American Counseling Association. (2014). The American Counseling Association code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

APA (American Psychological Association). (2010). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

Bahorik, A. L., Newhill, C. E., Queen, C. C., & Eack, S. M. (2014). Under-reporting of drug use among individuals with schizophrenia: Prevalence and predictors. Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 61–69.Google Scholar

Basterra, M. D., Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (2011). Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edens, J. F., Kelley, S. E., Lilienfeld, S. O., Skeem, J. L., & Douglas, K. S. (2015). DSM-5 antisocial personality disorder: Predictive validity in a prison sample. Law and Human Behavior, 39(2), 123–129.Google Scholar

Elkind, D. (1964). Piaget’s semi-clinical interview and the study of spontaneous religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 4, 40–47.Google Scholar

First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2016). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, clinician version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.Google Scholar

Frances, A. (2013). Essentials of psychiatric diagnosis: Responding to the challenge of DSM-5 (rev ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Ganzini, L., Denneson, L. M., Press, N., Bair, M. J., Helmer, D. A., Poat, J., & Dobscha, S. K. (2013). Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(9), 1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, D., & Rosenfeld, B. (2011). Evaluating the gold standard: A review and meta-analysis of the structured interview of reported symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 95–107.Google Scholar

Green, D., Rosenfeld, B., & Belfi, B. (2013). New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms. Assessment, 20(2), 210–218.Google Scholar

Hanley, T., & Reynolds, D. J. (2009). Counselling psychology and the internet: A review of the quantitative research into online outcomes and alliances within text-based therapy. Counselling Psychology Review, 24(2), 4–13.Google Scholar

Hays, P. A. (2016). Addressing cultural complexities in practice: Assessment, diagnosis, and therapy (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353–366.Google Scholar

Hormes, J. M., Gerhardstein, K. R., & Griffin, P. T. (2012). Under-reporting of alcohol and substance use versus other psychiatric symptoms in individuals living with HIV. AIDS Care, 24(4), 420–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoyt, M. F. (2000). Some stories are better than others: Doing what works in brief therapy and managed care. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Jobes, D. A. (2016). Managing suicidal risk: A collaborative approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Joiner, T. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kroshus, E., Kubzansky, L. D., Goldman, R. E., & Austin, S. B. (2015). Norms, athletic identity, and concussion symptom under-reporting among male collegiate ice hockey players: A prospective cohort study. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(1), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us crazy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Large, M. M., & Ryan, C. J. (2014). Suicide risk categorisation of psychiatric inpatients: What it might mean and why it is of no use. Australasian Psychiatry, 22(4), 390–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lilienfeld, S. O., Smith, S. F., & Watts, A. L. (2013). Issues in diagnosis: Conceptual issues and controversies. In Craighead, W. E. & Miklowitz, D. J. (Eds.), Psychopathology: History, diagnosis, and empirical foundations (2nd ed., pp. 1–35). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2011). Inter‐rater reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM‐IV axis I disorders (SCID I) and axis II disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(1), 75–79.Google Scholar

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work II. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 48, 4–8.Google Scholar

Richman, W. L., Weisband, S., Kiesler, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 754–775.Google Scholar

Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rogers, R. (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). SIRS-2: Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Salamon, S., Santelmann, H., Franklin, J., & Baethge, C. (2018). Test-retest reliability of the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 230, 28–33.Google Scholar

Sellbom, M., & Hopwood, C. J. (2016). Evidence‐based assessment in the 21st century: Comments on the special series papers. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(4), 403–409.Google Scholar

Shea, S. C. (1998). Psychiatric interviewing: The art of understanding (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar

Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1018Google Scholar

Sommers-Flanagan, J. (2016). Clinical interview. In Norcross, J. C., VandenBos, G. R., & Freedheim, D. K. (Eds.), APA handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Sommers-Flanagan, J. (2018). Conversations about suicide: Strategies for detecting and assessing suicide risk. Journal of Health Service Psychology, 44, 33–45.Google Scholar

Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (1998). Assessment and diagnosis of conduct disorder. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2017). Clinical interviewing (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Strub, R. L., & Black, F. W. (1977). The mental status exam in neurology. Philadelphia: Davis.Google Scholar

Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Sue, S. (1998). In search of cultural competence in psychotherapy and counseling. American Psychologist, 53(4), 440–448.Google Scholar

Suhr, J. A. (2015). Psychological assessment: A problem-solving approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Suhr, J. A., & Berry, D. T. R. (2017). The importance of assessing for validity of symptom report and performance in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Introduction to the special section on noncredible presentation in ADHD. Psychological Assessment, 29(12), 1427–1428.Google Scholar

Suhr, J. A., Cook, C., & Morgan, B. (2017). Assessing functional impairment in ADHD: Concerns for validity of self-report. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(2), 151–160.Google Scholar

Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 189–207.Google Scholar

Tolin, D. F., Gilli Tolin, D. F., Gilliam, C., Wootton, B. M., Bowe, W., Bragdon, L. B. et al. (2018). Psychometric properties of a structured diagnostic interview for DSM-5 anxiety, mood, and obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. Assessment, 25(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vannoy, S. D., Andrews, B. K., Atkins, D. C., Dondanville, K. A., Young-McCaughan, S., & Peterson, A. L. (2017). Under reporting of suicide ideation in US Army population screening: An ongoing challenge. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(6), 723–728.Google Scholar

