Conducting Interpretive Research in Engineering Education Using Qualitative and Ethnographic Methods

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.035

Chapter 28 - Conducting Interpretive Research in Engineering Education Using Qualitative and Ethnographic Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015

Aditya Johri

Edited by

Aditya Johri and

Barbara M. Olds

Show author details

Aditya Johri: Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Aditya Johri: Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Barbara M. Olds: Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter provides an overview of conducting interpretive research using qualitative and ethnographic methods. The chapter complements Chapters 27 by Case and Light and 26 by Moskal, Reed-Rhoades, and Strong in this volume, which respectively provide an overview of the different qualitative and mixed method approaches to engineering education research. The primary purpose of this chapter is to provide entry-level researchers with background information on how to conduct interpretive research. Because every researcher has his or her own “tricks of the trade,” this chap-ter necessarily presents methods and ap-proaches found useful by this author, and represents an individual perspective on interpretive research. The number of references has been limited to around fifty to avoid overwhelming the target audience; this chapter is not intended as a comprehensive review of interpretive research or of qualitative and ethnographic methods.

Interpretive Research in the Human Sciences

Social scientists currently distinguish interpretive research from other research traditions in that the researcher is taken to be a critical part of the process. The primary goal of the research is to understand participants’ meaning-making, with less emphasis on the typical flow of the scientific method followed in other research methodologies. This type of research requires an investigator to include his or her own perceptions, becoming more of a sense-maker than an objective reporter: Interpretive research is an umbrella term used to describe studies that endeavor to understand a community in terms of the actions and interaction of the participants, from their own perspectives” (Tobin, 1999, p. 487).

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , pp. 551 - 570

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.035 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Geer, B., “First Days in the Field,” in Hammond, P. (Ed.), Sociologists at Work (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1964), pp. 322–344Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1996/2006). A guide to field research. Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1988). Writing for social scientists. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you're doing it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brandt, R. M. (1972). Studying behavior in natural settings. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Eisner, E. W., & Peshkin, A. (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 352–368). London: SAGE.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Golden-Biddle, K & Locke, K. (2006). Composing qualitative research: Crafting theoretical points from qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Goodall, H. (2000). Writing the new ethnography. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Cambridge, MA: Hackett.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. NJ: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar

Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heath, S. B. (1986). Sociocultural contexts of language development. Beyond language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority students, 143–186.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar

Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2010). Designing & conducting ethnographic research: An introduction (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2006). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Martin, D., & Sommerville, I. (2004). Patterns of cooperative interaction: Linking ethnomethodology and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 11(1), 59–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.CrossRef Google Scholar

Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). Focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus group as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.CrossRef Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1998). Qualitative interviewing: The act of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 21–27.Google Scholar

Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE publications.Google Scholar

Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. L. (1972). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY and London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Perspectives on practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Tobin, K. (1999). Interpretive research in science education. In Kelly, A. E. & Lesh, R. (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 487–512). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (2000). Unobtrusive measures (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Wolcott, H. F. (1995). The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamire Press.Google Scholar

Wolcott, H. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice-told tale: Feminism, postmodernism, and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Yanow, D. (2006). Thinking interpretively. In Yanow, D. & Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 5–27). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar