Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- Index
- References
Part III - Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 255 - 370Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Wignell, P. and Lange, R. (2017). Multimodal Recontextualisations of Images in Violent Extremist Discourse. In Zhao, S., Djonov, E., Björkvall, A. and Boeriis, M. (eds.) Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge. 181–202.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., Chai, K. and Lange, R. (2018). A Multimodal Mixed Methods Approach for Examining Recontextualisation Patterns of Violent Extremist Images in Online Media Discourse, Context & Media 21: 18–35.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and Discourse – What’s the Problem? From Affect as Excess to Affective/Discursive Practice. Subjectivity 6(4): 349–68.Google Scholar
Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L. and Lange, R. (2017). A Mixed Methods Empirical Examination of Changes in Emphasis and Style in the Extremist Magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism 11(2): 2–20.Google Scholar
Further Reading
This offers an introduction to multimodality from a practice-based perspective and approaches multimodal phenomena from different theoretical perspectives and disciplinary angles.
This provides a comprehensive introduction to various theoretical approaches to multimodality from different disciplines (e.g. visual studies, anthropology, conversation analysis, sociocultural theory, etc.).
This presents an accessible introduction to multimodality that illuminates the potential of multimodal research for understanding the ways in which people communicate. Offering a wide range of examples, clear practical support and a glossary of terms, the book is an ideal reference guide for beginners in multimodal analysis.
This is an essential resource for researchers interested in multimodal communication. Drawing on an enormous range of examples including children’s drawings, textbook illustrations, photojournalism, advertising images, fine art, websites, as well as three-dimensional material artefacts such as sculpture, the book presents a comprehensive account of the ways in which images communicate meaning.
This presents a systematic toolkit of theories, concepts and techniques for carrying out critical discourse analysis of language and images. Based on a variety of case studies and examples drawn from a range of traditional and new media genres, the book is an essential resource for beginners in critical discourse analysis.
Bateman, J., Wildfeuer, J. and Hiippala, T. (2017). Multimodality Foundations, Research and Analysis: A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2014). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing Multimodality. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. ([1996]2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
References
Bateman, J. (2014). Looking for What Counts in Film Analysis: A Program of Empirical Research. In Machin, D. (ed.) Visual Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 301–30.Google Scholar
Bateman, J. and Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bateman, J., McDonald, D., Hiippala, T., Couto-Vale, D. and Costetchi, E. (2019). Systemic Functional Linguistics and Computation: New Directions, New Challenges. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. and Schönthal, D. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 561–86.Google Scholar
Bateman, J., Tseng, C. I., Seizov, O., J acobs, A., Lüdtke, A., Müller, M. G. and Herzog, O. (2016). Towards Next-Generation Visual Archives: Image, Film and Discourse. Visual Studies 31(2): 131–54.Google Scholar
Bateman, J., Wildfeuer, J. and Hiippala, T. (2017). Multimodality Foundations, Research and Analysis: A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, Codes and Control, Vol. IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bezemer, J. and Jewitt, C. (2009). Social Semiotics. In Östman, J.-O., Verschueren, J. and Versluys, E. (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics: 2009 Installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. D. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Y. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2014). Learning Human Photo Shooting Patterns from Large-Scale Community Photo Collections. Multimedia Tools and Applications 24: 11499–516.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2013). Multimodal Interaction from a Conversation Analytic Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Djonov, E. and Zhao, S. (2014). Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Djonov, E. and Zhao, S. (2017). Social Semiotics: A Theorist and a Theory in Retrospect and Prospect. In Zhao, S., Djonov, E., Björkvall, A. and Boeriis, M. (eds.) Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge. 1–18.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S., Hood, S. and Stenglin, M. (2011). Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. (2017). Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal Metaphor, Vol. 11. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behaviour. New York: Garden City.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1489–522.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, ed. by Webster, J. J.. Vol. 10. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2018). Halliday in the 21st Century: Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, ed. by Webster, J. J.. Vol. 11. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Hart, C. (2016). The Visual Basis of Linguistic Meaning and Its Implications for Critical Discourse Studies: Integrating Cognitive Linguiic and Multimodal Methods. Discourse & Society 27(3): 335–50.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2014). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing Multimodality. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, C. and Ventola, E. (2008). From Language to Multimodality: New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. ([1996]2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a Semiotic Mode: Notes for a Grammar of Colour. Visual Communication 1(3): 343–68.Google Scholar
Kress, G., Jewitt, C. L., Ogborn, J. and Tsatsarelis, C. (2014). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom, 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Machin, D. (2013). What Is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies? Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 347–55.Google Scholar
Machin, D. (2016). The Need for a Social and Affordance-Driven Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies. Discourse & Society 27(3): 322–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and Richardson, J. E. (2012). Discourses of Unity and Purpose in the Sounds of Fascist Music: A Multimodal Approach. Critical Discourse Studies 9(4): 329–45.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Toy As Discourse: Children’s War Toys and the War on Terror. Critical Discourse Studies 6(1): 51–64.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2002). Meaning beyond the Clause: SFL Perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 52–74.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2014). The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–56.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–66.Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L. (1999). Towards a Systemic Functional Analysis of Multisemiotic Mathematics Texts. Semiotica 124(1/2): 1–29.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L. (2000). Classroom Discourse in Mathematics: A Multisemiotic Analysis. Linguistics and Education 10(3): 359–88.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L. (2008). Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing Ideational Meaning Using Language and Visual Imagery. Visual Communication 7: 443–75.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B. (eds.) Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury. 120–37.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L. (2015). The Language of Learning Mathematics: A Multimodal Perspective. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour 40(Part A): 63–74.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L. and Smith, B. A. (2011). Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L., Chua, A. and Podlasov, A. (2014). The Role of Images in Social Media Analytics: A Multimodal Digital Humanities Approach. In Machin, D. (ed.), Visual Communication. Berlin: Gruyter. 565–88.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., Tan, Sabine, and E, Marissa K. L. (2014). Multimodal Pragmatics. In Schneider, K. and Barron, A. (eds.) Pragmatics of Discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 239–68.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Pham, D.-S., Bateman, J. and Vande Moere, A. (2018). A Digital Mixed Methods Research Design: Integrating Multimodal Analysis with Data Mining and Information Visualization for Big Data Analytics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 12(1): 11–30. DOI: 10.1177/1558689816651015.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S. and Wignell, P. (2016). Inter-Semiotic Translation as Resemiotization: A Multimodal Perspective. Signata [Special Issue on Translating: Signs, Texts, Practices] 7(1): 199–229.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S. and Wignell, P. (2019). SFL and Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L. and Schönthal, D. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 433–61.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Wignell, P. and Lange, R. (2017). Multimodal Recontextualisations of Images in Violent Extremist Discourse. In Zhao, S., Djonov, E., Björkvall, A. and Boeriis, M. (eds.) Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge. 181–202.Google Scholar
O’Toole, M. ([1994] 2011). The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1984). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Vol. 2: 1867–1871. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pennock-Speck, B. and Del Saz-Rubio, M. M. (2013). A Multimodal Analysis of Facework Strategies in a Corpus of Charity Ads on British Television. Journal of Pragmatics 49(1): 38–56.Google Scholar
Podlasov, A. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2014). Japanese Street Fashion for Young People: A Multimodal Digital Humanities Approach for Identifying Socio-Cultural Patterns and Trends. In Djonov, E. and Zhao, S. (eds.) Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Culture. New York: Routledge. 71–90.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de ([1916]/1983). Course in General Linguistics, trans. by Harris, R.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sindoni, M. G., Wildfeuer, J. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2017). Mapping Multimodal Performance Studies. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L. and Wignell, P. (2016). Multimodal Research: Addressing the Complexity of Multimodal Environments and the Challenges for CALL. ReCALL [Special Issue on Multimodal Environments in CALL] 28(3): 253–73.Google Scholar
Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., Chai, K. and Lange, R. (2018). A Multimodal Mixed Methods Approach for Examining Recontextualisation Patterns of Violent Extremist Images in Online Media Discourse, Context & Media 21: 18–35.Google Scholar
Tan, S., Wignell, P. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). From Book to Stage to Screen: Semiotic Transformations of Gothic Horror Genre Conventions. Social Semiotics [Special Issue: The Languages of Performing Arts: Semiosis, Communication and Meaning-Making] 26(4): 404–23.Google Scholar
Unsworth, L. (2008). Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing Social Action. Discourse and Society 6(1): 81–106.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The Representation of Social Actors. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds.) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 32–70.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a Semiotics of Typography. Information Design Journal 14(20): 139–55.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2012). The Critical Analysis of Musical Discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 9(4): 319–28.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. and Boeriis, M. (2017). Towards a Semiotics of Film Lighting. In Wildfeuer, J. and Bateman, J. A. (eds.) Film Text Analysis: New Perspectives on the Analysis of Filmic Meaning. New York/Abingdon: Routledge. 24–45.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. and Djonov, E. (2015). Notes towards a Semiotics of Kinetic Typography. Social Semiotics 25(2): 244–53.Google Scholar
Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L. and Lange, R. (2017). A Mixed Methods Empirical Examination of Changes in Emphasis and Style in the Extremist Magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism 11(2): 2–20.Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, J. (2014). Film Discourse Interpretation: Towards a New Paradigm for Multimodal Film Analysis, Vol. 9. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, J. and Bateman, J. A. (2016). Film Text Analysis: New Perspectives on the Analysis of Filmic Meaning, Vol. 50. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 3rd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Further Reading
This very useful introductory essay is partly concerned with the semiotic mediation of material qualities.
Goodwin’s magnum opus brings together his lifelong concern with gesture, materiality, language and embodiment in an argument about the cooperative character of human action.
This is an important attempt to apply the linguistic anthropological approach to the study of documents in their contexts of use.
In this classic, pioneering essay, the author explores ways of thinking about language across a range of contexts and challenges a simplistic application of Saussurean sign theory to the ethnographic study of language in context.
This is an important and influential intervention in which the author shows the utility of Peircean sign theory in a semiotic consideration of material objects.
In this short but brilliant comment on Hull’s ethnography, the author draws upon Derrida and some of the ethnographic details Hull reports on to articulate larger questions about the relationships among language, discourse and materiality.
This is a useful, recent and quite comprehensive survey of Peirce’s writings on signs.
Chumley, L. (2017). Qualia and Ontology: Language, Semiotics, and Materiality: An Introduction. Signs and Society, 5(S1): S1–S20.Google Scholar
Hull, M. (2012). Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1989). When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy. American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–67.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things. Language and Communication 23(2/3): 409–25.Google Scholar
Nakassis, C. (2013). Materiality, Materialization. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(3): 399–406.Google Scholar
References
Agha, A. (2011). Commodity Registers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(1): 22–53.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. ([1939]1971). The Nature of the Linguistic Sign. In Problems in General Linguistics, trans. by Meek, M. E.. Oxford, OH: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Chumley, L. (2017). Qualia and Ontology: Language, Semiotics, and Materiality: An Introduction. Signs and Society 5(S1): S1–S20.Google Scholar
Chumley, L. and Harkness, N. (2013). Introduction: Qualia. Anthropological Theory 13(1/2): 3–11.Google Scholar
Cody, F. (2009). Inscribing Subjects to Citizenship: Petitions, Literacy Activism, and the Performativity of Signature. Cultural Anthropology 24(3): 347–80.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F. and Enfield, N. J. (2013). Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items. PLoS ONE 8(11): e78273.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (2017). Qualia as Value and Knowledge: Histories of European Porcelain. Signs and Society 5(S1): S128–53.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975). Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, N. (2013). Songs of Seoul: An Ethnography of Voice and Voicing in Christian South Korea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hull, M. (2003). The File: Agency, Authority, and Autography in an Islamabad Bureaucracy. Language and Communication 23: 287–314.Google Scholar
Hull, M. (2012). Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1989). When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy. American Ethnologist 16(2): 248–67.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1970). Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. In Selected Writings, Vol. 2: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton. 130–47.Google Scholar
Jappy, T. (2017). Peirce’s Twenty-Eight Classes of Signs and the Philosophy of Representation. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (1997). Signs of Recognition: Powers and Hazards of Representation in an Indonesian Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things. Language and Communication 23(2/3): 409–25.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (2007). Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. (2006). A Semiotic Ontology of the Commodity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16: 76–102.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. (2017). Semiotic agency. In Enfield, N. J. and Kockelman, P. (eds.) Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, trans. by Porter, C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, B. (1997). Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1925). La Méthode Comparative En Linguistique Historique. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Nakassis, C. (2013). Materiality, Materialization. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(3): 399–406.Google Scholar
Nakassis, C. (2016). Doing Style: Youth and Mass Mediation in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parmentier, R. (1994). Signs in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1868). On the Natural Classification of Arguments. In Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (581st meeting, April 9, 1867) 7: 261–87.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1958). Values in a Universe of Chance: Selected Writings of Charles S. Peirce, ed. by Weiner, P. P.. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce, Vol. 1: Selected Philosophical Writings‚ 1867–1893. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2: Selected Philosophical Writings, 1893–1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ransdell, J. (1976). Another Interpretation of Peirce’s Semiotic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12(2): 97–110.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. ([1916]1959). Course in General Linguistics, trans. by Baskin, W.. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Savan, D. (1988). An Introduction to C.S. Peirce’s Full System of Semeiotic. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (1998). Jakobson’s Problematic Appropriation of Peirce. In Shapiro, M. (ed.) The Peirce Seminar Papers, Vol. 3: Essays in Semiotic Analysis. New York: Peter Lang. 89–123.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. and Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language Diversity and Social Action: A Third Locus of Linguistic Relativity. Current Anthropology 53: 302–33.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V.N. ([1929]1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. by Matejka, L. and Titunik, I. R.. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Further Reading
This case study of the linguistic landscape of Antwerp, Belgium explores the way in which multilingual signs chronicle the complex histories of a place.
This is an important collection about linguistic landscapes, with a focus on language and visual discourse and on spatial practices.
This classic text explores the ways in which the meaning of public texts is dependent on a rich understanding of the social and physical context in which they exist.
This is one of the earliest collections of linguistic landscape research; it gives a good overview of the scope of the field.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. B. K. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D. (eds.) (2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Computer-Mediated Communication and Linguistic Landscapes. In Holmes, J. and Hazen, K. (eds.) Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 74–90.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.Google Scholar
BBC News. (2017). London Attack: Crowds Gather for Vigil to Honour Victims. June 5. www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-40159030.Google Scholar
BBC News(2018a). Didcot Signs Point to Narnia, Gotham City and Middle Earth. March 19. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-43459598.Google Scholar
BBC News(2018b). Didcot’s Narnia and Middle Earth Sign-Changer Found. March 20. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-43470241.Google Scholar
BBC News(2018c). Didcot’s Narnia and Middle Earth Signs Removed. March 21. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-43486855.Google Scholar
Bellafante, G. (2017). The False Feminism of “Fearless Girl.” New York Times, March 16. www.nytimes.com/2017/03/16/nyregion/fearless-girl-statue-manhattan.html.Google Scholar
Blackwood, R. (2017). Introduction: Methodology in Linguistic Landscape Research. Linguistic Landscape 3(3): 221–5.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2018). Dialogues with Ethnography: Notes on Classics, and How I Read Them. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Maly, I. (2014). Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis and Social Change: A Case Study. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies. Paper 133: 1–20.Google Scholar
Bradley, J., Moore, E., Simpson, J. and Atkinson, L. (2018). Translanguaging Space and Creative Activity: Theorising Collaborative Arts-Based Learning. Language and Intercultural Communication 18(1): 54–73.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2008). All of the Above: New Coalitions in Sociocultural Linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 401–31.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2006). Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2010). Welsh Linguistic Landscapes “from Above” and “from Below.” In Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (eds.) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, London: Continuum. 77–101.Google Scholar
De Cock, B. and Pizarro Pedraza, A. (2018). From Expressing Solidarity to Mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic Functions of Hashtags Starting with #jesuis across languages. Language in Society 47(2): 197–217.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, T. (2016). Queerly Remembered: Rhetorics for Representing the GLBTQ Past. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, H. (2017). Why “Pissing Dog” Statue beside “Fearless Girl” Statue Is Misogynistic. Rolling Stone, May 31. www.rollingstone.com/culture/why-nyc-pissing-dog-statue-is-misogynistic-w484932.Google Scholar
Fugallo, N. and Jaeger, M. (2017). Pissed-Off Artist Adds Statue of Urinating Dog next to “Fearless Girl.” New York Post, May 29. http://nypost.com/2017/05/29/pissed-off-artist-adds-statue-of-urinating-dog-next-to-fearless-girl/.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2014). Small Stories Transposition and Social Media: A Micro-perspective on the Greek Crisis. Discourse & Society (Special Issue: From Grexit to Grecovery: Euro/Crisis Discourses, ed. by Wodak, R. and Angouri, J.) 25 (4): 519–39.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015a). Small Stories Research: Methods – Analysis – Outreach. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.) Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons 256–71.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015b). Life/Narrative of the Moment: From Telling a Story to Taking a Narrative Stance. In Schiff, B., McKim, A. E. and Patron, S. (eds.) Life and Narrative: The Risks and Responsibilities of Storying Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. and Goutsos, D. (2004). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Giaxoglou, K. (2018). #JeSuisCharlie? Hashtags as Narrative Resources in Contexts of Ecstatic Sharing. Discourse, Context, and Media (Special Issue on: Discourse of Social Tagging, ed. by Lee, C.) 22: 13–20.Google Scholar
Gorter, D. (ed.) (2006). Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 67–80.Google Scholar
Gorter, D. (2018). Methods and Techniques for Linguistic Landscape Research: About Definitions, Core Issues and Technological Innovations. In Pütz, M. and Mundt, N. (eds.) Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. (2018). “The Vitriol Was Really Unhealthy”: Artist Sonia Boyce on the Row over Taking Down Hylas and the Nymphs. The Guardian, March 19. www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/mar/19/hylas-nymphs-manchester-art-gallery-sonia-boyce-interview.Google Scholar
