Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-rlsgg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-23T13:37:35.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Engineering Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

By
Karen L. Tonso
Edited by
Aditya Johri  and
Barbara M. Olds
Karen L. Tonso
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Aditya Johri
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Barbara M. Olds
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Identity is a concept that figuratively combines the intimate or personal world with the collective space of cultural forms and social relations.

(Holland, Lachicotte, Skinner, & Cain, 1998, p. 4)

In everyday speech referring to someone as an engineer signals their having an engineering identity – marking that person as belonging to a group of people who practice engineering. In the popular imagination, engineers mistakenly tend to be considered (at least in the United States) as socially inept sorts who are fascinated with gadgets and fixing things, more practical than scientists, and somehow brainier than technicians. As such, though “engineer” provides vernacular shorthand for everyday conversation, research on engineering identity unpacks nuanced ways of being engineers, as well as delineates how being an engineer relates to doing engineering. Engineers’ identification with their profession can be critical for persistence, both as a student and then as a professional (see Chapter 16 by Lichtenstein, Chen, Smith, & Maldonado, this volume). Studies show that a lack of identification with, and by, engineering often motivates students to migrate out of engineering into other majors and can be a barrier for students in other majors to move into engineering (Seymour & Hewitt, 1997; Tonso, 2006a; see also Chapter 15 by Sheppard, Gilmartin, Brunhaver, & Antonio, this volume). In fact, identity and learning prove interconnected, as delineated by several scholars in the situated learning tradition from cultural anthropology (Greeno, 2006; Johri & Olds, 2011; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Tonso, 1997; Wenger, 1998). Within this tradition, learning is itself conceptualized as a change in identity that comes with participation. As learners move from novices to mature practitioners, they likewise shift from peripheral participation to fuller participation; they undergo identity transformations and their identifying with a community of practice becomes a central part of the learning that takes place. According to this perspective, students learn as they engage in meaningful activities, involved not only in the learning of content, but also in learning how to put content learning into perspective, gain conceptual understanding, and become part of a community. But, though self-identification grounds an emerging engineering identity, as Tonso (1999, 2006a) demonstrated, being identified by the community as belonging also proves crucial, and lack of identification can interfere with belonging for some with well-regarded competencies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , pp. 267 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, K. J. B., Courter, S. S., McGlamery, T., Nathans-Kelly, T. M., & Nicometo, C. G. (2010). Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, E. J. (2001). The neglected early history of codeswitching research in the United States. Language & Communication, 21(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, A. S. (2000) “Engineeresses invade campus”: Four decades of debate over technical coeducation. IEEE Technology and Society, 19(1), 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond ‘identity’. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47.CrossRef
Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, H. (2006). Being a female engineer: Identity construction and resistance of women in engineering schools. (Order No. 3231625, Texas A&M University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 253 pp.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., Hegg, S., & Lucena, J. C. (1993). Weeded out: Critical reflection in engineering education. Paper presented at the 1993 American Anthropological Association (AAA) Annual Meeting,Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2003). When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 168–176.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2004). Knowledge and professional identity in engineering. History and Technology, 20(4), 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2005). National identities in multinational worlds: Engineers and ‘engineering cultures. International Journal for Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 15(3/4), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorenson, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and Burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, M. (1996). The production of biologists at school and work: Making scientists, conservationists, or flowery bone-heads? In Levinson, B. A., Foley, D. E., & Holland, D. C. (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice (pp. 169–185). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, M. (2001). Changing conceptions of culture and ethnographic methodology: Recent thematic shifts and their implications for research on teaching. In Richardson, V. (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 209–225). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, M., & Finkel, E., with Behm, L., Lawrence, N., & Tonso, K. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, M., & Turns, J. (2011). Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professional identity development for engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 630–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, M., Turns, J., & Xu, K. (2008). Engineering students’ extrinsic and intrinsic strategies for the construction of professional identity. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Davos, Switzer-land. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis (1st ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Faulkner, W. (2007). “Nuts and bolts and people”: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. (1990). Learning capitalist culture: Deep in the heat of Tejas. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.Google Scholar
Greeno, J. (2006). Learning in activity. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, S. (1989). Pleasure, power, and technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: SAGE and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C. (2001). Women, race, and science: The academic experiences of twenty women of color with a passion for science. (Order No. 3005063, University of Colorado at Boulder). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 485 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C., Brown, J., Carlone, H., Azita, K., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johri, A., & Olds, B. (2011). Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, B. A., Foley, D. E., & Holland, D. C. (Eds.). (1996). The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lohan, M., & Faulkner, W. (2004). Masculinities and technologies: Some introductory remarks. Men and Masculinities, 6(4), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loui, M. C. (2005). Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (1996). Knowing machines: Essays on technical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwee, J. S., & Robinson, J. G. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (Edited by Deegan, M. J.) (2001). Essays in social psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Meyers, K. L., Ohland, M. W., Pawley, A. L., Siliman, S. E., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(1), 119–131.Google Scholar
Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–505). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In Turner, J. C., Hoog, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O’Connor, A. D. (1998). The cultural logic of gender in college: Heterosexism, homophobia and sexism in campus peer groups. (Order No. 9838392, University of Colorado at Boulder). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 387 pp.Google Scholar
Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Tonso, K. L. (2011). “Monsters of unnaturalness”: Making women engineers’ identities via newspapers and magazines (1930–1970), Journal of the Society of Women Engineers – 60th Anniversary Edition, 60, 60–75.Google Scholar
Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs. engineering switchers. Presentation at the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychological Quarterly, 63, 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). San Anselmo, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Talburt, S. (2000). Subject to identity: Knowledge, sexuality, and the academic practices in higher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (1996). The impact of cultural norms on women. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(3), 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (1997). Constructing engineers through practice: Gendered features of learning and identity development. (Order No. 9800565, University of Colorado at Boulder). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 456 pp.Google Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (1999). Engineering gender – gendering engineering: A cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(4), 365–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (2006a). Student engineers and engineering identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (2006b). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineering identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turns, J., Sattler, B., Eliot, M., Kilgore, D., & Mobrand, K. (2012). Preparedness portfolios and portfolio studios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 2(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., & Radcliffe, D. (2011). Engineering competence? An interpretive investigation of engineering students’ professional formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 703–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Engineering Identity
  • Edited by Aditya Johri, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Barbara M. Olds
  • Book: Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Engineering Identity
  • Edited by Aditya Johri, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Barbara M. Olds
  • Book: Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Engineering Identity
  • Edited by Aditya Johri, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Barbara M. Olds
  • Book: Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.019
Available formats
×