Welfel, E. R. (2016). Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues (6th ed.). Boston: Cengage.Google Scholar

Wiarda, N. R., McMinn, M. R., Peterson, M. A., & Gregor, J. A. (2014). Use of technology for note taking and therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 443–446.Google Scholar

Widiger, T. A., & Edmundson, M. (2011). Diagnoses, dimensions, and DSM-5. In Barlow, D. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 254–278). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yalom, I. D. (2002). The gift of therapy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Zander, E., Willfors, C., Berggren, S., Coco, C., Holm, A., Jifält, I. et al. (2017). The interrater reliability of the autism diagnostic interview-revised (ADI-R) in clinical settings. Psychopathology, 50(3), 219–227.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M. (2020). Integration, progress, and outcomes app for ages 6–18. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Rescorla, L. A., Turner, L. V., & Althoff, R. R. (2016). Internalizing/externalizing problems: Review and recommendations for clinical and research applications. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 55, 647–656.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., Krukowski, R. A., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2005). Assessment of adult psychopathology: Meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.361Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., Newhouse, P. A ., & Rescorla, L. A. (2004). Manual for the ASEBA older adult forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2007). Multicultural supplement to the Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2019). Multicultural supplement to the Manual for the ASEBA Older Adult Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

Achenbach, T. M., Rescorla, L. A., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2015). Guide to family assessment using the ASEBA. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

Barthlow, D. L., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Mcnulty, J. L. (2002). The appropriateness of the MMPI-2 K correction. Assessment, 9, 219–229.Google Scholar

Ben-Porath, Y., & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Restructured Form: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Brigidi, B. D., Achenbach, T .M., Dumenci, L., & Newhouse., P. A. (2010). Broad spectrum assessment of psychopathology and adaptive functioning with the Older Adult Behavior Checklist: A validation and diagnostic discrimination study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25, 1177–1185.Google Scholar

Burchett, D., Dragon, W. R., Smith Holbert, A. M., Tarescavage, A. M., Mattson, C. A., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2016). “False Feigners”: Examining the impact of non-content-based invalid responding on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form content-based invalid responding indicators. Psychological Assessment, 28, 458–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000205Google Scholar

Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J.R ., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2). Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.Google Scholar

De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Burgess, D. E., & Rabinowitz, J. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 858–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: A critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483Google Scholar

Ferdinand, R. F., Hoogerheide, K. N., van der Ende, J., Heijmens Visser, J. H., Koot, H. M., Kasius, M. C., & Verhulst, F. C. (2003). The role of the clinician: Three-year predictive value of parents’, teachers’, and clinicians’ judgment of childhood psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 867–876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar

Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Schedule. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Ingram, P. B., & Ternes, M. S. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: a meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 473–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1187769CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, D. N. (2003). Patients’ versus informants’ reports of personality disorders in predicting 7½ year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 216–222.Google Scholar

Loranger, A. W. (1988). Personality Disorder Examination (PDE) Manual. Yonkers, NY: DV Communications.Google Scholar

Martel, M. M., Markon, K., & Smith, G. T. (2017). Research review: Multi-informant integration in child and adolescent psychopathology diagnosis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 116–128.Google Scholar

McConaughy, S. H., & Achenbach, T. M. (2001). Manual for the Semistructured Clinical Interview for Children and Adolescents (2nd ed.). Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.Google Scholar

Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R. et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.Google Scholar

Rescorla, L. A., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Bilenberg, N., Bjarnadottir, G., Denner, S., et al. (2012). Behavioral/emotional problems of preschoolers: Caregiver/teacher reports from 15 societies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611434158Google Scholar

Rescorla, L. A., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Turner, L. V., Árnadóttir, H. A., Au, A. et al. (2016). Collateral reports of problems and cross-informant agreement about adult psychopathology in 14 societies. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 381–397.Google Scholar

Rescorla, L. A., Bochicchio, L., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I. et al. (2014). Parent-teacher agreement on children’s problems in 21 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.900719Google Scholar

Rescorla, L. A., Ewing, G., Ivanova, M. Y., Aebi, M., Bilenberg, N., Dieleman, G. C. et al. (2017). Parent-adolescent cross-informant agreement in clinically referred samples: Findings from seven societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46, 74–87.Google Scholar

Rescorla, L., Ginzburg, S., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I. et al. (2013). Cross-informant agreement between parent-reported and adolescent self-reported problems in 25 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 262–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 441–455. http://dx.doi.org.10.1007/s10862-017-9590-1Google Scholar

Tierney, M., Herrmann, N., Geslani, D. M., & Szalai, J. P. (2003). Contribution of informant and patient ratings to the accuracy of the Mini-Mental State Examination in predicting probable Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 813–818.Google Scholar