ITV News. (2017). Female Traffic Light Signals a Step Forward for Equality. March 7. www.itv.com/news/2017–03-07/female-traffic-light-signals-a-step-forward-for-equality/.Google Scholar
Jaworksi, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.) (1999). The Discourse Reader. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (eds.) (2010). Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Karlander, D. (2018). Mobile Semiosis and Mutable Metro Spaces: Train Graffiti in Stockholm’s Public Transport System. In Peck, A., Stroud, C. and Williams, Q. (eds.) Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kavada, A. (2018). Editorial: Media and the “Populist Moment.” Media, Culture & Society 40(5): 742–4.Google Scholar
Landry, R. and Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(1): 23–49.Google Scholar
Lou, J. (2016). The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Monaghan, F. (2018). Unforgetting Hillsborough: Researching Memorialisation. Poster presentation at X-Scapes Linguistic Landscape Workshop, May 2–4, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (2006). Death on Display. In Prelli, L. J. (ed.) Rhetorics of Display. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. 2014–29.Google Scholar
Morrison, K. (2015). #JeSuisCharlie Used More than 5 Million Times on Twitter. Adweek, January 12. www.adweek.com/digital/jesuischarlie-used-5-million-times-twitter/.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. L. (2018). Branding Muslimhood or Mourning the Dead? What Muslim Gravescapes Can Tell Us about the Living. Paper presented at X-Scapes Linguistic Landscape Workshop, May 2–4, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2009). Linguistic Landscapes and the Transgressive Semiotics of Graffiti. In Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D. (eds.) Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge. 302–12.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2015). Making Scents of the Landscape. Linguistic Landscape 1(3): 191–212.Google Scholar
Pütz, M. and Mundt, N. (eds.) (2018). Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multilingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (2016). Land as Infrastructure for Living. In Girot, C. and Imhof, D. (eds.) Thinking the Contemporary Landscape. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. 30–8.Google Scholar
Scarvaglieri, C., Redder, A., Pappenhagen, R. and Brehmer, B. (2013). Capturing Diversity: Linguistic Land- and Soundscaping. In Duarte, J. and Gogolin, I. (eds.) Linguistic Superdiversity in Urban Areas: Research Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 45–74.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. B. K. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. and Monaghan, F. (2017). Street Protests and the Creative Spectacle. Diggit Magazine, March 20. www.diggitmagazine.com/articles/street-protests-and-creative-spectacle.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. (2010). Discourses in Transit. In Jaworksi, A. and Thurlow, C. (eds.) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D. (eds.) (2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. and Waksman, S. (2009). Linguistic Landscape as an Ecological Arena: Modalities, Meanings, Negotiations, Education. In Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D. (eds.) Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York: Routledge. 313–31.Google Scholar
Snow, J. (2017). Grenfell Proved It: The British Media Are Part of a Disconnected Elite. The Guardian, August 23. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/23/grenfell-british-media-divide.Google Scholar
Thakker, K. (2017). Fearless Girl Takes Home 3 Top Awards at the Cannes Ad Festival. Fortune, June 20. http://fortune.com/2017/06/20/fearless-girl-cannes-awards/.Google Scholar
The Guardian. (2017). “Charging Bull” Sculptor Says New York’s “Fearless Girl” Statue Violates His Rights April 12. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/12/charging-bull-new-york-fearless-girl-statue-copyright-claim.Google Scholar
The Guardian. (2018). The Guardian View on Hylas and the Nymphs: Not Censorship. February 7. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/07/the-guardian-view-on-hylas-and-the-nymphs-not-censorship.Google Scholar
Trump, J. D. (@realDonaldTrump) “… the beauty that is being taken out of our cities, towns and parks [which] will be greatly missed and never able to be comparably replaced!” https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/898172999945392131. 17 Aug. 2017. 06:21am. Tweet.Google Scholar
Tufi, S. (2013). Shared Places, Unshared Identities: Vernacular Discourses and Spatialised Constructions of Identity in the Linguistic Landscape of Trieste. Modern Italy 18(4): 391–408.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (2017). How to Be Fearless in the Face of a Pissing Pug. Harper’s Bazaar, June 1. www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/features/a9960542/fearless-girl-pissing-pug-statue-nyc/.Google Scholar
Further Reading
This chapter offers a well-founded overview of key questions in sociolinguistics from the angle of body and embodiment. It deals with topics such as embodied indexicality, style as embodied self-presentation, embodied discourse and embodied agency.
