Abeler, J., & Jäger, S. (in press). Complex tax incentives. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.Google Scholar

Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490.Google Scholar

Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993). Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 527–545.Google Scholar

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3), 323–338.Google Scholar

Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 54–77.Google Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21–38.Google Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1999). Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. Kyklos, 52(2), 141–171.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. M., & McCaffery, E. J. (2003). Are there sex differences in fiscal political preferences? Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. T., Fong, N. M., Simester, D. I., & Tucker, C. E. (2010). How sales taxes affect customer and firm behavior: The role of search on the Internet. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 229–239.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1993). An experimental test of the public-goods crowding-out hypothesis. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1317–1327.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–860.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5), 334–343.Google Scholar

Azagba, S., & Sharaf, M. (2011). Cigarette taxes and smoking participation: Evidence from recent tax increases in Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5), 1583–1600.Google Scholar

Baird, J. E., Zelin, I. I., Robert, C., & Brennan, P. J. (2011). Academic major, gender, personal values, and reactions to an ethical dilemma. Journal of Business Case Studies, 2(2), 73–82.Google Scholar

Baugh, B., Ben-David, I., & Park, H. (2014). The “Amazon Tax”: Empirical evidence from Amazon and main street retailers. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Bazart, C., & Bonein, A. (2014). Reciprocal relationships in tax compliance decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(C), 83–102.Google Scholar

Becchetti, L., Degli Antoni, G., Ottone, S., & Solferino, N. (2013). Allocation criteria under task performance: The gendered preference for protection. Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 96–111.Google Scholar

Bergstrom, T. C., Blume, L. E., Varian, H. R. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), 25–49.Google Scholar

Bernheim, B. D. (2002). Taxation and saving. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1173–1249.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, A., Dana, J., & Baron, J. (under review). Can profit be good? Neglect of incentives and anti-profit beliefs.Google Scholar

Bø, E. E., Slemrod, J., & Thoresen, T. O. (2015). Taxes on the Internet: Deterrence effects of public disclosure. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 36–62.Google Scholar

Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38.Google Scholar

Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 649–658.Google Scholar

Bovenberg, A. L., & Goulder, L. H. (1996). Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General-equilibrium analyses. American Economic Review, 86(4), 985–1000.Google Scholar

Bracha, A., & Cooper, D. (2014). Asymmetric responses to income changes: The payroll tax increase versus tax refund in 2013. Economics Letters, 124(3), 534–538.Google Scholar

Brannlund, R., & Persson, L. (2012). To tax, or not to tax: Preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate Policy, 12(6), 704–721.Google Scholar

Brooks, N., & Doob, A. N. (1990). Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In Friedland, M.L. (ed.), Securing Compliance: Seven Case Studies (pp. 120–164). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Brownell, K. D., Farley, T., Willett, W. C., Popkin, B. M., Chaloupka, F. J., Thompson, J. W., & Ludwig, D. S. (2009). The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(16), 1599–1605.Google Scholar

Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.Google Scholar

Cabral, M., & Hoxby, C. (2012). The hated property tax: Salience, tax rates, and tax tevolts. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Chaloupka, F. J., & Pacula, R. L. (1999). Sex and race differences in young people’s responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies. Tobacco Control, 8(4), 373–377.Google Scholar

Chaloupka, F. J., Straif, K., & Leon, M. E. (2011). Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 20, 235–238.Google Scholar

Chamley, C. (1986). Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with infinite lives. Econometrica, 80(3), 607–622.Google Scholar

Chan, K. S., Godby, R., Mestelman, S., & Muller, R. A. (2002). Crowding-out voluntary contributions to public goods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(3), 305–317.Google Scholar

Chang, C., & Hitchon, J. C. B. (2004). When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates’ political advertisements. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 197–208.Google Scholar

Chang, O. H., Nichols, D. R., & Schultz, J. J. (1987). Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 299–309.Google Scholar

Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–1177.Google Scholar

Chow, R. M., & Galak, J. (2012). The effect of inequality frames on support for redistributive tax policies. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1467–1469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chung, J., & Trivedi, V. U. (2003). The effect of friendly persuasion and gender on tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 133–145.Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., Rusconi, E., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). Tax evasion and emotions: An empirical test of re-integrative shaming theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(C), 49–61.Google Scholar

Crockett, D., & Wallendorf, M. (2004). The role of normative political ideology in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 511–528.Google Scholar

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.Google Scholar

Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Lewis, A. (2006). Tax framing, instrumentality and individual differences: Are there two different cultures? Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 304–320.Google Scholar

Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Savoia, A. (2012). Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 159–168.Google Scholar

DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3–29.Google Scholar

DeCicca, P., Kenkel, D., & Liu, F. (2013). Excise tax avoidance: The case of state cigarette taxes. Journal of Health Economics, 32(6), 1130–1141.Google Scholar

De Juan, A., Lasheras, M. A., & Mayo, R. (1994). Voluntary tax compliant behavior of Spanish income tax payers. Public Finance, 49, 90–105.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971a). Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency. American Economic Review, 61(1), 8–27.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971b). Optimal taxation and public production II: Tax rules. American Economic Review, 61(3), 261–278.Google Scholar

Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1998). Ideology, tactics, and efficiency in redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 497–529.Google Scholar

Djanali, I., & Sheehan-Connor, D. (2012). Tax affinity hypothesis: Do we really hate paying taxes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 758–775.Google Scholar

Dyreng, S., Hoopes, J. L., & Wilde, J. H. (2014). Public pressure and corporate tax behavior. Working Paper, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Johnston, R. M. (2005). An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1543–1560.Google Scholar

Einav, L., Knoepfle, D., Levin, J., & Sundaresan, N. (2014). Sales taxes and Internet commerce. American Economic Review, 104(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Epstein, L. H., Dearing, K. K., Roba, L. G., & Finkelstein, E. (2010). The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study. Psychological Science, 21(3), 406–414.Google Scholar

Eriksen, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402.Google Scholar

Farrelly, M. C., Bray, J. W., Pechacek, T., & Woollery, T. (2001). Response by adults to increases in cigarette prices by sociodemographic characteristics. Southern Economic Journal, 68(1), 156–165.Google Scholar

Feenberg, D. R., & Poterba, J. M. (1991). Which households own municipal bonds? Evidence from tax returns. National Tax Journal, 44(4), 93–103.Google Scholar

Filippin, A., & Crosetto, P. (2014). A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Working Paper, University of Milan.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, A. (2009). EZ-Tax: Tax salience and tax rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 969–1010.Google Scholar

Goldin, J. (2012). Sales tax not included: Designing commodity taxes for inattentive consumers. Yale Law Journal, 122(1), 258–301.Google Scholar

Goldin, J. (2014). Optimal tax salience. Unpublished Manuscript, Yale Law School and Princeton University.Google Scholar

Goldin, J., & Homonoff, T. (2013). Smoke gets in your eyes: Cigarette tax salience and regressivity. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(1), 302–336.Google Scholar

Goldin, J., & Listokin, Y. (2014). Tax expenditure salience. American Law and Economics Review, 16(1), 144–176.Google Scholar

Goolsbee, A. (2000). In a world without borders: The impact of taxes on Internet commerce. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 561–576.Google Scholar

Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J. Jr. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24(3), 837–861.Google Scholar

Greenberg, S. B., & Greenberg, A. (2013). Public interests project frequency questionnaire, October 21–26, 2003. Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research.Google Scholar

Gronberg, T. J., Luccasen, R. A. III, Turocy, T. L., & Van Huyck, J. B. (2012). Are tax-financed contributions to a public good completely crowded-out? Experimental evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7), 596–603.Google Scholar

Gruber, J. H., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), 1–45.Google Scholar

Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625.Google Scholar

Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21(1), 86–92.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J., & Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 517–533.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, D. J., Kaplan, S. E., & Fuller, L. R. (1994). Characteristics of New Zealand tax evaders: A note. Accounting & Finance, 34(2), 79–93.Google Scholar

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [HMRC] (2012). Budget 2012. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk.Google Scholar

Hersch, J. (2000). Gender, income levels, and the demand for cigarettes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 21(2–3), 263–282.Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 37(3), 297–307.Google Scholar

Hill, C. A. (2010). What cognitive psychologists should find interesting about tax. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(2), 180–185.Google Scholar

Hines, J. R. (2007). Taxing consumption and other sins. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 49–68.Google Scholar

Homonoff, T. A. (2013). Can small incentives have large effects? The impact of taxes versus bonuses on disposable bag use. Working Paper, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Hu, Y. J., & Tang, Z. (2014). The impact of sales tax on internet and catalog sales: Evidence from a natural experiment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 32, 84–90.Google Scholar

Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147.Google Scholar

Internal Revenue Service [IRS] (2012). Tax gap for tax year 2006 overview. Retrieved from www.irs.gov/pub/newsroom/overview_tax_gap_2006.pdf.Google Scholar