Vidair, H. B., Reyes, J. A., Shen, S., Parrilla-Escobar, M. A., Heleniak, C. M., Hollin, I. L. et al. (2011). Screening parents during child evaluations: Exploring parent and child psychopathology in the same clinic. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.02.002Google Scholar

Abad, F. J., Sorrel, M. A., Roman, F. J., & Colom, R. (2016). The relationships between WAIS-IV factor index scores and educational level: A bifactor model approach. Psychological Assessment, 28, 987–1000.Google Scholar

AERA (American Educational Research Association), APA (American Psychological Association), & NCME (National Council on Measurement in Education). (2014). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

Ang, S., VanDyne, L., & Tan, M. I. (2011). Cultural intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.) Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 582–602). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

APA (American Psychological Association). (2017). Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar

Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07Google Scholar

Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar

Benson, N., Hulac, D. M., & Kranzler, J. H. (2010). Independent examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): What does the WAIS-IV measure? Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017767Google Scholar

Bjorklund, D. F. (2012). Children’s thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Blalock, L. D., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). Proactive interference and practice effects in visuospatial working memory span task performance. Memory, 19(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.537035Google Scholar

Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (2011a). Augmenting the core battery with supplementary subtests: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV measurement invariance across the United States and Canada. Assessment, 18, 133–140.Google Scholar

Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (2011b). Invariance of the measurement model underlying the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV in the United States and Canada. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 186–189.Google Scholar

Bracken, B. A. (1998). Bracken basic concept scale – Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Bracken, B.A., & McCallum, R.S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Brickman, A. M., Cabo, R., & Manly, J. J. (2006). Ethical issues in cross-cultural neuropsychology. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 91–100.Google Scholar

Brown, T. E. (1996). Brown attention deficit disorder scales for adolescents and adults. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar

Bunting, M. (2006). Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.183Google Scholar

Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(2), 141–154.Google Scholar

Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2016). Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 975–986.Google Scholar

Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2017). Structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Confirmatory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests. Psychological Assessment, 29(4), 458–472.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1941). Some theoretical issues in adult intelligence testing. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 592.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193.Google Scholar

Chen, H., Zhang, O., Raiford, S. E., Zhu, J., & Weiss, L. G. (2015). Factor invariance between genders on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 1–5.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. J. (1997). Children’s memory scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Cottrell, J. M., & Barrett, C. A. (2017). Examining school psychologists’ perspectives about specific learning disabilities: Implications for practice. Psychology in the Schools, 54 (3), 294–308. doi:10.1002/pits.21997Google Scholar

Council of State Directors for the Gifted and National Association of Gifted and Talented. (2015). State of the States in Gifted Education: Policy and Practice Data. www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/key%20reports/2014–2015%20State%20of%20the%20States%20%28final%29.pdfGoogle Scholar

Daniel, M. H. (2012). Q-interactive technical report 1: Equivalence of Q-interactive administered cognitive tasks: WAIS-IV. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Daniel, M. H., Wahlstrom, D., & Zhang, O. (2014). Q-interactive technical report 8: Equivalence of Q-interactive and paper administrations cognitive tasks: WISC-V. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2014). The stability of intelligence from childhood to old age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(2), 53–79.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Yang, J., Davies, G., Harris, S. E., Tenesa, A., Liewald, D. et al. (2012). Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age. Nature, 482, 212–215.Google Scholar

Dehn, M. J. (2013). Enhancing SLD diagnoses through the identification of psychological processing deficits. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 30(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2013.19Google Scholar

Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California verbal learning test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Denney, D. A., Ringe, W. K., & Lacritz, L. H. (2015). Dyadic short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(5), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acv035Google Scholar

DiStefano, C., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2006). Investigating the theoretical structure of the Stanford–Binet-Fifth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282905285244Google Scholar

Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., & Canivez, G. L. (2016). Exploratory and hierarchical factor analysis of the WJ-IV Cognitive at school age. Psychological Assessment. 29(4), 394–407. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000350Google Scholar

Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., & Canivez, G. L. (2018). An alternative conceptualization of the theoretical structure of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities at school age: A confirmatory factor analytic investigation. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6, 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000039Google Scholar

Drozdick, L. W., Getz, K., Raiford, S. E., & Zhang, O. (2016). Q-interactive technical report 14: WPPSI-IV: Equivalence of Q-interactive and paper formats. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Drozdick, L. W., Holdnack, J. A., Weiss, L. G., & Zhou, X. (2013). Overview of the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV/ACS. In Holdnack, J. A., Drozdick, L W., Weiss, L. G., & Iverson, G. L. (Eds.), WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS: Advanced clinical interpretation (pp. 1–73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Drozdick, L. W., Singer, J. K., Lichtenberger, E. O., Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2018). The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-second edition and the KABC-II Normative Update. In Flanagan, D. & Harrison, P. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Ehrler, D. J., & McGhee, R. L. (2008). Primary test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential ability scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar

Elliott, C. D. (2012). Differential ability scales: Early Years Spanish supplement (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar

Flanagan, D. P., & Alfonso, V. C. (2017). Essentials of WISC-V assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Flanagan, D. P., & Dixon, S. G. (2014). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Encyclopedia of Special Education. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118660584.ese0431Google Scholar

Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1998). Interpreting intelligence tests from contemporary Gf-Gc theory: Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the WJ-R and KAIT in a non-white sample. Journal of School Psychology, 36(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4405(98)00003-xGoogle Scholar

Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler intelligence scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Fletcher-Janzen, E. (2003). A validity study of the KABC-II and the Taos Pueblo children of New Mexico. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Fletcher-Janzen, E., Strickland, T. L., & Reynolds, C. (2000). Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.95.1.29Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.54.1.5Google Scholar

Ford, D. Y. (2004). The National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented Senior Scholar Series: Intelligence testing and cultural diversity: Concerns, cautions, and considerations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

Ford, L., Kozey, M. L., & Negreiros, J. (2012). Cognitive assessment in early childhood: Theoretical and practical perspectives. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 585–622). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Fujita, K., Ishikuma, T., Aoyama, S., Hattori, T., Kumagai, K., & Ono, J. (2011). Theoretical foundation and structure of the Japanese version of KABC-II. Japanese Journal of K-ABC Assessment, 13, 89–99. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar

Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble-mindedness. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Goldstein, G. A., Allen, D. N., Minshew, N. J., Williams, D. L., Volkmar, F., Klin, A., & Schultz, R. T. (2008). The structure of intelligence in children and adults with high functioning autism. Neuropsychology, 22(3), 301–312.Google Scholar

Goldstein, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (2010). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales in the assessment of psychopathology. In Wess, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D., & Raiford, S. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 189–216). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004). Intelligence predict health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 1–4.Google Scholar

Gregoire, J., Daniel, M., Llorente, A. M., & Weiss, L. G. (2016). The Flynn effect and its clinical implications. In Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Holdnack, J. A., & Prifitera, A. (Eds.), WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 187–212). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404697-9.00006-6Google Scholar

Green, P. (2004). Medical symptom validity test. Kelowana, BC: Paul Green Publishing.Google Scholar

Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218–224.Google Scholar

Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Wiederholt, J. L. (2009). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Hammill, D. D., Weiderholt, J. L., & Allen, E. A. (2014). Test of silent contextual reading fluency (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Hannay, H. J., & Lezak, M. D. (2004). The neuropsychological examination: Interpretation. In Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Harcourt Assessment. (2005). Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.Google Scholar

Heaton, R. K., Avitable, N., Grant, I., & Matthews, C. G. (1999). Further cross validation of regression based neuropsychological norms with an update for the Boston Naming Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 572–582.Google Scholar

Heaton, R. K., Taylor, M. J., & Manly, J. (2003). Demographic effects and the use of demographically corrected norms with the WAIS–III and WMS–III. In Tulsky, D. S., Saklofske, D. H., Chelune, G. J., Heaton, R. K., Ivnik, R. J., Bornstein, R., et al. (Eds.), Clinical interpretation of the WAIS–III and WMS–III (pp. 181–210) San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Holdnack, J. A., Drozdick, L. W., Weiss, L. A., & Iverson, G. L. (2013) WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS: Advanced Clinical Interpretation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Holdnack, J. A., Lissner, D., Bowden, S. C., & McCarthy, K. A. L. (2004). Utilising the WAIS-III/WMS-III in clinical practice: Update of research and issues relevant to Australian normative research. Australian Psychologist, 39, 220–227.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1965). Fluid and crystallized intelligence: A factor analytic study of the structure among primary mental abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1968). Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence. Psychological Review, 75, 242–259.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1972). State, trait and change dimensions of intelligence: A critical experiment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 159–185.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.Google Scholar

Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., & Hannay, H. J. (2004). Neurobehavioral variables and diagnostic issues. In Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W., Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hresko, W., Schlieve, P., Herron, S., Swain, C., & Sherbenou, R. (2003). Comprehensive mathematical abilities test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Hunt, M. S. (2008). A joint confirmatory factor analysis of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, second edition, and the Woodcock-Johnson tests of cognitive abilities, third edition, with preschool children. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(11-A), 4605.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (2000). TESTING: The dilemma of group differences. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.121Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S. (2009). IQ testing 101. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1993). Kaufman adolescent and adult intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004a). Kaufman assessment battery for children, second edition (KABC-II) manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004b). Kaufman test of educational achievement, second edition (KTEA-II) comprehensive form manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004c). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN:Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2008). KABC-II batterie pour l’examen psychologique de l’enfant-deuxième édition. Montreuil: Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement (3rd ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2018). Kaufman assessment battery for children, second edition, normative update. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L., Drozdick, L. W., & Morrison, J. (2018) Kaufman assessment battery for children, second edition, normative update manual supplement. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., Melchers, P., & Melchers, M. (2014). German-language adaptation of the Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). Frankfurt: Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., & Publication Committee of Japanese Version of the KABC-II. (2013). Japanese version of Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). Tokyo: Maruzen.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2006). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Lichtenberger, E. O., Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Kaufman, N. L. (2005). Essentials of KABC-II assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Weiss, L. G. (2010). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue of JPA on the Flynn effect. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(5), 379–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910373344Google Scholar

Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Taub, G. E., Reynolds, M. R., & Kranzler, J. H. (2006). Higher order, multisample, confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition: What does it measure? School Psychology Review, 35, 108–127.Google Scholar

Keith, T. Z., Low, J. A., Reynolds, M. R., Patel, P. G., & Ridley, K. P. (2010). Higher-order factor structure of the Differential Ability Scales-II: Consistency across ages 4 to 17. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 676–697.Google Scholar

Kellogg, C. E., & Morton, N. W. (2016). Beta (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S., Ohlsson, H., Mezuk, B., Sundquist, J. O., & Sundquist, K. (2016). Observed cognitive performance and deviation from familial cognitive aptitude at age 16 years and ages 18 to 20 years and risk for schizophrenia and bipolar illness in a Swedish national sample. JAMA Psychiatry; 73, 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0053Google Scholar

Kirkwood, M. W. (2015). Validity testing in child and adolescent assessment: Evaluating exaggerating, feigning and noncredible effort. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Kirkwood, M. W., Hargrave, D. D., & Kirk, J. W. (2011). The value of the WISC-IV digit span subtest in noncredible performance during pediatric neuropsychological examinations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(5), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr040.Google Scholar

Larsen, L., Hartmann, P., & Nyborg, H. (2008). The stability of general intelligence from early adulthood to middle-age. Intelligence, 36, 29–34.Google Scholar

Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lichtenberger, E. O., & Kaufman, A. S. (2009). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment, Vol. 50. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (trans. B. Haigh). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (trans. B. Haigh, 2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Malda, M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Srinivasan, K., & Sukumar, P. (2010). Traveling with cognitive tests: Testing the validity of a KABC-II adaptation in India. Assessment, 17, 107–115.Google Scholar

Manly, J. J. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of separate norms for African Americans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040590945346Google Scholar

Manly, J. J., & Echemendia, R. J. (2007). Race-specific norms: Using the model of hypertension to understand issues of race, culture, and education in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 319–325.Google Scholar

Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Markwardt, F. C. (1997). Peabody individual achievement test-revised/normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Mays, K. L., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2009) Applications of the Kaufman assessment battery for children, 2nd edition in neuropsychological assessment. In Reynolds, C. R. & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical child neuropsychology (3rd ed., pp. 281–296). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

McFadden, T. U. (1996). Creating language impairments in typically achieving children: The pitfalls of “normal” normative sampling. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151–179). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S., & Evans, J. J. (2004). Internal and external factorial extensions to the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities: A review of factor analytic research since Carroll’s seminal 1993 treatise. St. Joseph, MN: Institute for Applied Psychometrics.Google Scholar

Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048070.Google Scholar

Meyers, J. E., Zellinger, M. M., Kockler, T., Wagner, M., & Miller, R. M. (2013). A validated seven-subtest short form for the WAIS-IV. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 20, 249–256.Google Scholar

Miller, D. C. (2013). Essentials of school neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Miller, D. I., Davidson, P. S. R., Schindler, D., & Meisser, C. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV in older adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 375–390.Google Scholar

Mitrushina, M., Boone, K. B., Razani, J., & D’Elia, L. F. (2005). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mittenburg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094–1102.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. E., Rothlisberg, B. A., McIntosh, D. E., & Hunt, M. S. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis of the KABC-II in preschool children. Psychology in the Schools, 46(6), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20394Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A. (2015). Naglieri nonverbal ability test (3rd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Goldstein, S. (2014a). Cognitive assessment system (2nd ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Goldstein, S. (2014b). Cognitive assessment system – second edition: Brief. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Goldstein, S. (2014c). Cognitive assessment system – second edition: Rating scale. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Niileksela, C. R., Reynolds, M. R., & Kaufman, A. S. (2013). An alternative Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) factor structure of the WAIS-IV: Age invariance of an alternative model for ages 70–90. Psychological Assessment, 25, 391–404.Google Scholar

Norfolk, P. A., Farner, R. L., Floyd, R. G., Woods, I. L., Hawkins, H. K., & Irby, S. M. (2014). Norm block sample sizes: A review of 17 individually administered intelligence tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 544–554.Google Scholar

Norman, M. A., Evans, J. D., Miller, S. W., & Heaton, R. K. (2000). Demographically corrected norms for the California Verbal Learning Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 80–94.Google Scholar

Oakland, T., Douglas, S., & Kane, H. (2016). Top ten standardized tests used internationally with children and youth by school psychologists in 64 countries: A 24-year follow-up study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915595303Google Scholar

Pearson. (2009a). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.Google Scholar

Pearson. (2009b). Advanced clinical solutions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV. San Antonio, TX: Author.Google Scholar

Pena, E. D., Spaulding, T. J., & Plante, E. (2006). The composition of normative groups and diagnostic decision making: Shooting ourselves in the foot. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 247–254.Google Scholar

Potvin, D. C. H., Keith, T. Z., Caemmerer, J. M., & Trundt, K. M. (2015). Confirmatory factor structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition With Preschool children: Too young for differentiation? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(6), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914568538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(1), 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.02.005Google Scholar