The concept of bodily and emotionally lived experience of language is developed in detail and grounded in post-structuralist and phenomenological thinking.
This is one of Goodwin’s famous studies on how interactants make use of their bodies and display affects to achieve collaborative action. It is based on a sequence in which a father is helping his daughter do homework.
The book analyzes personal experiences of language through the voices of Mexican immigrant women in the United States, in relation to racialization discourses. The author emphasizes that the interactional dimension of emotions is a central linguistic device not only found in constructed dialogues (reported speech) but also emergent in the whole narrative structure.
This book presents a new social science understanding of affect and emotion and offers insights into approaches from psycho, neuro, bio and social sciences.
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2016). Embodied Sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173–97.Google Scholar
Busch, B. (2017). Expanding the Notion of the Linguistic Repertoire: On the Concept of Spracherleben – The Lived Experience of Language. Applied Linguistics 38(3): 340–58.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities. Discourse & Society 18(1): 53–73.Google Scholar
Relaño Pastor, A. M. (2014). Shame and Pride in Narrative: Mexican Women’s Language Experiences at the U.S.–Mexico Border. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Alim, H. S. (2016). Who’s Afraid of the Transracial Subject? Raciolinguistics and the Political Project of Transracialization. In Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R. and Ball, A. F. (eds.) Raciolinguistics: How Language Shapes Our Ideas about Race. New York: Oxford University Press. 33–50.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation). In Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. London: New Left Books. 127–88.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the Novel (1934–35). In Holquist, M. (ed.) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press. 259–422.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Emotion Talk(s): The Role of Perspective in the Construction of Emotion. In Dirven, R. and Niemeier, S. (eds.) The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 209–29.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1896/2012). Matière et mémoire. Essai sur la relation du corps à l’esprit. Paris: Editions Flammarion.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power, trans. by Raymond, G. and Adamson, M.. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2016). Embodied Sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173–97.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1934/1990). The Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Busch, B. (2010). New National Languages in Eastern Europe. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 182–200.Google Scholar
Busch, B. (2012). The Linguistic Repertoire Revisited. Applied Linguistics 33(5): 503–23.Google Scholar
Busch, B. (2016). Regaining a Place from which to Speak and to Be Heard: In Search of a Response to the “Violence of Voicelessness.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 49: 317–30.Google Scholar
Busch, B. (2017). Expanding the Notion of the Linguistic Repertoire: On the Concept of Spracherleben – The Lived Experience of Language. Applied Linguistics 38(3): 340–58.Google Scholar
Busch, B. and Spitzmüller, J. (forthcoming) Indexical borders: The sociolinguistic scales of the shibboleth. International Journal of Sociolinguistics.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual Practice as Spatial Repertoires: Expanding the Paradigm beyond Structuralist Orientations. Applied Linguistics 39(1): 31–54.Google Scholar
Charon, R. (2006). Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damásio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 43–63.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2013). Positioning Level 3: Connecting Local Identity Displays to Macro Social Processes. Narrative Inquiry 23(1): 40–61.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2013). Editorial: Positioning in Narrative Interaction. Narrative Inquiry 23(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2013). Emotions in Multiple Languages, 2nd rev. ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1970). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Barrie & Rocklif.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The Stance Triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 139–82.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. and Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction. Text & Talk 32(4): 433–51.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1992). Language and Bodies in Social Space: Samoan Ceremonial Greetings. American Anthropologist 94(3): 657–91.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self: Lectures at Vermont University in October 1982. In Technologies of the Self, ed. by Martin, L. H. et al. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. 16–49.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2011). Body Memory and the Unconscious. In Lohmar, D. and Brudzinska, D. J. (eds.) Founding Psychoanalysis: Phenomenological Theory of Subjectivity and the Psychoanalytical Experience. Berlin: Springer. 86–103.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–522.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities. Discourse & Society 18(1): 53–73.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and Understanding. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 229–52.Google Scholar
