Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Frontispiece
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Values
- Part II Modalities
- Part III Institutions
- Part III. A The State
- Part III. B The Executive
- Part III. C The Democratic System
- Part III D The Legal System
- Part III E The Global System
- Part IV Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Part III. B - The Executive
from Part III - Institutions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2025
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Frontispiece
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Values
- Part II Modalities
- Part III Institutions
- Part III. A The State
- Part III. B The Executive
- Part III. C The Democratic System
- Part III D The Legal System
- Part III E The Global System
- Part IV Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory , pp. 639 - 719Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Recommended Reading
Ackerman, B. (2000). The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113 (3), 633–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J. A. (2006). Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constitutional Reform Committee (1992[1848]). Report on the 1848 Draft Constitution of Switzerland. In Lijphart, Arend ed., Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–174.Google Scholar
Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types and Democratic Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2008 [1787/88]). The Federalist Papers. Edited by L. Goldman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khaitan, T. (2021). Balancing Accountability and Effectiveness: A Case for Moderated Parliamentarism. Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law, 7 (1) 81–155.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., ed. (1992). Parliamentary versus Presidential Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J., & Valenzuela, A., eds. (1994). The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, D., & Shugart, M. (2010). Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers – How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, M., & Carey, J. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strøm, K., Müller, W., & Bergman, T., eds. (2003). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2009), Presidents with Prime Ministers. Do Direct Elections Matter? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Blackstone, W. (1979). Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. I. Edited by Katz, S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: VersoGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (2013). The Law of the Constitution. Edited by Allison, J. W. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fatovic, C. (2009). Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2017). The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, H. (1989). Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power, New York: Free Press; London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meinecke, F. (1957). Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’État and Its Place in Modern History. Translated by D. Scott. Introduction by W. Stark. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Naudé, G. (2020). Political Considerations upon Refin’d Politicks, and the Master-Strokes of State. Translated by W. King. Edited by Watson, K.. Independently published.Google Scholar
Plato, (1992). Statesman. Translated by J. B. Skemp. Edited by Ostwald, M.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Poole, T. (2015). Reason of State: Law, Prerogative and Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by G Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Emerson, B. (2019). The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, D. R. (2014). Tocqueville’s Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1914–1940, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, E. (2001). Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 114(8), 2245–2385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. Z. (2010). Race, Sex, and Rulemaking: Administrative Constitutionalism and the Workplace, 1960 to the Present. Virginia Law Review, 96(4), 799–886.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2012). Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law, New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Michaels, J. D. (2018). Constitutional Coup: Privatization’s Threat to the American Republic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rahman, K. S. (2016). Democracy Against Domination, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2021). Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (1994). Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, S., Dearborn, J. A., & King, D. (2021). Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recommended Reading
Broeksteeg, H., Verhey, L., & Van den Driessche, I., eds. (2008). Political Accountability in Europe: Which Way Forward? Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. & Moss, D. A. eds. (2014). Preventing Regulatory Capture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eifert, M. (2014). Conceptualizing Administrative Law–Legal Protection Versus Regulatory Approach. In Pünder, H. and Waldhoff, C., eds., Debates in German Public Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 203–218.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. (2002). Accountability in the European Union. In Alston, P. and de Witte, B., eds., Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, E. (2001). Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 114 (8), 2245–2319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. (2018). Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. (1987). Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3 (2), 243–277.Google Scholar
Nicholas, B. (1970). Loi, Règlement and Judicial Review in the Fifth Republic. Public Law, 1970, 251–276.Google Scholar
Reitz, J. C. (2006). Political Economy and Separation of Powers. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 15 (2), 579–625.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (2021). Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France, New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Egidy, S. & Fowkes, J. (2015). Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany, and the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P., & Emerson, B., eds. (2017). Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. & Perroud, T. (2014). Policymaking and Public Law in France: Public Participation, Agency Independence, and Impact Assessment. The Columbia Journal of European Law, 19 (2), 225–312.Google Scholar
Ruffert, M., ed., (2007). The Transformation of Administrative Law in Europe, Munich: Sellier.Google Scholar
Shane, P. M. (2009). Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, P. L. (2007). Overseer or “the Decider”? The President in Administrative Law. George Washington Law Review, 75 (4), 696–760.Google Scholar