Jackson, B. R., & Milliron, V. C. (1986). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125–166.Google Scholar

Jha, P., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2000). The economics of global tobacco control. British Medical Journal, 321, 358–361.Google Scholar

Jung, Y. H., Snow, A., & Trandel, G. A. (1994). Tax evasion and the size of the underground economy. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 391–402.Google Scholar

Kahn, K. F. (1993). Gender differences in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for US Senate. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 481–502.Google Scholar

Kesselman, J. R. (1989). Income tax evasion: An inter-sectoral analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 38, 137–182.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (eds.). (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kasper, M., Kogler, C., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax policy and the news: An empirical analysis of taxpayers’ perceptions of tax-related media coverage and its impact on tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 54, 58–63.Google Scholar

Kastlunger, B., Dressler, S. G., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., & Voracek, M. (2010). Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D). Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 542–552.Google Scholar

Katz, M. A. (2011). The politics of purchasing: Ethical consumerism, civic engagement, and political participation in the United States. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535–553.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Kastlunger, B., & Wahl, I. (2010). Why pay taxes? A review of tax compliance decisions. In Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B. (eds.), Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance (pp.15–32). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In Denmark, F. L. & Paludi, M. A. (eds.), Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories, 2nd ed. (pp. 205–236). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. (2013). A spoonful of choice: How allocation increases satisfaction with tax payments. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(2), 223–238.Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. P., De Neve, J., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Eliciting taxpayer preferences increases tax compliance. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(2), 77–92.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, Nature, and Nurture, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Manuszak, M. D., & Moul, C. C. (2009). How far for a buck? Tax differences and the location of retail gasoline activity in Southeast Chicagoland. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 744–765.Google Scholar

Manzoor, S. H., & Straub, J. D. (2005). The robustness of Kingma’s crowd-out estimate: Evidence from new data on contributions to public radio. Public Choice, 123(3–4), 463–476.Google Scholar

Markowitz, S., & Grossman, M. (2000). The effects of beer taxes on physical child abuse. Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), 271–282.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J. (1994). The uneasy case for wealth transfer taxation. Yale Law Journal, 104(2), 283–365.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 679–705.Google Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., & Slemrod, J. (2006). Toward an agenda for behavioral public finance. In McCaffery, E. J. & Slemrod, J. (eds.), Behavioral Public Finance (pp. 3–31). New York: Sage.Google Scholar

McGowan, J. R. (2000). The effect of political affiliation on taxpayers’ attitudes toward alternative tax systems. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22(1), 111–128.Google Scholar

Mettler, S. (2011). The Submerged State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Miles, M. R. (2014). Process over outcome: How perceptions of procedural fairness influence conservative support for redistributive taxes. Social Science Journal, 51(4), 615–626.Google Scholar

Newman, B. J., & Bartels, B. L. (2011). Politics at the checkout line: Explaining political consumerism in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 803–817.Google Scholar

Nonnemaker, J. M., & Farrelly, M. C. (2011). Smoking initiation among youth: The role of cigarette excise taxes and prices by race/ethnicity and gender. Journal of Health Economics, 30(3), 560–567.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a model of sin taxes. American Economic Review, 93(2), 186–191.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2006). Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 90(10), 1825–1849.Google Scholar

OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2013). What drives tax morale? Retrieved from www.oecd.org/ctp/tax-global/TaxMorale_march13.pdf.Google Scholar

Olivola, C. Y., Kim, Y., Merzel, A., Kareev, Y., Avrahami, J., & Ritov, I. (2014). Diffusion of responsibility across cultures and contexts: The impact of individual, cultural, and contextual factors on responses to the Volunteer’s Dilemma Game. Unpublished Manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Olivola, C. Y., & Sussman, A. B. (2014). Many behavioral tendencies associated with right-leaning (conservative) political ideologies are malleable and unrelated to negativity. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 37(3), 323–324.Google Scholar

Orviska, M., & Hudson, J. (2002). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83–102.Google Scholar

Parker, S. C. (2003). Does tax evasion affect occupational choice? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 379–394.Google Scholar

Payne, A. A. (1998). Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 323–345.Google Scholar

Pestieau, P., & Possen, U. M. (1991). Tax evasion and occupational choice. Journal of Public Economics, 45, 107–125.Google Scholar

Pestieau, P., & Possen, U. M. (1992). How do taxes affect occupational choice? Public Finance, 47, 108–119.Google Scholar

Pickhardt, M., & Prinz, A. (2014). Behavioral dynamics of tax evasion – A survey. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 1–19.Google Scholar

Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 551–584.Google Scholar

Porcano, T. M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 47–67.Google Scholar

Poterba, J. M. (2002). Taxation, risk-taking, and household portfolio behavior. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1109–1171.Google Scholar

Prinz, A., Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2014). The slippery slope framework on tax compliance: An attempt to formalization. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 20–34.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal, 37(145), 47–61.Google Scholar

Reckers, P. M., Sanders, D. L., & Roark, S. J. (1994). The influence of ethical attitudes on taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal, 47(4), 825–836.Google Scholar

Reimers, S. (2009). A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 461–466.Google Scholar

Rivers, N., & Schaufele, B. (2014). Salience of carbon taxes in the gasoline market. Working Paper, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Roos, J. M. T., & Shachar, R. (2014). When Kerry met Sally: Politics and perceptions in the demand for movies. Management Science, 60(7), 1617–1631.Google Scholar

Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. R. (2014). Discriminatory taxes are unpopular—even when they are efficient and distributionally fair. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 463–476.Google Scholar

Schepanski, A., & Shearer, T. (1995). A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 174–186.Google Scholar

Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: A new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal, 12(4), 340–345.Google Scholar

Scholz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Adaptive political attitudes: Duty, trust, and fear as monitors of tax policy. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 903–920.Google Scholar

Schwartz, R., & Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34, 282–300.Google Scholar

Scott, W. J., & Grasmick, H. G. (1981). Deterrence and income tax cheating: Testing interaction hypotheses in utilitarian theories. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(3), 395–408.Google Scholar

Shah, A. M., Bettman, J. R., Ubel, P. A., Keller, P. A., & Britton, J. E. (2014). Surcharges plus unhealthy labels reduce demand for unhealthy menu items. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 773–789.Google Scholar

Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(38), 15197–15200.Google Scholar

Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 25–48.Google Scholar

Soliman, A., Jones, P., & Cullis, J. (2014). Learning in experiments: Dynamic interaction of policy variables designed to deter tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 175–186.Google Scholar

Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. (1995). Masculinity and femininity: Defining the undefinable. In Kalbfleisch, P. J. & Cody, M. J. (eds.), Gender, Power, and Communication in Human Relationships (pp. 105–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W. (1986). Civilization at a discount: The problem of tax evasion. National Tax Journal, 39(1), 13–20.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W., & Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Understanding tax evasion. Public Finance, 31, 295–305.Google Scholar

Stehr, M. (2007). The effect of cigarette taxes on smoking among men and women. Health Economics, 16(12), 1333–1343.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. (1991). Does government spending crowd out donations? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 591–612.Google Scholar

Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26.Google Scholar

Sussman, A. B., & Olivola, C. Y. (2011). Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, S91–S101.Google Scholar

Tan, F., & Yim, A. (2014). Can strategic uncertainty help deter tax evasion? An experiment on auditing rules. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(C), 161–174.Google Scholar

Torgler, B. (2003). To evade taxes or not to evade: That is the question. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(3), 283–302.Google Scholar

Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Torgler, B., & Valev, N. T. (2010). Gender and public attitudes toward corruption and tax evasion. Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(4), 554–568.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.Google Scholar

Verboon, P., & Van Dijke, M. (2007). A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 704–727.Google Scholar

Vesterlund, L., Babcock, L., & Weingart, L. (2014). Breaking the glass ceiling with “no”: Gender differences in declining requests for non-promotable tasks. Unpublished Manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Wagenaar, A. C., Salois, M. J., & Komro, K. A. (2009). Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: A meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction, 104(2), 179–190.Google Scholar

Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: An empirical analysis of the “Slippery Slope Framework.” Law & Policy, 32(4), 383–406.Google Scholar

Wahlund, R. (1992). Tax changes and economic behavior: The case of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 657–677.Google Scholar

Wallschutzky, I. G. (1984). Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5, 371–384.Google Scholar

Warr, P. G. (1982). Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics, 19, 131–138.Google Scholar

Watson, H. (1985). Tax evasion and labor markets. Journal of Public Economics, 27, 231–246.Google Scholar

Webley, P., Cole, M., & Eidjar, O.-P. (2001). The prediction of self-reported and hypothetical tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 141–155.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2004). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213–228.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2005). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(6), 862–883.Google Scholar

Whillans, A. V., Wispinski, N. J., & Dunn, E. W. (under review). Seeing wealth as a responsibility improves attitudes toward taxation.Google Scholar

Winter, N. J. (2010). Masculine Republicans and feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618.Google Scholar