Heavey, E. (2015). Narrative Bodies, Embodied Narratives. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.) Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 429–46.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. ([1929]1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance. In Jaffe, A. (ed.) Stance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3–28.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and Poetics. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) Style in Language. New York: Wiley. 350–77.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R. and Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond Languages, Beyond Modalities: Transforming the Study of Semiotic Repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism 14(3): 219–32.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, U. and Polzin, C. (2015). Research on the Relationship between Language and Emotion. In Lüdtke, U. (ed.) Emotion in Language: Theory – Research – Application. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211–40.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception, trans. by Smith, C.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Milani, T. M. (2017). Queering Critique: Discourse, Body, Affect. In Handler, P., Kaindl, K. and Wochele, H. (eds.) Ceci n’est pas une festschrift. Texte zur Angewandten und Romanistischen Sprachwissenschaft für Martin Stegu. Berlin: Logos. 245–58.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–66.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, H. (2010). Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001). Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and Semiotic Assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism 14(3): 269–82.Google Scholar
Pépin, N. (2008). Introduction to the Special Issue: Studies on Emotions in Social Interaction. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée 88: 1–18.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2006). Das hybride Subjekt. Eine Theorie der Subjektkulturen von der bürgerlichen Moderne zur Postmoderne. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Relaño Pastor, A. M. (2014). Shame and Pride in Narrative: Mexican Women’s Language Experiences at the U.S.–Mexico Border. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, W. S. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2015). Language and Emotion. The Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. In Lüdtke, U. (ed.) Emotion in Language: Theory – Research – Application. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 157–73.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (2015). The Developmental Psychology and Neuropsychology of Emotion in Language. In Lüdtke, U. (ed.) Emotion in Language: Theory – Research – Application. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–26.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. (1929/1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. ([1934]1994). §14. The Problem of the Environment (1934). In van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J. (eds.) The Vygotsky Reader. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 338–54.Google Scholar
Wellgraf, S. (2018). Schule der Gefühle. Zur emotionalen Erfahrung von Minderwertigkeit in neoliberalen Zeiten. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and Discourse – What’s the Problem? From Affect as Excess to Affective/Discursive Practice. Subjectivity 6(4): 349–68.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1995). Emotion and Facial Expression: A Semantic Perspective. Culture and Psychology 1: 227–58.Google Scholar
Further Reading
This article offers a reframing of “competence” by examining how multilingual STEM scholars engage in their work through linguistic, embodied and material resources. Building on conceptual insights from new materialism and Actor-Network theory, it explores some of the methodological implications of posthumanist thinking for discourse analysts.
In dialogue with emerging posthumanist multispecies studies, this ethnography investigates the semiotic entanglements of Ecuadorian Quichua-speaking Runa with the plants, animals and ecosystems they interact with in the Amazon. In challenging anthropocentric thinking about language, discourse and representation, the book offers an innovative understanding of semiosis as not only human but an emergent property of all living beings or “selves.”
This book offers an in-depth introduction to Actor-Network theory from one of the key figures in its development. Divided into two parts, it first provides an overview of the theoretical influences motivating ANT’s call for a shift from a “sociology of the social” to a “sociology of associations.” The second part guides readers through the methodological principles underpinning ANT.
This book introduces posthumanism to the field of applied linguistics by arguing against the popular conception that language is the key to human exceptionalism. Pennycook dismantles this logic by drawing attention to the embodied, material and distributed nature of language.