Rabin, L. A., Paolillo, E., & Barr, W. B. (2016). Stability in test-usage practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada over a 10-year period: A follow-up survey of INS and NAN members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31, 206–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw007Google Scholar

Raiford, S. E. (2017). Essentials of WISC-V integrated assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Raiford, S. E., Drozdick, L. W., & Zhang, O. (2015). Q-interactive technical report 11: Q-Interactive special group studies: The WISC-V and children with autism spectrum disorder and accompanying language impairment or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Raiford, S. E., Drozdick, L. W., & Zhang, O. (2016). Q-interactive technical report 13: Q-interactive Special group studies: The WISC-V and children with specific learning disorders in reading and mathematics. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Raiford, S. E., Holdnack, J., Drozdick, L. W., & Zhang, O. (2014). Q-interactive technical report 9: Q-interactive Special Group Studies: The WISC-V and children with intellectual giftedness and intellectual disabilities. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Raiford, S. E., Zhang, O., Drozdick, L. W., Getz, K., Wahlstorm, D., Gabel, A., Holdnack, J., & Daniel, M. H. (2016). Q-Interactive technical report 12: WISC-V coding and symbol search in digital format: Reliability, validity, special group studies, and interpretation. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. www.helloq.com/research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Randolph, C. (1998). Repeated battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Raven, J. C. (2018). Ravens 2 progressive matrices: Clinical edition. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar

Reynolds, C. R., & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.). (2007). Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals, Vol. 3 (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2015). Reynolds intellectual assessment scales (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. R., Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Fisher, M. E., & Low, J. A. (2007). Confirmatory factor structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition: Consistency with Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 511–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.511Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. R., Ridley, K. P., & Patel, P. G. (2008). Sex differences in latent general and broad cognitive abilities for children and youth: Evidence from higher-order MG-MACS and MIMIC Models. Intelligence, 26, 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohling, M. L., Miller, R. M., Axelrod, B. N., Wall, J. R., Lee, A. J. H., & Kinikini, D. T. (2015). Is co-norming required? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30, 611–633.Google Scholar

Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet intelligence scales – fifth edition: Technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Rowe, E. W., Kingsley, J. M., & Thompson, D. F. (2010). Predictive ability of the general ability index (GAI) versus the full scale IQ among gifted referrals. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020148Google Scholar

Rushton, J. P., & Rushton, E. W. (2003). Brain size, IQ, and racial group differences: Evidence from musculoskeletal traits. Intelligence, 31, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00137-X.Google Scholar

Russell, E. W., Russell, S. L., & Hill, B. D. (2005). The fundamental psychometric status of neuropsychological batteries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(6), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.05.001.Google Scholar

Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Baldwin, A., & Baldwin, C. (1993). Stability of intelligence from preschool to adolescence: The influence of social and family risk factors. Child Development, 64, 80–97.Google Scholar

Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). La Mesa, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Sattler, J. M. (2016). Assessment of children: WISC-V and WPPSI-IV. La Mesa, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Sattler, J. M., & Ryan, J. J. (2009). Assessment with the WAIS-IV. La Mesa, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Scheiber, C. (2016a). Do the Kaufman tests of cognitive ability and academic achievement display construct bias across a representative sample of Black, Hispanic, and Caucasian school-age children in grades 1 through 12? Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 942–952. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000236Google Scholar

Scheiber, C. (2016b). Is the Cattell-Horn-Carroll-based factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fifth edition (WISC-V) construct invariant for a representative sample of African-American, Hispanic, and Caucasian male and female students ages 6 to 16 years? Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, 2(3–4), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-016-0019-7Google Scholar

Scheiber, C. & Kaufman, A. S. (2015). Which of the three KABC-II global scores is the least biased? Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, 1, 21–35.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the work place. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99–114). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & McDonough, E. M (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014a). Woodcock-Johnson-IV tests of achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014b). Woodcock-Johnson-IV tests of oral language. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson–IV tests of cognitive abilities. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Schwartz, H. (2014). Following reports of forced sterilization of female inmates, California passes ban. Washington Post, 26 September. www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/09/26/following-reports-of-forced-sterilization-of-female-prison-inmates-california-passes-ban/?utm_term=.0085bcae1945Google Scholar

Sotelo-Dynega, M., & Dixon, S. G. (2014). Cognitive assessment practices: A survey of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 51(10), 1031–1045.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man, their nature, and measurement. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Staffaroni, A. M., Eng, M. E., Moses, J. A. Jr., Zeiner, H. K., & Wickham, R. E. (2018). Four- and five-factor models of the WAIS-IV in a clinical sample: Variations in indicator configuration and factor correlational structure. Psychological Assessment, 30, 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(5), 797–811.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A triarchic approach to the understanding and assessment of intelligence in multicultural populations. Journal of School Psychology, 37(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00029-6.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (Eds.). (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taub, G. E., & McGrew, K. S. (2004). A confirmatory factor analysis of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory and cross-age invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities III. School Psychology Quarterly, 19(1), 72–87.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford-Binet intelligence scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar

Tombaugh, T. N. (1997). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260–268.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14 (6), 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.xGoogle Scholar

Vig, S., & Sanders, M. (2007). Cognitive assessment. In Brassard, M. R., & Boehm, A. E. (Eds.), Preschool assessment: Principles and practices (pp. 383–419). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Visser, L., Ruiter, S. A., van der Meulen, B. F., Ruijssenaars, W. A., & Timmerman, M. E. (2012). A review of standardized developmental assessment instruments for young children and their applicability for children with special needs. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(2), 102–127.Google Scholar

Ward, L. C., Bergman, M. A., & Hebert, K. R. (2012). WAIS-IV subtest covariance structure: Conceptual and statistical considerations. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025614Google Scholar

Watkins, M. W., & Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Bifactor structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Fourth Edition. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 52–63.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (1955). Wechsler adult intelligence scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2004). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Spanish (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler memory scale (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2017). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Spanish (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D., & Kaplan, E. (2015). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Integrated (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Weiderholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2012). Gray oral reading tests (5th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., & Chen, H. (2013a). WAIS-IV clinical validation of the four- and five factor interpretive approaches [special edition]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(2), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913478030CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., & Chen, H. (2013b). WISC-IV and clinical validation of the four- and five-factor interpretive approaches [special edition]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913478032Google Scholar

Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Prifitera, A., & Holdnack, J. A. (2006). WISC-IV: Advanced clinical interpretation. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). WRAT4 wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Wong, T. M., Strickland, T. L., Fletcher-Janzen, E., Ardilla, A., & Reynolds, C. R. (2000). Theoretical and practical issues in the neuropsychological treatment and assessment of culturally dissimilar patients. In Fletcher-Janzen, E., Strickland, T.L., & Reynolds, C.R. (Eds.) Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology (pp. 3–18). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001a). Woodcock-Johnson III: Tests of cognitive abilities. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001b). Woodcock-Johnson III: Tests of achievement instrument. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Abedi, J. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometrics issues. Educational Assessment, 8, 231–257.Google Scholar

Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C, Baker, E., & Lord, C. (2001). NAEP math performance test accommodations: Interactions with student language background (CSE Technical Report 536). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.Google Scholar

Abedi, J., & Leon, S. (1999). Impact of students’ language background on content-based performance: Analyses of extant data. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.Google Scholar

Abedi, J., Leon, S., & Mirocha, J. (2003). Impact of student language background on content-based performance: Analyses of extant data (CSE Technical Report 603). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.Google Scholar

Adelman, H. S., Lauber, B. A., Nelson, P., & Smith, D. C. (1989). Toward a procedure for minimizing and detecting false positive diagnoses of learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 234–244.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Desk reference to the diagnostic criteria from DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar

APA (American Psychological Association). (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practices.Google Scholar

Babad, E. Y., Inbar, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 459–474.Google Scholar

Banks, K. (2006). A comprehensive framework for evaluating hypotheses about cultural bias in educational testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 115–132.Google Scholar

Banks, K. (2012). Are inferential reading items more susceptible to cultural bias than literal reading items? Applied Measurement in Education, 25, 220–245.Google Scholar

Breaux, K. C. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test: Technical manual (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Breaux, K. C., Bray, M. A., Root, M. M., & Kaufman, A. S. (Eds.) (2017). Special issue on studies of students’ errors in reading, writing, math, and oral language. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916669656Google Scholar

Brooks, B. L., Holdnack, J. A., & Iverson, G. L. (2011). Advanced clinical interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: Prevalence of low scores varies by level of intelligence and years of education. Assessment, 18, 156–167.Google Scholar

Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny reading test (forms G and H). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Coleman, C., Lindstrom, J., Nelson, J., Lindstrom, W., & Gregg, K. N. (2010). Passageless comprehension on the Nelson Denny Reading Test: Well above chance for university students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 244–249.Google Scholar

Connolly, A. (2007). Key Math-3 Diagnostic Assessment. Austin, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Cruickshank, W. M. (1977). Least-restrictive placement: Administrative wishful thinking. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 193–194.Google Scholar

CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1999). Teacher’s guide to Terra Nova: CTBS battery, survey, and plus editions, multiple assessments. Monterey, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Davis, L. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (1995). “Will CBM help me learn?”: Students’ perception of the benefits of curriculum-based measurement. Education and Treatment of Children, 18(1), 19–32.Google Scholar

Deeney, T. A., & Shim, M. K. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ views of reading fluency: Issues of consequential validity in adopting one-minute reading fluency assessments. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 41(2), 109–126.Google Scholar

DeRight, J., & Carone, D. A. (2015). Assessment of effort in children: A systematic review. Child Neuropsychology, 21, 1–24.Google Scholar

Ford, J. W., Missall, K. N., Hosp, J. L., & Kuhle, J. L. (2017). Examining oral passage reading rate across three curriculum-based measurement tools for predicting grade-level proficiency. School Psychology Review, 46, 363–378.Google Scholar

Fuchs, L. S. (2016). Curriculum based measurement as the emerging alternative: Three decades later. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32, 5–7.Google Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 64–84.Google Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.Google Scholar

