Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations
- The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Revisiting the Origins and Evolution of Commons Thought
- Part II Averting New Tragedies
- Part III New Forms of Contested Commons
- Part IV Urban Landscape and Infrastructure as a Commons
- Part V Reassessing Old and New Institutions for Collective Action
- Part VI Managing and Restoring the Commons
- Part VII Law, Legal Theory, and the Commons
- 21 Prior Appropriation as a Response to the Tragedy of the Commons
- 22 Using the Public Trust Doctrine to Manage Property on the Moon
- 23 A Biotechnology “Regulatory Commons” Problem
- 24 Can Affirmative Action Offer a Lesson in Fighting Enclosure?
- Part VIII Technology, the Internet, and the Future of Commons Governance
- Index
21 - Prior Appropriation as a Response to the Tragedy of the Commons
from Part VII - Law, Legal Theory, and the Commons
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2021
- The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations
- The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Revisiting the Origins and Evolution of Commons Thought
- Part II Averting New Tragedies
- Part III New Forms of Contested Commons
- Part IV Urban Landscape and Infrastructure as a Commons
- Part V Reassessing Old and New Institutions for Collective Action
- Part VI Managing and Restoring the Commons
- Part VII Law, Legal Theory, and the Commons
- 21 Prior Appropriation as a Response to the Tragedy of the Commons
- 22 Using the Public Trust Doctrine to Manage Property on the Moon
- 23 A Biotechnology “Regulatory Commons” Problem
- 24 Can Affirmative Action Offer a Lesson in Fighting Enclosure?
- Part VIII Technology, the Internet, and the Future of Commons Governance
- Index
Summary
Watercourses are a quintessential common-pool resource. In arid regions of the United States, use of the available is privatized by the adoption of prior appropriation. Prior appropriation has admirably done its job in eliminating unauthorized, illegal, self-help redistributions of the commons that threatened a tragic free-for-all competition. Over time, prior appropriation proved inadequate at solving other commons problems. Prior appropriation creates strong incentives to over-rapid development of water-dependent uses and wastefully excessive uses designed to obtain the right to use (in perpetuity) larger than needed amounts of water. Checks in prior appropriation have failed to do their job and a major environmental problem looms in the form of ever-increasing instances of total stream dewatering. Again, prior appropriation could, in theory, address de-watering, but has failed to do so. Additional coercive law is needed, the most effective and direct of which is rigorous implementation and enforcement of minimum flow and level regimes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Commons Research Innovations , pp. 255 - 263Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021