This book offers an introduction to nexus analysis and remains a cutting-edge example of a posthumanist orientation to ethnographic discourse analysis. The method is illustrated through an investigation of how early internet communication mediated Alaska Natives’ access to various institutional assemblages in the 1980s. The appendix of the book further summarizes the key principles of nexus analysis in a highly useful “field guide” for examining posthumanist actor-networks and assemblages.
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Materializing “Competence”: Perspectives from International STEM Scholars. Modern Language Journal 102(2): 268–91.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
References
Alexander, R. and Stibbe, A. (2014). From the Analysis of Ecological Discourse to the Ecological Analysis of Discourse. Language Sciences 41: 104–10.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (2015). Mediants, Materiality, Normativity. Public Culture 27(276): 221–37.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs 28(3): 801–31.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to a New Materialism. In Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds.) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla, Y. and Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital Protest, Hashtag Ethnography, and the Racial Politics of Social Media in the United States. American Ethnologist 42(1): 4–17.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2016). Embodied Sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173–97.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociological Review 32: 196–233.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2018). Materializing “Competence”: Perspectives from International STEM Scholars. Modern Language Journal 102(2): 1–24.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, D. and Frost, S. (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis/St Paul: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. ([1966] 1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. by Smith, A. M. S.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2015). Discourse, Small d, Big D. In Tracy, K., Ilie, C. and Sandel, T. L. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 418–22.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–522.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. and Ikeda, M. (2019). The Materialization of Language in Tourism Networks. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0100Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (eds.) (2010). Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2009). Dancing, Skating, and Sex: Action and Text in the Digital Age. Journal of Applied Linguistics 6(3): 283–302.Google Scholar
Kell, C. (2015). “Making People Happen”: Materiality and Movement in Meaning-Making Trajectories. Social Semiotics 25(4): 423–45.Google Scholar
Kirksey, S. E. and Helmreich, S. (2010). The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25(4): 545–76.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2007). How Dogs Dream: Amazonian Natures and the Politics of Transspecies Engagement. American Ethnologist 34(1): 3–24.Google Scholar
Lamb, G. (2019). Towards a Green Applied Linguistics in the Anthropocene: Human–Sea Turtle Semiotic Assemblages in Hawai’i. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz046Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1990). Technology Is Society Made Durable. Sociological Review 38 (supplement): 103–31.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993/2012). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. and Mol, A. (2008). The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001. In Knappett, C. and Malafouris, L. (eds.) Material Agency. Dusseldorf: Springer. 57–77.Google Scholar
Lou, J. (2016). The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2018). The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops. Discourse Studies 20(6): 743–69.Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2012). Teaching Touch/Response-Feel: A First Step to an Analysis of Touch from an (Inter)active Perspective. In Norris, S. (ed.) Multimodality in Practice: Investigating Theory-in-Practice-through-Methodology. New York: Routledge. 7–19.Google Scholar
Norris, S. and Jones, R. (2005). Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 39(4): 445–61.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2015). Metrolingualism: Language in the City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2015). Multilingual Dynamics in Sámiland: Rhizomatic Discourses on Changing Language. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(2): 206–25.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, V. (2006). Of Texts AND Translations AND Rhizomes: Postcolonial Anxieties AND Deracinations AND Knowledge Constructions. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 3(4): 223–44.Google Scholar
Ren, C. (2011). Non-human Agency, Radical Ontology and Tourism Realities. Annals of Tourism Research 38(3): 858–81.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (2008). Discourse Itineraries: Nine Processes of Resemiotization. In Bhatia, V., Flowerdew, J. and Jones, R. (eds.) Advances in Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. 233–44.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shiri, S. (2015). Co-constructing Dissent in the Transient Linguistic Landscape: Multilingual Protest Signs of the Tunisian Revolution. In Rubdy, R. and Said, S. B. (eds.) Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape: Language and Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 239–59.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2016). Queering Critical Discourse Studies or/and Performing “Post-Class” Ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies 13(5): 485–514.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. and Jaworski, A. (2014). “Two Hundred Ninety-Four”: Remediation and Multimodal Performance in Tourist Placemaking. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(4): 459–94.Google Scholar
Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography in and for a More-than-Human World. Cultural Geographies 13(4): 600–9.Google Scholar
Zhu, Hua, Li, Wei, and Lyons, A. (2017). Polish Shop(ping) as Translanguaging Space. Social Semiotics 27(4): 411–33.Google Scholar