Gardner, E. (1989). Five common misuses of tests. ERIC Digest No. 108. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests Measurement and Evaluation.Google Scholar

Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Holt, D. V., Goldhammer, F., & Funke, J. (2013). Computer-based assessment of complex problem solving: Concept, implementation, and application. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 407–421.Google Scholar

Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (2009). Test of written language (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. G., & Edwards, M. J. (2010). Symptom exaggeration in post-secondary students: Preliminary base rates in a Canadian sample. Applied Neuropsychology, 17, 135–143.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., Armstrong, I., & Parker, K. C. H. (2010). An investigation of methods to detect feigned reading disabilities. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25, 89–98.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., & Parker, K. C. H. (2008). Identifying students feigning dyslexia: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection. Dyslexia, 14, 228–246.Google Scholar

Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2017 ). An update to compiled ORF norms (Technical Report No. 1702). Eugene, OR: Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Hinnant, J. B., O’Brien, M., & Ghazarian, S. R. (2009). The longitudinal relations of teacher expectations to achievement in the early school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 662–670.Google Scholar

Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2016). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hosp, J. L., & Suchey, N. (2014). Reading assessment: Reading fluency, reading fluently, and comprehension – Commentary on the special topic. School Psychology Review, 43, 59–68.Google Scholar

Huff, K. L., & Sireci, S. G. (2001). Validity issues in computer-based testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 16–25.Google Scholar

Jones, E. D., Southern, W. T., & Brigham, F. J. (1998). Curriculum-based assessment: Testing what is taught and teaching what is tested. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 239–249.Google Scholar

Joseph, L. M., Wargelin, L., & Ayoub, S. (2016). Preparing school psychologists to effectively provide services to students with dyslexia. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(4), 15–23.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., & Breaux, K. C. (2014). Technical and interpretive manual. Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement – Third Edition (KTEA-3) Comprehensive Form. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Keenan, J. M., & Betjemann, R. S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 363–380.Google Scholar

Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills that they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.Google Scholar

Keenan, J. M., & Meenan, C. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 125–135.Google Scholar

Kellow, J. T., & Jones, B. D. (2008). The effects of stereotypes on the achievement gap: Reexamining the academic performance of African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 34(1), 94–120.Google Scholar

Kendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22, 354–367.Google Scholar

Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1168–1201.Google Scholar

Kirkwood, M. W., Kirk, J. W., Blaha, R. Z., Wilson, P. (2010). Noncredible effort during pediatric neuropsychological exam: A case series and literature review. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 604–618.Google Scholar

Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative reading inventory–3. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–16.Google Scholar

Lu, P. H., & Boone, K. B. (2002). Suspect cognitive symptoms in a 9-year old child: Malingering by proxy? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 90–96.Google Scholar

Markwardt, F. C. (1997). Peabody individual achievement test – revised (normative update). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar

Martiniello, M. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14, 160–179.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S., LaForte, E. M., & Schrank, F. A. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV: Technical manual [CD]. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Molnar, M. (2017). Market is booming for digital formative assessments. Education Week, May 24. http://edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/05/24/market-is-booming-for-digital-formative-assessments.htmlGoogle Scholar

Monroe, M. (1932). Children who cannot read. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

NASP (National Association of School Psychologists). (n.d.). NASP practice model: 10 domains. www.nasponline.org/standards-and-certification/nasp-practice-model/nasp-practice-model-implementation-guide/section-i-nasp-practice-model-overview/nasp-practice-model-10-domainsGoogle Scholar

NASP (National Association of School Psychologists). (2016). School psychologists’ involvement in assessment. Bethesda, MD: Author.Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314–1334.Google Scholar

Rome, H. P., Swenson, W. M., Mataya, P., McCarthy, C. E., Pearson, J. S., Keating, F. R., & Hathaway, S. R. (1962). Symposium on automation techniques in personality assessment. Proceedings of the Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic, 37, 61–82.Google Scholar

Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations. CA: Author.Google Scholar

Schneider, J. W., Lichtenberger, E. O., Mather, N., & Kaufman, N. L. (2018). Essentials of assessment report writing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014a). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014b). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of oral language. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014a). Woodcock-Johnson IV. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014b). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., & Tilly, D. W. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 5, 459–479.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J., Leighton, J. P., Jang, E. E., & Chu, M. W. (2016). Advances in the science of assessment. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 34–59.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Singleton, C. H. (2001). Computer-based assessment in education. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(3), 58–74.Google Scholar

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.Google Scholar

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.Google Scholar

Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Learning Disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 189–207.Google Scholar

Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S., & Christensen, L. (2013). Accommodations for assessment. In Lloyd, J., Landrum, T., Cook, B., & Tankersley, M. (Eds.)., Research-based approaches for assessment (pp. 94–110). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar

Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270–291.Google Scholar

Van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 497–527.Google Scholar

VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.004Google Scholar

Van Norman, E. R., Nelson, P. M., & Parker, D. C. (2018). A comparison of nonsense-word fluency and curriculum-based measurement of reading to measure response to phonics instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000237Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar