environment 12(5): 457–469.Google Scholar
UN-HABITAT (United Nations Human Settlements Programme). 2011. Cities and Climate Change: Global Report on Human Settlements. Earthscan.Google Scholar
Winkler, H., Baumert, K, Blanchard, K. O., Burch, S, and Robinson, J. 2007. What factors influence mitigative capacity? Energy Policy 35(1): 692–703.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by