Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:06:06.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - User Design through Self-Customization

from Part I - Individual Consumer Decision Making and Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Claudia Townsend ,
Ulrike Kaiser  and
Martin Schreier
Edited by
Michael I. Norton ,
Derek D. Rucker  and
Cait Lamberton
Michael I. Norton
Affiliation:
Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Derek D. Rucker
Affiliation:
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
Cait Lamberton
Affiliation:
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology , pp. 233 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaker, D. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalising on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bayus, B. L (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell idea storm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
Belk, R. W., Bahn, K. D., & Mayer, R. N. (1982). Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 4–17.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961–981.Google Scholar
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.Google Scholar
Buechel, E. C., & Janiszewski, C. (2014). A lot of work or a work of art: How the structure of a customized assembly task determines the utility derived from assembly effort. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 960–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. W., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2006). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
Coupey, E., Irwin, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, C. P. (2007). Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 357–369.Google Scholar
Dalgic, T. (2006). Handbook of Niche Marketing: Principles and Practice. New York: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Dalgic, T., & Leeuw, M. (1994). Niche marketing revisited: Concept, applications and some European cases. European Journal of Marketing, 28(4), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delleart, B. G. C., & Stremersch, S. (2005). Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 146–160.Google Scholar
Diehl, K., & Poynor, C. (2010). Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, K. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 894–912.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & Hader, C. (2013). Mass or only niche customization? Why we should interpret configuration toolkits as learning instruments. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 1–21.Google Scholar
Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Klausberger, K. (2013). “Does this sound like a fair deal?” Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual's decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization Science, 24(5), 1495–1516.Google Scholar
Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Schreier, M. (2008). Complementing mass customization toolkits with user communities: How peer input improves customer self-design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(6), 546–559.Google Scholar
Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Steger, C. J. (2009). Testing the value of customization: When do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 103–121.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(6), 401–415.Google Scholar
Franke, N., Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2013). Integrating problem solvers from analogous markets in new product ideation. Management Science, 60(4), 1063–1081.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & Schreier, M. (2008). Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters, 19(2), 93–107.Google Scholar
Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010). The “i designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Management Science, 56(1), 125–140.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., & Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 65–79.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E. Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 75–91.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D., & Wilson, T. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In Forgas, J. (ed.), Thinking and Feeling: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition (pp. 178–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J. II (1996). The four faces of mass customization. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 91–101.Google Scholar
Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, A, Heitmann, M., Morgan, R. Henneberg, S. C., & Landwehr, J. (2009). Consumer decision making and variety of offerings: The effect of attribute alignability. Psychology & Marketing, 26(4), 333–358.Google Scholar
Heitmann, M., Herrmann, A., & Kaiser, C. (2007). The effect of product variety on purchase probability. Review of Managerial Science, 1(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., and Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer co-creation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 670(3), 247–257.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 491–513.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a food thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033.Google Scholar
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 259–266.Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 373–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2013). Principles of Marketing, 15th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Gregg, A. P., & Park, S. H. (2013). The person in the purchase: Narcissistic consumers prefer products that positively distinguish them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., & Gaeth, G. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P., (2006). The Construction of Preference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1060.Google Scholar
Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1999). Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 143–159.Google Scholar
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861–1883.Google Scholar
Miceli, G. N., Raimondo, M. A., & Farace, S. (2013). Customer attitude and dispositions towards customized products: The interaction between customization model and brand. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 209–225.Google Scholar
Mochon, D., Norton, M., & Ariely, D. (2012). Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 363–369.Google Scholar
Moreau, C. P, Bonney, L., & Herd, K. B. (2011). It's the thought (and the effort) that counts: How customizing for others differs from customizing for oneself. Journal of Marketing, 75(5), 120–133.Google Scholar
Moreau, C. P., & Herd, K. (2010). To each his own? How comparisons with others influence consumers’ evaluations of their self-designed products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 806–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson-Field, K., & Riebe, E. (2011). The impact of media fragmentation on audience targeting: An empirical generalization approach. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(1), 51–67.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D., (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.Google Scholar
Nishikawa, H., Schreier, M., & Ogawa, S. (2013). User-generated versus designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(2), 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, M., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460.Google Scholar
Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 64(3), 347–356.Google Scholar
Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 65–71.Google Scholar
O'Hern, M. S., & Kahle, L. R. (2013). The empowered customer: User-generated content and the future of marketing. Global Economics and Management Review, 18(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
O'Hern, M. S., & Rindfleisch, A. (2010). Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda. Review of Marketing Research, 6, 84–106.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, F. T., Ihl, C., & Vossen, A. (2010). A typology of customer co-creation in the innovation. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1732127.Google Scholar
Piller, F., Moeslein, K., & Stotko, C. M. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Production Planning & Control, 15(4), 435–444.Google Scholar
Pine, J. B. II (1993). Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.Google Scholar
Prelec, D., Wernerfelt, B., & Zettelmeyer, F. (1997). The role of inference in context effects: Inferring what you want from what is available. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, T., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2007). Research note: User design of customized products. Marketing Science, 26(2), 268–280.Google Scholar
Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 246–257.Google Scholar
Reed, A. II, Forehand, M., Puntoni, S., & Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 310–321.Google Scholar
Salvador, F., Piller, F. T., & de Holan, P. M. (2009). Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(3), 71–77.Google Scholar
Schreier, M. (2006). The value increment of mass-customized products: An empirical assessment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(4), 317–327.Google Scholar
Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). The innovation effect of user design: Exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 18–32.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. I. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 105–119.Google Scholar
Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing; 69(1), 32–45.Google Scholar
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M., (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Research Papers 1610. Stanford University: Graduate School of Business.Google Scholar
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behaviour: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004) (original 1999). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Syam, N., Krishnamurthy, P., & Hess, J. D. (2008). That's what I thought I wanted? Miswanting and regret for a standard good in a mass customized world. Marketing Science, 27(3), 379–397.Google Scholar
Tevfik, D., & Leeuw, M. (1994). Niche marketing revisited: Concept, applications and some European cases. European Journal of Marketing, 28(4), 39–55.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. V, & Malaviya, P. (2013). Consumer-generated ads: Does awareness of advertising co-creation help or hurt persuasion? Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 33–47.Google Scholar
Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66.Google Scholar
Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. (2014). The visual preference heuristic: The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993–1015.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A., Dhar, R., & Zettelmeyer, F. (2009). Contingent response to self-customization procedures: Implications for decision satisfaction and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 754–763.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–806.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E., De Jong, J. P. J., & Flowers, S. (2012). Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: Findings from a representative study in the United Kingdom Management Science, 58(9), 1669–1681.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821–833.Google Scholar
Wedell, D., & Bockeholt, U. (1990). Moderation of preference reversals in the long run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 429–438.Google Scholar
Wilcox, K., & Song, S. (2011). Discrepant fluency in self-customization. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×